Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465   IUP :10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465    Full Text (PDF)

Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach

Atilla Aydın

The right to unionize is now considered as one of the most important indicators of contemporary democracy. Here, unionization rate is defined as the ratio of the number of union members to the total number of employed workers. However, on its own, unionization does not mean anything and it is considered along with the right to collective bargaining. This study used collective bargaining agreement coverage rate data to investigate the effects of economic variables on the collective bargaining agreement coverage rate. It used the share of industrial sector added value in gross domestic product (GDP), per capita income, and inflation as independent variables. The study covered the period of 1988–2022 using the Johansen cointegration and autoregressive distributed lag bound tests. The findings revealed that the variables are cointegrated in the long term. A 1% increase in the share of industrial value added in GDP increases the unionization rate by approximately 3.40%. While a 1% increase in inflation reduces the actual unionization rate by 0.49%, a 1% increase in per capita national income reduces it by approximately 1.18%. Additionally, the study established an error correction model, determining that the deviations experienced in the short term disappear in the long term.

DOI :10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465   IUP :10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465    Full Text (PDF)

Türkiye’de Toplu İş Sözleşme Kapsama Oranını Etkileyen İktisadi Faktörler: Eşbütünleşme Yaklaşımı

Atilla Aydın

Sendikalaşma hakkı, günümüzde çağdaş demokrasinin en önemli göstergelerinden biri olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Sendikalaşma oranı, sendika üyesi işçi sayısının toplam çalışan işçi sayısına oranı olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Ancak sendikalaşma, tek başına bir anlam ifade etmemekte ve toplu iş sözleşme hakkı ile birlikte ele alınmaktadır. Bu çalışmada toplu iş sözleşmesi kapsama oranı verisi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı, iktisadi değişkenlerin toplu iş sözleşmesi kapsama oranı üzerindeki etkilerini araştırmaktır. Bu bağlamda sanayi sektörü katma değerinin GSYH içindeki payı, kişi başına gelir ve enflasyon bağımsız değişkenler olarak ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın veri arâlığı 1988-2022 yılları olup yöntem olarak Johansen eşbütünleşme testi ve ARDL sınır testi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre değişkenler uzun dönemde eşbütünleşiktir. Sanayi katma değerinin GSYH içindeki payında gerçekleşen %1’lik artış fiili sendikalaşma oranını yaklaşık %3,40 oranında arttırmaktadır. Enflasyondaki %1’lik artış fiili sendikalaşma oranını %0.49 düşürürken, kişi başına milli gelirdeki %1’lik artış fiili sendikalaşma oranını yaklaşık %1,18 düzeyinde aşağı çekmektedir. Ayrıca hata düzeltme modeli kurulmuş ve kısa dönemde yaşanan sapmaların uzun dönemde ortadan kalktığı saptanmıştır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The right to unionize is recognized as one of the most important indicators of modern democracy. In this context, the most important factors are the unionization rate, defined as the ratio of the number of unionized workers to the total number of employed workers, and collective bargaining coverage rate, defined as the ratio of the number of workers benefiting from a collective bargaining agreement to the number of workers earning wages. This study aims to determine the economic factors affecting the collective bargaining coverage rate in Turkey. The study uses the following independent variables: the share of industrial sector value added in GDP, inflation rate, and per capita income, to discuss the effects of market conditions on collective bargaining coverage rate.

Unionization is generally associated with legal and social factors. Görmüş (2020) and Mülayim (2023) investigated the factors affecting the collective bargaining coverage rate, namely, unionization rate, level of collective bargaining agreements, and incentive scheme. However, few empirical studies investigate the relationship between unionization and economic variables. Oswald (1982) argued that an increase in unionization will raise wages, leading to decreased employment and output. Blanchard and Summers (1986) concluded that a high unionization rate increased the natural unemployment rate in the 1980s. Ramjas (1989) found that an increase in the unionization rate negatively impacts worker productivity. Bean and Crafts (1995) reported that an increase in the unionization rate negatively affects total factor productivity. De Groot (2001) found that unions will increase the general wage level and inflation if the wage increase cannot be compensated by productivity increases. Meanwhile, Daveri and Tabellini (2000) analyzed the economic effects of taxation processes, finding that if excessive taxation is passed on to workers, labor costs and unemployment increase and union density decreases. Van Reenen (1996) and Wrigles (2002) argued that while creative enterprises pay higher wages, competitive enterprises have a low general wage level. Here, unions become stronger and resources cannot be allocated to research and development activities, resulting a slowdown in growth. Turnbull (2003) found that unionization slows down GDP growth, while Baker et al. (2005) identified a significant relationship between collective bargaining coverage and unemployment. Murtin et al. (2014) found that if the collective bargaining coverage rate is higher than the unionization rate, wages will become rigid and harm employment. Barbier-Gauchard et al. (2023) found that nominal wages and employment fall when unionization is weak, putting downward pressure on inflation. Empirical studies generally associate unionization with the labor market. In contrast, this study examines unionization and collective bargaining coverage from a broader, macroeconomic perspective.

