Referanslar

• Abrahamsson, S., & Danyi, E. (2018). Becoming stronger by becoming weaker: The hunger strike as a mode of doing politics. Journal of International Relations andDevelopment, 22(4), 882-898. google scholar
• Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International practices. International Theory 3(1), 1-36. google scholar
• Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Arı T. & Gökpınar F. B. (2020). Climate-Migration: A security analysis within the context of green theory. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 17(68), 41-53. google scholar
• Ashley, Richard K. (1984). The poverty of neorealism. International Organization 38(2), 225-286. google scholar
• Auer, M. R. (2000). Who participates in global environmental governance? Partial answers from international relations theory. Policy Sciences 33(2), 155-80. google scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg A. (2014). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Brighton: Harvester Press. google scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2008)[1986]. Dialectic: The pulse offreedom. London: Routledge. google scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2009). Scientific realism and human emancipation. London: Routledge. google scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2013)[1975]. A realist theory of science. London: Routledge. google scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (2016). Enlightened common sense: The philosophy of critical realism. Routledge. google scholar
• Bhaskar, R. & Danermark B. (2006). Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: a critical realist perspective. Scandinavian Journal ofDisability Research 8(4), 278-297. google scholar
• Bhaskar, R., Cheryl F., Parker J., Heyer, K. G. (2010). Interdisciplinarity and Climate Change: Transforming Knowledge and Practice for Our Global Future. Taylor & Francis. google scholar
• Bir, B. (2020). Global Climate Strikes, Environmental Protests in 2020. Anadolu Ajansı. Retrieved from https:// www.aa.com.tr/en/environment/global-climate-strikes-environmental-protests-in-2020/2082982. google scholar
• Brototi, R., & Martinez-Alier J. (2019). Environmental justice movements in India: an analysis of the multiple manifestations of violence. Ecology, Economy and Society—the INSEE Journal 2(1), 77-92. google scholar
• Brown, O. (2008). Migration and climate. Geneva: International Organization for Migration. google scholar
• Building Bridges Collective. (2010). Space for movement?: Reflections from Bolivia on climate justice, social movements and the state. Leeds: Footprint Workers Co-op. google scholar
• Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40(4), 519-531. google scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. London: Routledge. google scholar
• Campbell, D. (1998). National deconstruction: Violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
• Carlsnaes, W. (1992). The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis. International Studies Quarterly 36(3), 245-270. google scholar
• Corpwatch. (2020). Our History. Retrieved from https://corpwatch.org/node/4?id=11314. google scholar
• Danermark, B., Ekstrom, M., Jakobsen, L. (2005). Explaining society: An introduction to critical realism in the social sciences. London and New York: Routledge. google scholar
• Dessler, D. (1989). What’s at stake in the agent-structure debate? International Organization 43(3), 441-73. google scholar
• Doty, R. L. (1999). A reply to Colin Wight. European Journal of International Relations 5(3), 387-390. google scholar
• Doty, R. L. (1997). Aporia: a critical exploration of the agent-structure problematique in international relations theory. European Journal ofInternational Relations 3(3), 365-92. google scholar
• Dyer, W., & Williams, M. (2021). Quantification and realist methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 24(1), 109-121. google scholar
• Fletcher, A. J. (2017). Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. International journal of social research methodology 20(2), 181-194. google scholar
• Giacomini, T., & Turner, T. (2015). The 2014 people’s climate march and flood wall street civil disobedience: making the transition to a post-fossil capitalist, commoning civilization. Capitalism Nature Socialism 26(2), 27-45. google scholar
• Giddens, A. (1997). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. Cambridge: Polity Press. google scholar
• Grygiel, J. J. (2018). Return of the barbarians: Confronting non-state actors from ancient Rome to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Hartwig, M. (Ed.) (2015) Dictionary of Critical Realism. Routledge. google scholar
• Hastings, C. (2021). A critical realist methodology in empirical research: foundations, process, and payoffs. Journal of Critical Realism 20(5), 458-473. google scholar
