Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480    Tam Metin (PDF)

Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği

Mehmet AkyolEmrullah Mete

Sera gazı emisyonlarının neden olduğu küresel ısınma ve iklim değişikliği tüm ülkeleri üretim faktörlerini yeniden gözden geçirmeye zorlamaktadır. Emisyon hacimlerini düşürücü teknolojilerin geliştirilmesi ülkeler için öncelikli hedeflerden biri olmuştur. Bu çalışmada çevresel teknolojik inovasyonların CO2 emisyonu üzerindeki etkisi OECD kurucu üyesi 18 ülke için araştırılmıştır. 2005-2018 yılları arası dönemin incelendiği çalışmada panel genelleştirilmiş momentler metodu (GMM) yönteminden yararlanılmıştır. Bağımlı değişken olarak CO2 emisyonunun kullanıldığı çalışmada enerji tüketimi, ekonomik büyüme (GSYH) ve teknolojik inovasyon verileri bağımsız değişken olarak kullanılmıştır. Teknolojik inovasyon göstergesi olarak iklim değişikliğini önleyici patent sayıları kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, iklim değişikliğini önlemeye yönelik patent başvurularında meydana gelen %1 düzeyinde artış CO2 emisyonunu %0.02 oranında azaltmaktadır. Diğer yandan enerji tüketiminde meydana gelen %1 düzeyindeki artış CO2 emisyonu üzerinde %0.56 oranında artışa neden olmaktadır. Son olarak GSYH büyüme hızında meydana gelen %1 düzeyindeki artış ise CO2 emisyonu üzerinde %0.001 oranında artışa neden olmaktadır.

JEL Classification : O11 , O31 , Q55
DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Impact of Environmental Technological Innovations on CO2 Emissions: The Case of OECD Countries

Mehmet AkyolEmrullah Mete

Global warming and climate change, caused by greenhouse gas emissions, have compelled all countries to reconsider their production factors. Developing technologies to reduce emission volumes has been one of the priority targets for countries. This study investigated the impact of environmental technological innovations on CO2 emissions in 18 OECD members. The panel generalized method of moments (GMM)was employed in the study to produce estimates for the period between 2005 and 2018. Energy consumption, economic growth (GDP), and technological innovation data were used as independent variables in the study, CO2 emissions were used as dependent variable, whereas the number of patents preventing climate change was used as a technological innovation indicator. The analysis results showed that a 1% increase in patent applications for preventing climate change reduced CO2 emissions by 0.02%. However, a 1% increase in energy consumption caused an increase of 0.56% in CO2 emissions. Finally, the 1% increase in the GDP growth rate caused an increase of 0.002% in CO2 emissions.

JEL Classification : O11 , O31 , Q55

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Following the industrial revolution, the adoption of mechanization, the introduction of mass production, and the use of fossil fuels put serious pressure on the ecosystem, resulting in climate change and environmental pollution. This mode of production and economic growth, which has threatened the continuity of natural life since the first half of the 20th century, has begun to draw attention, necessitating the introduction of certain environmental principles. One of the key principles is the concept of sustainable development. Sustainable development refers to economic development based on the use of renewable resources, considering the environmental effects of economic activities. Achieving economic growth without causing environmental pollution will be possible only with technological development and innovation.

According to the endogenous economic growth theory, increase in research and development (R&D) activities can provide factor productivity and an increase in production with technological innovation; however, the contribution of technological innovation to environmental quality, especially greenhouse gas emissions, is uncertain. Thus, it is important to determine whether technological innovation protects the environment.

Technological innovation is considered as a key solution to environmental problems and a viable instrument for sustainable development. Technological innovation refers to the innovation of production or production technology, the development of new ideas, development and implementation of new patents and technologies, and modification in the existing production process. The relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions is based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve in economic literature. The relationship between economic growth and pollution is presented as an inverse U-curve, and the increase in production and income creates an initial increasing pressure on the environment as countries continue their economic development. On reaching a certain income level, the environmental pressure created by economic growth is decreased.

