CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/PB/SS10.2019.001.028   IUP :10.26650/PB/SS10.2019.001.028    Full Text (PDF)

Strategic Investment Incentives: Turkish Case

Canatay HacıköylüZeynep Karal Önder

The three main instruments of fiscal policy are tax, expenditure and debt. An example of fiscal policy in terms of expenditure is state aids, which is frequently used by an intervention of the state. State aid is a concept that includes expressions such as the incentive and support measure, which is common in daily language.The state aid is determined support given to the production of certain goods and services to a specific region, sector, business or group of enterprises by using public resources.

In Turkey, in addition to the support given in previous years, strategic investment incentives started to be implemented in 2012 with 3305 No. “Decisions About State Aid for Investment”. Strategic investment incentives are a spending policy aimed at reducing the current account deficit and eliminating import dependency in the long run, which is applied to products with high import dependency.

This study aims to explore the impact of strategic investment incentive system on investments by examining the strategic investment practices regarding 3305 No. “Decisions About State Aid for Investment”.66.503 incentive certificates were issued between 2012 and 2015, of which only 48 are strategic investment incentives. On the other hand, 13%(138.8 billion TL) of the total capital incentive of 1 trillion TL is strategic investmnet incentives. In this context, within the scope of strategic investment incentives(2012-2018), a survey will be carried out with 48 enterprises. The survey included effects of incentives on investors, operation and result of strategic investment incentive system, suggestions. As a result, policy implication will be presented about the applicability of the strategic investment incentive system and whether the tax advantages have reached their goal.


JEL Classification : H32 , H50

References

  • Babaoğlu, B. (2005). Türkiye’de Cari işlemler Dengesi Sürdürülebililiği, D. S. Böke, Ed., (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Ankara. google scholar
  • Boratav, K. (2005). Türkiye İktisat Tarihi 1908-2002, Ankara, İmge Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Boratav, K. (2010). Emperyalizm, Sosyalizm ve Türkiye, İstanbul, Yordam Kitap. google scholar
  • Ekonomi Bakanlığı. (2012). Girdi Tedarik Stratejisi (GİTES) ve Eylem Planı, Ankara, Ekonomi Bakanlığı. google scholar
  • Ekonomi Bakanlığı. (2012). Yeni Teşvik Sistemi-Yatırımlarda Devlet Yardımları, İstanbul, T.C. Ekonomi Bakanlığı-Teşvik Uygulama ve Yabancı Sermaye Genel Müdürlüğü, Nisan 06. google scholar
  • Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. (2019). Yatırım Teşvik Sistemi-Yatırımlarda Devlet Yardımları. Ankara, Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. google scholar
  • Ekonomi Bakanlığı. (2012). Girdi Tedarik Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı (2013-2015), Ankara, T.C. Ekonomi Bakanlığı. google scholar
  • TCMB. (2019). Ödemeler Dengesi İstatistikleri-Metaveri, Retrieved from Ödemeler Dengesi İstatistikleri: https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/TR/TCMB+TR/Main+Menu /Istatistikler/Odemeler+Dengesi+ve+Ilgili+Istatistikler/Odemeler+Dengesi+Istatistikleri/. google scholar
  • TUİK. (2019). Dış Ticaret İstatistikleri, Retrieved from Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu: http://www. tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1046, Şubat 20. google scholar
  • YASED. (2011). Türkiye’nin Cari Açığı: Makro ve Mikro Açıdan Nedenleri ve Çözüm Önerileri, İstanbul, YASED. google scholar


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.