Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026   IUP :10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026    Tam Metin (PDF)

Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Güler Arasİlhan ÇamBilal ZavalsızSerkan Keskin

Hisse senedi getirilerindeki değişimi açıklayan faktörlerin neler olduğunun ortaya koyulması, finans literatüründeki önemli araştırma konuları arasında yer almaktadır. Bu bağlamda, Fama ve French, piyasa, büyüklük ve değer faktörlerinden oluşan üç faktörlü varlık fiyatlama modeline (FF3F), kârlılık ve yatırım faktörlerini de ekleyerek beş faktörlü bir varlık fiyatlama modeli (FF5F) geliştirmişlerdir. Bu model, ABD başta olmak üzere, çeşitli gelişmiş ülke piyasalarında test edilmiş ve modelin getirilerdeki değişimin açıklanmasındaki başarısı kanıtlanmıştır. Ancak bu modelin, gelişmiş ülke piyasalarından farklı dinamiklere sahip olan gelişmekte olan ülke piyasalarında geçerli olup olmadığı ile ilgili araştırmalarda eksiklikler vardır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye hisse senedi piyasası için, FF5F’nin geçerli olup olmadığının incelenmesi ve FF5F’nin CAPM ve FF3F başta olmak üzere diğer alternatif modellere göre ne kadar başarılı performans gösterdiğinin test edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Ocak 2005 - Haziran 2017 tarihleri arası 150 aylık dönemde, 18 adet kesişim portföyünün getirileri üzerinden analizler yapılmıştır. Regresyon analizlerinden elde edilen sabit terimlerin mutlak değerlerinin ortalaması, ortalama düzeltilmiş R2 değerleri, GRS–F test istatistik ve p-değeri sonuçları değerlendirildiğinde, FF5F’in Türkiye hisse senedi piyasasında diğer alternatif modellerden daha iyi performans gösterdiği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

DOI :10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026   IUP :10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026    Tam Metin (PDF)

A Comparison of the Performance of Fama-French Multifactor Asset Pricing Models: An Application on Borsa İstanbul

