Araştırma Makalesi

DOI :10.26650/ibr.2023.52.804819   IUP :10.26650/ibr.2023.52.804819    Tam Metin (PDF)

Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector

Saniye Yıldırım ÖzmutluEsin Can Mutlu

The effects of environmental conditions on firm performance are investigated in this study. Within the scope of the research, the relationships between the strategic posture and the performance of logistics companies in varying environmental conditions were examined. During this study, the interaction between variables was also investigated by predicting the presence of the mediating effect of strategic posture. In this context, a research model and related research hypotheses were developed. The created research model was comprised of the three-dimension of environmental conditions developed by Dess and Beard (1984), six dimensions of strategic stance developed by Venkatraman (1989), and firm performance variables. A survey related to the research was conducted with 264 people working in managerial positions in 218 logistics companies operating within the scope of the research to test the hypotheses in the research model. The analysis of the obtained data was performed by the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method utilizing the SPSS and AMOS software program. According to the analysis results, it was determined that the strategic posture variable has a full mediating effect between environmental conditions and firm performance. As a result, by enabling logistics companies to realize their strategic posture features, information was provided to guide them on how to improve their performance in changing environmental conditions.

PDF Görünüm


  • Adner, R., Csaszar, F. A., & Zemsky, P. B. (2014). Positioning on a multiattribute landscape. Management Science, 60(11), 2794-2815. google scholar
  • Aldrich, H E. (1979). Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. google scholar
  • Araujo, L., & Gava, R. (2012). Proactive companies: How to anticipate market changes. Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Arun, K. & Yıldırım Özmutlu, S. (2021). Narratives of environmental munificence of 3PL firms on the rela-tionship between dynamic capabilities, strategic management and organizational performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(1), 96-118. google scholar
  • Ballou, Ronald H. (2004). Business Logistics/Supply Chain Management (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. google scholar
  • Bocken, N. M., & Geradts, T. H. (2020). Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Or-ganization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 53(4), 101950. google scholar
  • Bolland, E. J. (2020). Strategizing: New Thinking about Strategy, Planning, and Management. Emerald Group Publishing. google scholar
  • Bowersox, D. J., & Closs, D. J. (1996). Logistical management: The integrated supply chain process. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies. google scholar
  • Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J, ve Cooper, B.M. (2002). Supply chain logistics management. Int.ed. The McGraw-Hill. google scholar
  • Bradley, S. W., Shepherd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2011). The Importance of Slack for New Organizations Fa-cing ‘Tough’ Environments: The Importance of Slack. Journal ofManagementStudies, 48(5), 1071-1097. google scholar
  • Bryson, J M. (2011). Strategic planningfor public and nonprofit organizations: a guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
  • Bunger, A. C., Choi, M. S., MacDowell, H., & Gregoire, T. (2021). Competition Among Mental Health Or-ganizations: Environmental Drivers and Strategic Responses. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 48(3), 393-407. google scholar
  • Buzzell, R. D., Gale, B. T., & Sultan, R. G. (1975). Market share-a key to profitability. Harvard Business Review, 53(1), 97-106. google scholar
  • Cannella, A. A., Park, J. H., & Lee, H. U. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy ofManagement Journal, 51(4), 768-784. google scholar
  • Castrogiovanni, G. J. (1991). Environmental munificence; a theoretical assessment. Academy of Manage-ment Review, 16(3), 542-565. google scholar
  • Castrogiovanni, G. J. (2002). Organization task environments: have they changed fundamentally over time? Journal ofManagement, 28(2), 129-150. google scholar
  • Chakravarthy, B. S. (1982). Adaptation: A promising metaphor for strategic management. Academy ofMa-nagement Review, 7(1), 35-44. google scholar
  • Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Soci-ology, 6(1), 1-22. google scholar
  • Cooper, M. C., Lambert, D. M., & Pagh, J. D. (1997). Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics. The International Journal ofLogistics Management, 8(1), 1-14. google scholar
  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environ-ments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87. google scholar
  • Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal ofManagement, 26(3), 435-462. google scholar
  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall google scholar
  • D’Aveni, R A. (1994). Hypercompetition. New York, NY: Free Press. google scholar
  • DeSarbo, W. S., Anthony Di Benedetto, C., Song, M., & Sinha, I. (2005). Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic framework: uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 47-74. google scholar
  • Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52-73. google scholar
  • Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265-273. google scholar
  • Dickson, P. R., & Giglierano, J. J. (1986). Missing the boat and sinking the boat: A conceptual model of entrepreneurial risk. Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 58-70. google scholar
  • Dollinger, M. J., & Golden, P. A. (1992). Interorganizational and collective strategies in small firms: Envi-ronmental effects and performance. Journal of Management, 18(4), 695-715. google scholar
