References

• ‘2012 International Arbitration Survey: Present and Preferred Practices in the Arbitral Process’ (Queen Mary University of London and White and Case 2012) <https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/ media/arbitration/docs/2012_International_Arbitration_Survey.pdf> accessed 20 April 2022 google scholar
• ‘2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration’ (Queen Mary University of London and White and Case 2015) google scholar
• ‘2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration’ (Queen Mary University of London and White and Case 2018) <https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/ arbitration/docs/2012_International_Arbitration_Survey.pdf> accessed April 25, 2022 google scholar
• ‘2020 International Arbitration Survey:” Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)’ (Queen Mary University of London and Corporate Counsel International Arbitration Group (CCIAG) 2020) <https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/QM-CCIAG-Survey-ISDS-2020.pdf> accessed 21 April 2022 google scholar
• ‘2021 International Arbitration Survey: Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World’ (Queen Mary University of London and White and Case 2021) <https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/ arbitration/docs/LON0320037-QMUL-International-Arbitration-Survey-2021_19_WEB.pdf> accessed 20 April 2022 google scholar
• Abdel Wahab MS, ‘Party-Appointed Experts in International Commercial Arbitration: A Necessity or a Nuisance?’ in Franco Ferrari and Friedrich Jakob Rosenfeld (eds), Handbook of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration: Key Concepts and Issues (Kluwer Law International 2022) google scholar
• Ahrens H.J., Der Beweis Im Zivilprozess (Otto Schmidt 2015) google scholar
• Akıncı Z, ‘Milletlerarası Tahkimde Bilirkişi’, Milletlerarası Tahkim Semineri 2010 google scholar
• Alvarez JE, ‘The Search for Objectivity: The Use of Experts in Philip Morris v Uruguay’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 411 google scholar
• Angoura S, The Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration (Nomos 2022) google scholar
• ‘Annual Arbitration Survey 2021: Expert Evidence in International Arbitration Saving the Party-Appointed Expert’ (BCLP 2021) <https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/events-insights-news/bclp-arbitration-survey-2021-expert-evidence-in-international-arbitration.html> accessed December 11, 2022 google scholar
• Arslan R and others, Medenî Usul Hukuku (7th edn, Yetkin Yayınları 2021) google scholar
• Ashford P, The IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2013) google scholar
• Atalay O, ‘Deliller (Tanık, Keşif, Bilirkişi, Uzman Görüşü)’ in Hakan Pekcanıtez and others (eds), Pekcanıtez Usul - Medenî Usûl Hukuku, vol. 15. (On İki Levha Yayıncılık 2021) google scholar
• Aygül M, Milletlerarası Ticarî Tahkimde Tahkim Usûlüne Uygulanacak Hukuk ve Deliller (2., On İki Levha Yayıncılık 2014) google scholar
• Baker CM and Greenwood L, ‘In Search of an Exemplary International Construction Arbitration’ in Arthur W Rovine (ed), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers, vol. 6 (Brill | Nijhoff 2013) <https://brill.com/view/serial/CIAM> google scholar
• Balkar S, Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkim ve Etik (1., On İki Levha Yayıncılık 2022) google scholar
• Bennouna M, ‘Experts before the International Court of Justice: What For?’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 345 google scholar
• Blackaby, N. & Others, Redfern & Hunter, 2015. On International Arbitration (6th edition, Oxford University Press 2015) google scholar
• ——, Redfern and Hunter, ‘On International Arbitration (Student Version) (Sixth edition, Oxford University Press 2015) google scholar
• Blackaby N and Wilbraham A, ‘Practical Issues Relating to the Use of Expert Evidence in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2016) 31 ICSID Review, 655 google scholar
