Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638   IUP :10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638    Full Text (PDF)

Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye

Sevda YapraklıFatma Kanca Kervan

Analysis of the impact of innovation on exports is a significant topic in the international economics literature. Ceteris paribus, the effect of innovation on exports according to technology intensity is crucial for countries’ competitiveness, foreign trade earnings, and development levels. Although Turkey, as an open country, has an export-oriented production structure and active export activities, its export performance remains relatively low. This study examines the effects of key innovation indicators such as R&D expenditures, patent application numbers, Information Technology Communications (ICT), and Total Factor Productivity (TFP) on exports according to technology intensity. For this purpose, predictions were made using the Vector Auto-regression (VAR) model, using annual data from the period 1990-2021 for Turkey. Variance decomposition and ımpulse-response functions were employed to identify the relationships between the variables in accordance with the VAR model estimates. In the Variance Decomposition analysis, it was determined that the most effective innovation indicator in exports according to the technology intensity is R&D expenditures. The impulse-response functions indicate that the main innovation indicator affecting the export of medium-high-tech products is ICT, while the indicator affecting the export of high-tech products is R&D expenditures. Furthermore, it has been determined that the positive effect on future period export performance of past period performance of the export of mediumhigh-tech products is higher than the effect of the export of high-tech products. The analysis results recommend that the level of technology exports influenced by innovation and the ability to gain the international competitive advantage in Turkey is low. 

DOI :10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638   IUP :10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638    Full Text (PDF)

Teknoloji Yoğunluğuna Göre İhracatı Etkileyen Temel Inovasyon Göstergeleri: Türkiye İçin Zaman Serisi Analizlerine Dayalı Bir Uygulama

Sevda YapraklıFatma Kanca Kervan

Inovasyonun ihracat üzerindeki etkisinin analizi, uluslararası iktisat literatürünün önemli konuları arasında yer almaktadır. Diğer etkileri sabitken, inovasyonun teknoloji yoğunluğuna göre ihracata etkisi, ülkelerin rekabet güçleri, dış ticaret kazançları ve gelişmişlik seviyeleri açısından kritik öneme sahiptir. Dışa açık bir ülke olan Türkiye’de ihracata dayalı bir üretim yapısı ve dış satım faaliyeti olmasına rağmen, ihracat performansının düşük olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de Ar-Ge harcamaları, patent başvuru sayıları, Bilgi İletişim Teknolojileri (BIT) ve Toplam Faktör Verimliliği (TFV) şeklindeki temel inovasyon göstergelerinin teknoloji yoğunluğuna göre ihracat üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Türkiye için 1990-2021 dönemine ait yıllık veriler kullanılarak Vector Autoregression (VAR) modeli ile tahminler yapılmıştır. VAR modeli tahminleri doğrultusunda değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler varyans ayrıştırması ve etki-tepki fonksiyonları ile belirlenmiştir. Varyans ayrıştırma analizinde teknoloji yoğunluğuna göre ihracat üzerinde en etkili inovasyon göstergesinin Ar-Ge harcamaları olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Etkitepki fonksiyonları, orta-yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatı üzerinde etkili olan temel inovasyon göstergesinin BIT, yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatı üzerinde etkili olan göstergenin ise Ar-Ge harcamaları olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca orta-yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatının geçmiş dönem performansının, gelecekteki ihracat performansı üzerindeki pozitif etkisinin, yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatının etkisinden daha yüksek olduğu da belirlenmiştir. Analiz sonuçları Türkiye’de teknoloji ihracatının inovasyondan etkilenme ve uluslararası rekabet avantajı elde etme seviyesinin düşük olduğuna işaret etmektedir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


In line with globalisation and technological changes, countries that sell goods and services abroad, that is, export, increase their foreign trade earnings and competitiveness. Exports according to technology intensity are one of the basic indicators reflecting the goods composition and sectoral competitive advantages in foreign trade of countries and are classified as low, medium (lowhigh), and high-technology exports. As countries shift from low-tech products to medium- and high-tech products in their export commodity baskets, their competitiveness, export revenues, and hence their level of economic development increase.