Studies on the emission-reducing effect of technological innovation are important not only in the relation to countries but also for academic purposes. In this regard, this study used energy technology innovation to test the impact of technology on emissions; it evaluated the R&D scale and, finally, developed a patent. Unlike R&D expenditure, patent data were a measure of output. A patent is a right to the person making an invention granted by a governing authority; it may grant other people the right to use the invention for a certain period. Obtaining a patent is both an intensive procedure and a very expensive process. The intensive procedure and heavy cost serve as a guarantor for high quality inventions. A patent is usually granted after the development of the technology has begun, that is, it proofs that success has been achieved.

This study examined the impact of environmental technological innovations on CO2 emissions in 18 OECD founding countries. The study focused on the period between 2005 and 2018. CO2 emissions were used as the dependent variable; energy consumption, economic growth (GDP), and technological innovation data were used as independent variables. The panel generalized method of moments (GMM) was used for the analysis and the number of patents to prevent climate change was used as a technological innovation indicator.

The patent data used in the study were scored according to the inventor countries. For example, where there was a joint patent application from two different countries, each country was given 0.5 points to prevent duplicate counting, and in case of applications from three countries, each country was given 0.33 points. Concerning patent applications, classifications were made based on the technology density. There were four classifications. Classifications of 1 and above refer to all patent applications, including inventions with low value. In this study, patent applications of inventions with higher value were used, considering the classifications of 2 and above.

Analyzed results show that the increase in energy consumption and economic growth increase CO2 emissions and an increase in the number of patents reduces CO2 emissions. The evaluated results in terms of OECD countries were not surprising. In fact, patent applications for environmental innovations aimed at preventing climate change increased approximately six times in the last three decades across OECD countries. This increase indicates the importance given to policies for preventing environmental problems in OECD countries. Additionally, the acceleration of globalization, the increase in the world population, and the resulting increase in total demand increased the production and energy demand. Although efforts to reduce energy consumption based on fossil resources and interest in renewable energy have recently increased, the share of renewable energy consumption in total energy consumption has not yet reached the desired levels.  