This study uses the Johansen cointegration test and ARDL bounds test to determine the long-term relationship between variables. To apply the cointegration test, all variables should be stationary of the same order. In this framework, the stationarity of the variables is investigated with conventional and structural break unit root tests. Moreover, long-term parameters are estimated and the effects of each variable on the collective bargaining coverage rate are decomposed. Finally, an error correction model is constructed to analyze the short run.

According to the results, a 1% increase in the share of industrial value added in gross domestic product (GDP) increases the collective bargaining coverage rate by approximately 2.19%. This result is natural considering that unionization tendency is generally higher in the industrial sector. Meanwhile, a 1% increase in inflation decreases the collective bargaining coverage rate by approximately 0.19%; the increase in inflation decreases real wage and employment level. The increases in enterprises’ input costs are expected to be compensated by the pressure on wages and collective bargaining agreements. In countries with weak collective bargaining power, the inflationary process results in a decline in real wages and distorts income distribution. This framework can explain the negative impact of the inflation rate on collective bargaining coverage. A 1% increase in per capita income decreases the collective bargaining coverage rate by approximately 0.77%. Evaluating this result along with the functional income distribution structure in Turkey is important. Increasing the rate of collective bargaining coverage is important for workers’ rights and democratization. Based on this study’s findings, a structural change in favor of the industry will increase the rate of collective bargaining. High inflation is among today’s most important problems. Nowadays, the fight against inflation is carried out by turning expectations into positive and reducing economic risks. The study finds that a decrease in inflation will increase the rate of collective bargaining coverage. Additionally, the implementation of economic policies aimed at improving income distribution will also increase the collective bargaining coverage rate. Moreover, spreading economic growth to all segments of society is important for ensuring economic stability. To this end, this framework indicates that regulations to prevent the erosion of wage incomes, tax policies in favor of labor incomes, and the fight against inflation should be implemented.