One of the key factors that enhance the export performance of countries is innovation. Innovation, which can be defined as developing a new product and/or service or production technology, finding a new market, or providing change and improvement beyond what is available in logistics activities, is the primary source of countries’ international competitive advantage. Although numerous studies have been conducted to measure innovation, a universally accepted measurement has yet to be established. Factors that vary according to internal and external sources such as firm, industry, and economic structure, the fact that innovation is a complex process that requires continuity and that it is difficult to measure with simple techniques, it makes difficult to develop a standard innovation measurement.

However, by employing various measurement techniques, a consensus has emerged on several indicators for comparing innovation levels at both the firm and country levels. The main ones are RD expenditures, patent application numbers, Information Communication Technologies (ICT), and Total Factor Productivity (TFP). RD activities grounded in scientific research, technology transfer, and the development of existing knowledge facilitate the integration of new knowledge, particularly into the production process. Patents, which protect the inventions/innovations of individuals or companies, are official documents that ensure monopolisation in the production and trade of the invention/innovation in question. New products and production processes can be developed through ICT, which encompasses the examination, development, management, and implementation of electronic and computer-based information systems and data. TFP, defined as obtaining more output from the increase in labour and capital inputs, reveals the cost-cutting and efficiency-enhancing effects of technological advancement.

In the literature, the number of applied studies investigating the relationship between innovation and foreign trade/export in Turkey has been on the rise, particularly in recent years. However, the effects of basic innovation indicators on medium-high and high-technology product exports have not been examined in studies on the subject. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap in the literature by empirically revealing the effects of four fundamental innovation indicators on exports according to technology intensity in the Turkish example.

In this study, the effects of basic innovation indicators such as RD expenditures, patent application numbers, ICT and TFP on exports according to the technology intensity have been examined. For this purpose, predictions were made using the Vector AutoRegression (VAR) model, using annual data from the period 1990-2021 for Turkey. Variance decomposition and ımpulse-response functions were employed to identify the relationships between the variables in accordance with the VAR model estimates. In the Variance Decomposition, it was determined that the most effective innovation indicator in exports according to the technology intensity is R&D expenditures. The impulse-response functions reveal that the main innovation indicator influencing the export of medium-high-tech products is ICT, whereas the indicator impacting the export of high-tech products is R&D expenditures. Furthermore, it has been determined that the positive effect on future period export performance of past period performance of the export of medium-high-tech products is higher than the effect of the export of high-tech products.

The findings obtained within the scope of the study are consistent with the findings obtained in the studies conducted by researchers such as Hirsch and Bijaoui (1985), Le (1987), Zhao and Li (1997), Şahbaz et al. (2014), Kılıç et al. (2014), Özkan and Yılmaz (2017), Neves, Teixeria and Silva (2016), Usman (2019) and Akyol and Demez (2020). However, the findings differ from the results of the main studies by Landesman and Pfaffermayr (1997), Karagöz (2007), Wagner (2008), Fu, Wu, and Tang (2011), and Han et al. (2017). It is possible to say that this difference may be due to the data period, method used, sample and the use of non-standard innovation indicators. Using data sets grounded in standard innovation measures for future studies will contribute to obtaining more meaningful and comparable results.

Based on the analysis results, it is possible to say that technology exports in Turkey are partially affected by innovation and therefore the possibility of gaining international competitiveness in terms of exports is low. To enhance Turkey’s competitiveness, it needs to produce and sell export goods and services that are based on qualified labour, knowledge and technology, and have high added value and economic complexity. To achieve this, it is crucial to boost public-private investments, especially R&D expenditures along with other innovation indicators.


