CHAPTER

DOI :10.26650/B/SS10.2021.013.28   IUP :10.26650/B/SS10.2021.013.28    Full Text (PDF)

Analysis of Asymmetric Effect on Health Expenditures of Income With Panel Data Models

Ferda Yerdelen Tatoğlu

In the literature, many analyses have been conducted on the effect of income on health expenditures. This effect is considered to be symmetrical in most of these studies. According to the results of the symmetric regression model, a one-unit increase or decrease in the independent variable has the same effect on the dependent variable. However, according to asymmetric theory, an equivalent increase or decrease of an independent variable can affect the dependent variable at different rates, or cause asymmetrical behavior in response.

After 2010, studies were conducted using cross-sectional and time series data to estimate the asymmetric model. Asymmetry has been discussed by Chamlin and Cochran (1998), with the non-linear autoregressive moving average (ARIMA) model, and by Shin et al. (2014), with the non-linear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model. Asymmetric studies with panel data are more recent. The panel NARDL model was first discussed by Salisu and Isah (2017). Conversely, studies about asymmetry in panel data regression models emerged after York and Light’s (2017) study. York and Light (2017) used the first difference model to estimate asymmetric panel data models and determined efficient estimators using robust standard errors. Allison (2019) proposed the generalized least squared (GLS) method to estimate this model and demonstrated that the GLS estimator produced unbiased and efficient estimators. According to this method, variables exhibiting asymmetric behavior are divided into positive and negative components, and, using these variables, the first difference regression model is estimated using ordinary least squares (OLS) with robust standard errors or GLS.

In this study, gross domestic product (GDP), life expectancy at birth (mean life expectancy) (LE) to represent technological progress, and the ratio of the population over 65 to the total population (AGE) were used as determinants of health expenditures (HE). Data for 44 countries between 2000 and 2018 were used. The data for all variables were obtained from the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) database. Firstly, the presence of individual effects and whether they were correlated with the independent variables was tested. After determining that there is an individual effect that is correlated with the independent variables, an F test was used to Both variables increase healthcare costs by increasing both the cost of care and the demand for medical treatments and research and development expenditures for the healthcare sector. A positive relationship between the aging population and public expenditures has been reported by Burner et al. (1992), Getzen (1992), Seshamani and Gray (2004), Yang et al. (2003), Lee and Miller (2002), Sanz and Velazquez (2007), and Sorensen (2013). determine whether  there the effect of income on HE was asymmetrical. If the effect of income on HE is found to be asymmetrical, this indicates that HE responds less to a decrease in income than to increase in income. Similar results in the literature have been reported by Parkin et al. (1987), Di-Matteo (2003), Freeman (2003), Dreger and Reimers (2005), Sen (2005), Costa-i Font et al. (2009), Baltagi and Moscone (2010), Moscone and Tosetti (2010), Ke et al. (2011), Farag et al. (2012), Acemoglu et al. (2013), Murthy and Okunade (2016), and Kouassi et al. (2018). A possible theoretical justification for the asymmetric effect of changes in income on HE may be demand irreversibility. According to this theory, consumers are less responsive to decreases than increases in income. When future prices and therefore expenditures are uncertain, price increases will cause individuals to increase healthcare expenditures (Maynard and Subramaniam, 2015). However, a similar effect is not observed in income decreases. Under this hypothesis, health demand will be more elastic given an increase in income. In addition, the inability of the government to make rapid policy changes, especially during economic crises, may be another reason for the asymmetric effect of income on HE. Since the income elasticity of HE is less than one, health services are considered a necessity and not a luxury. In addition, the effects of the population over 65 years of age and life expectancy at birth were found to be positive. Over the last 30 years, a decrease in the fertility rate has led to an increase in the life expectancy of the aging population, changes, and innovations in health services, and an improvement in living conditions, especially those of elderly individuals (such as Zweifel and Ferrari (1992), and Iliman and Tekeli (2017)). Both variables increase healthcare costs by increasing both the cost of care and the demand for medical treatments and research and development expenditures for the healthcare sector. A positive relationship between the aging population and public expenditures has been reported by Burner et al. (1992), Getzen (1992), Seshamani and Gray (2004), Yang et al. (2003), Lee and Miller (2002), Sanz and Velazquez (2007), and Sorensen (2013).

The findings of this study indicate that healthcare spending is a necessity rather than a luxury. Therefore, policies should be implemented to increase healthcare expenditures in the countries in which healthcare expenditures are less than the OECD average. In recent years, the life expectancy at birth worldwide and the elderly population have increased. More attention should be paid to issues such as the development of innovative healthcare policies for the elderly, such as home care, healthcare, and public services.

