Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279   IUP :10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279    Full Text (PDF)

A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies

Ebru IlgatNoyan Aydın

Innovation is defined as the adoption or application of new ideas or products, fostering skill development and continuous learning. It also involves the integration of new technologies and business practises, with technological advancements enabling the creation and improvement of products and processes. In an increasingly competitive environment, the importance of technological innovation and entrepreneurship in the social and economic spheres is growing, requiring societies to adapt to rapid scientific developments. In this context, the knowledge acquisition, entrepreneurial, and creative capabilities of individuals and societies play a central role in socio-economic progress, impacting various sectors and promoting a culture of innovation. Entrepreneurship stands out as a key driver of economic progress, as entrepreneurs can develop new ideas and products. Creativity plays a significant role in organisational effectiveness and adapting to competitive environments, fostering innovation and enhancing performance in dynamic settings. This study examines the relationship between the innovation capacities and technological innovation tendencies of university students who have the greatest potential for innovation. Data collected from 836 students were analysed using structural equation modelling. The findings indicate that creativity is the most influential factor affecting innovation tendency, while the propensity to take risks is the least important factor. Accordingly, policies should be developed that include both informative and encouraging practical applications in education from early ages to change and enhance students’ entrepreneurial and innovative capacities and their attitudes towards risk-taking. In this way, significant contributions can be made to a country’s socio-economic and technological development.

DOI :10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279   IUP :10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279    Full Text (PDF)

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Yenilikçilik Kapasitelerinin Teknolojik Yenilikçilik Eğilimlerine Etkisini Ölçmeye Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi

Ebru IlgatNoyan Aydın

Yenilikçilik (inovasyon), yeni fikirlerin veya ürünlerin benimsenmesi veya uygulanması olarak tanımlanır ve beceri gelişimini ve sürekli öğrenmeyi teşvik eder. Aynı zamanda, yeni teknolojiler ve iş uygulamalarının entegrasyonunu içerirken, teknolojik gelişmeler ürün ve süreçlerin oluşturulmasını ve iyileştirilmesini sağlamaktadır. Artan rekabet ortamında sosyal ve ekonomik alanlarda teknolojik yeniliğin ve girişimciliğin önemi giderek artmakta ve toplumların hızlı bilimsel gelişmelere uyum sağlaması gerekmektedir. Bu bağlamda, bireylerin ve toplumların bilgi edinme, girişimcilik ve yaratıcılık özellikleri de sosyoekonomik ilerlemede merkezi bir role sahip olup, pek çok sektörü etkileyerek bir yenilikçilik kültürünü teşvik etmektedir. Girişimciler yeni fikirler ve ürünler geliştirebildikleri için girişimcilik, ekonomik ilerlemenin anahtar itici gücü olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Yaratıcılık, kurumsal etkinlikte ve rekabetçi ortamlara uyum sağlamada önemli bir rol oynayarak yenilikçiliği beslemekte ve değişken ortamlara uyum sağlayarak performansı artırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, yenilikçilik anlamında en çok potansiyele sahip üniversite öğrencilerinin yenilikçilik kapasiteleri ile teknolojik yenilik eğilimleri arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. 836 öğrenciden temin edilen veriler yapısal eşitlik modeli ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, yaratıcılığın inovasyon eğilimini en çok etkileyen faktör olduğunu, risk alma eğiliminin ise en az öneme sahip faktör olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu doğrultuda, öğrencilerin girişimcilik ve yenilikçilik kapasiteleri ile risk alabilme tutumlarını değiştirip geliştirebilmek için erken yaşlardan itibaren eğitimde hem bilgilendirici hem de teşvik edici pratik uygulamalara yer verecek politikalar geliştirilmelidir. Böylelikle ülkenin sosyo-ekonomik ve teknolojik gelişimine önemli katkılar sağlanabilecektir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Innovation can be seen as the adoption or implementation of a new idea or product within a specific context, demonstrating the adaptability of a concrete output resulting from the creative process. It generates excitement, encourages skill development and information exchange, and promotes dynamism by breaking monotony. Innovation also accelerates organisational and personal growth, encouraging originality, personal development, and continuous learning.

Innovation has become increasingly crucial in both social and economic contexts, prompting rapid changes towards more scientifically advanced societies. Adapting to these changes is vital to avoid being left behind. Knowledge acquisition is central to socioeconomic progress, influencing economic, political, and social dynamics. As knowledge spreads, it profoundly impacts sectors such as the economy, business environment, and education, fostering a culture of innovation. Innovation integrates new technologies and business practises, facilitating governance by addressing public issues and shaping policy frameworks.

