Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238    Tam Metin (PDF)

Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi

Erdal Eroğlu, Gülçin Tunç, Mine Aydemir Dev

Bu çalışmanın amacı, belediyeler ile STK’lar arasındaki aktif katılım ilişkisinin incelenmesinde kullanılacak yeni bir ölçek geliştirmektir. Yerel düzeyde vatandaş katılımı literatürde farklı yönleriyle ele alınmasına karşın STK üyelerinin belediye karar alma süreçlerine katılım düzeyleri hakkındaki algılarını bütçe sürecine odaklanarak ortaya koymayı hedefleyen bir ölçek mevcut değildir. Yazındaki bu boşluğu doldurmak yönünde, katılım ve bütçeleme süreçleriyle ilgili geniş bir kaynak taraması yapılmış ve bu tarama sonucunda elde edilen girdiler iki boyuttan ve altı maddeden oluşan yeni ölçeğin geliştirilmesinde kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin içerdiği iki boyut, “katılım mekanizmaları” ve “katılım süreci” olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu kararda, seçilen katılım mekanizmaları ile pratikte gerçekleşen katılım süreci arasındaki karşılıklı etkileşime yazında sıklıkla vurgu yapılması etkili olmuştur. Yerel düzeyde vatandaş katılımını tespit etmeye yönelik mevcut ölçeklerin büyük oranda kamudaki yöneticilerin algısını ölçmeye odaklanmış olması dolayısıyla STK’ların algısını elde etmeye yönelen bu çalışmanın vatandaşlar ve belediyeler arasındaki karmaşık katılım ilişkisinin anlaşılmasına katkı yapacağı düşünülmektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Ölçek geliştirme, Aktif katılım, STK’lar, Belediye, Geçerlilik, Güvenilirlik
DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238    Tam Metin (PDF)

Measuring NGOs’ Active Participation in Municipal Decision Making in Turkiye

Erdal Eroğlu, Gülçin Tunç, Mine Aydemir Dev

This study develops a new scale for measuring the active participation relation between municipalities and NGOs. While citizen participation at the local level is a widely explored topic, a scale that aims to get NGO members’ perceptions about their level of participation and focuses on the budgeting process is not available. We carried out an extensive review of the participation and budgeting literature and considered the inputs obtained from this review in developing our two-dimensional and 6-item participation scale. ‘Participation mechanism’ and ‘participation process’ were determined as two dimensions. This was a decision made based on the existence of an emphasis on the interplay between the participation mechanisms used and the participation process actualized in the relevant literature. As existing scales for examining local participation are designed to get data from public officials, we hope that obtaining data from NGOs will enrich our understanding of the complex participatory relationship between citizens and the local administration.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Scale development, Active participation, NGOs, Municipality, Validity, Reliability

PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Arıkboğa, E. (2013). Geçmişten geleceğe büyükşehir belediye modeli. Yerel Politikalar, 3, 48-96. google scholar
  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216-224. google scholar
  • Barnes, M., Newman, J. & Knops A, et al. (2003). Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation. Public Administration, 81(2), 379-99. google scholar
  • Beaumont, J. & Nicholls, W. (2008). Plural governance, participation, and democracy in cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 87-94. google scholar
  • Beckett, J. & King, C. S. (2002). The challenge to improve citizen participation in public budgeting: A discussion. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 14(3), 463-85. google scholar
  • Berner, M. M., Amos, J. M., & Morse, R. S. (2011). What constitutes effective citizen participation in local government? Views from city stakeholders. Public Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 128-63. google scholar
  • Berner, M. (2003). Current practices for involving citizens in local government budgeting: Moving beyond method. Public Administration Quarterly, 27(3-4), 410-32. google scholar
  • Brannan, T. John, P. & Stoker, G. (2006). Active citizenship and effective public services and programmes: How can we know what really works? Urban studies, 43(5-6), 993-1008. google scholar
  • Brenner, N. (2004). Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe, 1960-2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447-88. google scholar
  • Bulut, Y. & Ş. Taniyici. (2006). Representativeness and Attitudes of Municipal Council Members in Turkey: The Case of Erzincan Province. Local Government Studies, 32(4), 413-428. google scholar
  • Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen participation: Models and methods. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(11), 1179-96. google scholar
  • Chandler, D. (2001). Active citizens and the therapeutic state: The role of democratic participation in local government reform. Policy & Politics, 29(1), 3-14. google scholar
  • Cheema, G. S. (2011). Engaging civil society to promote democratic local governance: Emerging trends and policy implications in Asia. Working paper no 7, Swedish International Centre for Local Democracy (ICLD), Visby. google scholar
  • Chen, X., Yu, H., & Yu, F. (2015). What is the optimal number of response alternatives for rating scales? From an information processing perspective. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 3(2), 69-78. Chhotray, V., & Stoker, G. (2009) Governance Theory and Practice A Cross-Disciplinary Approach. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave MacMillan Press. google scholar
  • Chirenje, L. I., Giliba, R. A., & Musamba, E. B. (2013). Local communities’ participation in decision-making processes through planning and budgeting in African countries. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 11(1), 10-16. google scholar
  • Chyung, S. Y., Roberts, K., Swanson, I., et al. (2017). Evidence-based survey design: The use of a midpoint on the Likert scale. Performance Improvement, 56(10), 15-23. google scholar
  • Clark, L. A. & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-19. google scholar
  • Council of Europe (CoE). (2009). Code of Good Practice for Civil Participation in the Decision-Making Process. CONF/PLE (2009) CODE1, Conference of INGOs at its meeting on 1st October 2009, Available at https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/code-of-good-pratice-for-civil--participation-in-the-decision-making-process-en.pdf, (Accessed 21 April 2020). google scholar
  • Cohen, J. & Rogers, J. (1992). Secondary associations and democratic governance. Politics and Society, 20(4), 393-472. google scholar
  • Devas, N. & Grant, U. (2003). Local government decision-making—citizen participation and local accountability: Some evidence from Kenya and Uganda. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 23(4), 307-316. google scholar
  • DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. google scholar
  • Ebdon, C. (2000). The relationship between citizen involvement in the budget process and city structure and culture. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(3), 383-393. google scholar
  • Ebdon, C. (2002). Beyond the public hearing: Citizen participation in the local government budget process. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 14(2), 273-294. google scholar
  • Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. L. (2004). Searching for a role for citizens in the budget process. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(1), 32-49. google scholar
  • Ebdon, C. & Franklin, A. L. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 437-447. google scholar
  • Eroglu, E. and Serbes, H. (2018). Fiscal Autonomy of Sub-Central Governments in Turkey. in M. Rodríguez Bolívar, & M. López Subires (Ed.), Financial Sustainability and Intergenerational Equity in Local Governments (pp. 83-100). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3713-7.ch004. google scholar
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. google scholar
  • Fung, A. (2006). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001) Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5-41. google scholar
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). PrenticeHall. google scholar
  • Heinelt, H. (2013). Introduction: The role perception and behavior of municipal councilors in the changing context of local democracy. Local Government Studies, 39(5), 633-639. google scholar
  • Heper, M., & Keyman, E. F. (1998). Double-faced state: political patronage and the consolidation of democracy in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 34(4), 259-277. google scholar
  • Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of management, 21(5), 967-988. google scholar
  • Ianniello, M. Iacuzzi, S. & Fedele, P., et al. (2019). Obstacles and solutions on the ladder of citizen participation: a systematic review. Public Management Review, 21(1), 21-46. google scholar
  • Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419-436. google scholar
  • Irvin, R. A. & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65. google scholar
  • Jenkins, G. D. & Taber, T. D. (1977). A Monte Carlo study of factors affecting three indices of composite scale reliability. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 62(4), 392-398. google scholar
  • Jessop, B. (2016). Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 8-32. google scholar
  • Jurlina Alibegovic, D., & Slijepcevic, S. (2018). Attitudes towards citizen participation in the local decisionmaking process: A comparative analysis. Drustvena istrazivanja: casopis za opea drustvenapitanja, 27(1), 155-175. google scholar
  • King, C. S., Feltey, K. M. & O’Neill Susel, B. (1998). The question of participation: toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 317-26. google scholar
  • Kissling, C., & Steffek, J. (2008). CSOs and the Democratization of International Governance: Prospects and Problems. In: Steffek, J. Kissling, C. & Nanz, P. (eds) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance-A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave MacMillan Press, 208-18. google scholar
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. google scholar