DOI :10.26650/B/SS10.2021.013.28   IUP :10.26650/B/SS10.2021.013.28    Full Text (PDF)

Gelirin Sağlık Harcamaları Üzerindeki Asimetrik Etkisinin Panel Veri Modelleri ile Analizi

Ferda Yerdelen Tatoğlu

Gelirin sağlık harcamaları üzerindeki etkisi birçok analize konu olmuş ve yapılan çalışmaların çok büyük bir kısmında bu etkinin simetrik olduğu düşünülerek sonuçlar elde edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Ekonometride genel kullanım alanı olan simetrik regresyon model sonuçlarına göre, bir bağımsız değişkendeki bir birimlik artış ile azalışın bağımlı değişkende yarattığı etkinin yönü farklı olsa da şiddeti aynıdır. Oysa asimetrik teoriye göre, bir bağımsız değişkenin aynı miktardaki artış ve azalışı bağımlı değişkeni farklı oranlarda etkileyebilmektedir, bir başka ifade ile asimetrik davranış sergileyebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, 2000-2018 döneminde 44 ülke için sağlık harcamalarının gelir esnekliğinin asimetrik davranış gösterip göstermediği incelenmiştir. Bu nedenle simetriklik varsayımı, artan gelirin sağlık harcamaları üzerindeki etkisinin düşen gelirin etkisinden farklı olup olmadığını araştırmak için esnetilmiştir. Sonuçlar, gelirdeki pozitif şokların sağlık harcamalarını negatif şoklardan fazla etkilediğini yani etkinin asimetrik olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca sağlık harcamalarının gelir esnekliği birden küçük çıkmıştır, bu durum sağlık harcamalarının lüks değil gereklilik olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmasını sağlamaktadır.

