Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim  Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği

Demirci Bengi; Gürer Bildik Nilüfer

doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800

Araştırma Makalesi

DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800 IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800 Tam Metin (PDF)

Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği

Bu çalışma, vatandaşların yerel yönetimlerle olan ilişkilerinde çevrimiçi (online) iletişim kanallarını ve yerel düzeyde çevrimiçi ve çevrimdışı (offline) iletişim kanallarını birleştiren entegre çok kanallı platformları kullanmaya ilişkin tutumlarını incelemektedir. Vatandaşların söz konusu tutumları, bu konudaki farkındalıkları, kullanma eğilimleri ve memnuniyetlerine bakılarak analiz edilmiş ve bu yapılırken cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim ve sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik düzeylerinin etkisi dikkate alınmıştır. Araştırmanın temel hipotezi, hızla dijitalleşen dünyada vatandaşların belediye ile olan ilişkilerinde en çok tercih edilen iletişim yolunun online iletişim olacağı şeklinde idi. Çalışma, Antalya’nın Muratpaşa ilçesinde yaşayanlarla gerçekleştirilen ve katılımcılara ilçe belediyesiyle iletişim kurmak için tercih ettikleri yolların sorulduğu, yüz yüze anketlerden elde edilen verilere dayalı, betimsel nicel bir araştırmaya dayanmaktadır. Bu ilçe belediyesi, çevrimiçi ve çevrimdışı iletişim kanallarını ortak bir platformda birleştiren entegre bir model olan Turunç Masa uygulamasını kullanmakta olduğu için çalışma alanı olarak seçilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları, vatandaşların belediye ile olan ilişkilerinde geleneksel yöntemleri tercih ettiklerini göstermektedir. Telefon ile iletişim kurmak en çok tercih edilen yöntem iken bunu yüz yüze iletişim takip etmektedir. Sosyal medya en az tercih edilen iletişim kanalları arasındadır. Entegre model, yaygın olarak bilinmekte ve her zaman bilinçli olmasa da sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Vatandaş tutumu, Çevrimiçi (online) iletişim, Yerel yönetim, Yönetişim, Entegre çok kanallı platform

DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800 IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800 Tam Metin (PDF)

Citizens’ Attitudes Towards Online Communication Channels in Contacting Local Governments and the Emergence of Integrated Multi-Channel Platforms: The Case of Orange Table

Bengi Demirci, Nilüfer Gürer Bildik

This article explores attitudes of citizens towards online communication channels and newly emerging integrated multichannel platforms which combine online and offline communication channels, when contacting local governments. It analyzes citizens’ attitudes in terms of their awareness, intention to use and satisfaction, together with the effects of gender, age, education, and socio-economic development level. Main hypothesis of the research was that in highly digitalized world the most preferred way of communication between citizens and municipality would be online contact. The article presents descriptive quantitative analysis based on data obtained by paper-based questionnaire conducted with residents of Muratpasa district in Antalya, where participants were asked about their preferred ways for communicating with district municipality. This district was chosen for the integrated platform - namely the Orange Table – which was adopted by the municipality, and which combined online and offline communication channels for interacting with citizens. The research revealed that citizens still prefer traditional offline communication channels when contacting municipality. Calling by phone was the most preferred way which was followed by going personally. Social media was one of the least preferred communication channels. Integrated model was widely known and frequently used although not consciously all the time.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Citizen attitude, Online communication, Local government, Governance, Integrated multi-channel platform

