CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/B/SS07.2021.002.11   IUP :10.26650/B/SS07.2021.002.11    Full Text (PDF)

Digital Public Relations and The Transformation of Identities

Hatice Burcu Önder Memiş

As digitalization has led to the transformation of many fields, it has also played a key role in the evolution of public relations. In particular, the fact that social media facilitates direct communication with institutions, managers, and other identities without the need for any other intermediary is among the main factors influencing this transformation. Digitalization has changed the target groups. Target groups now have more access to information. The information flowing through many channels has increased the abilities of individuals to question, research, learn the reasons, think critically, challenge, give immediate feedback, and react. The diversity of thoughts that emerges in the face of events has allowed the intensification of comparisons, reasoning and sharing them in all kinds of digital media. Thus, a virtual environment has been created in which individuals can come together and discuss their ideas freely and share their different interpretations or new information immediately. These virtual environments are as effective for communication as the environments where individuals are physically next to each other. At times, they help facilitate the physical gatherings of many people as in the case of popular uprisings in the Middle East and Egypt. Another significant aspect of digital platforms is the assumption that such digital platforms, as well as anything posted on such platforms, have the potential to transform the identity of individuals. Today, individuals tend to define themselves and who they are through knowledge sharing, posts, and feedback, in addition to their standing and attitudes towards an issue on such platforms. What does this mean for public relations? As a matter of course, the first answer to this question is to meet the target groups of these new identities in the right digital platforms and convey the right messages in these environments. Thus, the information needs of target audiences with new identities are met through the right platforms. At the same time, public relations also find the opportunity to reach the symmetrical communication it aims to achieve.



