Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization

Bai Gao

Industrial policy lost legitimacy and disappeared in public discourse in the heyday of neoliberalism and Washington consensus. Recently, however, industrial policy is experiencing a renaissance in many parts of the world. There have appeared several forms of industrial policy in the academic literature that vary greatly with different conceptualizations of the state. Even within one type of state there may be multiple types of industrial policy. The discussions on industrial policy in the 1980s-1990s used to be dominated by the conceptualizations of the developmental state that emphasized promoting strategic industries and the social-protection state that focused on protecting sunset industries. Nevertheless, the three ongoing megatrends, the globalization reversal, technological revolution, and the great-power competition in the profound transformation of the postwar international order, plus the unique experience of the Chinese development in the past four decades, have presented us three other types of industrial policy, practiced by the entrepreneurial state, the market-facilitating state, and the competitiveadvantage building state. Industrial policy has indeed regained legitimacy, but it still faces many challenges. There will be a process of social construction in the future in which various state and societal actors redefine the scope and acceptable means of industrial policy.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Aiginger, K. (2011). The inefficiency of industrial and innovation policy in France. VOXeu CEPR. https://voxeu.org/article/inefficiency-industrial-and-innovation-policy-france google scholar
  • Bailey, D., Cowling, K., & Tomlinson, P. (2015). Introduction: New perspectives on industrial policy for a modern Britain. In D. Bailey, K. Cowling, & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), New perspectives on industrial policy for a modern Britain (pp. 11–16). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Brum, K. (2018). Tech world. Foreign Affairs, 97(4), 43–48. google scholar
  • Calder, K. (1988). Crisis and compensation. Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Clinton, H. (2020). A national security reckoning. Foreign Affairs, 99(6). https://www.foreignaffairs. com/articles/united-states/2020-10-09/hillary-clinton-national-security-reckoning google scholar
  • Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. (2019). National industrial strategy 2030: Strategic guidelines for a German and European industrial policy. https://www.bmwi.de/ Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/Industry/national-industry-strategy-2030.pdf?__ blob=publicationFile&v=9 google scholar
  • Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history. The National Interest, 16(Summer), 3–18. google scholar
  • Gao, B. (1997). Economic ideology and Japanesse industrial policy: Developmentalism from 1931 to 1965. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Gao, B. (2001). Japan’s economic dilemma: the institutional origins of prosperity and stagnation. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Gao, B. (2004). The state and the associational order of the economy: The institutionalization oof cartels and trade association in Japan, 1931-1945. In F. Dobbin (Ed.), The sociology of the economy (pp. 43–73). Russell Sage Foundation. google scholar
  • Gao, B. (2018). Why does globalization reverse? The crisis of the neoliberal policy paradigm. In L. Yang & W. Shen (Eds.), New humanism and global governance (pp. 59–102). World Science Press. google scholar
  • Gao, B. (2020). Stepping out the Samuelson trap: Building an open economy in the era of post globalization (in Chinese). Beijing Cultural Review, December, 45–58. google scholar
  • Gao, B., & Ru, Y. (in press). Industrial policy and competitive advantage: A comparative study of the cloud computing industry in Hangzhou and Shenzhen. In B. Hofman, E. Baark, & J. Qian (Eds.), Innovation and China’s global emergence. National University of Singapore Press. google scholar
  • Gao, B., & Zhu, L. (2020). From the ‘world factory’ to a power of industrial internet of things: Building competitive advantage in the era of smart manufacturing (in Chinese). Reform, June, 5–18. google scholar
  • Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundation of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Harrison, A., & McMilan, M. (2006). Outsourcing jobs? Multinationals and us employment. NBER Working Paper 12732. google scholar
  • Hirsch, L. (2020). Biden uses progressive message to roll out his moderate economic plan. CNBC. July 10th. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/09/biden-uses-progressive-message-to-roll-out-hismoderate-economic-plan.html google scholar
  • Hou, R., & Bi, D. (2016). Wu jinglian and chen qing tai enthusiastically discussed “industrial policy.” (in Chinese). www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2016-11/28/c_129380878.htm google scholar
  • Johnson, C. (1982). Miti and the Japanese miracle. Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Jutras, C. (2016). Iot and the connected mafufactuer. https://www.plex.com/blog/iot-and-connectedmanufacturer google scholar
  • Kim, S. Y. (2019[2015]). Deep integration and regional trade agreements. In L. Martin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the political economy of international trade (pp. 360–379). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Lin, Y. F. (2014). New structural economics: Reflections on the theoretical framework of economic development and policy (in Chinese). Beijing University Press. google scholar
  • Lin, Y. F., & Zhang W.Y. (2016). Lin yifu and zhang weiying: A major debate on industrial policy (in Chinese). www.aisixiang.com/data/102073.html google scholar
  • Lucchese, M., Nascia, L., & Pianta, M. (2016). Industrial policy and technology in Italy. Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 43(2), 233–260. google scholar
  • Manger, M., & Shadlen, K. (2019 [2015]). Trade and development. In L. Martin (Ed,), The Oxford handbook of the political economy of international trade (pp. 475–492). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Mazzucato, M. (2015). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. Public Affairs. google scholar
  • Murakami, Y. (1996). An anticlassical political-economic analysis: A vision for the next century. Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • National Science & Technology Council. (2018). Strategy for American Leadership in Advanced Manufacturing. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/AdvancedManufacturing-Strategic-Plan-2018.pdf google scholar
  • Polanyi, K. (1957 [1944]). The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press. google scholar
  • Rajan, R. (2010). Fault lines: How hidden fractures still threaten the world economy. Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Reuters. (2019). Germany presses for changes in eu competition rules after siemens/Alstom deal blocked. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-alstom-m-a-siemens-eu-germany/germany-pressesfor-changes-in-eu-competition-rules-after-siemens-alstom-deal-blocked-idUSKCN1PV1BO google scholar
  • Tilton, M. (1996). Restrained trade: Cartels in Japan’s basic materials industries. Cornell University Press. google scholar
  • TWCSI. (2020). Implementation of “industry 4.0” smart manufacturing, Germany promotes umati communication standards and specifications. Market Prospect. https://www.market-prospects. com/articles/implementation-of-industry-40-smart-manufacturing google scholar
  • UNCTAD. (2018). World investment report 2018: Investment and new industrial policies. google scholar
  • UNCTAD. (2019). World investment report 2019: Special economic zones. google scholar
  • Uriu, R. (1996). Troubled industries: Confronting economic change in Japan. Cornell University Press. google scholar
  • US Senate Committee on SB&E. (2019). Made in china 2025 and the future of American industry. google scholar
  • World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Yanez, F. (2017). The 20 key technologies of Industry 4.0 and smart factories: The road to the digital factory of the future. Independently Published. google scholar
  • Zhao, Z. X. (2020). The evolution of China’s high-tech zones and the guiding principle of the developmental state. Advance Online Publication. Istanbul University Journal of Sociology, 40(2). http://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.052 google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Gao, B. (2020). The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 40(2), 577-597. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058


AMA

Gao B. The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi. 2020;40(2):577-597. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058


ABNT

Gao, B. The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 40, n. 2, p. 577-597, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Gao, Bai,. 2020. “The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 40, no. 2: 577-597. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058


Chicago: Humanities Style

Gao, Bai,. The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 40, no. 2 (Jul. 2021): 577-597. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058


Harvard: Australian Style

Gao, B 2020, 'The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization', İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 577-597, viewed 25 Jul. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Gao, B. (2020) ‘The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization’, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 40(2), pp. 577-597. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058 (25 Jul. 2021).


MLA

Gao, Bai,. The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization.” İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, vol. 40, no. 2, 2020, pp. 577-597. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058


Vancouver

Gao B. The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi [Internet]. 25 Jul. 2021 [cited 25 Jul. 2021];40(2):577-597. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058 doi: 10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058


ISNAD

Gao, Bai. The Renaissance of Industrial Policy: Developmentalism in the Era of Post Globalization”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi 40/2 (Jul. 2021): 577-597. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0058



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim15.05.2020
Kabul15.11.2020
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma31.12.2020

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.