PDF View

References

  • Akarsu, Y. (2020). Patent başvurularının Türkiye’nin ihracatına etkisi [The impact of patent applications on Turkey’s exports]. Uluslararası Yönetim Eğitim ve Ekonomik Perspektifler Dergisi, 8(2), 110-124. google scholar
  • Akyol, M. & Mete, E. (2021). Teknoloji yoğunluklarına göre dış ticaretin ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi: Türkiye örneği [The effect of foreign trade on economic growth according to technology intensity: Türkiye example]. Maliye Dergisi, 180, 208-232. google scholar
  • Akyol, M. & Demez, S. (2020). Ar-Ge harcamalarının yüksek teknoloji ürün ihracatına etkisi: AB’ye üye geçiş ekonomileri ve Türkiye analizi [The impact of R&D expenditures on high technology product exports: Analysis of EU member transition economies and Türkiye]. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 11(3), 767-781. google scholar
  • Ayar, B. & Erdil, T. S. (2018). Inovasyon ve Ar-Ge faaliyetlerinin ihracat performansına etkisi: Türk işletmeleri üzerine algısal bir araştırma [The impact of innovation and R&D activities on export performance: A perceptual research on Turkish businesses]. Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, 13(49), 45-68. google scholar
  • Çakmak, E. & Yıldız, G. (2018). Teknolojik inovasyonun ihracat üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye-AB (15) ülkeleri örneği [The impact of technological innovation on exports: The example of Türkiye-EU (15) countries]. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 19(2), 1-16. google scholar
  • Çakmak, U. & Tanrıverdi, A. (2021). Inovasyon sürecinde Türkiye’nin konumuna ilişkin bir değerlendirme [An evaluation of Turkey’s position in the innovation process]. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 56(1), 470-494. google scholar
  • Çeştepe, H., Arslan, E. & Yazıcı, M. (2020). Toplam faktör verimliliği, ekonomik büyüme ve ihracat ilişkisi: Gelişmekte olan ülkeler örneği [The relationship between total factor productivity, economic growth and exports: The example of developing countries]. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 27(3), 495-510. google scholar
  • Çetin, K. & Gedik, H. (2017). Inovasyon ve ihracat performansı ilişkisi: Karaman örneği [Innovation and export performance relationship: Karaman example]. Uluslararası Ekonomik ve İdari Çalışmalar Dergisi, (22. UPK Ahmet Hamdi İslamoğlu Özel Sayısı), 109-126. google scholar
  • Çitil, M. (2020). Uluslararası ticaret teorileri [International trade theories]. Içinde M. R. Görgün & S. Adıgüzel (Ed.), Uluslararası İktisat, ss. 103-124, Ankara, Türkiye: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Davis, G.B. (2000). Information systems conceptual foundations: Looking backward. Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, (41), 61-82. google scholar
  • Deviren, N. V. (2003). Yeni dış ticaret teorileri ve Türkiye-AB Ülkeleri arasındaki endüstri-içi ticaretin analizi [New foreign trade theories and analysis of intra-industry trade between Türkiye and EU Countries]. (Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul. google scholar
  • Dipietro W. & Anoruo, E. (2006). Creativity, innovation and export performance. Journol of Policy Modeling, 28(2), 133-139. google scholar
  • Dursun, Ö. O. (2017). İnovasyon üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. International Journal of Management and Administration, 1(1), 12-17. google scholar
  • Eaton, J. & Kortum, S. (1997). Technology and bilateral trade. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 2, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_ papers/w6253/w6253.pdf. google scholar
  • Ersoy, E. R. (2022). Yüksek teknolojili sanayi üretimi ve ihracatın geliştirilmesinde eğitim reformlarının rolü [The role of reforms training in the development of high-tech industrial production and exports]. (Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul. google scholar
  • Fagerberg, J. (1988). International competitiveness. The Economic Journal, 98(392), 355-374. google scholar
  • Fonchamnyo, D. C. & Wujung, V. A. (2016). Innovation and export performance: An empirical ınsight on the effect of innovation on manufacturing firms in Cameroon. Applied Economics and Finance, 3(4),123-130. google scholar
  • Fu, D., Wu, Y. & Tang, Y. (2012). Does innovation matter for Chinese high-tech exports? A firm-level analysis. Frontiers of Economics in China, 7(2), 218-245. google scholar
  • Gan, S. & Cheng, D. (2019). Exchange rate appreciation, RD and export sophistication: Evidence from China. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 29(2), 237-246. google scholar
  • Gökmen, Y. & Türen, U. (2013). The determinants of high technology exports volume: A panel data analysis of EU-15 countries. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 2(3), 217-232. google scholar
  • Guan, J. & Ma, N. (2003). Innovative capability and export performance of chinese firms. Technovation, 23(9), 737-747. google scholar
  • Hacker, R. S. & Hatemi-J, A. (2003). How productivity and domestic output are related to exports and foreign output in the case of Sweden. Empirical Economics, 28, 767-782. google scholar
  • Han, C., Thomas, S. R., Yang, M., Ieromonachou, P. & Zhang, H. (2017). Evaluating R&D ınvestment efficiency in China’s high-tech industry. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 28(1), 93-109. google scholar
  • Hirsch, S. & Bijaoui, I. (1985). R&D intensity and export performance: A micro view. Review of World Economics, 121(2), 238-251. google scholar
  • Karagöz, K. (2007). Bilgi iletişim teknolojilerindeki gelişmenin ihracata etkisi: Türkiye için ampirik bir analiz [The impact of development in information communication technologies on exports: An empirical analysis for Türkiye]. Maliye Dergisi, 153, 214-223. google scholar
