CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/B/AH09SSc16.2024.034.003   IUP :10.26650/B/AH09SSc16.2024.034.003    Full Text (PDF)

Romantic Figurations: Legacies of the Reformation in Novalis and Kleist

Matthew Thomas Stoltz

On the eve of the nineteenth century Friedrich von Hardenberg (Novalis) wrote one of his most controversial texts entitled Christenheit oder Europa (1799). In it, he re-imagines the history of Europe prior to the Reformation as utopia. Emerging at the center of this text are not “facts,” but rather figurations of history that promise a revolutionary break with the divisiveness of Europe’s past. In what follows, I explore how this approach to historiography developed out of the Fragmentenstreit (1774-1780), wherein Lessing encouraged readers to engage with the spirit of (biblical) history rather than its letter. Eight years after the publication of Christenheit oder Europa, Heinrich von Kleist wrote Michael Kohlhaas (1808), a story that also uses the Reformation as its primary historical backdrop. But Kleist’s approach to historical representation deviates significantly from Novalis. In it, we find no grand narrative for a universal history but instead a tragically local tale full of sound and fury that throws the reader back into a vicious circle of state sponsored injustice. Unlike Novalis, who took inspiration from the fairy tale genre to present his account of the Reformation, Kleist draws on the form of the chronicle to structure his fictional account of the Reformation. In Novalis, the past serves to point towards a better future, yet Kleist remains skeptical of any urge to predict the future by means of the past insofar as such predictions generate violence and dystopia.



References

  • Bayle, P. (1991). Historical and critical dictionary (R. H. Popkin, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett. google scholar
  • Beutel, A. (2017). Luther Handbuch (3rd ed.). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. google scholar
  • Bender, J. B. & Wellbery, D. E. (Eds.). (1990). The ends of rhetoric: History, theory, practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Blumenberg, H. (1998). Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. google scholar
  • Bloch, E. (2009). Atheism in Christianity (J. T. Swan, Trans.). New York: Verso. google scholar
  • Brosamer, H. (1529). Seven-Headed Martin Luther. [Woodcut]. Retrieved from https://dia.pitts.emory.edu// image_details.cfm?ID=461 google scholar
  • Deutsch, N. M. (1513). Airborne Witch Carrying Artist Skull (1513). [Pen and Ink] Retreived from https:// commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Picture_of_Airborne_Witch_by_Niklaus_ Manuel_Deutsch.jpg google scholar
  • Dürer, A. (1501). Nemesis (Das grofie Glück) [Engraving] Retrieved from https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Datei:Albrecht_Dürer_-_Nemesis_- _Google_Art_Project.jpg#file google scholar
  • Heine, H. (2016). Zur Geschichte der Religion und Philosophie in Deutschland. Hamburg: Tredition Classics. google scholar
  • Holbein, H. (1519). Luther as Hercules Germanicus. [Colored Woodcut]. Retreived from https://germanhistory-intersections.org/en/germanness/ghis:image-228 google scholar
  • Grien, H. B. (1521). Luther as an Augustinian Friar. [Woodcut]. Retreived from https://bridwell.omeka.net/ exhibits/show/luther/portraits google scholar
  • Kleingeld, P. (2008). Romantic cosmopolitanism: Novalis’s “Christianity or Europe”. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46(2), 269-284. google scholar
  • Kleist, H. von. (1961). Kleist’s Werke in zwei Bânden: ErsterBand. Weimar: Volksverlag. google scholar
  • Kleist, H von. (2004). The marquise of o—and other stories. New York: Penguin Books. google scholar
  • Koerner, J. L. (2008). The reformation of the image. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Koselleck, R. (1979). Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. google scholar
  • Leibniz, G. (1998). Theodicy: Essays on the goodness of God, the freedom of man, and the origin of evil. Chicago, IL: Open Court. google scholar
  • Lessing, G. E. (2005). Philosophical and theological writings. (H. Nisbet, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press google scholar
  • Lessing, G. E. (1989). Werke und Briefe (Vol. 8, A. Schilson, Ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Klassiker Verlag. google scholar
  • Luther, M. (2012). Martin Luther’s basic theological writings (3rd ed., T. F. Lull & W. R. Russell, Eds.). Minneapolis: Fortress Press. google scholar
  • Massing, M. (2018). Fatal discord: Erasmus, Luther, and the fight for the western mind. New York: Harper Perennial. google scholar
  • Melanchthon, P. (1999). Orations on philosophy and education (S. Kusukawa, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Müntzer, T. (1993). Revelation and revolution: Basic writings of Thomas Müntzer (M. G. Baylor, Trans.). Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press. google scholar
  • Novalis. (1997). Philosophical Writings. (Trans. M. M. Stoljar). Albany, NY: SUNY Press. google scholar
  • Novalis. (1978). Werke in drei Bande (J. Mahl & R. Samuel, Eds.). München: Carl Hanser Verlag. google scholar
  • Novalis. (1960). Schriften. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe (Vol. 4, P. Kluckhohn, R. Samuel, H.-J. Mahl, & G. Schulz, Eds.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag. google scholar
  • Pickford, H. (2013). Thinking with Kleist: Michael Kohlhaas and moral luck. The German Quarterly, 86(4), 381-403. google scholar
  • Schmitt, C. (1986). Political romanticism (G. Oakes, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. google scholar
  • Taubes, J. (2009). Occidental eschatology (D. Ratmoko, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. google scholar


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.