• Bor H, ‘Expert Evidence’ in Julian DM Lew, Harris Bor et al. (eds), Arbitration in England with chapters on Scotland and Ireland (Kluwer Law International 2013) google scholar
• Born GB, International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2021) google scholar
• Brown DW, ‘Oral Evidence and Experts in Arbitration’ (2004) 2 Kluwer Law International & ICC 77 google scholar
• Centner B, Iura Novit Curia in Internationalen Schiedsverfahren : Eine Historisch-Rechtsvergleichende Studie Zu Den Grundlagen Der Rechtsermittlung (Mohr Siebeck 2019) google scholar
• Christoph Grenz, Der Faktor Zeit Im Schiedsverfahren (PL Acad Research 2013) <https://books. google.de/books?id=MLAtnQEACAAJ> google scholar
• De Berti G, ‘Experts and Expert Witnesses in International Arbitration : Adviser , Advocate or Adjudicator ?’ in Nikolaus Pitkowitz and Alexandre Petsche (eds), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2011, vol 2011 (Manz’sche Verlags- und Universitatsbuchhandlung; Manz’sche Verlags- und Universitatsbuchhandlung 2011) google scholar
• de Chazournes, L. B. & others, ‘One Size Does Not Fit All-Uses of Experts before International Courts and Tribunals: An Insight into the Practice’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 477 google scholar
• ——, ‘The Expert in the International Adjudicative Process: Introduction to the Special Issue’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 339 google scholar
• Donoghue JE, ‘Expert Scientific Evidence in a Broader Context’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 379 google scholar
• Donovan, D. F. & others, ‘Reconsidering the Role of Legal Experts as a Means to Greater Arbitral Efficiency’ in Julie Bedard and Patrick W Pearsall (eds),Reflections on International Arbitration: Essays in Honour of Professor George Bermann (JURIS 2022) google scholar
• Dwyer D, The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence (Cambridge University Press 2009) google scholar
• Ehle B, ‘Practical Aspects of Using Expert Evidence in International Arbitration’ (2012) II Yearbook on International Arbitration 75 google scholar
• Elyıldırım H., Hukuk Yargılamasında Uzman Görüşü (Özel Bilirkişi) (Adalet Yayınevi 2021) google scholar
• Flett J, ‘When Is an Expert Not an Expert?’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 352 google scholar
• Foster CE, Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals: Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof and Finality (Cambridge University Press 2011) google scholar
• P. Fouchard, E. Gaillard, and B. Goldman, “On International Commercial Arbitration (John Savage and Philippe Fouchard eds, Kluwer Law International 1999) google scholar
• Freyer DH, Newman LW, Hill RD, ‘Assessing Expert Evidence’, The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (2., Juris 2008) google scholar
• Giray FK, Milletlerarası Yatırım Tahkiminde Kamulaştırmadan Doğan Tazminat ve Tazminatın Hesaplanmasında Kullanılan Yöntemler (2., Beta Basım 2013) google scholar
• Hacıbekiroğlu E, Milletlerarası Tahkim Hukukunda Deliller ve Delillerin Değerlendirilmesi (On İki Levha Yayıncılık 2012) google scholar
• Hanağası E, Medeni Yargılama Hukukunda Silahların Eşitliği (Yetkin Yayınları 2016) google scholar
• Hanotiau B, ‘The Conduct of the Hearings’ in LW Newman and RD Hill (eds), Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (Third, Juris Publishing, Incorporated 2014) <https://books. google.co.in/books?id=0bOIAwAAQBAJ> google scholar
• Hodgson M and Stewart M, ‘Experts in Investor-State Arbitration: The Tribunal as Gatekeeper’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 453 google scholar
• Hoffmann AK and Shetty NK, ‘Evidence and Hearings’ in Albert Jan Van Den Berg (ed), International Arbitration: The Coming of a New Age? (ICCA & Kluwer Law International 2012) google scholar