  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications. google scholar
  • Marien, S., Hooghe, M., & Quintelier, E. (2010). Inequalities in non-institutionalized forms of political participation: A multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies, 58(1), 187-213. google scholar
  • Marquetti, A., Schonerwald da Silva, C. E. & Campbell, A. (2012). Participatory economic democracy in action: Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, 1989-2004. Review ofRadical Political Economics, 44(1), 62-81. google scholar
  • Michels, A. & De Graaf, L. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477-491. google scholar
  • Novy. A., & Leubolt, B. (2005). Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: Social innovation and the dialectical relationship of state and civil society. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2023-2036. google scholar
  • Organisation For Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2001). Citizens as Partners-OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policymaking. Paris, OECD Publications Service. google scholar
  • Orbista, C. (2012). NGOs Participation in Local Governance in the Philippines. MA Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. google scholar
  • Orosz, J. F. (2002). Views from the field: Creating a place for authentic citizen participation in budgeting. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 14(3), 423-44. google scholar
  • Pandeya, G. P. (2015). Does citizen participation in local government decision-making contribute to strengthening local planning and accountability systems? an empirical assessment of stakeholders’ perceptions in Nepal. International Public Management Review, 16(1), 67-98. google scholar
  • Petrova, T. (2011). Citizen participation in local governance in Eastern Europe: Rediscovering a strength of civil society in the post-socialist world? Europe-Asia Studies, 63(5), 757-787. google scholar
  • Posner, P. WB (2004). Local democracy and the transformation of popular participation in Chile. Latin American Politics and Society, 46(3), 55-81. google scholar
  • Pratchett, L. (2004). Local autonomy, local democracy and the ‘new localism’. Political studies, 52(2), 358-375. google scholar
  • Rios, A. M., Bastida, F. & Benito, B. (2016). Budget transparency and legislative budgetary oversight: An international approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(5), 546-568. google scholar
  • Rivenbark, W. C., & Kelly, J. M. (2006). Performance budgeting in municipal government. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(1), 35-46. google scholar
  • R0İseland, A. & Vabo, S. I. (2015). Interactive - or counteractive - governance? Lessons learned about citizen participation and political leadership, In: ECPR General Conference, Montreal, 26-29th August 2015. google scholar
  • Sarıbay, A.Y. 1997. Türkiye’de Demokrasi ve Sivil Toplum. Liberal Düşünce, 32-43. google scholar
  • Sener, T. (2014). Civic and political participation of women and youth in Turkey: An examination of perspectives of public authorities and NGOs. Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), 69-81. google scholar
  • Shah, A., & Shen, C. (2007). Citizen-centric performance budgeting at the local level. In: Shah A (ed) Local Budgeting. Washington D.C.: The World Bank Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series, 151178. google scholar
  • Simmons, R. (2001). Questionnaires. In: N. Gilbert (ed) Researching Social Life. London: Sage Publications, 85-104. google scholar
  • Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164-178. google scholar
  • S0rensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2007). Introduction: Governance network research- Towards a second generation. In: S0rensen, E. & Torfing, J. (eds) Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave MacMillan Press, 1-21. google scholar
  • Steffek, J. & Nanz, P. (2008). Emergent Patterns of Civil Society Participation in Global and European Governance. In: Steffek, J., Kissling, C. & Nanz, P. (eds) Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance-A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave MacMillan Press, 1-29. google scholar
  • Swyngedouw, E. (1992). Territorial organization and the space/technology nexus. Transactions of the Institute ofBritish Geographers, 17(4), 417-433. google scholar
  • Tekeli, İ. (2017). Katılımcı Demokrasi ve Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları. Sosyal Demokrasi Derneği Yayınları. google scholar
  • Toprak, Z. (2011). Yerel Yönetimlerde Başkanın Politik Lider Rolü. Journal ofIstanbul University Law Faculty, 69(1-2), 299-315. google scholar
  • Tsang, S., Royse, C. F., & Terkawi, A. S. (2017). Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi Journal ofAnaesthesia, 11(1), 80-89. google scholar
  • Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411-427. google scholar
  • Veltmeyer, H. (2008). Civil society and local development. Interaçoes Campo Grande, 9(2), 229-243. google scholar
  • Weber, P. S., Weber, J. E., Sleeper, B. R., & Schneider, K. L. (2004). Self-efficacy toward service, civic participation, and the business student: Scale development and validation. Journal of business ethics, 49(4), 359-369. google scholar
  • Weijters, B., Cabooter. E. & Schillewaert, N. (2010) The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels. International, Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 236-247. google scholar
  • White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1), 6-15. google scholar
  • Yabanci, B. (2019). Turkey’s tamed civil society: Containment and appropriation under a competitive authoritarian regime. Journal of Civil Society, 15(4): 285-306. google scholar
  • Yang, K. (2005). Explaining citizen involvement efforts: SES, institutions, & managerial behavior, In: Public Management Research Association Conference. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download ?doi=10.1.1.509.6966&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Accessed 15 April 2020). google scholar
  • Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2005). Assessing citizen involvement efforts by local governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(2), 191-216. google scholar
  • Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 249-264. google scholar
  • Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes? Public Administration Review, 71(6), 880-92. google scholar
  • Zhang, Y., & Liao, Y. (2011). Participatory budgeting in local government: Evidence from New Jersey municipalities. Public Performance and Management Review, 35(2), 281-302. google scholar
  • Zhang, Y., & Yang, K. (2009). Citizen participation in the budget process: The effect of city managers. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21(2), 289-317. google scholar
  • Zittel, T., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Introduction: Democratic reform and political participation. In: Zittel, T. & Fuchs, D. (eds) Participatory Democracy and Political Participation: Can Participatory Engineering Bring Citizens Back In? London and New York: Routledge, 1-5. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Eroğlu, E., Tunç, G., & Aydemir Dev, M. (2023). Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 32(1), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238