The innovation process involves developing, commercialising, and marketing new or improved products, processes, or services. It encompasses a broad range of activities, from product development to implementing new organisational structures and administrative systems. Technological innovation involves transforming new ideas into concrete products and disseminating them. It is divided into two main types: technological product innovation, which commercialises a product to provide new services or maximise existing product benefits, and technological process innovation, which involves the complete innovation or significant improvement of production or distribution processes.

Technological developments and innovative approaches create practical products. This innovation manifest in both the improvement and development of existing products and the production of entirely new ones. Technological product innovation focuses on providing new services to consumers through product development or commercialisation, while technological process innovation aims at improving production or distribution methods. Globalisation, driven by technological progress, has reshaped the global arena, intensifying competition, particularly in industrial areas.

Creativity, the essence of human endeavour, significantly impacts organisational effectiveness, providing resilience in rapid transformations and competitive environments. The process of birthing new concepts embodies creativity as a precursor to innovative breakthroughs, fuelling innovation and turning intellectual effort into tangible results. Creativity involves critical thinking, distinguishing connections between events, anticipating obstacles, finding solutions, and expressing findings precisely. It is crucial to adapt to variability in complex and competitive environments to innovate and enhance performance.

An entrepreneur combines innovative products, processes, markets, organisational structures, or supply channels, taking proactive risks to transform opportunities into viable economic offers. Entrepreneurship involves implementing new configurations, perceiving opportunities arising from environmental factors, and transforming these opportunities into products or services.

In today’s globalised world, entrepreneurship has emerged as a critical factor driving economic progress. With increasing competition and technological advancements, individuals and institutions must adopt innovations to stay current. Entrepreneurs play a pivotal role in this by pioneering new ideas and products through their visionary perspectives.

This study examines the relationship between university students’ entrepreneurial characteristics and their innovation-technological innovativeness. Data were collected through a survey and analysed using a structural equation model. The study focuses on the innovative and entrepreneurial characteristics of university students, hypothesising their impact on the students’ general tendency to innovate and subsequently their tendency towards technological innovation. Data were gathered from 836 undergraduate students at Kütahya Dumlupınar University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences.

University students were chosen due to their leading role in society and their potential to generate new ideas and contribute significantly to economic and technological progress. Universities are key action centres for discovering talents and producing and sharing knowledge. The survey targeted students to test the impact of their innovative capacity on technological innovation tendency using structural equation modelling. The scale used to measure innovation and technological innovation tendency included factors like risk-taking, proactiveness, uncertainty avoidance, creativity, innovativeness, and technological innovation. The overall reliability of the measurement model was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.95). Confirmatory factor analysis and necessary modifications yielded a significant model (p<0.05) with acceptable goodness of fit values (X2/df = 3.35, GFI = 0.85, RMSEA = 0.59).

All hypotheses were confirmed, except for the one proposing a relationship between the risk-taking tendency and the innovation tendency. Creativity was the most important factor influencing students’ innovation tendency, while risk-taking was the least important. The emphasis on creativity may stem from the need to tackle diverse problems in a world of constant change and competition. Students’ perceptions of socioeconomic risk and uncertainty might influence the lack of a significant relationship between risk-taking and innovation tendencies. 

To foster innovation, innovation be integrated into national education policy from an early age, with local and general competitions to encourage students. During long holidays, students can be directed to techno parks, research centres, and university campuses for scientific research training. Higher education students should be encouraged to participate in social and scientific activities to apply their theoretical knowledge. Finally, the entrepreneurship course content and teaching style in higher education should be revised to be practical and independent of grade concerns.