• Hofmann D and Kunz OM, ‘Commentary on the Swiss Rules, Article 27 [Tribunal-Appointed Experts]’ in Manuel Arroyo (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2., Kluwer Law International 2018) google scholar
• Hunter M, ‘Expert Conferencing and New Methods’ (2007) 4 Transnational Dispute Management google scholar
• Hwang M, ‘Witness Conferencing’ in Jamie McKay (ed), The Legal Media Group Guide to the World’s Leading Experts in Commercial Arbitration (2008) google scholar
• Hwang M and Ong CYC, ‘Effective Cross-Examination in Asian Arbitrations’ in LW Newman and Timothy G. Nelson (eds), Take the Witness: Cross-examination in International Arbitration (2., JURIS 2018) google scholar
• ICC, ‘ICC Arbitration Commission Report on Controlling Time and Costs in Arbitration’ (ICC 2018) ICC Publication 861-2. google scholar
• ‘ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR Report: Resolving Climate Change Related Disputes through Arbitration and ADR’ (ICC 2019) ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR 999 ENG google scholar
• International Law Association Committe on International Commercial Arbitration, ‘Ascertaining the Contents of the Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2008), V. Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 163 google scholar
• Jones D, ‘Party Appointed Expert Witnesses in International Arbitration: A Protocol at Last’ (2008) 24 Arbitration International 137 google scholar
• ——, ‘Ineffective Use of Expert Evidence in Construction Arbitration’, Dubai Arbitration Week 2020 (2020) google scholar
• ——, ‘Redefining the Role and Value of Expert Evidence’ (2021) <https://dougjones.info/content/ uploads/2021/12/DJ-ICC-Expert-Evidence-Post-Conference-Updated-Chapter.pdf> google scholar
• Kamya-Lukoda, G.E., ‘Role of Expert Witnesses in Construction Arbitration: Delay and Disruption and Quantum Issues’ in Renato Nazzini and Anthony J Morgan (eds), Transnational construction arbitration : key themes in the resolution of construction disputes / (Informa Law from Routledge 2018) google scholar
• Kantor M, ‘A Code of Conduct for Party-Appointed Experts in International Arbitration-Can One Be Found?’ (2010) 26 Arbitration International 323 google scholar
• Kaufmann-Kohler G, ‘Globalization of Arbitral Procedure’ (2003) 36 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1313 google scholar
• Khodykin RM and Mulcahy C, A Guide to the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2019) google scholar
• ——, ‘Commentary on the IBA Rules on Evidence, Article 5 [Party-Appointed Experts]’, A Guide to the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2019) google scholar
• Knoblach S, Sachverhaltsermittlung in Der Internationalen Wirtschaftsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (Schriften zum Prozessrecht, Duncker & Humblot 2003) google scholar
• Kuru B, Medenî Usul Hukuku El Kitabı, vol. I (Yetkin Yayınları 2021) google scholar
• Langford, M., Behn D and Lie RH, ‘The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration’ (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law 301 google scholar
• Lee NK, ‘Selecting the Expert Witness as an Arbitrator in Patent Arbitrations’ (2016) 70 Dispute Resolution Journal. google scholar
• Lew JDM, Mistelis LA, and Kröll SM, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2003) google scholar
• Lim JW, ‘Tribunal-Appointed Experts in International Arbitration’, in Franco Ferrari and Friedrich Jakob Rosenfeld (eds), Handbook of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration: Key Concepts and Issues (Kluwer Law International 2022) google scholar
• Lörcher, G., in Robert Briner and others (eds), Law of International Business and Dispute Settlement in the 2Ist Century (Carl Heymanns) google scholar
• Lotz B, ‘Der Sachvrestandige Im Schiedsverfahren’ (2011) 9 SchiedsVZ | German Arbitration Journal 203 google scholar
