References

• Antonucci, F., & Costa, C. (2020). Precision aquaculture: a short review on engineering innovations. Aquaculture International, 28(1), 41-57. google scholar
• Baki, B., & Yücel, Ş. (2017). Feed cost/production income analysis of seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) aquacul-ture. International Journal of Ecosystems & Ecology Sciences, 7(4). google scholar
• Balakrishnan, S., Rani, S. S., & Ramya, K. C. (2019). Design and development of IoT based smart aquaculture system in a cloud environment. International Journal of Oceans and Oceanography, 13(1), 121-127. google scholar
• Bates, H., Pierce, M., & Benter, A. (2021). Real-time environmental monitoring for aquaculture using a Lo-RaWAN-based IoT sensor network. Sensors, 21(23), 7963. google scholar
• Cai, H., Li, F., Lv, P., Ran, L., & Zou, L. (2021). INTELLIGENT AQUACULTURE ENVIRONMENT MONI-TORING SYSTEM BASED ON LORA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY. INMATEH-Agricultural Engineering, 63(1). google scholar
• Cavrois-Rogacki, T., Leeming, D., Lopez, P. M., Davie, A., & Migaud, H. (2022). Plant-based protein ingredients can successfully replace fish meal in the diet of ballan wrasse (LABRUS BERGYLTA) juveniles. Aqua-culture, 546, 737419. google scholar
• Chavan, M. S., Patil, M. V. P., Chavan, S., Sana, S., & Shinde, C. (2018). Design and implementation of IOT based real time monitoring system for aquaculture using raspberry pi. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 6(3), 159-161. google scholar
• Chen Y, Zhen Z, Yu H, Xu J (2017) Application of fault tree analysis and fuzzy neural networks to fault diag-nosis in the Internet of Things (IoT) for aquaculture. Sensors 17(1):153. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010153 google scholar
• Craig, S. R., Helfrich, L. A., Kuhn, D., & Schwarz, M. H. (2017). Understanding fish nutrition, feeds, and feeding. google scholar
• De Silva, P. P., & De Silva, P. A. (2016, October). Ipanera: An industry 4.0 based architecture for distributed soil-less food production systems. In 2016 Manufacturing & Industrial Engineering Symposium (MIES) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. google scholar
• Daoliang, L. I., & Chang, L. I. U. (2020). Recent advances and future outlook for artificial intelligence in aqu-aculture. Smart Agriculture, 2(3), 1. google scholar
• FAO. (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation. FAO Rome. google scholar
• Glencross, B. D., Baily, J., Berntssen, M. H., Hardy, R., MacKenzie, S., & Tocher, D. R. (2020). Risk assess-ment of the use of alternative animal and plant raw material resources in aquaculture feeds. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(2), 703-758. google scholar
• Gün, A., Kızak, V. (2019) Abdulselam, G. Ü. N., and Volkan KIZAK. “Dünyada ve Türkiye’de su ürünleri üretiminde istatistiki durum.” Menba Kastamonu Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi 5.2 (2019): 25-36 google scholar
• Hassoun, A., Cropotova, J., Trollman, H., Jagtap, S., Garcia-Garcia, G., Parra-Lopez, C., ... & Bono, G. (2023). Use of industry 4.0 technologies to reduce and valorize seafood waste and by-products: A narrative review on current knowledge. Current Research in Food Science, 100505. google scholar
• Henares, M. N., Medeiros, M. V., & Camargo, A. F. (2020). Overview of strategies that contribute to the environ-mental sustainability of pond aquaculture: rearing systems, residue treatment, and environmental assessment tools. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(1), 453-470. google scholar
• Innovation newsnetwork, 2019, https://www.innovationnewsnetwork.com/aquaculture-4-0/596/ (viewed: 08/06/2023) google scholar
• Kaushik, S. J., & Hemre, G. I. (2008). Plant proteins as alternative sources for fish feed and farmed fish quality. In Improving farmed fish quality and safety (pp. 300-327). Woodhead Publishing. google scholar