PDF View

References

  • Alpar, C.R., 2013. Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Avcı, U. (2009). Öğrenme yönelimliliğin yenilik performansı üzerine etkisi: Muğla mermer sektöründe bir inceleme. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 5(10), 121-138. google scholar
  • Bozkurt, Ö. (2007). Girişimcilik eğiliminde kişilik özelliklerinin önemi. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 1(2), 93-111. google scholar
  • De Carvalho, J. & Chima, F.O. (2014). Applications of structural equation modeling in social sciences research. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(1), 6-11. google scholar
  • Dragan, D. & Topolsek, D. (2014, June). Introduction to structural equation modeling: review, methodology and practical applications. In the International Conference on Logistics & Sustainable Transport, Vol 6, 19-21). google scholar
  • Er, P. H. (2013). Girişimcilik ve yenilikçilik kavramlarının iktisadi düşüncedeki yeri: Joseph A. Schumpeter. Journal of Management and (29), 75-85. google scholar
  • Economics Research, 14(2) google scholar
  • Ilgat, E. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yenilikçilik kapasitelerinin teknolojik yenilikçilik eğilimlerine etkisini ölçmeye yönelik bir model önerisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kütahya. google scholar
  • Iriondo, J.M., Albert, M.J. & Escudero, A. (2003). Structural equation modelling: An alternative for assessing causal relationships in threatened plant populations. Biological Conservation, 113(3), 367-377. google scholar
  • Kanbur, E. ve Özyer, K. (2016). Çalışanların bireysel yaratıcılık düzeylerinin iç girişimcilik performanslarına etkisi. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 14(2), 264-275. google scholar
  • Kaplan, D. (1995). Statistical power in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 100-117). Sage Publications, Inc. google scholar
  • Karadal, H. ve Saygın, M. (2016). İnovasyon yetenekleri ile girişimci kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki üzerine ampirik bir araştırma. Eurasian Academy of Sciences Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, 1, 282-294. google scholar
  • Naktiyok, A. ve Timuroğlu, M. K. (2010). Öğrencilerin motivasyonel değerlerinin girişimcilik niyetleri üzerine etkisi ve bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23(3), 85-103. google scholar
  • Oğuz ve Prystrom (2015). Dünyadaki en yenilikçi ve rekabetçi ekonomiler örneğinde yenilikçiliğin ve rekabetçiliğin belirleyicisi olarak beşerî sermayenin kalitesi. Uluslararası arenada Türk ekonomisinin yeri. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(4), 31-42. google scholar
  • Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G.A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, Routledge. google scholar
  • Sandberg, B. (2002). Creating the market for disruptive innovation: Market proactiveness at the launch stage. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 11(2), 184-196. google scholar
  • Satorra, R. ve Bentler, P.M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. American Statistical Association 1988 Proceedings of the business and economics sections (pp. 308-313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. google scholar
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74. google scholar
  • Sharma, P. & Chrisman, J.J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11-28. google scholar
  • Tornatzky L.G. & Klein K.J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28-45. google scholar
  • Vaughan, J. (2013). Defining technological innovation. Library Technology Reports, 49(7), 10-46. google scholar
  • Weston, R. & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719-751. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, E. (2007). Bilgi çağında yaratıcılığın ve yaratıcılığı yönetmenin önemi. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2007(1), 109-120. google scholar
  • Yüce, A. ve Samsa, Ç. (2017). Sosyal ve teknolojik yenilikçilik eğilimlerinin keşifsel satın alma eğilimi üzerine etkisi: Kafkas üniversitesi öğrencileri üzerine uygulama. Balkan ve Yakın Doğu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(4), 67-74. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Ilgat, E., & Aydın, N. (2024). A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 0(41), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279


AMA

Ilgat E, Aydın N. A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics. 2024;0(41):82-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279


ABNT

Ilgat, E.; Aydın, N. A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 41, p. 82-96, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ilgat, Ebru, and Noyan Aydın. 2024. “A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0, no. 41: 82-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279


Chicago: Humanities Style

Ilgat, Ebru, and Noyan Aydın. A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0, no. 41 (Mar. 2025): 82-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279


Harvard: Australian Style

Ilgat, E & Aydın, N 2024, 'A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies', EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, vol. 0, no. 41, pp. 82-96, viewed 10 Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ilgat, E. and Aydın, N. (2024) ‘A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies’, EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 0(41), pp. 82-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279 (10 Mar. 2025).


MLA

Ilgat, Ebru, and Noyan Aydın. A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, vol. 0, no. 41, 2024, pp. 82-96. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279


Vancouver

Ilgat E, Aydın N. A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics [Internet]. 10 Mar. 2025 [cited 10 Mar. 2025];0(41):82-96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279 doi: 10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279


ISNAD

Ilgat, Ebru - Aydın, Noyan. A Model Proposal to Measure the Effect of University Students’ Innovation Capacity on Their Technological Innovation Tendencies”. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0/41 (Mar. 2025): 82-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2024.41.1497279



TIMELINE


Submitted07.06.2024
Accepted08.10.2024
Published Online26.12.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.