  • Drucker, P. F. (1954). The Practice of Management. New York: Harper & Row. Publishers. Lnc. google scholar
  • Du, Y., & Kim, P. H. (2021). One size does not fit all: Strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 124, 272-285. google scholar
  • Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncerta-inty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-327. google scholar
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Sull, D. N. (2001). Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 106-119. google scholar
  • Elbanna, S., & Child, J. (2007). Influences on strategic decision effectiveness: Development and test of an integrative model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 431-453. google scholar
  • Elbanna, S., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Gherib, J. (2015). Do environment and intuition matter in the relationship between decision politics and success?. Journal of Management and Organization, 21(1), 60-81. google scholar
  • Ellinger, A. E., Daugherty, P. J., & Keller, S. B. (2000). The relationship between marketing/logistics in-terdepartmental integration and performance in US manufacturing firms: an empirical study. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 1-22. google scholar
  • Ellinger, A. E., Ellinger, A. D., & Keller, S. B. (2002). logistics managers’ learning environments and firm performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 19-37. google scholar
  • Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18(1), 21-32. google scholar
  • Fink, A. (2016). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. google scholar
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. google scholar
  • Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 3-18. google scholar
  • Galbraith, C., & Schendel, D. (1983). An empirical analysis of strategy types. Strategic Management Jour-nal, 4(2), 153-173. google scholar
  • Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marke-ting, 58(2), 1-19. google scholar
  • Garüa-Sânchez, I. M., Gallego-Âlvarez, I., & Zafra-G6mez, J. L. (2020). Do the ecoinnovation and ecode-sign strategies generate value added in munificent environments?. Business Strategy and the Environ-ment, 29(3), 1021-1033. google scholar
  • Ghemawat, P. (2016). Evolving ideas about business strategy. Business History Review, 90(4), 727-749. google scholar
  • Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Leech, N. A. (2017). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis. google scholar
  • Glueck, W. F. (1980). Business policy and strategic management (3rd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill. google scholar
  • Goll, I., & Rasheed, A. A. (2004). The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 41-54. google scholar
  • Goll, I., & Rasheed, A. M. (1997). Rational decision-making and firm performance: the moderating role of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 583-591. google scholar
  • Gonzalez-Benito, J., & Gonzalez-Benito, O. (2005). Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis. Omega, 33(1), 1-15. google scholar
  • Gonzalez-Benito, J. (2005). A study of the effect of manufacturing proactivity on business performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(3), 222-241. google scholar
  • Grant, J. H., & King, W. R. (1982). The logic of strategic planning. Boston: Little, Brown. google scholar
  • Grant, R. M. (2003). Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: Evidence from the oil majors. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6), 491-517. google scholar
  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formula-tion. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135. google scholar
  • Guo, H., Wang, C., Su, Z., & Wang, D. (2020). Technology Push or Market Pull? Strategic Orientation in Business Model Design and Digital Start-up Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(4), 352-372. google scholar
  • Haessler, P. (2020). Strategic Decisions between Short-Term Profit and Sustainability. Administrative Scien-ces, 10(3), 1-31. google scholar
  • Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th Edition). United Kingdom: Cengage Learning. google scholar
  • Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2020). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Ma-nagement Studies, 58(5), 1159, 1197. google scholar
  • Hayes, R. H., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1984). Restoring our competitive edge: competing through manufactu-ring. USA, New York: John Wiley&Sons, 1984. google scholar
  • Hettich, E., & Kreutzer, M. (2021). Strategy formation across organizational boundaries: an interorganizati-onal process model. British Journal of Management, 32(1), 147-199. google scholar
  • Hofer, C. W. (1983). ROVA: A new measure for assessing organizational performance. In R. Lamb (Ed.), Advances in strategic management: Vol. 2, 43-55. New York: JAI Press, 1983. google scholar
  • Hofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. St. Paul, MN: West, 1978. google scholar
  • Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Beyond the triple bottom line. Business Stra-tegy and the Environment, 18(3), 177-191. google scholar
  • Huber, G. P., & Daft, R. L. (1987). The information environments of organizations. In Handbook of Organi-zational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, F. Jablin et al., eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. google scholar
  • Israel, G. D. (2013). Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS), University of Florida. Retrieved from Agricultural. In Education and Communication Department, UF/IFAS Extension. https://edis.ifas. google scholar
  • Jamali, H. (2020). Banking Governance, Financial Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility. Jurnal Manajement, 24(3), 497-512. google scholar
  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1996). Market orientation: review, refinement, and roadmap. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 1(2), 119-135. google scholar
