Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/JECS2020-0090   IUP :10.26650/JECS2020-0090    Tam Metin (PDF)

Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi

Burcu YürükHakan Acaroğlu

Optimal kamu harcamaları payının ne olması gerektiğiyle ilgili devam eden tartışmalar uzun yıllardır ekonomi politikasının önemli konuları arasında yer almaktadır. Bu nedenle kamu harcamalarının ekonomi içindeki payının belirlenmesi makroekonomik değişkenler açısından önem arz etmektedir. Söz konusu makroekonomik değişkenlerden biri olan işsizliğin kamu sektörü boyutu ile ilişkisi Burton A. Abrams (1999) tarafından Abrams eğrisi hipotezi ile ifade edilmektedir. Bu hipoteze göre, kamu sektörünün genişlemesi işsizlik oranını artırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’ de Abrams eğrisi hipotezinin geçerliliği serilerin birikimli pozitif ve negatif değişimlerini dikkate alan Hatemi-J (2012) asimetrik nedensellik testi ile ve 1985-2019 zaman serisi verileri kullanılarak analiz edilmektedir. Çalışma kapsamında asimetrik nedensellik analizinden yararlanılması gizli nedensellik ilişkisinin ortaya çıkarılması açısından önem taşımaktadır. Analizden elde edilen bulgulara göre, işsizlik pozitif şoku ile kamu harcamaları pozitif şoku arasında asimetrik nedensellik ilişkisine rastlanmaktadır. Asimetrik nedensellik ilişkinin yönünü tespit etmek amacıyla oluşturulan etki-tepki analizleri incelendiğinde, İşsizlik pozitif şoklarının, kamu harcamaları pozitif şoklarını artırdığı görülmektedir. Elde edilen sonuç, Abrams eğrisi hipotezinin geçerli olmadığını göstermektedir. Bu nedenle, kamu harcamalarının işsizlikle mücadelede mali yükü azaltılmalıdır. İşsizliğin kalıcı bir şekilde azaltılmasında istihdam yaratmaya yönelik aktif istihdam politikalarına öncelik verilmelidir.

DOI :10.26650/JECS2020-0090   IUP :10.26650/JECS2020-0090    Tam Metin (PDF)

An Asymmetric Causality Analysis of the Relationship between Government Expenditure and Unemployment in Turkey

Burcu YürükHakan Acaroğlu

The ongoing debates regarding the optimal government expenditure share have been a critical concern of economic policy for many years. Therefore, determining the share of government expenditure in the economy is important in terms of macroeconomic variables. The relationship between unemployment, which is one of the indicated macroeconomic variables, and public sector size is expressed by Abrams (1999) through the Abrams curve hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, large public sector size increases the unemployment rate. In this study, the validity of the Abrams curve hypothesis in Turkey is being analyzed with Hatemi-J’s (2012) asymmetric causality test that considers the cumulative positive–negative changes of series using the 1985–2019 time series data. In the scope of the work, the use of asymmetric causality analysis is valuable for revealing the hidden causality relationship. According to the findings obtained from the analysis, an asymmetrical causality relationship is found between unemployment positive shock and government expenditure positive shock. An impulse-response analysis was applied to determine the direction of the asymmetric causality relationship, revealing that positive shocks of unemployment increase the positive shocks of government expenditure. The results reveal that the Abrams curve hypothesis is invalid. Therefore, the financial burden of government expenditure in fighting against unemployment should be reduced. Active employment policies aimed at creating employment opportunities should be prioritized for permanently reducing unemployment.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


There is a broad difference of opinion among economic schools on the role of the government in affecting the economy. According to the classical economics school, since increases in government expenditure negatively affect the economic growth, limitations of the public domain and an adaptation of the understanding of minimal state intervention are needed. In contrast, the Keynesian view suggests the thesis that increased government expenditure will contribute to economic growth through total demand. For this reason, the relationship of government expenditure, one of the fiscal policy instruments of government, with macroeconomic variables is among the frequently discussed topics in the literature. The relationship between the size of government expenditure and unemployment was first examined by Abrams (1999), who theorized that increased government expenditure raises unemployment for various reasons. Among these reasons, the crowding out effect of the increase in government expenditure on private investments stands out. The Abrams curve hypothesis supports the classical economic view and remains in use in both national and international literature.