Güler Arasİlhan ÇamBilal ZavalsızSerkan Keskin

Exploring the factors that explain changes in stock returns is one of the most important research topics in finance literature. Recently, Fama and French have developed the five-factor asset-pricing model (FF5F) by adding profitability and investment factors on the three-factor model (FF3F), which consists of market, size and value factors. This model has been tested in various developed countries, especially in the USA, and has proved its success in explaining the changes in stock returns. However, there are deficiencies in the researches on whether this model is valid for developing countries with different dynamics from developed countries. In this paper, it is aimed to examine whether the FF5F is valid for Turkish stock market and to test how successful the FF5F is in comparison with the CAPM, FF3F and other alternative models. For this purpose, returns of 18 different intersection portfolios have been analyzed during the period of 150-months between January 2005 and June 2017. According to the regression results of mean absolute values of intercept terms, mean adjusted R-squared values, GRS-F test statistics and its p-values, it has been found that FF5F performs better than the other alternative models in the Turkish stock market.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Exploring the factors that explain changes in stock returns is one of the most important research topics in finance literature, and thus scholars have introduced a wide variety of models. The most well-known is the capital assets pricing model (CAPM), which explains the change in returns with a single factor, called the market beta measuring the systematic risk of the market. The most important feature expected from any asset-pricing model is the power to explain the change in stock returns. Many researchers have found that the power of CAPM is not sufficient. Thus, alternative asset pricing models have been proposed to develop CAPM. Among these models, the three-factor asset pricing model offered by Fama and French has been tested by many researchers in both developed and developing countries. It has been proven that the performance of the model is better than CAPM. Fama and French’s threefactor model explain changes in stock returns with market, size and value factors. After three-factor models, Fama and French has been criticized about the lack of their models. With the discovery of several factors that has any information in explaining returns (such as momentum, volatility, liquidity, investment and profitability factors), the use of multi-factor models has become widespread in explaining stock returns. In line with these advances in the literature, Fama and French acknowledged that a significant portion of the change in stock returns could not be explained by the three-factor model. Thus, Fama French have introduced five-factor model by adding profitability and investment factors to three-factor model. They were based on the dividend discount model when making decisions to add only these two factors to the three factor models. The Five-factor model has been tested in various developed countries, especially in the USA, and has proved its success in explaining the changes in stock returns. However, there are deficiencies in the researches on whether this model is valid for developing countries with different dynamics from developed countries (such as higher returns and higher price fluctuations). In this paper, it is aimed to examine whether the five-factor model is valid for the Turkish stock market and to test how successful the five-factor model is in comparison with the CAPM, three-factor model and other alternative three and four factor models. For this purpose, average monthly percent excess returns for eighteen intersection portfolios formed on six Size and Value, six Size and Profitability, six Size and Investment have been analyzed during the period of 150-months between January 2005 and June 2017. Regression results of mean absolute values of intercept terms, mean adjusted R-squared values, GRS-F test statistics and its p-values were used to evaluate the relative performance of the models in capturing the changes in the returns of the left-hand-side intersection portfolios in the Turkish stock market. It has been found that FF5F performs better than the CAPM, the three-factor model and other alternative three - or four-factor models in the Turkish stock market. The empirical findings in the paper conform to the findings obtained in both developed and developing countries. Moreover, these findings are also similar to those obtained from other studies testing the five-factor model on BIST and using a different sample period and different portfolio sets from this paper. Future studies can be focused on to develop a more comprehensive asset pricing model by adding other factors that have been proven to explain the average returns (such as momentum factor, inverse momentum factor, liquidity factor, volatility factor) to the five-factor model. Since what is most important here is to find the model that explains more change with less factors, it will be substantial to identify unnecessary factors and to have an asset-pricing model that shows more effective results for developing countries such as Turkey.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Acaravci, S. K., & Karaomer, Y. (2017). FamaFrench five factor model: evidence from Turkey, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(6), 130-137. google scholar
  • Aharoni, G., Grundy, B., & Zeng, Q. (2013). Stock returns and the Miller Modigliani valuation formula: Revisiting the Fama French analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2), 347-357. google scholar
  • Allen, D. E., & Cleary, F. (1998). Determinants of the cross-section of stock returns in the Malaysian stock market, International Review of Financial Analysis, 7(3), 253-275. google scholar
  • Anghel, A., Dumitrescu, D., & Tudor, C. (2015). Modeling portfolio returns on Bucharest Stock exchange using the Fama-French multifactor model, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 17(1), 22-46. google scholar
  • Arshanapalli, B. G., Coggin, T. D., & Doukas, J. (1998). Multifactor asset pricing analysis of international value investment strategies, The Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(4), 10-23. google scholar
  • Atakan, T. & Gökbulut, İ. (2010). Üç faktörlü varlık fiyatlandırma modelinin İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası’nda uygulanabilirliğinin panel veri analizi ile test edilmesi, MUFAD Dergisi, 45: 180-189. Azimli, A., & Mandacı, P. E. (2017). Corporate investment and expected stock returns in Borsa Istanbul, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 299-315. Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks, Journal of financial economics, 9(1), 3-18. google scholar
  • Basu, S. (1983). The relationship between earnings’ yield, market value and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence, Journal of financial economics, 12(1), 129-156. google scholar
  • Bereket, Y. (2014). The valıdıty of Fama-French fourfactor model in Istanbul Stock Exchange, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi / Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara. google scholar
  • Bhandari, L. C. (1988). Debt/equity ratio and expected common stock returns: Empirical evidence, The journal of finance, 43(2), 507-528. Black, F. (1972). Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing, The journal of business, 45(3), 444-455. google scholar
  • Black, F. Jensen, M. C. & Scholes, M. S. (1972). The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests, In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets. Michael C. Jensen, ed. New York: Praeger. google scholar
  • Blitz, D., Hanauer, M. X., Vidojevic, M., & van Vliet, P. (2016). Five Concerns with the FiveFactor Model, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn. com/abstract=2862317. Blume, M. E. (1970). Portfolio theory: a step toward its practical application, The Journal of Business, 43(2), 152-173. google scholar
  • Boamah, N. A. (2017). The price of risk on the African frontier stock markets, Journal of African Business, 18(2), 238-256. google scholar
  • Bondt, W. F., & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact?, The Journal of finance, 40(3), 793-805. google scholar
  • Cao, Q., Leggio, K. B., & Schniederjans, M. J. (2005). A comparison between Fama and French’s model and artificial neural networks in predicting the Chinese stock market, Computers & Operations Research, 32(10), 2499-2512. google scholar
  • Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance, The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82. google scholar