References

  • Aka, A. (2010). Kimliğe Teorik Yaklaşımlar, C.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [C. Ü. Journal of Social Science], 34(1), 17-24. google scholar
  • Aksu, H. (2018). Dijitopya Dijital Dönüşüm ve Yolculuk Rehberi [Guide of Digitopia Digital Transformation and Journey]. İstanbul, Turkey: Pusula 20 Teknoloji ve Yayıncılık A.Ş. google scholar
  • Alikılıç, A. Ö. (2011). Halkla İlişkiler 2.0 Sosyal Medyada Yeni Paydaşlar, Yeni Teknikler [Public Relations 2.0 New Stakeholders, New Techniques on Social Media]. Ankara, İstanbul: Efil Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Aiello, W., Lodha, S. & Ostrovsky, R. (1998). Fast Digital Identity Revocation, In Annual International Cryptology Conference, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 137-152. google scholar
  • Atılgan, F. (2020). Sosyal Medya Pazarlaması ve Tüketici Satın Alma Değişkenleri İlişkisi, Sosyal Kimlik ve Algılanan Değerin Aracılık Rolü Üzerine Bir Araştırma [A Survey Research on the Relationship Between Social Media Marketing and Consumers’ Buying Behaviour, the Mediating Roles of Social Identity and Perceived Value], Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8 (2), 1892-1921. google scholar
  • Avcıoğlu, G. Ş. (2011). Yapısal Kimlikten Seçilmiş Kimliğe Kimliğin Medya Aracılığıyla Yeniden Üretimi [From structural identity to elective identity; reproduction of identity through the media], Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi [Journal of International Human Science], 8, 359-370. google scholar
  • Aydınalp, I. G. Ş. (2013). Sosyal Medyaya Halkla İlişkiler Perspektifinden Eleştirel Bir Bakış [A critical View to Social Media from Public Relations Perspective]. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication TOJDAC, 3(4), 1-11. google scholar
  • Bayazıt Şahinoğlu, Z. (2009). Postmodern Tüketim ve Moda Satın Alma Davranışı: Türk Moda Tüketicilerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma [Postmodern Consumption and Trend Buying Behaviour: A Research on Turkish Trend Consumers], (Doctoral dissertation, Marmara University, Istanbul). google scholar
  • Bhattacharya, C. B. & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer Company Identification: A Framework For Understanding Consumers’ Relationships With Companies, Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76-88. google scholar
  • Bauman, Z. (2006). Küreselleşme (2nd ed.) [Globalisaiton], İstanbul, Turkey: Ayrıntı Yayınları. google scholar
  • Bocock, R. (1997). Tüketim [Conspumtion] (İ. Kutluk, Trans.). Ankara, Turkey: Dost Kitabevi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Birch, D. (2016). Kimlik: Yeni Para [Identity: New Money] (A. Usta, Trans.). İstanbul, Turkey: Mediacat Yayınları. google scholar
  • Castells, M. (2008). Enformasyon Çağı: Ekonomi, Toplum ve Kültür Kimliğin Gücü (2nd ed.) [Information Age: Power of Economy, Society and Culture Identitiy]. Istanbul, Turkey: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Çankaya, M. N. (2010). Dijital Pazarlama Trendleri [Digital Marketing Trends]. İstanbul, Turkey: MediaCat ve Dijital Age. google scholar
  • Durdu, Z. (2013). Kimliğin Dönüşümü ve Kültürel Küreselleşme [Transformation of Identity and Globalization], The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies International Journal of Social Science, 6(7), 345-365. google scholar
  • Dursun, Ö. Ö. & Barut, E. (2016). Sosyal Medyanın Yeni Sorunsalı: Sanal Kimlikler [New Research Question of Social Media: Virtial Identities]. In A. İşman, H. F. Odabaşı & B. Akkoyunlu (Eds.), Eğitimde Teknoloji Okumaları [Technology Readings in Education] (pp. 535-552). Ankara, Turkey: Salmat Basım Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Fırat, F. (1995). Consumer Culture or Culture Consumed?, In J. A Costa & G. J. Bamoasy (Eds.), USA-CA: Thousand Oaks- Sage. google scholar
  • Fırat, A. F. & Schultz, C. J. (2001). Preliminary Metric Investigations Into The Nature Of The Postmodern Consumer, Marketing Letters, 12(2), 33-45. google scholar
  • Fichter, J. (1994). Sosyoloji Nedir? [What is Sociology?] (N. Çelebi, Trans.). Ankara, Turkey: Atilla Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Goffman, E. (2009). Günlük Yaşamda Benliğin Sunumu [Presentation of the Ego in Daily Life]. (B. Cezar, Trans.). Istanbul, Turkey: Metis Yayınları. google scholar
  • Gifford, J. (2010). Digital Public Relations: E-Marketing’s Big Secret, Continuing Higher Education Review, 74, 62-72. google scholar
  • Güçdemir, Y. (2015). Sanal Ortamda İletişim Bir Halkla İlişkiler Perspektifi (3rd Ed.) [Communicaiton in Virtual Environment A public Relations Perspective]. Istanbul, Turkey: Derin Yayınları. google scholar
  • Güleç, C. (1992). Türkiye’de Kültürel Kimlik Krizi [Cultural Identity Crises in Turkey]. Ankara, Turkey: V Yayınları. google scholar
  • Güvenç, B. (1993). Türk Kimliği [Turkish Identitiy]. Ankara, Turkey: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları. google scholar
  • Hall, S. (2015). Kültürel Kimlik ve Diaspora [Cultural Identity and Diaspora]. In M. A. Yolcu (Ed.), (T. G. Sönmez, Trans.). Diaspora ve Kimlik [Diaspora and Identity] (pp. 133-152). Konya, Turkey: Kömen Yayınları. google scholar
  • Hallahan, K. (2004). Protecting An Organization’s Digital Public Relations Assets, Public Relations Review, 30, 255-268. google scholar