An examination of empirical literature reveals that traditional models (Granger causality test, VAR causality test, panel causality test, etc.) are preferred among contemporary scholars. In linear models, the effect of positive and negative shocks is accepted as homogeneous. It was first suggested by Granger and Yoon (2002) that the effects of positive and negative shocks differ. According to Granger and Yoon (2002), traditional methods are insufficient for explaining the hidden cointegration between variables. Similarly, a study conducted by Hatemi-J (2012) asserted that the homogenous acceptance of the relationship between negative and positive shocks limits the potential for the identification of asymmetric causality. The asymmetric causality test allows the comparative examination of negative and positive shocks. In this way, it is claimed that such restrictions disappear. In this study, a causality relationship between government expenditure and unemployment using quarterly time series for Turkey between 1985: Q1 and 2019: Q4 were analyzed using Hatemi-J’s (2012) asymmetric causality method. It is stipulated that the asymmetric causality test exploited within the scope of the study will present a novel perspective from the existing literature in determining the hidden causality relationship that occurs due to positive and negative shocks between variables. In addition, the direction of the asymmetric relationship is determined applying the asymmetric impulse-response analysis developed by Hatemi-J (2014).

According to the empirical findings obtained from the study, a statistically significant asymmetric causality is found between the positive shock of unemployment and the positive shock of government expenditure at the 5% and 10% significance levels. The asymmetric impulse-response analysis reveals that positive shocks of unemployment increases government expenditure positive shocks. These results indicate that the Abrams curve hypothesis asymmetric model framework does not apply in Turkey. The results obtained imply that government expenditure has been used in an attempt to reduce the problem of unemployment in Turkey. In the long run, this case will negatively affect the public economy and cause more problems, i.e., deteriorating resource allocation, decreased efficiency and labor productivity rates, increased budget deficits, etc. These challenges are revealed to be among the structural causes of long-term economic crises. The real struggle against unemployment depends on the achievement of active employment policies. In this context, the direct proportionality of an increase in economic growth with employment is important. An increase in employment as a result of economic growth in Turkey has been insufficient in recent years. This study shows that unemployment cannot be reduced only by economic growth. Therefore, the unemployment problem in Turkey requires a more comprehensive and active strategy.