References

• Acemoğlu, D., Finkelstein, A., & Matthew, J. N. (2013). Income and health spending: evidence from oil price shocks. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1079-1095. google scholar
• Allison, P. D., (2019). Asymmetric fixed-effects models for panel data. Socius, 5, 1-12. google scholar
• Baker, L. C., & Wheeler, S. K. (2000). Managed care and technology diffusion the case of MRI. Health Affairs, 17, 195-207. google scholar
• Baltagi, B. H., & Moscone, F. (2010). Health care expenditure and income in the OECD reconsidered: Evidence from panel data. Economic Modelling, 27, 804-811. google scholar
• Barati, M., & Fariditavana, H. (2018). Asymmetric effect of income on the US healthcare expenditure: evidence from the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Empirical Economics, 1-30. google scholar
• Baumol, W. J. (1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review, 57, 415-426. google scholar
• Blomqvist, A. G., & Carter, R. (1997). Is health care really a luxury? Journal of Health Economics, 16, 207-229. google scholar
• Burner, T. S., Waldo, D. R., & McKusik, D. R., (1992). “National health expenditures projections through 2030”, Health Care Financing Review, 14, 1-29, google scholar
• Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L. (2005). Health care expenditure and GDP: Are they broken stationary?, Journal of Health Economics, 24(5), 839-854. google scholar
• Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran J. K. (1998). Causality, Economic Conditions, and Burglary. Criminology, 36, 425-40. google scholar
• Chen, W. Okunade, A., & Lubiani, G. G. (2014). Quality-quantity decomposition of income elasticity of US hospital care expenditure using state-level panel data. Health Economics, 23(11), 1340-1352. google scholar
• Costa-i, F. J., Gemmill, M., & Rubert, G. (2009). Revisiting the health care luxury good hypothesis: aggregation, precision, and publication biases?, Health, econometrics and data group WP. The University of York, UK, 1-32. google scholar
• Culyer, A. J. (1988). Health care expenditures in Canada: Myth and reality; past and future (Canadian Tax Paper), Canadian Tax Foundation google scholar
• Di-Matteo, L. & Di-Matteo, R. (1998). Evidence on the determinants of canadian provincial government health expenditures: 1965-1991. Journal ofHealth Economics, 17, 211-228. google scholar
• Di-Matteo, L. (2003). The income elasticity of health care spending: A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches. The European Journal ofHealth Economics, 4, 20-29. google scholar
• Dreger, C., & Reimers, H. E. (2005). Health care expenditures in OECD countries: A panel unit root and cointegration analysis. International Journal ofApplied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 2, 5-20. google scholar
• Farag, M., NandaKumar, A., Wallack, S., Hodgkin, D., Gaumer, G., & Erbil, C. (2012). The income elasticity of health care spending in developing and developed countries. International Journal ofHealth Care Finance and Economics, 12, 145-162. google scholar
• Freeman, D. G. (2003). Is health care a necessity or a luxury? Pooled estimates of income elasticity from US state-level data. Applied Economics, 35(5), 495-502. google scholar
• French, D. (2012). Causation between health and income: A need to panic. Empirical Economics, 42, 583-601. google scholar
• Gbesemete, K. P. & Gerdtham, U. G. (1992). Determinants of health care expenditure in Africa: A cross-sectional study. World Development, 20(2), 303-308. google scholar
• Gerdtham, U. G, S0gaard, J., Andersson, F., & Jönsson, B. (1992). An econometric analysis of health care expenditure: a cross-section study of the OECD countries. Journal of HealthEconomics, 11 (1), 63-84. google scholar
• Gerdtham, U. G., & Löthgren, M. (2000). On stationarity and cointegration of international health expenditure and GDP. Journal ofHealth Economics, 19(4), 461-475. google scholar
• Gerdtham, U. G., & Löthgren, M. (2002). New panel results on cointegration of international health expenditure and GDP. Applied Economics, 34, 1679-1686. google scholar
• Getzen, T. E. (1992), Population ageing and growth of health expenditures. Journal of Gerontology; Social Sciences, 47, 97-108. google scholar
• Getzen, T. E. (2000). Health care is an individual necessity and a national luxury: applying multilevel decision models to the analysis of health care expenditures, Journal ofHealth Economics, 19(2), 259-270. google scholar
• Getzen, T. E., & Okunade, A. A. (2017). Symposium introduction: papers on ‘modeling national health expenditures. Health Economics, 26(7), 827-833. google scholar
• Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80, 223-255. google scholar
• Hall R., & Jones, C. (2007). The value of life and the rise in health spending. Quarterly Journal ofEconomics, 122(1), 39-72. google scholar
• Halıcı-Tülüce, N. S., Doğan, İ., & Dumrul, C. (2016). Is income relevant for health expenditure and economic growth nexus? International Journal ofHealth Economics and Management, 16, 23-49. google scholar
• Hansen, P., & King, A. (1996). The determinants of health care expenditure: A cointegration approach. Journal ofHealth Economics, 15, 127-137. google scholar
• Hartwig, J. (2008). What drives health care expenditure? Baumol’s model of ‘unbalanced growth’ revisited, Journal ofHealth Economics, 27(3), 603-623. google scholar
• Hitiris, T., & Posnett, J. (1992). The determinants and effects of health expenditure in developed countries. Journal ofHealth Economics, 11(2), 173-181. google scholar
• Hoffman, C., Rice, D., & Sung, H. Y. (1996). Persons with chronic conditions: their prevalence and costs. JAMA, 276(18), 1473-1479. google scholar
• Iliman, T, & Tekeli, R. (2017). Yaşlılık ve sağlık harcamaları arasındaki ilişki: literatür taraması. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(4), 277-291. google scholar
• İçen, H. (2018). Doğrusal olmayan ARDL yaklaşımı ile eşbütünleşme ve bir uygulama. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimsel Enstitüsü Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adana. google scholar
• Jewell, T., Lee, J., Tieslau, M., & Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Stationarity of heath expenditures and GDP: Evidence from panel unit root tests with heterogeneous structural breaks. Journal of Health Economics, 22(2), 313-323. google scholar
• Ke, X., Saksena, P., & Holly, A. (2011). The determinants of health expenditure: A country-level panel data analysis. World Health Organization WP. google scholar