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Albino, V., Ardito, L., Dangelico, R.M. ve Petruzzelli, A.M. (2014). Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis. Applied Energy, 135, 836-854. google scholar
  • Anderson, T.W. ve Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18, 47-82. google scholar
  • Arellano, M., ve Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. google scholar
  • Balestra, P. ve Nerlove, M. (1966). Pooling cross section and time series data in the estimation of dynamic model: The demand for natural gas. Econometrica, 34(3), 585-612. google scholar
  • Baltagi, B. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  • Bindi, G. (2019). Technological innovation and the environment, an analysis based on patent counts (Master dissertation, Lund University, Sweeden). Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/ download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8981996&fileOId=8982016 google scholar
  • Chen, Y. ve Lee, C.C. (2020). Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross-country evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 1-11. google scholar
  • Cheng, C., Ren, X., Dong, K., Dong, X. & Wang, Z. (2021). How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 1-11. google scholar
  • Çağlayan Akay, E. (2018). Dinamik Panel Veri Modelleri, (Ed.) Selahattin Güriş, Uygulamalı Panel Veri Ekonometrisi (ss. 114-120). İstanbul: Der Yayınları. google scholar
  • Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C.N., Salman, M., Boamah, K.B., Ampon-Wireko, S. ve Dogbe, C.S.K. (2021). Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 1-11. google scholar
  • Eom, T.H., Lee, S.H. & Xu, H. (2008). Introduction to Panel Data Analysis: Concepts and Practices. In Miller, G.J. & Yang, K. (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration (pp. 575594). Middletown, Pennsylvania: CRC Press. google scholar
  • Erdoğan, S., Yıldırım, S., Yıldırım, D.Ç. ve Gedikli, A. (2019). G20 Ülkelerinde İnovasyon ve CO2 Emisyonu. S. Erdoğan ve diğerleri (Ed.), Uluslararası Enerji Ekonomi ve Güvenlik Kongresi (ss. 193202). İstanbul: Basım Pazıl Reklam, Danışmanlık, Matbaa ve Organizasyon. google scholar
  • Fernandez, Y.F., Lopez, M.A.F. ve Blanco, B.O. (2018). Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3459-3467. google scholar
  • Gedik, Y. (2020). Sosyal, ekonomik ve çevresel boyutlarla sürdürülebilirlik ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma. International Journal of Economics, Politics, Humanities & Social Sciences, 3(3), 196-215. google scholar
  • Grossman, G. ve Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research No.3914. Erişim adresi: https://www.nber. org/papers/w3914 google scholar
  • Hashmi, R. ve Alam, K. (2019). Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1100-1109. google scholar
  • Johnstone, N., Hascic, I. ve Popp, D. (2010). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45, 133-155. google scholar
  • Lin, B. ve Zhu, J. (2019a). Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO2 emissions constraint. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 662-671. google scholar
  • Lin, B. ve Zhu, J. (2019b). The role of renewable energy technological innovation on climate change: Empirical evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment, 659, 1505-1512. google scholar
  • Mongo, M., Belaid, F. ve Ramdani, B. (2021). The effects of environmental innovations on CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Europe. Environmental Science and Policy, 118, 1-9. google scholar
  • Hascic, I. ve Migotto, M. (2015). Measuring environmental innovation using patent data. OECD google scholar
  • Environment Working Papers No.89. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/ environment/measuring-environmental-innovation-using-patent-data_5js009kf48xw-en google scholar
  • Popp, D., Newell R.G. ve Jaffe, A.B. (2010). Energy, the environment and technological change. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 2, 873-937. google scholar
  • Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 10021037. google scholar
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: an Inquiry in to Profits. Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, London: Harward University Press. google scholar
  • Stokey, N.L. (1998). Are there limits to growth? International Economic Review, 39 (1), 1-31. google scholar
  • Wang, Z. ve Zhu, Y. (2020). Do energy technology innovations contribute to CO2 emissions abatement? A spatial perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 726, 1-14. google scholar
  • Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2013). İleri Panel Veri Analizi: Stata Uygulamalı (2.bs.). İstanbul: Beta. google scholar
  • Yii, K.J. ve Geetha, J. (2017). The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: Evidence from Granger causality test. Energy Procedia, 105, 3118-3124. google scholar
  • Yu, Y. ve Du, Y. (2019). Impact of technological innovation on CO2 emissions and emissions trend prediction on ‘new normal’ economy in China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 10(1), 152-161. google scholar
  • Zhang, Y.J., Peng, Y.L., Ma, C.Q. ve Shen, B. (2017). Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 100, 18-28. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Akyol, M., & Mete, E. (2021). Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 71(2), 569-590. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480


AMA

Akyol M, Mete E. Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi. 2021;71(2):569-590. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480


ABNT

Akyol, M.; Mete, E. Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 71, n. 2, p. 569-590, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Akyol, Mehmet, and Emrullah Mete. 2021. “Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği.” İstanbul İktisat Dergisi 71, no. 2: 569-590. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480


Chicago: Humanities Style

Akyol, Mehmet, and Emrullah Mete. Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği.” İstanbul İktisat Dergisi 71, no. 2 (Dec. 2022): 569-590. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480


Harvard: Australian Style

Akyol, M & Mete, E 2021, 'Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği', İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 569-590, viewed 7 Dec. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Akyol, M. and Mete, E. (2021) ‘Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği’, İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 71(2), pp. 569-590. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480 (7 Dec. 2022).


MLA

Akyol, Mehmet, and Emrullah Mete. Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği.” İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, vol. 71, no. 2, 2021, pp. 569-590. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480


Vancouver

Akyol M, Mete E. Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi [Internet]. 7 Dec. 2022 [cited 7 Dec. 2022];71(2):569-590. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480 doi: 10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480


ISNAD

Akyol, Mehmet - Mete, Emrullah. Çevresel Teknolojik İnovasyonların CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği”. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi 71/2 (Dec. 2022): 569-590. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2021-935480



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim10.05.2021
Kabul07.12.2021
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma31.12.2021

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.