• Hoddy, E. T. (2019). Critical realism in empirical research: employing techniques from grounded theory methodology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22(1), 111-124. google scholar
• Hu, X. (2018). Methodological implications of critical realism for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Critical Realism 17(2), 118-139. google scholar
• Kolasi, K. (2020). Postyapısalcılığın söylemsel ontolojisinin eleştirisi: uluslararası ilişkilerde söylem dışı alan ve eleştirel gerçekçilik. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 17(65), 83-100. google scholar
• Martiskainen, M., Axon, S., Sovacool, B.K., Sareen, S., Dylan F. D. R., Axon K. (2020). “Contextualizing climate justice activism: Knowledge, emotions, motivations, and actions among climate strikers in six cities.” Global Environmental Change 65,102180. google scholar
• Mbow C., Pörtner, H.O., Reisinger A., Canadell J., O’Brien P. (2017). Special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems (SR2). Geneva: IPCC. google scholar
• Mingers, J, & Standing, C. (2017). Why things happen: Developing the critical realist view of causal mechanisms. Information and Organization 27(3), 171-189. google scholar
• Mohai, P., D., Pellow, J., Roberts, T. (2009) Environmental justice. Annual review of environment and resources 34 (2009), 405-430. google scholar
• Noyes, D. (2018) Blaming the polish plumber: Phantom agents, invisible workers, and the liberal arena. Journal ofInternational Relations and Development 22(4), 853-81. google scholar
• Porpora, D.V. (1989). Four concepts of social structure . Journal for the Theory ofSocial Behaviour 19(2),195-211. google scholar
• Porpora, D.V. (2015). Reconstructing sociology: The critical realist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Princen, T., & Finger M. (1994). Environmental NGO’s in World Politics: Linking the Local and the Global. London: Routledge. google scholar
• Reed, M. (2005). Reflections on the ‘realist turn’in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies 42(8), 1621-1644. google scholar
• Reitan, R, and Gibson S. (2012).Climate change or social change? environmental and leftist praxis and participatory action research. Globalizations 9(3), 395-410. google scholar
• Ringmar, E. (2019). The problem with performativity: comments on the contributions. Journal ofInternational Relations and Development 22(4), 899-908. google scholar
• RisingUp. (2018). Extinction rebellion occupy greenpeace offices. Retrieved from https://risingup.org.uk/ extinction-rebellion-occupy-greenpeace-offices. google scholar
• Sinn, H.W. (2012). The Green Paradox: A Supply-Side Approach to Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. google scholar
• Tollefson, J. (2019). The hard truths of climate change- by the numbers. Nature. Retrieved from https://www. nature.com/immersive/d41586-019-02711-4/index.html. google scholar
• Ülman, B., Balta-Peker, E., Ağcan, M.A. (2011) “Uluslararası” fikri, epistemolojik yanılgı ve eleştirel gerçekliğin imkânları. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 8(30), 15-41. google scholar
• Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw Hill. google scholar
• Weber, C. (1998). Performative states. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27(1), 77-95. google scholar
• Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization 46(2), 391-425. google scholar
• Wendt, A. (1987). The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization 41(3), 335-70. google scholar
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: University Press. google scholar
• Wendt, A. (2004). The state as person in international theory. Review ofInternational Studies 30(2), 289-316. google scholar
• Westra, L. (2013). Environmental justice and the rights of ecological refugees. London: Earthscan. google scholar
• Weyler, R. (2019) Extinction and rebellion. Greenpeace International. Retrieved from: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/22058/extinction-and-rebellion/. google scholar
• Wight, C. (1999). They shoot dead horses don’t they?: Location agency in Agent-structure problematique. European Journal ofInternational Relations 5(1), 109-42. google scholar
• Wight, C. (2000). Interpretation all the way down?: A reply Roxanne Lynn Doty.” European Journal of International Relations 6(3),423-30. google scholar
• Wight, C. (2004). State agency: social action without human activity?. Review of International Studies 30(2), 269-280. google scholar
• Wight, C. (2006). Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Wolfers, A. (1965). Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. google scholar
• Yalvaç, F. (2012). Uluslararası ilişkiler teorisindeki temel tartışmalar ve eleştirel gerçekçilik. In T. Arı (Ed.) Uluslararası İlişkilerde Postmodern Analizler, Bursa: MKM. google scholar
• Zibechi, R. (2010) Dispering power: social movements as anti-state forces. Edinburgh: AK Press. google scholar

Atıflar