• Lafont, M., Dupont, S., Cousin, P., Vallauri, A., & Dupont, C. (2019, June). Back to the future: IoT to improve aquaculture: Real-time monitoring and algorithmic prediction of water parameters for aquaculture needs. In 2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. google scholar
• Li, D., & Bao, J. (2018). Research progress on key technologies of underwater operation robot for aquacultu-re. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 34(16), 1-9. google scholar
• Luna, M., Llorente, I., & Cobo, Â. (2019). Integration of environmental sustainability and product quality cri-teria in the decision-making process for feeding strategies in seabream aquaculture companies. Journal of cleaner production, 217, 691-701. google scholar
• Midilli, A., Kucuk, H., & Dincer, I. (2012). Environmental and sustainability aspects of a recirculating aquacul-ture system. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 31(4), 604-611. google scholar
• Munguti, J. M., Musa, S., Orina, P. S., Kyule, D. N., Opiyo, M. A., Charo-Karisa, H., & Ogello, E. O. (2014). An overview of current status of Kenyan fish feed industry and feed management practices, challenges and opportunities. google scholar
• OECD, P. (2015). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2015-2024. google scholar
• Parra L, Sendra S, Gartia L, Lloret J (2018a) Design and deployment of low-cost sensors for monitoring the water quality and fish behaviour in aquaculture tanks during the feeding process. Sensors 18(3):750. https:// doi.org/10.3390/s18030750 google scholar
• Parra, L., Lloret, G., Lloret, J., & Rodilla, M. (2018b). Physical sensors for precision aquaculture: A Re-view. IEEE sensors journal, 18(10), 3915-3923. google scholar
• Pratiwy, F. M., Cahya, M. D., & Andriani, Y. (2022). Digitization of aquaculture: A review. google scholar
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102. google scholar
• TUİK, 2023, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Su-Urunleri-2022-49678#:~:text=Su%20%C3%BCr%-C3%BCnleri%20%C3%BCretimi%202022%20y%C4%B1l%C4%B1nda%20bir%20%C3%B6nceki%20 y%C4%B1la%20g%C3%B6re%20%256,bin%20808%20ton%20olarak%20ger%C3%A7ekle%C5%9Fti google scholar
• UNEP. (2017). The emissions gap report 2017: A UN environment synthesis report. United Nations Environ Programme (UNEP). google scholar
• World Bank Group. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. World Bank Publications. google scholar
• YILDIZ, MUSTAFA (2008) “Fatty Acid Composition of Some Commercial Marine Fish Feeds Available in Türkiye,” Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences: Vol. 32: No. 3, Article 2. Available at: https:// journals.tubitak.gov.tr/veterinary/vol32/iss3/ google scholar
• Yıldız, M., Eroldoğan, T. O., Ofori-Mensah, S., Engin, K., & Baltacı, M. A. (2018). The effects of fish oil rep-lacement by vegetable oils on growth performance and fatty acid profile of rainbow trout: Re-feeding with fish oil finishing diet improved the fatty acid composition. Aquaculture, 488, 123-133. google scholar
• Zettl, S., Cree, D., Soleimani, M., & Tabil, L. (2019). Mechanical properties of aquaculture feed pellets using plant-based proteins. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5(1), 1656917. google scholar
• Zhang, S., Guo, Y., Li, S., Ke, Z., Zhao, H., Yang, J., ... & Zhang, Z. (2022). Investigation on environment mo-nitoring system for a combination of hydroponics and aquaculture in greenhouse. Information Processing in Agriculture, 9(1), 123-134. google scholar
• Zhou, C., Xu, D., Lin, K., Sun, C., & Yang, X. (2018). Intelligent feeding control methods in aquaculture with an emphasis on fish: a review. Reviews in Aquaculture, 10(4), 975-993. google scholar