AMA

Eroğlu E, Tunç G, Aydemir Dev M. Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences. 2023;32(1):35-56. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238


ABNT

Eroğlu, E.; Tunç, G.; Aydemir Dev, M. Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 32, n. 1, p. 35-56, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Eroğlu, Erdal, and Gülçin Tunç and Mine Aydemir Dev. 2023. “Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 32, no. 1: 35-56. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238


Chicago: Humanities Style

Eroğlu, Erdal, and Gülçin Tunç and Mine Aydemir Dev. “Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 32, no. 1 (Sep. 2024): 35-56. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238


Harvard: Australian Style

Eroğlu, E & Tunç, G & Aydemir Dev, M 2023, 'Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi', Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 35-56, viewed 12 Sep. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Eroğlu, E. and Tunç, G. and Aydemir Dev, M. (2023) ‘Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi’, Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 32(1), pp. 35-56. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238 (12 Sep. 2024).


MLA

Eroğlu, Erdal, and Gülçin Tunç and Mine Aydemir Dev. “Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, 2023, pp. 35-56. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238


Vancouver

Eroğlu E, Tunç G, Aydemir Dev M. Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences [Internet]. 12 Sep. 2024 [cited 12 Sep. 2024];32(1):35-56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238 doi: 10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238


ISNAD

Eroğlu, Erdal - Tunç, Gülçin - Aydemir Dev, Mine. “Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Karar Alma Süreçlerine STK’ların Aktif Katılımının Ölçülmesi”. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 32/1 (Sep. 2024): 35-56. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2023.32.1180238



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim26.09.2022
Kabul24.01.2023
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma03.03.2023

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.