  • Jiang, W., Wang, L., Chu, Z., & Zheng, C. (2020). How does CEO regulatory focus matter? The impacts of CEO promotion and prevention focus on firm strategic change. Group & Organization Management, 45(3), 386-416. google scholar
  • Jurkovich, R. (1974). A core typology of organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(3), 380-394. google scholar
  • Kaplan, R. S. (1984). Yesterday’s accounting undermines production. Harvard Business Review, 62(4), 95101. google scholar
  • Kaufmann, C., Kock, A., & Gemünden, H. G. (2020). Emerging strategy recognition in agile portfolios. International Journal of Project Management, 38(7), 429-440. google scholar
  • Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 570-598. google scholar
  • Kelly, D., & Storey, C. (2000). New service development: initiation strategies. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11(1), 45-63. google scholar
  • Lee, H. L. (2002). Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties. California Management Review, 44(3), 105-119. google scholar
  • Legionosuko, T., Sundari, S., & Sutawijaya, A. H. (2019). The Effect of Training, Integrity and Competency Knowledge of Cooperation Team Official Human Resources in Directorate General of Defense Strategy the Ministry. International Review of Management and Marketing, 9(6), 128. google scholar
  • Liu, A., Liu, H., & Gu, J. (2021). Linking business model design and operational performance: The media-ting role of supply chain integration. Industrial Marketing Management, 96, 60-70. google scholar
  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. google scholar
  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm per-formance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429-451. google scholar
  • Lundgren, C., Bokrantz, J., & Skoogh, A. (2021). A strategy development process for Smart Maintenance implementation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(9), 142-166. google scholar
  • March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404-1418. google scholar
  • Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Lean, agile or leagile? Matching your supply chain to the marketplace. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4061-4070. google scholar
  • Mentzer, J. T., & Firman, J. (1994). Logistics control systems in the 21st century. Journal of Business Logis-tics, 15(1), 215-227. google scholar
  • Miles, M. P., Covin, J. G., & Heeley, M. B. (2000). The relationship between environmental dynamism and small firm structure, strategy, and performance. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8(2), 63-78. google scholar
  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. google scholar
  • Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., & Preffer, J. (1974). Organization environment concepts and issues. Industrial Relations. A Journal of Economy and Society, 13(3), 244-264. google scholar
  • Miles, M. P., & Covin, J. G. (2000). Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial Advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 299-311. google scholar
  • Miller, D. (1988). Relating Porter’s business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and perfor-mance implications. Academy ofManagement Journal, 31(2), 280-308. google scholar
  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: the third link. StrategicManagement Journal, 4(3), 221-235. google scholar
  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management science, 30(10), 1161-1183. google scholar
  • Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. B. (2020). Strategy safari. Pearson UK. google scholar
  • Morgan, R. E., & Strong, C. A. (1998). Market orientation and dimensions of strategic orientation. European Journal ofMarketing, 32(12), 1051-1073. google scholar
  • Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W., & Hill, R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal ofBusiness Research, 36(1), 15-23. google scholar
  • Nakano, M. (2015). Exploratory analysis on the relationship between strategy and structure/processes in supply chains: Using the strategy-structure-processes-performance paradigm. The International Journal ofLogistics Management, 26(2), 381-400. google scholar
  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35. google scholar
  • O’Leary-Kelly, S. W., & Flores, B. E. (2002). The integration of manufacturing and marketing/sales decisi-ons: impact on organizational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 20(3), 221-240. google scholar
  • Perez-Franco, R. J., & Phadnis, S. (2018). Eliciting and representing the supply chain strategy of a business unit. The International Journal ofLogistics Management, 29(4), 1401-1423. google scholar
  • Perreault, W. D., & Russ, F. A. (1976). Physical Distribution Service in Industrial Purchase Decisions. Journal of Marketing, 40(2), 3-10. google scholar
  • Piercy, N. F., & Morgan, N. A. (1994). The marketing planning process: behavioral problems compared to analytical techniques in explaining marketing plan credibility. Journal ofBusiness Research, 29(3), 167178. google scholar
  • Robinson, K. C. (1995). Measures of entrepreneurial value creation: An investigation of the impact of stra-tegy and industry structure on the economic performance of independent new ventures. Doctoral Disser-tation, University Of Georgia. google scholar
  • Sabherwal, R., Sabherwal, S., Havakhor, T., & Steelman, Z. (2019). How does strategic alignment affect firm performance? The roles of information technology investment and environmental uncertainty. MIS Quarterly, 43(2), 453-474. google scholar
  • Schendel, D., & Hofer, C. W. (1979). Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning. Boston: Little, Brown. google scholar
  • Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493511. google scholar