• Mbengue MM and Das R, ‘Rules Governing the Use of Experts in International Disputes’ (2018) 17 Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 415 google scholar
• Moses ML, The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (Third Edition, Cambridge University Press 2017) google scholar
• Mosk M, ‘Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law The Role of Facts in International Dispute Resolution (Volume 304)’ google scholar
• Mosk RM, ‘The Role of Facts in International Dispute Resolution (Volume 304)’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (Brill) <http://referenceworks.brillonline. com/entries/the-hague-academy-collected-courses/the-role-of-facts-in-international-dispute-resolution-volume-304-A9789004140233_01> google scholar
• Münch J, Münchener Kommentar Zur ZPO (6., Beck-Online 2022) google scholar
• Nations U and Nations Commission on International Trade Law U, ‘UNCITRAL Notes on Organizing Arbitral Proceedings’ <www.uncitral.org> google scholar
• Nemeth JC and Haidostian L, ‘The “Hot Tub” Method of Taking Expert Testimony Is Gaining Steam: What You Need to Know’ [2014], IBA Arbitration News 91 google scholar
• Nessi S, ‘Expert Witness: Role and Independence’ in Christoph Müller, Sebastien Besson, and Antonio Rigozzi (eds), New Developments in International Arbitration 2016 (Schulthess Juristische Medien AG 2016) google scholar
• Newman LW and Klieman RJ, Take the Witness: The Experts Speak on Cross Examination (Juris Pub 2006) <https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=bVRGNTQAlLUC> google scholar
• Oetiker C, ‘Commentary on Art. 26-30 Swiss Rules of Arbitration’ in Tobias Zuberbühler, Philipp Habegger, and Christoph Müller (eds), Swiss Rules of International Arbitration Commentary (2., Schulthess 2013) google scholar
• O’Malley, N.D., Rules of Evidence in International Arbitration: An Annotated Guide (Second edition, Informa law from Routledge 2019) google scholar
• Öztek S, ‘Bilirkişi Raporunun Hâkimi Bağlamaması’, Prof. Dr. Ejder Yılmaz’a Armağan, vol. 2 (2014) google scholar
• Parlett K, ‘Parties’ Engagement with Experts in International Litigation’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 440 google scholar
• Patocchi PM and Niedermaier T, ‘UNCITRAL Rules’ in Rolf A Schütze (ed), Institutional Arbitration: A Commentary (Bloomsbury Publishing 2013) google scholar
• Pekcanıtez H, ‘Özel Uzman (Bilirkişi) Görüşü ve Değerlendirilmesi’ (2016) 2 Makaleler 393 google scholar
• Peter W. ‘Witness “Conferencing”’ (2002) 18 Arbitration International 47 google scholar
• Plant B, ‘Expert Evidence and the Challenge of Procedural Reform in International Dispute Settlement’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 464 google scholar
• Pörnbacher, K., Duncker P and Baur S, ‘Gaspreisanpassungs-Schiedsverfahren - Hintergründe und prozessuale Besonderheiten’ (2012) 10 SchiedsVZ | German Arbitration Journal 289 google scholar
• Proske CE. Expert witness conferencing in Schiedsverfahren (Mohr Siebeck 2019) <https://www. mohrsiebeck.com/10.1628/978-3-16-158274-5> accessed October 25, 2022 google scholar
• Raeschke-Kessler H, ‘Witness Conferencing’ in LW Newman and RD Hill (eds), Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (Third, Juris Publishing, Incorporated 2014) <https://books.google.co.in/books?id=0bOIAwAAQBAJ> google scholar
• Reiner A and Aschauer C, ‘ICC Rules’ in Rolf Arno Schütze (ed), Institutional Arbitration: Article-by-Article Commentary (C H Beck, Hart, Nomos 2013) google scholar
• Risse J and Haller H, ‘Die „IBA-Regeln“ Zur Beweisaufnahme in Der InternationalenSchiedsgerichtsbarkeit’ in Walter Eberl (ed), Beweis im Schiedsverfahren (1., Nomos 2015) google scholar
• Rogers CA, Ethics in International Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2014) google scholar