PDF View

References

  • Akyiğit, E. (2022), Toplu İş Hukuku, İstanbul, Seçkin Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Aydın, U. ve Keskin, Ö. (2015), “2821 Sayılı Kanundan 6356 Sayılı Kanuna: Türkiye’de Sendikalar Hukukunun Dönüşümü, Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, No. 2: 1-41. google scholar
  • Baker D., Glyn A., Howell D. ve Schmitt J. (2005), Labor Market İnstitutions and Unemployment: Assessment of the Crosscountry Evidence. in: google scholar
  • Howell D (Ed.) Fighting Unemployment: The Limits of Free Market Orthodoxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Pp. 72-118. google scholar
  • Barbier-Gauchard, A., Betti, T. ve De Palma, F. (2023), Monetary Policy with Weakened Unions 1, Revue d’economiepolitique, (4), 525-540. google scholar
  • Bean, C. ve Crafts, N. (1995). British Economic Growth Since 1945: Relative Economic Decline and Renaissance? Economic Growth in Europe Since, 131- 172. google scholar
  • Blanchard, O.J. ve Summers, L.H. (1986), Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem. NBER Macroecon. Annu., 1: 15-78. https://doi.org/10.1086/654013 google scholar
  • Brooks, C. (2008), Intoductory Econometrics for Finance, Second Edition, Cambridge University Prress. google scholar
  • Çelik, A. ve Lordoğlu, K. (2006), Türkiye’de Resmi Sendikalaşma İstatistiklerinin Sorunları Üstüne, Çalışma ve Toplum, 2 (9), 11-30. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ct/issue/71808/1155274 google scholar
  • Çil, N. (2018), Finansal Ekonometri. Der Yayınları, İstanbul. google scholar
  • Daveri, F. ve Tabellini, G. (2000), Unemployment, Growth and Taxation in İndustrial Countries, Econ. Policy, 30: 47- 104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00057 google scholar
  • De Groot, H.L.F. (2001), Unemployment, Growth, and Trade Unions. Growth Change, 32(1): 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/0017-4815.00150 Demircioğlu, A. M. (2009), Ulusal ve Uluslararası Hukukta Teşmilin Hukuki Boyutları ve Uygulaması, Sicil İş Hukuk Dergisi, No. 15: 120-121. google scholar
  • Dickey, D. A. ve Fuller, W. A. (1979), Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431. google scholar
  • Dickey D.A. ve Fuller W.A.(1981), Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica, 49(4), ss.1057 1072. google scholar
  • DİSK-AR (2019), Sendikalaşma Araştırması, https://disk.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Sendikalasma-Arastirmasi.pdf google scholar
  • DİSK-AR (2022), Araştırma Bülteni, https://arastirma.disk.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Salgin-Doneminde-Isciler-Toplu-Is-Sozlesmesinden-Yoksun-Arastirma-Bulteni-1.pdf google scholar
  • DPT (2001), Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, Gelir Dağılımının İyileştirilmesi ve Yoksullukla Mücadele Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara, Erişim Tarihi: 11 Eylül 2023, https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Gelir-Dagiliminin-Iyilestirilmesi-ve-Yoksullukla-Mucadele-OIK-Raporu.pdf google scholar
  • Egemen, E. (1992), Toplu İş Sözleşmesinin Teşmili, Sosyal Siyaset D., C. I, S. 4, Nisan 1992. google scholar
  • Enders, W. (2010). Applied Econometric Time Series. Third Edition, Wiley, New York google scholar
  • Engle, R.F. ve Granger,C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica, 55, 251-76. google scholar
  • Görmüş, A. (2020), Toplu Pazarlık Kapsamını Etkileyen Faktörler: Karşılaştırmalı Endüstri İlişkileri Temelinde Türk Endüstri İlişkileri Sisteminin Modernizasyonu, Journal of Social Policy Conferences , (78) , 63-109 . DOI: 10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0003 google scholar
  • Granger, C.W.J. ve Newbold, P. (1974), Spurious Regressions in Econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120. google scholar
  • Hamilton, J.D. (1994), Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. google scholar
  • Harris, R. (1995), Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modelling, Prentice Hall. google scholar
  • Harris, R. ve Sollis, R. (2003), Applied Time Series, Modelling and Forecasting, John Wiley and Sons. google scholar
  • ILO (1997), World Labour Report 1997-1998, Geneva, google scholar
  • ILO. (2018), Quick Guide on Sources and Uses of Collective Bargaining Statistics, ILO Publications, International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland google scholar
  • Jirjahn, U. (2015), Research on Trade Unions and Collective Bargaining in Germany: The Contribution of Labor Economics. Trier: Universitat Trier. google scholar
  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economics Dynamic and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254. google scholar
  • Johansen, S. ve Juselius, K. (1990), Maximum Likelihood Estimation and İnference on Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210. google scholar
  • Kutal, M. (2014), Sendikalar ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Yasasının Kimi Hükümlerinin İptali İstemi, Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, (43), 13-28. google scholar
  • MacKinnon, J.G. (1991), Critical Values for Cointegration Tests, Edited by Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J., Long run economic relationship, Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Maddala, G.S. ve Kim, I.M. (2004), Unit Roots, Cointegration and Structural Change, Cambridge University Press, Sixth Printing. google scholar
  • Mills, T.C. ve Markellos, R.N. (2008), The Econometric Modelling of Financial Time Series, Third Edition, Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Muller, T. (2021), Collective Bargaining Systems in Europe- Some Stylised Facts, Brussels: UNI Europa Regional Conference Paper. google scholar
  • Murtin F., Serres A. ve Hijzen A. (2014), Unemployment and the Coverage Extension of Collective Wage Agreements. European Economic Review 71: 52-66. google scholar
  • Mülayim, B. O. (2023), Avrupa ve Ülkemizde Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kapsama Oranı ve Bu Oranı Etkileyen Faktörler, Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 5, 110-153. google scholar
  • OECD (2023, OECD Statistics on Collective Bargaining Coverage, Erişim tarihi,: 08 Eylül 2023, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=92378 google scholar
  • Oesingmann, K. (2016), The Extension of Collective Agreements in Europe.” Cesifo Dıce Report, Journal For Institutional Comparisons 14, no. 2, 59-64. google scholar