  • Seo, K., Woo, L., Mun, S. G., & Soh, J. (2021). The asset-light business model and firm performance in complex and dynamic environments: The dynamic capabilities view. Tourism Management, 85, 104311. google scholar
  • Sharfman, M. P., & Dean, J. W. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management, 17(4), 681-700. google scholar
  • Shwairef, A., Amran, A., Iranmanesh, M., & Ahmad, N. H. (2021). The mediating effect of strategic posture on corporate governance and environmental reporting. Review of Managerial Science,15(2), 349-378. google scholar
  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1993). Product-market strategy and performance: an analysis of the Miles and Snow strategy types. European Journal of Marketing, 27(10), 33-51. google scholar
  • Snow, C. C., & Hambrick, D. C. (1980). Measuring organizational strategies: Some theoretical and metho-dological problems. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 527-538. google scholar
  • Sodhi, M. S. (2015). Conceptualizing social responsibility in operations via stakeholder resource-based view. Production and Operations Management, 24(9), 1375-1389. google scholar
  • Srinivasan, M., Srivastava, P., & Iyer, K. N. (2020). Response strategy to environment context factors using a lean and agile approach: Implications for firm performance. European Management Journal, 38(6), 900-913. google scholar
  • Stank, T. P., Daugherty, P. J., & Ellinger, A. E. (1999). Marketing/logistics integration and firm performance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 10(1), 11-24. google scholar
  • Starbuck, W. H. (1976). Organizations and their environments. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, New York: Wiley. google scholar
  • Starbuck, W. H. (1983). Organizations as action generators. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 91-102. google scholar
  • Stock, J. R., & Lambert, D. M. (1992). Becoming a “World Class” company with logistics service quality. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 3(1), 73-81. google scholar
  • Tan, J. (2002). Impact of ownership type on environment-strategy linkage and performance: Evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 333-354. google scholar
  • Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2005). Environment-strategy co-evolution and co-alignment: a staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 141-157. google scholar
  • Tumidei, D., Alexiou, C., & Bourne, M. (2020). A choice and inevitability framework in strategic manage-ment: empirical evidence of its real-life existence. Review of Managerial Science, 1-38. google scholar
  • Tung, R. L. (1979). Dimensions of organizational environments: An exploratory study of their impact on organization structure. Academy of Management Journal, 22(4), 672-693. google scholar
  • Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Revi-ew, 10(3), 540-557. google scholar
  • Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942-962. google scholar
  • Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814. google scholar
  • Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1987). Measurement of business economic performance: an examina-tion of method convergence. Journal of Management, 13(1), 109-122. google scholar
  • Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Stra-tegic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319. google scholar
  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. CA, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1997). Dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Warwick, RI: Partners for the learning Organization. google scholar
  • Wolf, C., & Floyd, S. W. (2017). Strategic planning research: Toward a theory-driven agenda. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1754-1788. google scholar
  • Wolff, J. A., & Pett, T. L. (2006). Small-fiım performance: modeling the role of product and process impro-vements. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 268-284. google scholar
  • Wong, C. Y., Boon-Itt, S., & Wong, C. W. (2011). The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Journal of Operations management, 29(6), 604-615. google scholar
  • Wright, P. (2020). Strategic planning: A collaborative process. Nursing management, 51(4), 40-47. google scholar
  • Xie, H. Y., Xie, Q. J., & Zhao, H. (2018). Foreign firms’ strategic positioning and performance in a host market: A resource partitioning perspective. Multinational Business Review, 26(2), 173-192. google scholar
  • Yang, L., & Gan, C. (2020). Cooperative goals and dynamic capability: the mediating role of strategic flexi-bility and the moderating role of human resource flexibility. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(5), 782-795. google scholar
  • Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1989). Effects of environmental scarcity and munificence on the relationship of context to organizational structure. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 131-156. google scholar
  • Y u, C. L., Wang, F., & Brouthers, K. D. (2016). Competitor identification, perceived environmental un-certainty, and firm performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 33(1), 21-35. google scholar
  • Y uan, Y., Lu, L. Y., Tian, G., & Yu, Y. (2020). Business strategy and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 359-377. google scholar
  • Y uan, C., Xue, D., & He, X. (2021). A balancing strategy for ambidextrous learning, dynamic capabilities, and business model design, the opposite moderating effects of environmental dynamism. Technovation, 103, 102225. google scholar
  • Z immermann, R., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., & Moreira, A. C. (2020). An empirical analysis of the relationship between supply chain strategies, product characteristics, environmental uncertainty and performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(3), 375-391. google scholar
  • Zuckerman A., M. (2016). Healthcare Strategic Planning (3rd edition). Chicago, IL: Health, Administration Press. google scholar


Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın



Yıldırım Özmutlu, S., & Can Mutlu, E. (2023). Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector. Istanbul Business Research, 52(1), 1-30.


Yıldırım Özmutlu S, Can Mutlu E. Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector. Istanbul Business Research. 2023;52(1):1-30.


Yıldırım Özmutlu, S.; Can Mutlu, E. Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector. Istanbul Business Research, [Publisher Location], v. 52, n. 1, p. 1-30, 2023.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yıldırım Özmutlu, Saniye, and Esin Can Mutlu. 2023. “Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector.” Istanbul Business Research 52, no. 1: 1-30.

Chicago: Humanities Style

Yıldırım Özmutlu, Saniye, and Esin Can Mutlu. Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector.” Istanbul Business Research 52, no. 1 (May. 2023): 1-30.

Harvard: Australian Style

Yıldırım Özmutlu, S & Can Mutlu, E 2023, 'Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector', Istanbul Business Research, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1-30, viewed 28 May. 2023,

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yıldırım Özmutlu, S. and Can Mutlu, E. (2023) ‘Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector’, Istanbul Business Research, 52(1), pp. 1-30. (28 May. 2023).


Yıldırım Özmutlu, Saniye, and Esin Can Mutlu. Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector.” Istanbul Business Research, vol. 52, no. 1, 2023, pp. 1-30. [Database Container],


Yıldırım Özmutlu S, Can Mutlu E. Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector. Istanbul Business Research [Internet]. 28 May. 2023 [cited 28 May. 2023];52(1):1-30. Available from: doi: 10.26650/ibr.2023.52.804819


Yıldırım Özmutlu, Saniye - Can Mutlu, Esin. Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on the Relationship between Environmental Conditions and Firm Performance on the Logistics Sector”. Istanbul Business Research 52/1 (May. 2023): 1-30.


Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma29.09.2022


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.