• Sachs K and Lörcher T, ‘Commentary on the German Arbitration Law (10th Book of the German Code of Civil Procedure), Chapter V: Conduct of the Arbitral Proceeding, § 1049 - Experts Appointed by Arbitral Tribunal’ in Patricia Nacimiento, Stefan M Kröll, and Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel (eds), Arbitration in Germany: The Model Law in Practice (2., 2015) google scholar
• Sachs K and Schmidt-Ahrendts N, ‘Protocol on Expert Teaming : A New Approach to Expert Evidence’ (2011) 15 Arbitration Advocacy in Changing Times, ICCA Congress Series 135 google scholar
• Saenger I, ‘ZPO § 1049 Vom Schiedsgericht Bestellter Sachverstandiger’, Zivilprozessordnung (9., Beck-Online 2021) google scholar
• Samaras E and Strasser C, ‘Managing Party-Appointed Experts in International Arbitration— Analysis of the Current Framework and Best Practice Proposals-’ (2013) 11 Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren 314 google scholar
• Sarısözen MS, Medeni Usul Hukukunda Soru Yöneltme ve Çapraz Sorgu (Yetkin Yayınları 2016) google scholar
• Schafer E and Wilson DB, ‘Issues for Arbitrators to Consider Regarding Experts: An Updated Report of the ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR’ (ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR 2021) google scholar
• Schlaepfer AV and Duvanel VA, ‘Direct and Re-Direct Examination’ in Stephen Jagusch, Philippe Pinsolle, and Alexander G Leventhal (eds), The Guide to Advocacy (Fifth edition, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) google scholar
• Schmidt-Ahrendts N, ‘Expert Teaming -Bridging the Divide between Party-Appointed and Tribunal-Appointed Experts’ (2012) 43 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 653 google scholar
• Schneider, M.E., ‘Technical Experts in International Arbitration’ (1993) 11 ASA Bulletin; Kluwer Law International 446 google scholar
• Schütze RA, Das Internationale Zivilprozessrecht in Der ZPO : Kommentar (2., De Gruyter 2011) google scholar
• ——, ‘Der Beweis Des Anwendbaren Rechts Im Schiedsverfahren Und Die Feststellung Seines Inhalts’ in Walter Eberl (ed), Beweis im Schiedsverfahren (1., Nomos 2015) <http://www. nomos-shop.de/_assets/downloads/9783848702787_lese01.pdf> google scholar
• Schütze, R. A., Tscherning D and Wais W, Handbuch Des Schiedsverfahrens : Praxis Der Deutschen Und Internationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (2., de Gruyter 1990) google scholar
• Senogles G, ‘Some Views from the Crucible: The Perspective of an Expert Witness on the Adversarial Principle’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 361 google scholar
• Simmons JB, ‘Valuation in Investor-State Arbitration: Toward A More Exact Science’ (2012) 30 Berkeley Journal of International Law 196 google scholar
• Spitzer M, ‘Der Sachverstandigenbeweis Im Österreichischen Zivilprozess’ (2018) 131 Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess 25 google scholar
• Tanrıver S, Medenî Yargıda Bilirkişilik (Yetkin Yayınları 2016) google scholar
• ——, Hukukumuzda Bilirkişilik (Yetkin Yayınları 2017) google scholar
• ——, ‘Yasal Düzenleme ve Teorik Boyutuyla Bilirkişilik’ (Lexpera 2022) <https://www.youtube. com/live/F_b6CuiIn1Q?feature=share&t=22667> google scholar
• Theune U, ‘DIS Rules’ in Rolf Arno Schütze (ed), Institutional Arbitration: Article-by-Article Commentary (CH Beck, Hart Publishing, Nomos 2013) google scholar
• Townsend J, ‘Crossing the Hot-Tub - Examining Adverse Expert Witnesses in International Arbitration’ in LW Newman and B. H. Sheppard (eds), Take the Witness: Cross-examination in International Arbitration (JURIS 2010) google scholar
• ----, ‘Expert or Advocate? How to Present Foreign Law’ in Julie Bedard and Patrick W Pearsall (eds), Reflections on International Arbitration: Essays in Honour of Professor George Bermann (JURIS 2022) google scholar
• Trenor JA (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4., Law Business Research Ltd 2021) google scholar
