Referanslar

• Arslan, A. (2009). Felsefeye giriş. Ankara: Adres Yayınları. google scholar
• Bailey, S. K. (1964). Ethics and the public service. PublicAdministrationReview, 24(4), 234-243. google scholar
• Beeri, I., Dayan, R., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Werner, S. B. (2013). Advancing ethics in public organizations: The impact of an ethics program on employees’ perceptions and behaviors in a regional council. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 59-78. google scholar
• Brown, P. G. (1986). Ethics and education for the public service in a liberal state. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6(1), 56-68. google scholar
• Çevikbaş, R. (2006). Yönetimde etik ve yozlaşma. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20(1), 265-289. google scholar
• Cevizci, A. (2002). Etiğe giriş. İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları. google scholar
• Collins, B. K., Kim, H. J., & Tao, J. (2019). Managing for citizen satisfaction: Is good not enough?. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 5(1), 21-38. google scholar
• Cooper, C. A. (2021). Politicization of the bureaucracy across and within administrative traditions. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(7), 564-577. google scholar
• Cooper, T. L. (2004). Big questions in administrative ethics: A need for focused, collaborative effort. Public Administration Review, 64(4), 395-407. google scholar
• Dahlström, C., & Niklasson, B. (2013). The politics of politicization in Sweden. Public Administration, 91(4), 891-907. google scholar
• Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V., & Teorell, J. (2012). The merit of meritocratization: politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 656-668. google scholar
• De Graaf, G., Huberts, L., & Strüwer, T. (2018). Integrity violations and corruption in Western public governance: empirical evidence and reflection from the Netherlands. Public Integrity, 20(2), 131-149. google scholar
• Dinçer, Ö. (1997). Kamu yönetiminde davranışların siyasallaşması ve yolsuzluk. Yeni Türkiye Dergisi, (14), 1112-1118. google scholar
• Eryılmaz B. (2012). Kamu yönetimi, Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayınları. google scholar
• Eryılmaz, B. and Biricikoğlu H. (2011). Kamu yönetiminde hesap verebilirlik ve etik. İş Ahlakı Dergisi, 4(7), 19-45. google scholar
• Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (1999). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 748-765. google scholar
• Feldheim, M. A., & Wang, X. (2004). Ethics and public trust: Results from a national survey. Public Integrity, 6(1), 63-75. google scholar
• Frankena W. K. (1988). Ethics. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Press. google scholar
• Fuenzalida, J., & Riccucci, N. M. (2019). The effects of politicization on performance: the mediating role of HRM practices. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(4), 544-569. google scholar
• Gilmour, J. B., & Lewis, D. E. (2006). Political appointees and the competence of federal program management. American Politics Research, 34(1), 22-50. google scholar
• Goss, R. P. (1996). A Distinct Public Administration Ethics?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(4), 573-597. google scholar
• Gowan, M., S., Ibarreche, S., & Lackey, C. (2001). Service quality in a public agency: same expectations but different perceptions by employees, managers, and customers. Journal of Quality Management, 6(2), 275291. google scholar
• Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar
• Harper, S. J. (2009). Ethics versus morality: a problematic divide. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 35(9), 1063-1077. google scholar
• Hollibaugh Jr, G. E. (2015). Naıve cronyism and neutral competence: patronage, performance, and policy agreement in executive appointments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 341372. google scholar
• Huberts, L. W. (2018). Integrity: what it is and why it is important, Public Integrity, 20(1), 18-32. google scholar
• Josephson, M. (1989). Power, politics and ethics: ethical obligations and opportunities of government service. California: Marina Del Rey Press. google scholar
• Kakabadse A, Korac-Kakabadse N. and Kouzmin A (2003) Ethics, values and behaviors: comparison of three case studies examining the paucity of leadership in government. Public Administration, 81(3), 477-508. google scholar
• Kılavuz, R. (2002). Yönetsel etik ve halkın yönetsel etik oluşumuna etkileri. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26(2): 255-266. google scholar
• Kim, H., Jung, H., Kim, S. Y. (2022). Does politicization influence senior public officials’ work attitudes? Different forms and effects of politicization in the civil service. Public Management Review, 24(7), 11001123. google scholar
• Kuçuradi, I. (2004). Yunus aran birlikteliği konferansı. Felsefe ve Etik, İstanbul, 1-14. google scholar
• Lewis, B. R., & Mitchell, V. W. (1990). Defining and measuring the quality of customer service. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 8(6), 11 - 17. google scholar
• Lewis, C. W., & Gilman, S. C. (2012). The ethics challenge in public service. a problem-solving guide, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. google scholar
• Lewis, D. E. (2008). The politics of presidential appointments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. google scholar
• Linde, J. (2012). Why feed the hand that bites you? perceptions of procedural fairness and system support in post-communist democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 410-434. google scholar
• Marien, S., & Werner, H. (2019). Fair treatment, fair play? the relationship between fair treatment perceptions, political trust and compliant and cooperative attitudes cross-nationally. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 72-95. google scholar