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Abel, A.B., Bernanke B.S., & Croushure D. (2016). Macroeconomi. New York: Pearson Publisher. google scholar
  • Abrams, B. A. (1999). The effect of government size on the unemployment rate. Public Choice, 99(3/4), 395-401. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30024535 google scholar
  • Abouelfarag, H. A., & Qutb R. (2020). Does government expenditure reduce unemployment in Egypt?. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 36(1), 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/ doi/10.1108/JEAS-01-2020-0011/full/html google scholar
  • Afonso, A., Şen, H., & Kaya, A. (2018). Government size, unemployment, and inflation nexus in eight large emerging market economies. Research in Economics and Mathematics Working Paper Series 038-2018. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3174414 google scholar
  • Altunakar Mercan, S. Ş. ve Buyrukoğlu S. (2020). Türkiye’de abrams ve armey eğrilerinin geçerliliği. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(76), 1862-1878. google scholar
  • Aslan, A., ve Kula, F. (2010). Kamu sektör büyüklüğü işsizlik ilişkisi: Abrams Eğrisi’nin Türkiye ekonomisi için testi. Maliye Dergisi, 159, 155-166. google scholar
  • Barro, Robert J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937943 google scholar
  • Bayrakdar, S. (2017). Kamu Büyüklüğünün İşsizlik Üzerine Etkisi: Teorik Bir İnceleme. Çalışma ilişkileri Dergisi, 8(2), 95-117 google scholar
  • Bayrakdar, S. (2019). Kamu büyüklüğü ve işsizlik arasındaki ilişkinin analizi Türkiye örneği, Ankara: Astana Yayınları. google scholar
  • Bölükbaş, M. (2018). Kamu büyüklüğü işsizliğin ve genç işsizliğin nedeni midir? Türkiye örneği. Aydın İktisat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 1-17. google scholar
  • Christopoulos, D. K., & Tsionas, E. G. (2002). Unemployment and government size: Is there any credible causality?. Applied Economics Letters, 9(12), 797-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504850210129432 google scholar
  • Christopoulos, D. K., John L., & Efthymios, G. T. (2005). The Abrams curve of government size and unemployment: Evidence from panel data. Applied Economics, 37(10), 1193-1199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840500109274 google scholar
  • Cvecic, I., & Sokolic D. (2018). Impact of public expenditure in labour market policies and other selected factors on youth unemployment. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 31 (1), 2060-2080. https://doi. org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1480970 google scholar
  • Çelikay, F. (2017). İşsizlik, kamu harcamaları ve iç göçler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkileri: Türkiye üzerine bir inceleme. Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 25-219. google scholar
  • Durkaya, M., ve Ceylan, S. (2016). İşsizliğin azaltılmasında kamu kesimi büyüklüğünün rolü. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 53(615), 23-40. google scholar
  • Erdoğan A., Erdoğan S., ve Erdaş, H. (2018). Kamu büyüklüğünün Türkiye ekonomisine yönelik var analizi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2018(5), 119-131. google scholar
  • Ergeç, H. E., & Ersin, İ. (2019). The relationships between public expenditure and sectorial employment in Turkey. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies, 1(2), 150-168. google scholar
  • Feldmann, H. (2006). Government size and unemployment: Evidence from ındustrial countries. Public Choice, 127(3-4), 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-9003-y google scholar
  • Feldmann, H. (2010). Government size and unemployment in developing countries. Applied Economics Letters, 17(3), 289-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504850701720221 google scholar
  • Fouladi, M. (2010). The impact of government expenditure on gdp, employment and private investment a CGE model approach. Iranian Economic Review, 15(27), 54-76. Retrieved from https://ier.ut.ac.ir/article_32706.html google scholar
  • Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross- spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791 google scholar
  • Granger, C. W., & Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden cointegration. U of California, Economics Working Paper 2002-02.Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9qn5f61j google scholar
  • Güney, A., ve Balkaya E. (2018). Kamu harcamaları ve ticari açıklığın işsizlik ve genç işsizliğe etkisi. Sinop Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.30561/sinopusd.475574 google scholar
  • Hacker R. S., & Hatemi-J A. (2006). Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: theory and application. Applied Economics, 38(13), 1489-1500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840500405763 google scholar
  • Hatemi-J, A. (2011). Asymmetric panel causality tests with an application to the impact of fiscal policy on economic performance in Scandinavia. MPRA (Munich Personal Repec Archive Paper 55527, 1-12. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/55527Retrieved from google scholar
  • Hatemi-J, A. (2012). Asymmetric causality tests with an application. EmpiricalEconomics , 43(1) , 447-456. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0484-x google scholar
  • Hatemi-J, A. (2014). Asymmetric generalized ımpulse responses with an application in finance. Economic Modelling, 36(2014), 18-22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.014 google scholar
  • Hatemi-J, A., Gupta, R., Ksango, A., Mboweni, T., & Netshitenzhe, N. (2014). Are there asymmetric causal relationships between tourism and economic growth in a panel of G-7 countries. University of Pretoria, Department of Economics Working Paper 2014-76. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pre/wpaper/201476. html google scholar
  • Hatemi-J, A., & El-Khatib, Y. (2016). An Extension of The Asymmetric Causality Tests For Dealing With Deterministic Trend Components. Applied Economics, 48(42), 4033-4041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846 .2016.1150950 google scholar
  • Holden, S., & Sparrman V.(2018). Do government purchases affect unemployment?, Scand. J. of Economics 120(1), 124-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12214 google scholar
  • Kanca, O. C., ve Bayrak, M. (2015). Kamu harcamaları bileşenleri ile işsizlik arasındaki ilişki (Türkiye örneği). Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 1(2), 55-74. google scholar
  • Kamacı A., ve Kılıç, H. (2019). Kamu harcamalarının ekonomik büyüme ve işsizlik üzerindeki etkisi: OECD ülkeleri örneği. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 3(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.547516 google scholar
  • Karras, G. (1993). Employment and output effects of government spending: Is government size important?. Economic Inquiry, 31, 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb01298.x google scholar
  • Kaya Göze, D., Kaygısız Dursun A., ve Altuntepe N. (2015). Türkiye’de kamu harcamalarının toplam istihdama etkisi üzerine bir değerlendirme. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 83-96. Erişim Adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/akuiibfd/issue/1615/20221 google scholar
  • Mankiw, N.G.(2009). Macroeconomics. New York: Worth Publishers. google scholar
  • Matsumae, T., & Hasumi, R.(2016). Impacts of government spending on unemployment: Evidence from a medium-scale DSGE model. ESRI Discussion Paper Series 329. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/esj/esridp/329. html google scholar
  • Obisike, N. E., Okoli, U. V., Onwuka, I. N., & Mba, S. E. (2020). Impact of government expenditure on unemployment in Nigeria: Evidence from social expenditure. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Research, 6(1), 65-76. Retrieved from https://iiardpub.org/ google scholar
  • Odo, S. I., Elom-Obed, F. O., Okoro, T. O., & Nwachukwu, J. O. (2017). Understanding the relationship between unemployment and ınflation in Nigeria. Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development, 35, 55-64. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedomain.org/abstract/18477 google scholar
  • Sa, Y. (2011). Government size, economic growth and unemployment: Evidence from advanced and developing economy countries (A time series analysis, 1996-2006). International Review of Public Administration, 16(2), 95-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12264431.2011.10805198 google scholar
  • Sağdıç, E. N., ve Yıldız, F. (2020). Bölgesel düzeyde kamu harcamalarının işsizlik düzeyi üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2020(64), 208-226. google scholar
  • Scully, G W. (1989). The size of the state, economic growth and the efficient utilization of national resources. Public choice, 63(2), 149-164, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153397 google scholar
  • Selase, A. E. (2019). Impact of disaggregated public expenditure on unemployment rate of selected african countries: A panel dynamic analysis approach, American International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1(2), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.46545/aijhass.v1i2.101 google scholar
  • Şahin M., ve Özenç, Ç.(2007). Kamu harcamaları ile makro ekonomik değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkileri, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 200-225. Erişim Adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/comuybd/ issue/4113/54142 google scholar
  • Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T., (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8 google scholar
  • Topal M. H. ve Günay H. F. (2018).Türkiye’de Abrams eğrisi hipotezinin geçerliliği. International Congress on Political, Economic and Social Studies (ICPESS), 5, 285-305. google scholar
  • Uyanık, Y. (2008). Neoliberal Küreselleşme Sürecinde Türkiye İşgücü Piyasaları. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 209-224 google scholar
  • Wang, S., & Abrams, B. A. (2011). The effect of government size on the steady-state unemployment rate: A dynamic perspective. Alfred Lerner College of Business & Economics, Working Paper Series 2011-12. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dlw/wpaper/11-12..html google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Yürük, B., & Acaroğlu, H. (2021). Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 0(63), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0090


AMA

Yürük B, Acaroğlu H. Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society. 2021;0(63):93-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0090


ABNT

Yürük, B.; Acaroğlu, H. Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 63, p. 93-110, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yürük, Burcu, and Hakan Acaroğlu. 2021. “Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0, no. 63: 93-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0090


Chicago: Humanities Style

Yürük, Burcu, and Hakan Acaroğlu. Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0, no. 63 (Jul. 2021): 93-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0090


Harvard: Australian Style

Yürük, B & Acaroğlu, H 2021, 'Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi', Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 63, pp. 93-110, viewed 26 Jul. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0090


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yürük, B. and Acaroğlu, H. (2021) ‘Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi’, Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 0(63), pp. 93-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0090 (26 Jul. 2021).


MLA

Yürük, Burcu, and Hakan Acaroğlu. Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 63, 2021, pp. 93-110. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0090


Vancouver

Yürük B, Acaroğlu H. Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society [Internet]. 26 Jul. 2021 [cited 26 Jul. 2021];0(63):93-110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0090 doi: 10.26650/JECS2020-0090


ISNAD

Yürük, Burcu - Acaroğlu, Hakan. Türkiye’ de Kamu Harcamaları ve İşsizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi”. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0/63 (Jul. 2021): 93-110. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0090



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim16.06.2020
Kabul08.12.2020
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma21.04.2021

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.