  • Hayta, B. A. (2014). Postmodern Dönemin Tüketim İmajları: Postmodern Tüketim Kültürü, Tüketim Kalıpları ve Postmodern Tüketici [Consumption Images of Postmodern Age: Postmodern Consumption Culture and Consumer], In M. Babaoğul, A. & Şener, E. B. Buğday (Eds.) Tüketici Yazıları IV [Consumer Writings IV]. (pp. 9-31). Ankara, Turkey: TÜPADEM Yayınları. google scholar
  • Kadıoğlu, K. Z. (2013). Kitle İletişim Araçlarının Şekillendirdiği Sosyal Kimlikler ve Aidiyet Duygusu Ekseninde Tüketici Davranışları [Consumer Behaviour Shaped by the Mass Media in the Context of Social Identities and Sense of Belonging], İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi [Istanbul University Journal of Communication Faculty], 45, 101-114. google scholar
  • Kahraman, M. (2004). Günümüzün Büyüsü İmaj ve Gerçek Hayat [Image of Today’s Sorcery and Real Life], Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(30), 1.14. google scholar
  • Kavut, S. (2020). Kimliğin Dönüşümü: Dijital Kimlikler [Transformaiton of Identity: Digital Identities], Selçuk İletişim Dergisi [Journal of Selçuk Communication], 13 (2), 987-1008. google scholar
  • Kılıç, S. & Tok, N. (2013). Çevrecilikte Yeni Bir Kimlik: Ekolojizm, [A New Identity in Environmentalism: Ecologism], Journal of Academic Inquiries, 8(2), 223-250. google scholar
  • Köse, N. & Yengin, D. (2018). Dijital Pazarlamadan Fijital Pazarlamaya Geçişe Örnek Olarak Arttırılmış Gerçeklik ve Sanal Gerçeklik Uygulamalarının Pazarlama Üzerindeki Katkılarının İncelenmesi [Investigation of the Marketing Contribution of the Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Applications as a Sample as a Transition to Phygital Marketing from Digital Marketing], İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Dergisi [Journal of İstanbul Aydın University], 10 (1), 77-111. google scholar
  • Odabaşı, Y. (2013). Tüketim Kültürü (4th Edition) [Consumption Culture]. Istanbul, Turkey: Sistem Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Taylor, C. (2000). Tanınma Politikası [Recognition Policy] In A. Gutman (Ed.). Çok Kültürcülük [Multiculturism]. Istanbul, Turkey: YKY. google scholar
  • Odabaşı, Y. (2006). Tüketim Kültürü [Consumption Culture]. İstanbul, Turkey: Sistem Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Onedio (2019, June 26). Fairy ve TÜDAV İşbirliği ile Gerçekleşen Anlamlı Proje: ‘Balıklar Boğulmasın Sergisi’ [A Meaningful Project by Fairy andTÜDAV: ‘Fish should not get drowned’] [Web page post], Retrieved from https:// onedio.com/haber/fairy-ve-tudav-isbirligi-ile-gerceklesen-anlamli-proje-baliklar-bogulmasin-sergisi-797822 google scholar
  • Orçan, M. (2010). Kentleşme Sürecinde Tüketim Önceliklerinde Meydana Gelen Değişme [Change in Consumption Preferences in Urbanization PŞrocess], Tüketici ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi [Journal of Consumer and Consumption Research], 2 (1), 1-18. google scholar
  • Özel, P. A. & Sert, Y. N. (2015). Dijital Halkla İlişkiler Kavram ve Araçları [Digital Public Relations Concepts and Tools]. Istanbul, Turkey: Derin Yayınları. google scholar
  • Özdemir, Z. (2015). Sosyal Medyada Kimlik İnşasında Yeni Akım: Özçekim Kullanımı [New Trend In Identity Achievement In Social Media: Using Selfies], Maltepe Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi [Maltepe University, Journal of Communication Faculty], 2(1), 112-131. google scholar
  • Özgen, E. (2019). Hedef Kitlenin Dijital Dönüşümü [Digital Transformation of the Target Audience], In E. B. Sarıoğlu (Ed.), Dijital Halkla İlişkiler [Digital Public Relations] (pp. 15-27). Konya, Turkey: Eğitim Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Rheingold, H. (1993). A Slice of Life In My Virtual Community. Global Networks: Computers and International Communication, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. google scholar
  • Scott, S. G. & Lane, V. R. (2000). A Stakeholder Approach To Organizational Identity, Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43-62. google scholar
  • Shavers, B. & Bair, J. (2016). Digital Identity, In Hiding Behind the Keyboard: Uncovering Covert Communication Methods with Forensic Analysis, (pp. 187-202). Cambridge, USA: Syngress. google scholar
  • Slater, D. (1997). Consumer Culture and Modernity. Polity Press: Cambridge. google scholar
  • Shiftdelete. (2019, June 26). “Dizi İzlerken Alış Veriş Yapabileceksiniz!” [You can do shopping while watching serials], [Web page post] Retrieved from https://shiftdelete.net/dizi-izlerken-alisveris-yapabileceksiniz. google scholar
  • Subaşı, N. (2005). Kültürel Kimliğin Melezleşmesi ve Alevi Modernleşmesi Türkiye Kültürleri [Centralisaiton of cultural Identity and Turkey Cultures], Ankara, Turkey: Tetragon. google scholar
  • Şengün, S. (2014). Dijital Avatarlar İçin Semiyotik Bir Okuma ve Avatarların Dijital İletişimde Belirsizlik Azaltma Rolleri [A Semiotic Reading for Digital Avatars and Their Roles to Reduce Uncertainty in Digital Communicaiton], Dijital İletişim Etkisi Uluslararası Akademik Konferansı Bildiri Kitabı [Proceedings of the Digital Communicaiton Effect International Academic Conference], (pp. 33-44). Istanbul, Turkey: İskenderiye Kitap. google scholar
  • Yıldız, S. (2007). Kimlik ve Ulusal Kimlik Kavramlarının Toplumsal Niteliği [Social Quality of Identity and National Identity], Milli Folklor, 74, 9-16. google scholar


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.