• Meyer, D. F. (2018). Predictors of good governance and effective government management: the case of Poland. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 206-217. google scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2016). Civil service laws, merit, politicization, and corruption: The perspective of public officials from five East European countries. Public Administration, 94(4), 1105-1123. google scholar
• Mizrahi, S., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Cohen, N. (2021a). How well do they manage a crisis? the government’s effectiveness during the covid-19 pandemic. Public Administration Review, 1-11. google scholar
• Mizrahi, S., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Cohen, N. (2021b). Drivers of trust in emergency organizations networks: The role of readiness, threat perceptions and participation in decision making. Public Management Review, 23(2), 233-253. google scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Roberts, A. S. (2010). The triumph of loyalty over competence: The Bush administration and the exhaustion of the politicized presidency. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 572-581. google scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2007). Truth in government and the politicization of public service advice. Public Administration, 85(3), 569-586. google scholar
• OECD, (2000). Trust in government ethics measures in oecd countries. Paris. https://www.oecd.org/gov/ ethics/48994450.pdf (27.12.2021) google scholar
• Öktem, K. & Ömürgönülşen U. (2005, November). Kamu yönetiminde etık çalışmalarına yönelik genel bir çerçeve arayışı. Siyasette ve Yönetimde Etik Sempozyumu, Sakarya. 231-237. google scholar
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality, Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40. google scholar
• Peker, Ö. (1996), Toplam kalite yönetimi ve kamu hizmetinde kalite, Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 5(6), 43-57. google scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2013). Politicization: What is it and why should we care?. In Civil servants and politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Peters, G. B., & Pierre, J. (2004). Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective. a quest for control, London: Routledge. google scholar
• Plant, J. F. (2018). Responsibility in public administration ethics. Public Integrity, 20, 33-45. google scholar
• Prasad, R. (2010). Applying Ethics: Modes, Motivesand Levels of Commitment, Shashi Motilal (Ed), Applied ethics and human rights: conceptual analysis and contextual applications. (pp. 3-32). Delhi: Anthem Press, google scholar
• Rha, J. Y. (2012). Customer satisfaction and qualities in public service: an intermediary customer perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 32(12), 1883-1900. google scholar
• Rhee, S. K., & Rha, J. Y. (2009). Public service quality and customer satisfaction: exploring the attributes of service quality in the public sector. The Service Industries Journal, 29(11), 1491-1512. google scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
• Rothstein, B., Samanni, M., & Teorell, J. (2012). Explaining the welfare state: power resources vs. the quality of Government. European Political Science Review, 4(1), 1-28. google scholar
• Rouban, L. (2005). Politicization of the civil service, in G. Peters and J. Pierre (Eds), Handbook of Public Administration. (pp. 310-320), London: Sage. google scholar
• Sezer, Ö. (2008). Kamu hizmetlerinde müşteri vatandaş odaklılık: Türkiye’de kamu hizmeti anlayışı açısından bir değerlendirme. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(8), 147-172. google scholar
• Stâhlberg, K. (1987). The politicization of public administration: notes on the concept, causes and consequences of politicization. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 53(3), 363-382. google scholar
• Suzuki, K., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2021). Is impartiality enough? government impartiality and citizens’ perceptions of public service quality. Governance, 34(3), 727-764. google scholar
• Svara, J. H. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176-183. google scholar
• Svara, J. H., Braga, A., de Lancer, P., Massiah, M., Gilman, S., Ward, J., & Shields, W. (2015). Implementing the ASPA code of ethics: workbook and assessment guide, 1-26. https://www.aspanet.org/ASPADocs/ Membership/Ethics_Assessment_Guide.pdf (14.12.2021) google scholar
• TÜİK (2020). https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr (03.01.2022) google scholar
• TÜİK (2021) https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2020-37210 (03.01.2022) google scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 745-760. google scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G. (2015). Service quality, administrative process, and citizens’ evaluation of local government in the US. Public Management Review, 17(3), 425-442. google scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Citizens’ perceptions of politics and ethics in public administration: A five-year national study of their relationship to satisfaction with services, trust in governance, and voice orientations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 285-305. google scholar
• Walsh, K. (1991). Quality and public services. Public Administration, 69(4), 503-514. google scholar
• Wisniewski, M. (2001). Using SERVQUAL to assess customer satisfaction with public sector services. Managing Service Quality, 11(6), 380-388. google scholar
• Yılmaz, A., & Kılavuz, R. (2002). Türk kamu bürokrasisinin işlemsel sorunları üzerine notlar. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 3(2), 17-31. google scholar
• Yüksel, C. (2006). Kamu yönetiminde etik ve Türk kamu yönetiminde etik hakkında yeni yasal düzenlemeler. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, 64(2), 167-211. google scholar
• Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. google scholar

Atıflar