  • Ceylan, N. B., Dogan, B., & Berument, M. H. (2015). Three-factor asset pricing model and portfolio holdings of foreign investors: evidence from an emerging market–Borsa Istanbul, Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 28(1), 467-486. google scholar
  • Chan, H. W., & Faff, R. W. (2005). Asset pricing and the illiquidity premium, Financial Review, 40(4), 429-458. google scholar
  • Chiah, M., Chai, D., Zhong, A., & Li, S. (2016). A Better Model? An Empirical Investigation of the Fama–French Five-factor Model in Australia, International Review of Finance, 16(4), 595-638. google scholar
  • Connor, G., Hagmann, M., & Linton, O. (2012). Efficient semiparametric estimation of the Fama– French model and extensions, Econometrica, 80(2), 713-754. google scholar
  • Connor, Gregory and Sanjay Sehgal, 2001, Tests of the Fama and French Model in India, London School of Economics, Dıscussıon Paper No: 379. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/25057/1/dp379.pdf. google scholar
  • Coşkun, E. & Çınar, Ö. (2014). Üç faktör varlık fiyatlama modelinin geçerliliği: Borsa İstanbul’da bir inceleme, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(4), 235-250. google scholar
  • Czapkiewicz, A., & Wójtowicz, T. (2014). The four-factor asset pricing model on the Polish stock market, Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 27(1), 771-783. google scholar
  • de la O González, M., & Jareño, F. (2018). Testing extensions of Fama & French models: A quantile regression approach. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.08.004. google scholar
  • Erdinç, Y. (2017). Comparison of CAPM, threefactor Fama-French model and Five-Factor Fama-french model for the Turkish Stock Market. In Financial Management from an Emerging Market Perspective. 69-92. IntechOpen. google scholar
  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The crosssection of expected stock returns, The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465. google scholar
  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. google scholar
  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2004). The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 25-46. google scholar
  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2012). Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns, Journal of financial economics, 105(3), 457-472. google scholar
  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model, Journal of Financial Economics. 116 (1), 1-22. google scholar
  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2017). International tests of a five-factor asset-pricing model, Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 441-463. google scholar
  • Foye, J. (2018). A comprehensive test of the FamaFrench five-factor model in emerging markets, Emerging Markets Review. doi:10.1016/j. ememar.2018.09.002. google scholar
  • Gaunt, C. (2004). Size and book to market effects and the Fama French three factor asset pricing model: evidence from the Australian stockmarket, Accounting & Finance, 44(1), 27-44. google scholar
  • Gibbons, M., Ross, S., Shanken, J. (1989). A test of the efficiency of a given portfolio, Econometrica, 57, 1121-1152. google scholar
  • Gökgöz, F. (2008). Üç faktörlü varlık fiyatlama modelinin İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsasında uygulanabilirliği, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 63(2), 43-64. google scholar
  • Gönenç, H., & Karan, M. B. (2003). Do value stocks earn higher returns than growth stocks in an emerging market? Evidence from the Istanbul stock Exchange, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 14(1), 1-25. google scholar
  • Guo, B., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2017). The five-factor asset pricing model tests for the Chinese stock market, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 43, 84-106. google scholar
  • Güzeldere, H. & Sarıoğlu, S.E. (2012). Varlık fiyatlamada Fama-French üç faktörlü modelin geçerliliği: BIST üzerine bir araştırma, Business and Economics Research Journal, 3(2), 1-19. google scholar
  • Hou, K., Xue, C., & Zhang, L. (2015). Digesting anomalies: An investment approach, The Review of Financial Studies, 28(3), 650-705. google scholar
  • Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency, The Journal of finance, 48(1), 65-91. google scholar
  • Jiao, W. & Lilti, J. J. (2017). Whether profitability and investment factors have additional explanatory power comparing with FamaFrench Three-Factor Model: empirical evidence on Chinese A-share stock market, China Finance and Economic Review, 5(1), 7. google scholar
  • Kara, E. (2016). Testing Fama and French’s threefactor asset pricing model: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul, Cankırı Karatekin University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 6(1), 257-272. google scholar
  • Kaya, E. & Güngör, B. (2017). Fama ve French üç faktörlü modelin geçerliliği: Borsa İstanbul üzerine panel veri analizi”, Journal of Academic Researches and Studies, 9(17), 222-236. google scholar
  • Koy, A. (2013). Fama ve French’ în büyüklük ve değer risk primleri İMKB’de geçerli midir?, İ. Ü. İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi. 24(74), 102-118. google scholar
  • Kubota, K., & Takehara, H. (2017). Does the Fama and French Five-Factor Model Work Well in Japan?, International Review of Finance. DOI: 10.1111/irfi.12126. google scholar
  • Lin, Q. (2017).”Noisy prices and the Fama– French five-factor asset pricing model in China, Emerging Markets Review, 31, 141-163. google scholar
  • Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 13-37. google scholar
  • Maiti, M., & Balakrishnan, A. (2018). Is human capital the sixth factor?. Journal of Economic Studies, 45(4), 710-737. google scholar
  • Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio Selection, Efficient Diversification of Investments. J. Wiley. google scholar
  • Martinsa, C. C., & Eid Jr, W. (2015). Pricing assets with Fama and French 5–Factor Model: A Brazilian market novelty. XV Encontro Brasileiro de Finanças, 23 - 25 Temmuz, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Sao Paulo, Brezilya. google scholar
  • Miller, M., Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business 34, 411-433. google scholar
  • Novy-Marx, R. (2013). The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 1-28. google scholar
  • Racicot, F. E., & Rentz, W. F. (2016). Testing Fama– French’s new five-factor asset pricing model: evidence from robust instruments. Applied Economics Letters, 23(6), 444-448. google scholar
  • Rosenberg, B., Reid, K., & Lanstein, R. (1985). Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency”, The Journal of Portfolio Management, 11(3), 9-16. google scholar
  • Ross, S. A. (1976). “The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory. 13 (3), 341–60. google scholar
  • Roy, R., & Shijin, S. (2018). A six-factor asset pricing model. Borsa Istanbul Review. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2018.02.001 google scholar
  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). “Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk”, The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. google scholar
  • Sundqvist, T. (2017). Tests of a Fama-French FiveFactor Asset Pricing Model in the Nordic Stock Markets. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hanken School of Economics, Finlandiya. google scholar
  • Walid, E. M., & Ahlem, E. M. (2009). New evidence on the applicability of Fama and French threefactor model to the Japanese stock market. Working paper, Osaka University. http://www. tn.refer.org/CEAFE/Papiers_CEAFE10/Fina_ marche/ElhajMohamed.pdf google scholar
  • Xie, S., & Qu, Q. (2016). The three-factor model and size and value premiums in china’s stock market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(5), 1092-1105. google scholar
  • Yufang, S. (2017). The Comparison of Fama-French Five-Factor Model in Chinese A-share Stock Market and in Real Estate Sector. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Aalto University / School of Business, Finlandiya. google scholar
  • Zaremba, A., & Czapkiewicz, A. (2017). Digesting anomalies in emerging European markets: a comparison of factor pricing models. Emerging Markets Review, 31, 1-15. google scholar
  • Zhou, W., & Li, L. (2016). A New Fama-French 5-Factor Model Based on SSAEPD Error and GARCH-Type Volatility. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 6(05), 711. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Aras, G., Çam, İ., Zavalsız, B., & Keskin, S. (2018). Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Istanbul Business Research, 47(2), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026