• Keehan, S. P., Cuckler, G. A., Sisko, A. M., Madison, A. J., Smith, S. D., Stone, D. A., & Lizonitz, J. M. (2015). National health expenditure projections, 2014-24: spending growth faster than recent trends. Health Affairs, 34(8), 1407-1417. google scholar
• Kleiman, E. (1974). The Determinants of National Outlay on Health, Macmillan, London. google scholar
• Kouassi, E., Akinkugbe, O., Kutlo, N. O., & Brou, J. M. B. (2018). Health expenditure and growth dynamics in the SADC region: Evidence from non-stationary panel data with cross section dependence and unobserved heterogeneity. International Journal ofHealth Economics and Management, 18, 47-66. google scholar
• Lago-Penas, S., Cantarero-Prieto, D., & Blazquez-Fernandez, C. (2013). On the relationship between GDP and health care expenditure: A new look. Economic Modelling, 32, 124-129. google scholar
• Lee, R., & Miller, T. (2002). An Approach to forecasting health expenditures, with application to the U.S. Medicare System. Heatlh Servies Research, 37(5), 1365-1386. google scholar
• Leu, R. E. (1986). Public and Private Health Services: Complementarities and Conflicts. In: Culyer, A.J. and Jonsson, B., Eds., Blackwell, Oxford, 41-63. google scholar
• Lieberson, S. (1987). Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press. google scholar
• McCoskey, S. K., & Selden, T. M. (1998). Health care expenditures and GDP: Panel data unit root test results. Journal of Health Economics, 17, 369-376. google scholar
• Maxwell, R. J. (1981). Health and Wealth: An International Study of Health Care Spending, Lexington: Mass., Lexington. google scholar
• Maynard, L. J., & Subramaniam, V. (2015). Testing for sources of irreversible consumer demand. Economics World, 3(1-2), 1-17. google scholar
• Moscone, F., & Tosetti, E. (2010). Health expenditure and income in the United States. Health Economics, 19(12): 1385-1403. google scholar
• Murphy, K. M., & Topel, R. H. (2006). The value of health and longevity. Journal of Political Economics, 114(5), 871-904. google scholar
• Murthy, V. N., & Ukpolo, V. (1995). Aggregate health care expenditure in the United States: new results. Applied Economics Letters, 2(11), 419-421. google scholar
• Murthy, V. N., & Okunade, A. A. (2016). Determinants of US health expenditure: evidence from autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach to cointegration. Economic Modelling, 59, 67-73. google scholar
• Murthy, V. N., & Ketenci, N. (2017). Is technology still a major driver of health expenditure in the United States? Evidence from cointegration analysis with multiple structural breaks. International Journal of Health Economics and Management, 17(1), 29-50. google scholar
• Narayan, P. K. (2009). Are health expenditures and GDP characterized by asymmetric behaviour? Evidence from 11 OECD countries. Applied Economics, 41(4), 531-536. google scholar
• Narayan, P., Narayan, S., & Smyth, R. (2011). Is health care really a luxury in OECD countries? Evidence from alternative price deflators. Applied Economics, 43, 3631-3643. google scholar
• Newhouse, J. P. (1992). Medical care costs: how much welfare loss. Journal of Economic Perspective, 6, 3-21. google scholar
• Newhouse, J. P., & The Insurance Experiment Group. (1993). Free for All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. google scholar
• Newhouse, J. P. (1977). Medical care expenditure: A cross-national survey. Journal of Human Resources, 12(1), 115-125. google scholar
• Nordhaus, W. D. (2003). The health of nations: the contribution of improved health to living standards. In: Murphy KM, Topel RH (eds) Measuring the gains from medical research: an economic approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. google scholar
• Okunade, A. A. & Karakus, M. C. (2001). Unit root and cointegration tests: time-series versus panel estimates for international health expenditure models, Applied Economics, 33, 1131-1137. google scholar
• Okunade, A. A., & Murthy, V. N. (2002). Technology as a ‘major driver’of health care costs: a cointegration analysis of the Newhouse conjecture. Journal of Health Economics, 21(1), 147-159. google scholar
• Parkin, D., McGuire, A., & Yule, B. (1987). Aggregate health care expenditures and national income: Is healthcare a luxury good? Journal of Health Economics, 6(2), 109-127. google scholar
• Salisu, A. A., & Isah, K. O. (2017). Revisiting the oil price and stock market nexus: A nonlinear Panel ARDL approach. Economic Modelling, 66, 258-271. google scholar
• Sanz, I., & Velazquez, F. (2007). The Role of Ageing in the Growth of Goverment and Social Welfare Spending in the OECD. European Journal of Political Economics, 23, 917-931. google scholar
• Sen, A. (2005). Is health care a luxury? New evidence from OECD data. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 5(2), 147-164. google scholar
• Seshamani, M., & Gray, A. M. (2004). A longitudinal study of the effects of age and time to death on hospital costs, Journal of Health Economics, 23, 217-235. google scholar
• Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Horrace WC, Sickles RC (eds) Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, 281-414. google scholar
• Sorensen, R. J. (2013). Does aging affect preferences for welfare spending? A study of peoples’ spending preferences in 22 countries, 1985-2006. European Journal ofPolitical Economics, 29, 259-271. google scholar
• Vasudeva M. N. R., & Ukpolo, V. (1995) Aggregate health care expenditure in the United States: new results, Applied Economics Letters, 2(11), 419-421. google scholar
• Weil, T. P. (1995). Comparisons of medical technology in canadian, german, and us hospitals. Hospital & Health Services Administration, 40, 524533. google scholar
• Weisbrod, B. (1991). The health care quadrilemma: an essay on technologicalchange, insurance, quality of care, and cost containment. Journal ofEconomic Literature, 29, 523-552. google scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press. google scholar
• Yang, Z., Norton, E., & Stearns, S. C. (2003) Longevity and healthcare expenditures: The real reasons older people spend more. Journal of Gerontology. Social Sciences, 58, 2-10. google scholar
• York, R., & Light, R. (2017). Directional asymmetry in sociological analyses. Socius, 3, 1-13. google scholar
• You, X., & Okunade, A. A. (2017). Income and technology as drivers ofAustralian healthcare expenditures. Health Economics, 26(7), 853-862. google scholar
• Zweifel, P., Felder, S., & Meiers, M. (1999). Ageing of population and health care expenditure: A red herring?, Health Economics, 8(6), 485-496. google scholar