• Trittmann R and Kasolowsky B, ‘Taking Evidence in Arbitration Proceedings Between Common Law and Civil Law Traditions- The Development of a European Hybrid Standard for Arbitration Proceedings’ (2008) 31 University of New South Wales Law Journal 330 google scholar
• Uluç İ, Evidence-Taking in National and International Arbitration: The Reconciliation of Civil Law and Common Law Traditions (Yetkin Yayınları 2021) google scholar
• UNCTAD, ‘UNCTAD IIA Issues Note’ (UNCTAD 2015) 1 <https://unctad.org/system/files/ official-document/webdiaepcb2015d1_en.pdf> google scholar
• Ünüvar G, ‘Experts: Investment Arbitration’ [2021] Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law <http://opil.ouplaw.com> google scholar
• Van Damme I, ‘The Assessment of Expert Evidence in International Adjudication’ (2018) 9 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 401 google scholar
• Van Den Berg, A.J., ICCA Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 1988, XIII (ICCA & Kluwer Law International 1988) google scholar
• ——, ICCA Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 1993, vol XVIII (ICCA & Kluwer Law International 1993) google scholar
• Van Houtte V, ‘Party-Appointed Experts and Tribunal-Appointed Experts’ in Stephen R Bond (ed), Arbitral Procedure at the Dawn of the New Millennium: Reports of the International Colloquium of CEPANI (Bruylant 2004) google scholar
• Varga I. Beweiserhebung in Transatlantischen Schiedsverfahren: Eine Suche Nach Kompromissen Zwischen Deutscher Und US-Amerikanischer Beweisrechtstradition (Nomos 2006) <https:// books.google.com.tr/books?id=AszEAAAACAAJ> google scholar
• Veeder VV et al. (eds), ‘Act III: Advocacy with Witness Testimony’ (2005) 21 Arbitration International 583 google scholar
• Wach KJT, and Petsch T, ‘Der Sachverstandigenbeweis Im Schiedsverfahren - Grenzen Der Gestaltungsfreiheit von Parteien Und Schiedsgericht’ in Walter Eberl (ed), Beweis im Schiedsverfahren (1., Nomos 2015) google scholar
• Waincymer M, Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2012) google scholar
• Wall V, ‘States as First Class Citizens’? Special Treatment for States in International Disputes’, State involvement in arbitrations (2022) <https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2022/06/05/ lidw-2022-states-as-first-class-citizens/> google scholar
• Webster TH and Bühler MW, Handbook of UNCITRAL Arbitration (3rd edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2019) google scholar
• ——, Handbook of ICC Arbitration: Commentary, Precedents, Materials (5th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2021) google scholar
• Weiss A, and Bürgi Locatelli K, ‘Der Vom Schiedsgericht Bestellte Experte-Ein Überblick Aus Sicht Eines Internationalen Schiedsgerichts Mit Sitz in Der Schweiz’ (2004) 22 ASA Bulletin 479 google scholar
• White GM, The Use of Experts by International Tribunals (Syracuse University Press 1965) google scholar
• Wilske S and Gack C, ‘Expert Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration’ in Dennis Campbell and Anita Alibekova (eds), The Comparative Law Yearbook of International Business, vol. 29 (Wolters Kluwer 2007) google scholar
• Wilske S and Markert L, Beck’scher Online-Kommentar ZPO (Volkert Vorwerk and Christian Wolf eds, 44., Beck-Online 2022) google scholar
• Yalabık FT, ‘Questioning Expert Witnesses in Litigation and International Arbitration: How to Prevent Partisan Expert Reports and “Battle of Experts”’ 16 Medeni Usul ve İcra İflas Hukuku Dergisi 133 google scholar
• Yazıcı-Tıktık Ç, ‘HMK m. 293’teki Uzman Görüşü Kurumu Ile Anglo-Sakson Hukuk Sistemindeki Uzman Tanık Kurumunun Karşılaştırılması’ (2011) 7 Medeni Usul ve İcra İflas Hukuku Dergisi 79 google scholar
• Yıldızlı F, Uluslararası Tahkimde Zararın Değerlendirilmesi (Seçkin 2020) google scholar
• Zuberbühler, T. & Others, IBA Rules of Evidence: Commentary on the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (2., Schulthess 2022) google scholar

Citations