  • Oswald, A.J. (1982), Trade Unions, Wages and Unemployment: What Can Simple Models Tell Us? Oxf. Econ. Pap., 34(3): 526-545. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041569 google scholar
  • Peker, O. Ve Bölükbaş, M. (2012), Türkiye’de İşsizliği Belirleyen Faktörlerin Ampirik Bir Analizi, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26(3-4), 33-43. google scholar
  • Phillips, P.C. ve Perron, P. (1988), Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75(2), ss.335 346. google scholar
  • Pirler, B. (2013), Toplu İş İlişkileri Sistemimizde Yeni Döneme Başlarken Geride Bıraktıklarımız, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, No. özel sayı, 883-912. google scholar
  • Ramjas. (1989), Impact of Trade Unions on Productivity: A Study of the Indian Chemical Industry. Vikalpa J. Decis. 1581 Makers, 14(2): 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919890203 google scholar
  • Sarıca, S. (2023). Türkiye’de Sendikalaşma Oranı, Ticari Açıklık Oranı ve Kamu Nihai Tüketim Harcamalarının İşsizlik Üzerine Etkisi: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz. Sosyoekonomi, 31(56), 411-440. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.02.19 google scholar
  • Scheuer, S. (1997), Collective Bargaining Coverage Under Trade Unionism: A Sociological Investigation, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 35(1), 65-86. google scholar
  • Sevütekin, M. ve Çınar, M. (2017), Ekonometrik Zaman Serileri Analizi, 5. Baskı, Dora Yayınevi, Bursa. google scholar
  • Subaşı, İ. (2013), 6356 Sayılı Sendikalar ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kanununda Toplu İş Sözleşmesinin Teşmili, Çalışma ve Toplum, 4 (39), 209-246. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ct/issue/71802/1155299 google scholar
  • Tarı, R. ve Bakkal, H. (2017), Türkiye’de İşsizliğin Belirleyicileri, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 33, 1-18. google scholar
  • Traxler, F. (1994), Collective Bargaining: Levels and Coverage, Chapter 5, In: OECD Employment Outlook, 167-94. google scholar
  • Turnbull, P. (2003), What Do Unions Do Now? Journal of Labor Research, 24(3): 491-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-003-1010-5 google scholar
  • T.C. Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı (2023), Sendikal İstatistikler, Erişim Tarihi: 10 Eylül 2023, google scholar
  • https://www.csgb.gov.tr/istatistikler/calisma-hayati-istatistikleri/sendikal-istatistikler/isci-sayilari-ve-sendikalarin-uye-sayilari-hakkinda-tebligler/ google scholar
  • TÜİK (2023), Gayrisafi Yurt İçi Hasıla, Gelir Yöntemiyle Mevsim Etkisinden Arındırılmış Cari Fiyatlarla (Değer, Değişim Oranı), https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=ulusal-hesaplar-113&dil=1, Erişim Tarihi: 11 Eylül 2023. google scholar
  • Van Reenen, J. (1996), The Creation and Capture of Rents: Wages and İnnovation in a Panel of U.K. Companies, Q. J. Econ., 111(1): 195-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2946662 google scholar
  • Visser, J., Hayter, S. ve Gammarano, R. (2017), Trends in Collective Bargaining Coverage: Stability, Erosion Or Decline?, Geneva: ILO. google scholar
  • World Bank (2023), Inflation, Consumer Prices (Annual %), Erişim Tarihi: 10 Eylül 2023, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG google scholar
  • World Bank (2023), Industry (İncluding Construction), Value Added (% of GDP), Erişim Tarihi: 10 Eylül 2023, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.IND.TOTL.ZS google scholar
  • World Bank (2023), GDP Per Capita (Current US$), Erişim Tarihi: 10 Eylül 2023, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD google scholar
  • Wrigley, C. (2002), British Trade Unions Since 1933. google scholar
  • Yorgun, S. (2013), Sosyal Politika Açısından 6356 Sayılı Sendikalar ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kanunu, Çalışma Ve Toplum, 4(39), 357-380. google scholar
  • Yorğun, S. (2023), Sendikaların Toplu Pazarlık Yetkisi ve Kamu Toplu İş Sözleşmeleri Çerçeve Anlaşma Protokolü’nün Hukuki Boyutu. Çalışma ve Toplum, 76(1). google scholar
  • Zivot, E. ve Andrews, D. (1992), Further Evidence on the Great Crash, The Oil-Price Shock and The Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business Economic Statistics. 10(3): 251- 270. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Aydın, A. (2024). Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 0(40), 134-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465


AMA

Aydın A. Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics. 2024;0(40):134-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465


ABNT

Aydın, A. Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 40, p. 134-150, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Aydın, Atilla,. 2024. “Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0, no. 40: 134-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465


Chicago: Humanities Style

Aydın, Atilla,. Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0, no. 40 (Dec. 2024): 134-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465


Harvard: Australian Style

Aydın, A 2024, 'Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach', EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, vol. 0, no. 40, pp. 134-150, viewed 23 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Aydın, A. (2024) ‘Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach’, EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 0(40), pp. 134-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465 (23 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Aydın, Atilla,. Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, vol. 0, no. 40, 2024, pp. 134-150. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465


Vancouver

Aydın A. Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics [Internet]. 23 Dec. 2024 [cited 23 Dec. 2024];0(40):134-150. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465 doi: 10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465


ISNAD

Aydın, Atilla. Economic Factors Affecting the Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage Rate in Turkey: Cointegration Approach”. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0/40 (Dec. 2024): 134-150. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.40.1387465



TIMELINE


Submitted07.11.2023
Accepted22.03.2024
Published Online26.06.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.