AMA

Aras G, Çam İ, Zavalsız B, Keskin S. Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Istanbul Business Research. 2018;47(2):183-207. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026


ABNT

Aras, G.; Çam, İ.; Zavalsız, B.; Keskin, S. Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Istanbul Business Research, [Publisher Location], v. 47, n. 2, p. 183-207, 2018.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Aras, Güler, and İlhan Çam and Bilal Zavalsız and Serkan Keskin. 2018. “Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama.” Istanbul Business Research 47, no. 2: 183-207. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026


Chicago: Humanities Style

Aras, Güler, and İlhan Çam and Bilal Zavalsız and Serkan Keskin. Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama.” Istanbul Business Research 47, no. 2 (Oct. 2022): 183-207. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026


Harvard: Australian Style

Aras, G & Çam, İ & Zavalsız, B & Keskin, S 2018, 'Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama', Istanbul Business Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 183-207, viewed 5 Oct. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Aras, G. and Çam, İ. and Zavalsız, B. and Keskin, S. (2018) ‘Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama’, Istanbul Business Research, 47(2), pp. 183-207. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026 (5 Oct. 2022).


MLA

Aras, Güler, and İlhan Çam and Bilal Zavalsız and Serkan Keskin. Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama.” Istanbul Business Research, vol. 47, no. 2, 2018, pp. 183-207. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026


Vancouver

Aras G, Çam İ, Zavalsız B, Keskin S. Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Istanbul Business Research [Internet]. 5 Oct. 2022 [cited 5 Oct. 2022];47(2):183-207. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026 doi: 10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026


ISNAD

Aras, Güler - Çam, İlhan - Zavalsız, Bilal - Keskin, Serkan. Fama-French Çok Faktör Varlık Fiyatlama Modellerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması: Borsa İstanbul Üzerine Bir Uygulama”. Istanbul Business Research 47/2 (Oct. 2022): 183-207. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2018.47.02.0026



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim02.09.2018
Kabul22.01.2019

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.