Referanslar

Aiello, G. & Tosoni, S. (2016). Going About the City: Methods and Methodologies for Urban Communication Research. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1252-1262. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index. php/ijoc/article/view/5416 google scholar
The Australian Government Information Management Office - AGIMO (2009). Engage Getting on with Government 2.0. Report of the Government 2.0 Taskforce, Australian Government Information Management Office. Retrieved from https://www.finance.gov.au/sites/default/files/Government20TaskforceReport. pdf?v=1/ google scholar
Bergquist, M., Ljungberg, J., Remneland, B. & Rolandsson, B. (2017). From E-Government To E-Governance: Social Media and Public Authorities Legitimacy Work. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (pp. 858-872). Guimaraes, Portugal. https://hh.diva-portal.org/smash/get/ diva2:1153414/FULLTEXT01.pdf google scholar
Bonson, E., Torres, L., Royo, S. & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. giq.2011.10.001 google scholar
Bonson, E., Royo, S. & Ratkai, M. (2015). Citizens’ engagement on local governments’ Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.001 google scholar
Bonson, E., Royo, S. & Ratkai, M. (2017). Facebook Practices in Western European Municipalities: An Empirical Analysis of Activity and Citizens’ Engagement. Administration & Society, 49 (3), 320-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714544945 google scholar
Borge, R., Colombo, C. & Welp, Y. (2009). Online and Offline Participation at The Local Level. Information, Communication & Society, 12 (6), 899-928. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802483054 google scholar
Cho, S., Mossberger, K., Swindell, D. & Selby, J.D. (2021). Experimenting with Public Engagement Platforms in Local Government. Urban Affairs Review, 57(3), 763-793. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419897821 google scholar
Chu, H. & Xu, C. (2009). Web 2.0 and its dimensions in the scholarly world. Scientometrics, 80(3), 717-729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2103-y google scholar
Desouza, K. C. & Bhagwatwar, A. (2014). Technology-Enabled Participatory Platforms for Civic Engagement: The Case of U.S. Cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 21(4), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.20 14.954898 google scholar
Dunleavy, P. & Margetts, H. (2010, September). ‘The second wave of digital era governance’. In: American Political Science Association Conference, Washington DC, USA. (Unpublished) LSE Research Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27684/ google scholar
Dunleavy, P. & Margetts, H. (2015, September). Design principles for essentially digital governance. 111th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, American Political Science Association. LSE Research Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/64125/ google scholar
Edmiston, K. (2003). State and Local E-Government Prospects and Challenges. The American Review ofPublic Administration, 33 (1), 20-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074002250255 google scholar
Epstein, B., Bode, L. & Connolly, J. M. (2021). ‘Do squeaky wheels get the grease? Understanding when and how municipalities respond to online requests’, New Media & Society, 00(0),1-26. https://doi. org/10.1177/14614448211031249 google scholar
Firmstone, J. & Coleman, S. (2015). Public engagement in local government: the voice and influence of citizens in online communicative spaces. Information, Community & Society, 18 (6), 680-695. https://doi.org/10.10 80/1369118X.2014.986180 google scholar
Fusi, F. & Feeney, M.K. (2016). Social Media in the Workplace: Information Exchange, Productivity, or Waste?. The American Review ofPublic Administration, 48 (5), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016675722 google scholar
Guillamon, M.D., Rios, A.M., Gesuele, B. & Metallo, C. (2016). Factors influencing social media use in local governments: The case of Italy and Spain. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 460-471. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.005 google scholar
Hardey, M. & Loader, B. (2009). The Informatization of Welfare: Older People and the Role of Digital Services. British Journal of Social Work 39: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp024 google scholar
Hatuka, T., & Zur, H. (2020). Who is the ‘smart’ resident in the digital age? The varied profiles of users and nonusers in the contemporary city. Urban Studies, 57(6), 1260-1283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019835690 google scholar
Hendriks, F. (2014). Understanding Good Urban Governance: Essentials, Shifts, and Values. Urban Affairs Review 50(4): 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087413511782 google scholar
Jeffres, L.W. & Lin, C.A. (2006). Metropolitan Websites as Urban Communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(4): 957-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00303.x google scholar
Karkin, N. (2014). Barriers for Sustainable e-Participation Process: The Case of Turkey. In L.G. Anthopoulos & C.G. Reddick (Eds.), Government e-strategic planning and management: practices, patterns, and roadmaps, (pp. 227-243). New York: Springer google scholar
Kim, S. & Lee, J. (2012). E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government. Public Administration Review, 72, 819-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x google scholar
Kooiman, J. (1993). Social-Political Governance: Introduction. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern Governance: New Government-Society (pp.1-8). London: Sage Publication google scholar
Li, W., Feng, T., Timmermans, H. J. P. & Zhang, M. (2020). The Public’s Acceptance of and Intention to Use ICTs when Participating in Urban Planning Processes. Journal of Urban Technology, 27:3, 55-73. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1852816 google scholar
Magro, M.J. (2012). A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government. Administrative Sciences 2: 148-161. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci2020148 google scholar
Meijer, A.J. (2011). Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities: From a GovernmentCentric to a Community Approach to Public Service Support. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 598-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02391.x google scholar
Moon, M.J. (2002). The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00196 google scholar
Muratpasa Municipality Website (2018). Retrieved from https://muratpasa-bld.gov.tr/ google scholar
OECD (2001). Understanding the Digital Divide. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/ sti/1888451.pdf/ google scholar
OECD (2003a). The e-government imperative: main findings, OECD Policy Brief, OECD Observer, Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN015120.pdf/ google scholar
OECD (2003b). Promise and problems of E-democracy: challenges of online citizen engagement, Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/35176328.pdf/ google scholar
Oliveira, G.H.M. & Welch, E.W. (2013). Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. giq.2013.05.019 google scholar
Patti, D. & d’Antonio, S. (2016). Interactive Cities; Digital social media and user-generated content improving urban governance, Urban Interactive Cities, European Programme for Sustainable Urban Development. Retrieved from http://www.forumdascidades.pt/?q=content/interactive-cities-digital-social-media-and-user-generated-content-improving-urban/ google scholar
Pina, V., Torres, L. & Royo, S. (2017). Comparing online with offline citizen engagement for climate change: Findings from Austria, Germany and Spain. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 26-36. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.009 google scholar
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaer, G. (2004). Public Management Reform — A Comparative Analysis. (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
Singh, A.K. & Sahu, R. (2008). Integrating Internet, telephones, and call centers for delivering better quality e-governance to all citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 477-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. giq.2007.01.001 google scholar
Stamati, T., Papadopoulos, T. & Anagnostopoulos, D. (2015). Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: Cases in the Greek context. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 12-29. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.004 google scholar
Statistical Institute of Turkey (2018, August 27). Address-Based Demographic Statistics. Retrieved from https:// biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr/ google scholar
United Nations (2009). What is Good Governance?, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf/ google scholar
Uzun, M. M., Yildiz, M., & Onder, M. (2022). Big questions of artificial intelligence (AI) in public administration and policy. SIYASAL: Journal of Political Sciences, 31(2), 423-442. http://doi.org/10.26650/ siyasal.2022.31.1121900 google scholar
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=3375136 google scholar
Vromen, A. (2007). Australian young people’s participatory practices and internet use, Information, Community & Society 10(1): 48-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701193044 google scholar
Williamson, W. & Parolin, B. (2012). Review of Web-Based Communications for Town Planning in Local Government. Journal of Urban Technology, 19(1): 43-63, https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2012.626702 google scholar
Yang, Y. (2017). Towards a New Digital Era: Observing Local E-Government Services Adoption in a Chinese Municipality, Future Internet, 9 (53), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi9030053 google scholar
Yetano, A. & Royo, S. (2017). Keeping Citizens Engaged: A Comparison Between Online and Offline Participants. Administration & Society, 49(3): 394-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581625 google scholar
Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 646-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002 google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın

DIŞA AKTAR

APA

Demirci, B., & Gürer Bildik, N. (2023). Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 32(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800

AMA

Demirci B, Gürer Bildik N. Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences. 2023;32(1):95-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800

ABNT

Demirci, B.; Gürer Bildik, N. Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 32, n. 1, p. 95-112, 2023.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Demirci, Bengi, and Nilüfer Gürer Bildik. 2023. “Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 32, no. 1: 95-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800

Chicago: Humanities Style

Demirci, Bengi, and Nilüfer Gürer Bildik. “Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 32, no. 1 (Sep. 2024): 95-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800

Harvard: Australian Style

Demirci, B & Gürer Bildik, N 2023, 'Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği', Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 95-112, viewed 12 Sep. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Demirci, B. and Gürer Bildik, N. (2023) ‘Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği’, Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 32(1), pp. 95-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800 (12 Sep. 2024).

MLA

Demirci, Bengi, and Nilüfer Gürer Bildik. “Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, 2023, pp. 95-112. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800

Vancouver

Demirci B, Gürer Bildik N. Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences [Internet]. 12 Sep. 2024 [cited 12 Sep. 2024];32(1):95-112. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800 doi: 10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800

ISNAD

Demirci, Bengi - Gürer Bildik, Nilüfer. “Vatandaşların Belediye ile Olan İlişkilerinde Çevrimiçi (Online) İletişim Yöntemlerine İlişkin Tutumları ve Entegre Çok Kanallı Platformların Ortaya Çıkışı: Turunç Masa Örneği”. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 32/1 (Sep. 2024): 95-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1245800

Cilt 32, Sayı 12023, S. 95-112

ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ

Gönderim	01.02.2023
Kabul	01.03.2023
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma	01.03.2023

LİSANS

Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences