References

• ‘Government of Solomon Islands Written Observations on the Request by the General Assembly’, in Clark R S and Sann M (eds) The Case against the Bomb: Marshall Islands, Samoa & Solomen Islands Before the International Court of Justice in Advisory Proceedings on the Legality of the Threat of Use of Nuclear Weapons (Rutgers University School of Law at Camden 1996) 73-196. google scholar
• Alam S, ‘The United Nations’ Approach to Trade, the Environment and Sustainable Development’ (2006) 12 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L 607-639. google scholar
• Aldred J, ‘Justifying precautionary policies: Incommensurability and uncentainty’ (2013) 96 Ecological Economics 132-140. google scholar
• Antoine P, ‘International Humanitarian law and the Protection of the Environment in Time of Armed Conflict’ (1992) 32 (291) IRRC 517-537. google scholar
• Applegate J S, ‘The Taming of the Precautionary Principle’ (2002) 27 (1) Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 13-78. google scholar
• Ahteensuu M, ‘Defending the Precautionary Principle Against Three Criticisms’ (2007) 11 (61/56) Trames 366-381. google scholar
• Baker B, ‘Legal Protections for the Environment in Times of Armed Conflict’ (1993) 33 Va. J. Int’l L. 351-383. google scholar
• Barnidge Jr. R P, ‘The Due Diligence Principle under International Law’ (2006) 8 (1) Int’l Comm. L. Rev. 81-121. google scholar
• Barrios P, ‘The Rotterdam Convention on Hazardous Chemicals: A Meaningful Step Toward Environmental Protection?’ (2004) 16 (4) Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 679-762. google scholar
• Battle L C, ‘A Transnational Perspective on Extending NEPA: The Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context’ (1995) 5 (1) Duke Envtl. L & Pol’y F. 1-19. google scholar
• Bilder R B, ‘The Role of Unilateral Action in Preventing Environmental Injury’ (1981) 14 (1) Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 51-95. google scholar
• Birnie P, ‘Environmental Protection and Development’ (1995) 20 (1) Melb. Univ. Law Rev. 69. google scholar
• Birnie P W & Boyle A E, International Law and the Environment (2nd edition, Oxford University Press 2002) google scholar
• Blay S K N, ‘New Trends in the Protection of Antarctic Environment: The 1991 Madrid Protocol’ (1992) 86 (2) AJIL 377-399. google scholar
• Bodansky D, ‘Scientific Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle’ (1991) 33 (7) Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 4-44. google scholar
• Bodansky D, ‘Deconstructing the Precautionary Principle’ in Caron D and Scheiber H N (ed) Bringing New Law to Ocean Waters, (Brill 2004) 381-391. google scholar
• Bostian I, ‘Flashing the Danube: The World Court’s Decision Concerning the Gabcikovo Dam” (1998) 9 (2) Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 401-427. google scholar
• Boyer-Kassem T, ‘Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent?’ (2017) 37 (11) Risk Analysis 2026-2034. google scholar
• Boyle A, ‘The Role of International Human Rights Law in the Protection of the Environment”, in Boyle and Anderson (eds) Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1996) 43-69. google scholar
• Bracegirdle A M, ‘Case Analysis: Case to the International Court of Justice on Legality of French Nuclear Testing’ (1996) 9 (2) Leiden JIL 431-443. google scholar
• Brown W E, ‘International Environmental Law: Contemporary Issues and the Emergence of a New World Order’ (1993) 81 Geo. L. J. 675-710. google scholar
• Boyle A E ‘State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?’ (1990) 39 (1) 1-26. google scholar
• Cameron J and Abouchar J, ‘The Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law’, Freestone D and Hey E (eds) The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of implementation (Kluwer Publishers 1996) 29-52. google scholar
• Cameron J and Abouchar J, ‘The Precautionary Principle: A Fundamental Principle of Law and Policy For Protection of the Global Environment’ (1991) 14 (1) B. C. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 1-27. google scholar
• Cameron J and Mackenzie R, ‘Access to Environmental Justice and Procedural Rights in International Institutions’ in Boyle and Anderson (eds) Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1996) 129-152. google scholar
• Cassese A, International Law (2nd edition, Oxford University Press 2005) google scholar
• Cherian J G and Abraham J, ‘Concept of Private Property in Space: An Analysis’ (2007) 2 (4) J. Int’l. Com. L. & Tech. 211-220. google scholar
• Churchill R, ‘International Environmental Law and the United Kingdom’ (1991) 18 (1) J. L. & Soc’y. 155-173. google scholar
• Churchill R R, ‘Facilitating (Transnational) Civil Liability Litigation for Environmental Damage by Means of Treaties: Progress, Problems, and Prospects’ (2001) 12 (1) Yearbook Int’l. Envtl. L 3-41. google scholar
• Coffey S, ‘Establishing a Legal Framework for Property Rights to Natural Resources in Outer Space’ (2009) 41 (1) Case W. Res. J. Int’l. L. 119-147. google scholar
• DeFur P L, and Kaszuba M, ‘Implementing the Precautionary’ (2002) 288 (1-2) The Science of the Total Environment 155-165. google scholar
• De la Fayette L, ‘The OSPAR Convention Comes into Force: Continuity and Progress’ (1999) 14 (2) Int’l J. Marine & Coastal L. 247-297. google scholar
• Dellinger M, ‘Ten Years of the Aarhus Convention: How Procedural Democracy is Paving the Way for Substantive Change in National and International Environmental Law’ (2012) 23 (2) Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 309-366. google scholar
• Diaz A, ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources’ (1994) 24 (4) EPL 156-188. google scholar
• Dickson B, ‘The Precautionary Principle in CITES: A Critical Assessment’ (1999) 39 (2) Natural Resources Journal 211-228. google scholar
• Douglas-Scott S, “Environmental Rights in the European Union-Participatory Democracy or Democratic Deficit?”, in Boyle and Anderson (eds) Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1996) 109-128. google scholar
• Dross M, ‘Access to Justice in Environmental Matters’ (2003) 11 (4) Tilburg Foreign L. Rev. 720-737. google scholar
• Dupuy P-M, ‘Overview of the Existing Customary Legal Regime regarding International Pollution’, in Magraw D B (ed.) International Law and Pollution, USA, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988 61-89. google scholar
• Dupuy P-M, ‘Soft Law and the International Law of the Environment’ (1990) 12 (2) Mich. J. Int’l L. 420-435. google scholar
• Ebbesson J, ‘The Notion of Public Participation in International Environmental Law’ (1997) 8 1 YBIEL 51-97. google scholar
• Ebbesson J, ‘Public Participation and Privatisation in Environmental Matters: An Assessment of the Aarhus Convention’ (2011) 4 (2) Erasmus L. Rev. 71-89. google scholar
• Elkind J B, ‘Footnote to the Nuclear Test Cases: Abuse ofRight - A Blind Alley for Environmentalists’(1976) 9 (1) Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 57-98. google scholar
• Falk R A, ‘Toward Equilibrium in the World Order System’ (1970) 64 (4) Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc. 217-226. google scholar
• Falkner R, ‘Regulating biotech trade: the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety’ (2000) 76 (2) International Affairs 299-313. google scholar
• Fasoli E and McGlone A, ‘The Non-Compliance Mechanism Under the Aarhus Convention as ‘Soft’ Enforcement of International Environmental Law: Not So Soft After All!’ (2018) 65 (1) Neth. Int. L. Rev. 27-53. google scholar
• Ferreira S, ‘The Fundamental Right of Access to Environmental Information in the EC: A Critical Analysis of WWF-EPO v. Council’ (2007) 19 (3) J. Envtl. L. 399-408. google scholar
• Fitzmaurice M, ‘OSPAR Tribunal: Dispute Concerning Access to Information under Article 9 of the OSPAR Convention (Ireland v. United Kingdom)’ (2003) 18 (4) Int’l J. Marine & Coastal L. 541-558. google scholar
• Fitzmaurice M, ‘Some Problems Regarding the Formal Sources of International Law’, in Symbolae Verzijl, Presentees au Professeur J. H. W. Verzijl a l’occasion de son XXIeme Anniversaire (1958) 153-176. google scholar
• Francioni F, ‘Legal Aspects of Mineral Exploitation in Antarctica’ (1986) 19 (2) Cornell Int’l L.J. 363-388. google scholar
• Francioni F, ‘The Madrid Protocol on Protection of the Environment’ (1993) 28 (1) Tex. Int’l L. J. 47-70. google scholar
• Freeland S, ‘The limits of law: challenges to the global governance of space activities’ (2020) 153(1) J. & Procee. R. S. New South Wales 70-82. google scholar
• Freestone D, ‘The Road From Rio: International Environmental Law After the Earth Summit’ (1994) 6 (2) J. Envtl. L. 193-215. google scholar
• Freestone D, ‘Implementing Precaution Cautiously: The Precautionary Approach in the Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks Agreement’, in Hey E (ed) Developments in International Fisheries Law (Kluwer Law International 1999) 287-325. google scholar
• Freestone D and Hey E, ‘Origins and Development of the Precautionary Principle’, in Freestone D and Hey E (eds) The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation (Kluwer Publishers 1996) 3-15. google scholar
• French D, ‘Developing States and the Environmental Law’ (2000) 49 (1) ICLQ 35-60. google scholar
• Gabrynowicz J I, ‘Space Law: Its Cold War Origins and Challenges in the Era of Globalization’ (2004) 37 (4) Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1041-1065. google scholar
• Gardiner S M, “A Core Precautionary Principle” (2006) 14 (1) Journal of Political Philosophy 3360. google scholar
• Gaines S E, ‘International Principles for Transnational Environmental Liability’ (1989) 30 (2) Harv. Int’l L. J. 311-349. google scholar
• Gemalmaz M S, ‘Introduction to International Environmental Law:From Initial Steps to Institution Building for the Conservation of Environment-Part 1’ (2021) 33 (2) ERPL/REDP 119-219. google scholar
• Gemalmaz M S, ‘Introduction to International Environmental Law: From Initial Steps to Institution Building for the Conservation of Environment-Part II’ (2021) 33 (3) ERPL 773-816. google scholar
• Gemalmaz M S, ‘Transformation From Soft Law to Hard Law of International Environmental Protection: Process, Basic Concepts and Principles- Part 1:”Common Heritage of Mankind”, ”Present and Future Generations”, “Inter/Intra-generational Equity” and “Sustainable Development” (2022) 71 Annales de la Faculte de Droit d’Istanbul 119-219. google scholar
• Gess K N, ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources’ (1964) 13 (2) ICLQ 398-449. google scholar
• Getches D H, ‘Foreword: The Challenge of Rio’ (1993) 4 (1) Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 1-19. google scholar
• Gorove S, ‘Freedom of Exploration and Use in the Outer Space Treaty: A Textual Analysis and Interpretation’ (1971) 1 (1) Denv. J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 93-107. google scholar
• Gorny D, ‘The European Environment Agency and the Freedom of Environmenal Information Directive: Potential Cornerstones of EC Environmental Law’ (1991) 14 B. C. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 279-299. google scholar
• Gündling L, ‘The Status in International Law of the Principle of Precautionary Action’ (1990) 5 (1) Int’l J. Estuarine & Coastal L. 23-30. google scholar
• Hagen P E and Walls M P, ‘The Stockholm Convention On Persistent Organic Pollutants’ (2005) 19 (4) Natural Resources & Environment 49-52. google scholar
• Handl G, ‘Territorial Sovereignty and the Problem of Transnational Pollution’ (1975) 69 (1) AJIL 50-76. google scholar
• Handl G, ‘Balancing of Interests and International Liability for the Pollution of International Watercourses: Customary Principles of Law Revisited’ (1976) 3 Canadian YBIL 156-194. google scholar
• Handl G, ‘Environmental Protection and Development in Third World Countries: Common Destiny - Common Responsibility’ (1988) 20 (3) N.Y.U. J. Int’l L & Pol. 603-627. google scholar
• Handl G, ‘Environmental Security and Global Change: The Challenge to International Law’ (1990)1 Y.B. Int’l Envtl. L 3-33. google scholar
• Hartzell-Nichols L, ‘Adaptation as Precaution’ (2014) 23 (2 Special Issue) Environmental Values 19-164. google scholar
• Hayward P, ‘The Oslo and Paris Commissions’ (1990) 5 (1) Int’l J. Estuarine & Coastal L. 91-100. google scholar
• Henkin L- Crawford P R - Schachter O - Smit H, International Law: Cases and Materials (2nd Reprint-1998, Third Edition, West Publishing Co. 1993). google scholar
• Heverin T J, ‘Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons: Environmental and Humanitarian Limits on Self-Defense’ (1997) 72 (4) Notre Dame L. Rev. 1277-1308. google scholar
• Hey E, ‘The Precautionary Approach: Implications of the revision of the Oslo and Paris Conventions’(1991) 15 (4) Marine Policy 244-254. google scholar
• Hey E, ‘The Precautionary Concept in Environmental Policy and Law: Institutionalizing Caution’(1992) 4 (2) 303-318. google scholar
• Hey E - IJIsra T - Nollkaemper A, ‘The 1992 Paris Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic: A Critical Analysis’ (1993) 8 (1) Int’l J. Marine & Coastal L. 1-76. google scholar
• Hyde J N, ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Weath and Resources’ (1956) 50 (4) AJIL 854-867. Hornstein D T, ‘Reclaiming Environmental Law: A Normative Critique of Comparative Risk Analysis’ (1992) 92 (3) Columbia L. J. 562-633 Jendroska J, ‘Public participation in the preparation of plans and programmes: some reflections on the scope of obligations under Article 7 of the Aarhus Convention’ (2009) 6 (4) JEEPL 495-515. Jennings R Y, ‘The Judiciary, International and National, and the Development of International Law’ (1996) 45 (1) ICLQ 1-12. google scholar
• Juda L, ‘The United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement’, in Stokke O S and Thommessen 0 B (eds) Yearbook of International Co-operation on Environment and Development 2001/2002, (London, Earthscan Publications 2001) 53-58. google scholar
• Juste-Ruiz J, “The International Court of Justice and International Environmental Law”, in N Boschiero N, Scovazzi T, Pitea C, Ragni C (eds) International Courts and the Development of InternationalLaw (T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2013) 383-401. Kamminga M T, ‘The IAEA Convention on Nuclear Safety’ (1995) 44 (4) ICLQ 872-882. google scholar
• Katz D, ‘The Mismatch Between the Biosafety Protocol and the Precautionary Principle’ (2001) 13 (4) Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev 949-982. google scholar
• Kaye S B, ‘Legal Approaches to Polar Fisheries Regimes: A Comparative Analysis ofthe Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources and the Bering Sea Doughnut Hole Convention’ (1995) 26 (1) Cal. W. Int’l L. J. 75-114. google scholar
• Kelson J M, ‘State Responsibility and the Abnormally Dangerous Activity’ (1972) 13 (2) Harv. Int’l. L. J. 197-244. google scholar
• Kindall Mark P A, ‘UNCED and the Evolution of Principles of International Environmental Law’ (1991) 25 (1) John Marshall L. Rev. 19-31. google scholar
• Kiss A and Shelton D, International Environmental Law (First Edition, Ardsley-on-Hudson: Transnational Publishers 1991) google scholar
• Kiss A and Shelton D, Guide to International Environmental Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2007) google scholar
• Kiss A and Trindade A C, “Two Major Challenges of Our Time: Human Rights and the Environment”, in Trindade A A C (ed) Human Rights, Sustainable Development and the Environment (Costa Rica, Institute for Inter-American Human Rights 1992) 287-383. google scholar
• Koester V, ‘Cartagena Protocol: A New Hot Spot in the Trade-Environment Conflict?’ (2001) 31(2) Envtl. Pol’y & L. 82-94. google scholar
• Koester V, ‘Review of Compliance under the Aarhus Convention, a Rather Unique Compliance Mechanism’ (2005) 2 (1) JEEPL 31-44. google scholar
• Kovar D, ‘A Short Guide to the Rio Declaration’ (1993) 4 (1) Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 118140. google scholar
• Koskenniemi M, ‘Peaceful Settlement of Environmental Disputes’ (1991) Nordic J. Int’l L. (1991) 60 (1) 73-92. google scholar
• Kramer L, ‘The Implementation of Community Environmental Directives within Member States: Some Implications of the Direct Effect Doctrine’ (1991) 3 (1) J. Envtl. L. 39-56. google scholar
• Lachs M, ‘The Challenge of the Environment’ (1990) 39 (3) ICLQ 663-669. google scholar
• Lee E G, ‘International Legal Aspects of Pollution of the Atmosphere’ (1971) 21 (2) U. Toronto L. J. 203-210. google scholar
• Lee M and Abbot C, ‘The Usual Suspect? Public Participation Under the Aarhus Convention’(2003) 66 (1) Modern L. Rev. 80-108. google scholar
• Magraw D B, ‘Transboundary Harm: The International Law Commission’s Study of International Liability’ (1986) (80) 2 AJIL 305-330. google scholar
• MacDonald J M, ‘Appreciating the Precautionary Principle as an Ethical Evolution in Ocean Management’ (1995) 26 (3) Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 255-286. google scholar
• Marchant G E, ‘From General Policy to Legal Rule: Aspirations and Limitations of the Precautionary Principle’ (2003) 111(14) Environ Health Perspect. 1799-1803. google scholar
• Marr S, The Precautionary Principle in the Law of the Sea: Modern Decision Making in International Law (New York, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2003) google scholar
• Marshall F, ‘Two Years in the Life: The Pioneering Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee 2004-2006’ (2006) (8) 1 Int’l Comm. L. Rev. 123-154. google scholar
• Mazzeschi R P, “Forms of International Responsibility for Environmental Harm”, in Francioni F & Scovazzi T (eds) International Responsibility for Environmental Harm, (Graham & Trotman 1991)15-35. google scholar
• McAllister S T, ‘The Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters’ (1998) 10 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 187-198. google scholar
• McCaffrey S C, ‘Trans-Boundary Pollution Injuries: Jurisdictional Considerations in Private Ligitation Between Canada and United States’ (1973) 3 (2) Cal. W. Int’l L. J. 191-259. google scholar
• McCaffrey S C, ‘The Work of the International Law Commission Relating to Transfrontier Environmental Harm’ (1988) 20 (3) N.Y.U. J. Int’l L & Pol. 163-188. google scholar
• McCaffrey S C, ‘The Law of International Watercourses: Ecocide or Ecomanagement?’ (1990) 59 google scholar
• McCallion K F, ‘International Environmental Justice: Rights and Remedies’, (2003) 26 (3) Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 427-443. google scholar
• McDorman T L, ‘Access to Information under Article 9 of the OSPAR Convention (Ireland v. United Kingdom)’ (2004) 98 (2) AJIL 330-339. google scholar
• McIntyre O and Mosedale T, ‘The Precautionary Principle as a Norm of Customary International Law’ (1997) 9 (2) J. Envtl. L. 221-241. google scholar
• Mead S J, “The Precautionary Principle: A Discussion of the Principle’s Meaning and Status in an Attempt to Further Define and Understand the Principle” (2004) 8 N.Z. J. Envtl. L. 137-176. google scholar
• Mickelson K, ‘Rereading Trail Smelter’ (1992) 31 Canadian YBIL 219-234. google scholar
• Molenaar E J, ‘The 1996 Protocol to the 1972 London Convention’ (1997) 12 (3) Int’l J. Marine & Coastal L 396-403. google scholar
• Nadal C, ‘Pursuing Substantive Environmental Justice: The Aarhus Convention as a ‘Pillar’ of Empowerment’ (2008) 10 (1) Envtl. L. Rev. 28-45. google scholar
• Paradell-Trius L, ‘Principles of International Environmental Law’ (2000) 9 (2) RECIEL 93-99. google scholar
• Olmstead C J, ‘Prospects for Regulation of Environmental Conservation under International Law’, in Bos M (ed) The Present State of International Law (Kluwer, The Netherlands 1973) 245-253. google scholar
• Oxhorn M L, ‘The Norms of Nuclear Accidents after Chernobyl’ (1992-1993) 8 (2) J. Nat. Resources & Envtl. L. 375-395. google scholar
• Pallemaerts M, ‘International Enironmental Law From Stockholm to Rio: Back to the Future?’ in Sands P (ed) Greening InternationalLaw (The New Press 1994) 1-19. google scholar
• Palmer G, ‘New Ways to Make International Environmental Law’ (1992) 86 (2) AJIL 259-283. google scholar
• Parsons R J, ‘The Fight to Save the Planet: U.S. Armed Forces, “Greenkeeping”, and Enforcement of the Law Pertaining to Environmental Protection During Armed Conflict’ (1998) 10 (2) Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 441-500. google scholar
• Partan D, ‘The “Duty to Inform” in International Environmental Law’ (1988) 6 (1) B. U. Int’l L. J. 43. google scholar
• Porras D A, ‘The ‘Common Heritage’ of Outer Space: Equal Benefits for Most of Mankind’ (2006) 37 (1) C. W. Intl. L. J. 143-176. google scholar
• Rashbrooke G, ‘The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: A Forum for the Development of Principles of International Environmental Law?’ (2004) 19 (4) Int’l J. Marine & Coastal L. 515-536. google scholar
• Read J E, ‘The Trail Smelter Dispute’ (1963) 1 Canadian YBIL 213-229. google scholar
• Redgwell C, ‘Environmental Protection in Antarctica: The 1991 Protocol’ (1994) 43 (3) ICLQ 599-634. google scholar
• Rempe G A, ‘International Air Pollution - United States and Canada - A Joint Approach’ (1968) 10 (1) Ariz. L. Rev. 138-147. google scholar
• Rosas A, ‘The Right to Development’, in Eide A, Krause C and Rosas A (eds) Economic, Socialand Cultural Rights (Kluwer 2001) 119-130. google scholar
• Rosencranz A, ‘The Origin and Emergence of International Environmental Norms’ (2003) 26 (3) Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 309-320. google scholar
• Röben V, ‘The Order of the UNCLOS Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal to Suspend Proceedings in the Case of the MOX Plant at Sellafield: How Much Jurisdictional Subsidiarity?’ (2004) 73 Nordic J. Int’l L. 223-235. google scholar
• Rubin A P, ‘Pollution by Analogy: The Trail Smelter Arbitration’ (1971) 50 (3) Oregon L. Rev. 259-282. google scholar
• Ryall A, ‘Implementation of the Aarhus Convention through Community Environmental Law’(2004) 6 (4) Envtl. L. Rev. 274-277. google scholar
• Sand P H, ‘International Law on the Agenda of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development Towards Global Environmental Security’ (1991) 60 (1) Nordic J. Int’l L. 5-18. google scholar
• Sandin P, ‘Dimensions of the Pecautionary Principle’ (1999) 5 (5) Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 899-907. google scholar
• Sandin P, ‘The Precautionary Principle and the Concept of Precaution’ (2004) 13 (4) Environmental Values 461-475. google scholar
• Sands P, ‘Introduction’ in Sands P (ed) Greening International Law (Routledge 1994) google scholar
• Sands P, Principles of International Environmental Law (Second Edition, Cambridge University Press 2003) google scholar
• Sands P, ‘The “Greening” of International Law: Emerging Principles and Rules’ (1994) 1 (2) Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 293-323. google scholar
• Sanwal M, ‘Sustainable Development, the Rio Declaration and Multilateral Cooperation’ (1993) 4 (1) Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 45-68. google scholar
• Sattler R, ‘Transporting a Legal System for Property Rights: From the Earth to the Stars’ (2005) 6 (1) Chi. J. Int’l. L. 23-44. google scholar
• Schachter O, ‘The Emergence of International Environmental Law’ (1990) 44 (2) J. Int’l Aff. 457493. google scholar
• Scott J B, ‘The Tacna-Arica Arbitration’ (1923) 17 (1) AJIL 82-89. google scholar
• Scott J, ‘Law and Environmental Governance in the EU’, (2002) 51 (4) ICLQ 996-1005. google scholar
• Shany Y, ‘The First Mox Plant Award: The Need to Harmonize Competing Environmental Regimes and Dispute Settlement Procedures’ (2004) 17 (4) Leiden JIL 815-827. google scholar
• Shaw M N, International Law (Printed in the United Kingdom, Fourth printing, Fifth edition, Cambridge University Press 2005) google scholar
• Shelton D, ‘What Happened in Rio to Human Rights?’ (1992) 3 (1) Yearbook Int’l. Envtl. L. 75-93. google scholar
• Simpson Tand Jackson V, ‘Human Rights and the Environment’ (1997) 14 (4) Envtl. & Plan. L. J. 268-281. google scholar
• Sohn L B, ‘The Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment’ (1973) 14 (3) Harv. Int’l L. J. 423-514. google scholar
• Stein R E, ‘The Settlement of Environmental Disputes: Towards a System of Flexible Dispute Settlement’ (1985) 12 (2) Syracuse J. Int’l L. & Com 283-298. google scholar
• Stone C D, ‘Is There a Precautionary Principle’ (2001) 31 (7) ELR News & Analysis 10790-10799. google scholar
• Sunstein C R, ‘Beyond the Precautionary Principle’ (2003) 151 (2) U. Pa. L. Rev. 1003-1058. google scholar
• Tarlock A D and Wouters P, ‘Are Shared Benefits of International Waters an Equitable Apportionment?’ (2007) 18 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 523-536. google scholar
• Tromans S, Nuclear Law (Second Edition, Hart Publishing 2010) google scholar
• Turner D and Hartzell L, ‘The Lack of Clarity in the Precautionary Principle’ (2004) 13 (4) Environmental Values 449-460. google scholar
• Uibopuu H-J, ‘The Internationally Guaranteed Right of an Individual to a Clean Environment’(1977) 1 Comp. L. Y.B. 101-120. google scholar
• Verma D P, ‘The Nuclear Tests Cases: An Inquiry into the Judicial Response of the International Court of Justice’ (1982) 8 South African YBIL 20-57. google scholar
• Verwey W D, ‘Protection of the Environment in Times of Armed Conflict: In Search of a New Legal Perspective’ (1995) 8 (1) Leiden JIL 7-40. google scholar
• Weber S, ‘Environmental Information and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1991) 12(5) HRLJ 177-185. google scholar
• Wood Jr. H W, “The United Nations World Charter for Nature: The Developing Nations’ Initiative to Establish Protections for the Environment” (1985) 12 (4) Ecology L.Q. 977-996.Wright Q, ‘Tacna-Arica Arbitration’ (1925) 10 (1) Minn. L. Rev. 28-39. google scholar
• Yoshida O, ‘Soft Enforcement of Treaties: The Montreal Protocol ‘s Noncompliance Procedure and the Functions of Internal International Institutions’ (1999) 10 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 95-141. google scholar
• Zaelke D and Cameron J, ‘Global Warming and Climate Change- An Overview of the International Legal Process’ (1990) 5 (2) Am. U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 249-289. google scholar
• Zahedi N S, ‘Implementing the Rotterdam Convention: The Challenges of Transforming Aspirational Goals into Effective Controls on Hazardous Pesticide Exports to Developing Countries’ (1999)11 (3) Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 707-739. google scholar

Citations