  • Karahan, Ö. (2015). Intensity of business enterprise R&D expenditure and high-tech specification in European manufacturing sector. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 806-813. google scholar
  • Karakostas, E. (2022). What determines the medium and high technology products exports: The case of Germany” International Journal of Advanced Economics, 4(3), 40-52. google scholar
  • Keesing, D. B. (1967). The impact of research and development on United States trade. Journal of Political Economy, 75(1), 38-48. google scholar
  • Kervan, F.K. (2023). Temel inovasyon göstergelerinin teknoloji düzeyine göre ihracat üzerindeki etkileri: Türkiye üzerine ekonometrik analizler [Effects of basic innovation indicators on exports according to technology level: Econometric analyzes on Türkiye]. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Erzurum. google scholar
  • Kılıç, C., Bayar, Y. & Özekicioğlu, H. (2014). Araştırma geliştirme harcamalarının yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatı üzerindeki etkisi: G-8 ülkeleri için bir panel veri analizi [The impact of research and development expenditures on high-tech product exports: A panel data analysis for G-8 countries]. Erciyes Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 44, 115-130. google scholar
  • Korkmaz, S., Ermeç, A. & Yücedağ N. (2009). İşletmelerin yenilikçi kabiliyetleri ve ihracat performanslarına etkileri [Innovative capabilities of businesses and their impact on export performance]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 83-104. google scholar
  • Köseoğlu, D. & Tuncer, İ. (2022). Bilgi iletişim teknolojileri kullanımı, proaktif ihracat pazarı geliştirme yetenekleri ve ihracat performansı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between the use of information communication technologies, proactive export market development capabilities and export performance]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 32-52. google scholar
  • Kumar N. & Siddharthan, N. S. (1994). Technology firm size and export behaviour in developing countries: The case of Indian enterprises. Journal of Development Studies, 31(2), 289-309. google scholar
  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P. & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54,159-178. google scholar
  • Landesmann, M. & Pfaffermayr, M. (1997). Technological competition and trade performance. Applied Economics, 29(2),179-196. google scholar
  • Laursen K. (1999). The impact of technological opportunity on the dynamics of trade performance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 10(3), 341-357. google scholar
  • Le, C. D. (1987). The role of R&D in high technology trade: An empirical analysis. Atlantic Economic Journal, 15(4), 32-77. google scholar
  • Montobbio, F. & Rampa, F. (2005). The impact of technology and structural change on export performance in nine developing countries. World Development, 33(4), 527-547. google scholar
  • Neves, A., Teixeria, A. A. & Silva, S. T. (2016). Exports-R&D investment complementarity and economic performance of firms located in Portugal. Investigacion Economica, 75(295), 125-156. google scholar
  • OECD (2023). Main science and technology indicators, science, technology and R&D statistics. http://www.data.oecd.org.tr/tr/download/ article-file/104836. google scholar
  • Özdemir, O. (2019). Türkiye’de toplam faktör verimliliği, ekonomik büyüme ve ihracat arasındaki ilişkinin nedensellik analizi [Causality analysis of the relationship between total factor productivity, economic growth and exports in Turkey]. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 647, 23-63. google scholar
  • Özer, M. & Çiftçi, N. (2009). Ar-Ge harcamaları ve ihracat ilişkisi: OECD ülkeleri panel veri analizi [R&D expenditures and export relationship: Panel data analysis of OECD countries]. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(3), 39-50. google scholar
  • Özgen, F. B. & Güloğlu, B. (2004). Türkiye’de iç borçların iktisadi etkilerinin VAR tekniğiyle analizi [Analysis of the economic effects of domestic debts in Turkey using the VAR technique]. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 31, 93-114. google scholar
  • Özkan, G. & Yılmaz, H. (2017). Ar-Ge harcamalarının yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatı ve kişi başı gelir üzerindeki etkileri: 12 AB Ülkesi ve Türkiye için uygulama (1996-2015) [Effects of R&D expenditures on high-tech product exports and per capita income: Application for 12 EU Countries and Turkey (1996-2015)]. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 7(1), 1-12. google scholar
  • Özsağır, A. & Çütçü, İ. (2015). Inovasyon-dış ticaret arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi: Vektör hata düzeltme modeli ile Türkiye analizi [Causality relationship between innovation and foreign trade: Türkiye analysis with vector error correction model]. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, X(II), 119-132. google scholar
  • Rasiah, R. (2003). Foreign ownership technology and electronics exports from Malaysia and Thailand. Journal of Asian Economics, 14(5), 785-811. google scholar
  • Rath, B. N. & Akram, V. (2017). Export diversification and total factor productivity growth in case of Sout Asian Region. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 19(1), 196-210. google scholar
  • Sakaryalı, A. M. D. (2014). Inovasyon ve risk sermayesi [Innovation and venture capital]. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 9(1), 183-210. google scholar
  • Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A. S. & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options, reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms.Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(2), 237-263. google scholar
  • Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı (2023). Türk Patent ve Marka Kurumu: Patent resmi istatistikler [Türkiye Patent and Trademark Office: Patent official statistics]. https://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/patent-istatistik. google scholar
