CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/B/SS07SS49.2023.009.08   IUP :10.26650/B/SS07SS49.2023.009.08    Full Text (PDF)

New Qualitative Methodologies in Virtual Ethnographies: Flash Surveys, Images, and Built-in Translators

Stephen CarradınıAnya Hommadova Lu

Virtual ethnography extends traditional ethnography into persistent online digital worlds. Scholars have researched the changes in techniques, tools, and ethics that come with a shift from physical spaces to digital spaces and have found new approaches to offer new insights into the researched communities and new tools to allow new types of data to be collected. Questions surrounding participant-observation have become more complex as well. We offer explanations of one approach (screenshot collection) and two tools (flash surveys, built-in translators) as contemporary innovations in virtual ethnography. We have found that flash surveys can leverage the frequent presence of people in the mobile persistent world so as to allow data to be quickly acquired. These flash surveys are limited by social conditions that require the surveys to be very short, so as to not disrupt the social fabric by asking too many questions at a time. Screen captures (still and video) allow the researcher to unobtrusively record the data from real interactions and experiences in real time, but the researcher must also must carefully handle the intimate data that people share in disinhibited online spaces with close friends with whom they play the game. Built-in translators offer the ability for those who don’t speak the same language to form social bonds, but the possibility of misunderstandings due to inaccurate translation also exists. We argue that new media drives new societies in mobile virtual worlds, as the technology precedes and shapes the communities that exist in the mobile virtual worlds. Thus, tools and approaches must be continuously adapted to study these new societies.



References

  • Airoldi, M. (2018). Ethnography and the digital fields of social media. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21 (6), 661-673. http://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1465622 google scholar
  • Angelone, L. (2018). Virtual ethnography: The post possibilities of not being there. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 31(3), 275-295. google scholar
  • Beneito-Montagut, R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 716-735. http://doi. org/10.1177/1468794111413368 google scholar
  • Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Carradini, S., & Hommadova Lu, A. (2020). New motivations: Change over time in motivations for mobile gaming. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 12(3), 259-285. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00019_1 google scholar
  • Dommguez, D., Beaulieu, A., Estalella, A., Gomez, E., Schnettler, B., & Read, R. (2007). Virtual ethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3). google scholar
  • Driscoll, C., & Gregg, M. (2010). My profile: The ethics of virtual ethnography. Emotion, Space and Society, 3(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2010.01.012 google scholar
  • Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., & Bellotti, V. (2010). The best of both (virtual) worlds: Using ethnography and computational tools to study online behavior. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference, 2010, 136-148. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-8918.2010.00013.x google scholar
  • Fine, G. A. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(3), 267-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124193022003001 google scholar
  • Goodwin, D., Pope, C., Mort, M., & Smith, A. (2003). Ethics and ethnography: An experiential account. Qualitative Health Research, 13(4), 567-577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302250723 google scholar
  • Hancock, R., Crain-Dorough, M., Parton, B., & Oescher, J. (2011). Understanding and using virtual ethnography in virtual environments. In B. K. Daniel (Ed.), Handbook of research on methods and techniques for studying virtual communities (pp. 457-468). IGI Global. google scholar
  • Hommadova Lu, A., & Carradini, S. (2020). Work-game balance: Work interference, social capital, and tactical play in a mobile massively multiplayer online real-time strategy game. New Media & Society, 22(12), 2257-2280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819889957 google scholar
  • Hommadova Lu, A., & Carradini, S. (2021). Bonding and bridging social capital in an international video game guild. In R. Jackson (Ed.), Social Capital: Issues, Challenges and Perspectives (pp. 73-109). Nova Science Publishers. google scholar
  • Irwin, K. (2006). Into the dark heart of ethnography: The lived ethics and inequality of intimate field relationships. Qualitative Sociology, 29(2), 155-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9011-3 google scholar
  • Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935 google scholar
  • Lopez-Rocha, S. (2010). Nethnography in context: Methodological and practical implications of virtual ethnography. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(4), 291-302. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v05i04/51693 google scholar
  • Paech, V. (2009). A method for the times: A meditation of virtual ethnography faults and fortitudes. Nebula, 6(4), 163-180. google scholar
  • Pink, S. (2012). Visual ethnography and the internet. In S. Pink (Ed.), Advances in visual methodology, 113-130. Sage. google scholar
  • Varis, P. (2015). Digital ethnography. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 55-68). Routledge. google scholar
  • Williams, B. (2013). Virtual ethnography. Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford. google scholar


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.