  • Sandu, S. & Ciocanel, B. (2014). Impact of R&D and innovation on high-tech export. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 80-90. google scholar
  • Sey, N. & Aydın, B. (2021). Türkiye’de yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatı ve inovasyon ilişkisi üzerine ekonometrik bir inceleme [An econometric study on the relationship between high-tech product exports and innovation in Turkey]. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 238-252. google scholar
  • Seyidoğlu, H. (2020). Uluslararası iktisat teori politika ve uygulama, (22. bs). [International economic theory policy and practice]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Güzem Can Yayınları. google scholar
  • Sims, C.A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48. google scholar
  • Sungur, O., Aydın, H. İ. & Eren, M. V. (2016). Türkiye’de Ar-Ge, inovasyon, ihracat ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: Asimetrik Nedensellik Analizi [The relationship between R&D, innovation, exports and economic growth in Turkey: Asymmetric Causality Analysis]. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 21(1), 173-192. google scholar
  • Şahbaz, A., Yanar, R. & Adıgüzel, U. (20104). Ar-ge Harcamaları ve ileri teknolojili mal ihracatı ilişkisi: Panel nedensellik analizi [The relationship between R&D Expenditures and high-tech goods exports: Panel causality analysis]. Çukurova Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 23(1), 47-60. google scholar
  • Şahinli, M. ve Kılınç, E. (2013). Inovasyon ve inovasyon göstergeleri: AB Ülkeleri ve Türkiye karşılaştırması [Innovation and innovation indicators: Comparison of EU Countries and Türkiye]. Selçuk Üniversitesi İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, (25), 329-355. google scholar
  • Tekin, E. & Hancıoğlu, Y. (2018). Inovasyon belirleyicilerinin ihracat performansına etkisi üzerine bir araştırma [A research on the impact of innovation determinants on export performance]. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 14(4), 897-917. google scholar
  • Topal, A. (2019). Inovasyonun örgütsel performans üzerindeki etkisinde algılanan çevresel belirsizliğin düzenleyici rolü [The moderating role of perceived environmental uncertainty in the impact of innovation on organizational performance]. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, Nevşehir. google scholar
  • Türkiye Odalar ve Borsalar Birliği (2024). Eurostat Teknoloji Sınıflamaları Listesi [List of Eurostat Technology Classifications]. https,//tobb. org.tr/SanayiMudurlugu/Sayfalar/. google scholar
  • University of Groningen and University of California, Davis (2024). Total Factor productivity level at current purchasing power parities for Turkey, retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CTFPPPTRA669NRUG. google scholar
  • Usman, M. (2019). Relationship between R&D investment and high-tech exports: Empirical study from Pakistan. Journal of Innovation and Sustainability, 10(1), 110-123. google scholar
  • Uzay, N., Demir, M. & Yıldırım, E. (2012). İhracat performansı açısından teknolojik yeniliğin önemi: Türkiye imalat sanayi örneği [The importance of technological innovation in terms of export performance: The example of Turkish manufacturing industry]. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(1), 147-160. google scholar
  • Wagner, J. (2008). Exports and firm characteristics, first evidence from fractional probit panel estimates. University of Lüneburg, Working Paper Series in Economics, No. 97. https://www.leuphana.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Forschungseinrichtungen/ifvwl/WorkingPapers/lue/pdf/wp_ 97_Upload.pdf. google scholar
  • Wakelin, K. (1998). Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Research Policy, 26(7-8), 829-841. google scholar
  • World Bank (2023). Data, indicators, high-technology exports (% of manufactured exports). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL. TECH.MF.ZS?locations=TR. google scholar
  • World Bank (2023). Data, indicators, ICT goods exports (% of total goods exports). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.ICTG.ZS. UN?locations=TR. google scholar
  • Yardımcı, P. (2006). İçsel büyüme modelleri ve Türkiye ekonomisinde içsel büyümenin dinamikleri [Endogenous growth models and dynamics of endogenous growth in the Turkish economy]. Selçuk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 10(9), 96-115. google scholar
  • Yavuz, N. Ç. (2011). Durağanlığın belirlenmesinde KPSS ve ADF testleri: IMKB Ulusal-100 Endeksi ile bir uygulama [Determining stationarity in KPSS and ADF tests: An application with ISE National-100 Index]. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 54(1), 239-247. google scholar
  • Yılancı, V. (2009). Yapısal kırılmalar altında Türkiye için işsizlik histerisinin sınanması [Analyzing the unemployment hysteresis for Turkey under structural breaks]. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 10(2), 324-335. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, E. & Kesikoğlu, F. (2012). Ar-Ge harcamaları ile ihracat arasındaki nedensellik ilişkileri: Türkiye örneğinde panel nedensellik testi kanıtları [Causality relations between R&D expenditures and exports: Panel causality test evidence in the case of Türkiye]. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 32(1), 165-180. google scholar
  • Zhao, H. & Li, H. (1997). R&D and export, an empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturing firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 8(1), 89-105. google scholar
  • Zivot, E. & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Yapraklı, S., & Kanca Kervan, F. (2024). Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 0(41), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638


AMA

Yapraklı S, Kanca Kervan F. Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics. 2024;0(41):133-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638


ABNT

Yapraklı, S.; Kanca Kervan, F. Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 41, p. 133-150, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yapraklı, Sevda, and Fatma Kanca Kervan. 2024. “Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0, no. 41: 133-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638


Chicago: Humanities Style

Yapraklı, Sevda, and Fatma Kanca Kervan. Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0, no. 41 (Mar. 2025): 133-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638


Harvard: Australian Style

Yapraklı, S & Kanca Kervan, F 2024, 'Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye', EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, vol. 0, no. 41, pp. 133-150, viewed 10 Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yapraklı, S. and Kanca Kervan, F. (2024) ‘Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye’, EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 0(41), pp. 133-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638 (10 Mar. 2025).


MLA

Yapraklı, Sevda, and Fatma Kanca Kervan. Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, vol. 0, no. 41, 2024, pp. 133-150. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638


Vancouver

Yapraklı S, Kanca Kervan F. Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics [Internet]. 10 Mar. 2025 [cited 10 Mar. 2025];0(41):133-150. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638 doi: 10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638


ISNAD

Yapraklı, Sevda - Kanca Kervan, Fatma. Basic Innovation Indicators Affecting Exports According to Technology Intensity: An Application Based on Time Series Analysis for Türkiye”. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0/41 (Mar. 2025): 133-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1548638



TIMELINE


Submitted11.09.2024
Accepted04.12.2024
Published Online26.12.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.