Research Article


DOI :10.26650/eor.20251469910   IUP :10.26650/eor.20251469910    Full Text (PDF)

The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla

Reham A.h. IbrahimMohamed Adel AhmedAshraf M. Abu-seidaMahmoud HanafySara El Moshy

Purpose: This study investigated the bone regenerative potential following immediate implant insertion using osseodensifying Densah drills compared to conventional drills.

Materials and Methods: Eight adult male mongrel dogs were randomly assigned to three groups using a split-mouth design. Atraumatic extraction of the maxillary second premolar was performed in all dogs, and the sockets of the distal roots served as the control group. Group I was subdivided into two subgroups: in subgroup IA, the mesial socket of the second premolar was drilled using NucleOSS drills, while in subgroup IB, the socket was prepared using osseodensifying Densah drills. The dogs were euthanized immediately after osteotomy preparation. Group II was also subdivided into two subgroups: in subgroup IIA, osteotomy preparation was performed using NucleOSS drills, while in subgroup IIB, the osteotomy was prepared using Densah drills, followed by the insertion of NucleOSS T6 implants in both subgroups. The dogs were euthanized two months after implant insertion. Specimens were stained using Hematoxylin and Eosin as well as Masson Trichrome stain and subjected to histomorphometric analysis. Cone beam computed tomography was used to measure radiographic bone density.

Results: Subgroup IA exhibited areas of thermal osteonecrosis around the drilling site. Subgroup IB showed bone chips compressed into the bone marrow spaces of the osteotomy wall. The bone area percentage and bone density around implants in subgroup IIB were significantly higher than those in subgroup IIA (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Osseodensification is an effective technique for increasing bone density around implants in areas of poor bone quality, which is considered a promising indicator of long-term clinical success. 


PDF View

References

  • Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bone quality and quantity and dental implant failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2017;30. google scholar
  • Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:124-35. google scholar
  • Nkenke E, Kloss F, Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Radespiel-Tröger M, Loos K, Neukam FW. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic analysis of bone remodelling after installation of implants using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:595-602. google scholar
  • Steeves M, Stone C, Mogaard J, Byrne S. How pilot-hole size affects bone-screw pullout strength in human cadaveric cancellous bone. Can J Surg 2005;48:207. google scholar
  • Augustin G, Davila S, Mihoci K, Udiljak T, Vedrina DS, Antabak A. Thermal osteonecrosis and bone drilling parameters revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008;128:71-7. google scholar
  • Frost HM. A brief review for orthopedic surgeons: Fatigue damage (microdamage) in bone (its determinants and clinical implications). J Orthop Sci 1998;3:272-81. google scholar
  • Tabassum A, Walboomers XF, Wolke JGC, Meijer GJ, Jansen JA. Bone particles and the undersized surgical technique. J Dent Res 2010;89:581-6. google scholar
  • Turkyilmaz I, Aksoy U, McGlumphy EA. Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10:231-7. google scholar
  • Blanco J, Suarez J, Novio S, Villaverde G, Ramos I, Segade LAG. Histomorphometric assessment in human cadavers of the peri-implant bone density in maxillary tuberosity following implant placement using osteotome and conventional techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:505-10. google scholar
  • Wang L, Wu Y, Perez KC, Hyman S, Brunski JB, Tulu U, Bao C, Salmon B, Helms JA. Effects of condensation on peri-implant bone density and remodeling. J Dent Res 2017;96:413-20. google scholar
  • Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Vulpiani MP. New osseodensification implant site preparation method to increase bone density in low-density bone: In vivo: Evaluation in sheep. Implant Dent 2016;25:24-31. google scholar
  • Lahens B, Neiva R, Tovar N, Alifarag AM, Jimbo R, Bonfante EA, Bowers MM, Cuppini M, Freitas H, Witek L. Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low-density bone: An experimental study in sheep. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;63:56-65. google scholar
  • Hofbauer A, Huwais S. Osseodensification facilitates ridge expansion with enhanced implant stability in the maxilla: Part II case report with 2-year follow-up. Implant Pract 2015;8:14-21. google scholar
  • Alifarag AM, Lopez CD, Neiva RF, Tovar N, Witek L, Coelho PG. Atemporal osseointegration: Early biomechanical stability through osseodensification. J Orthop Res 2018;36:2516-23. google scholar
  • Jimbo R, Tovar N, Marin C, Teixeira HS, Anchieta RB, Silveira LM, Janal MN, Shibli JA, Coelho PG. The impact of a modified cutting flute implant design on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:883-8. google scholar
  • Huwais S. Enhancing implant stability with osseodensification: A case report with 2-year follow-up. Implant Pract 2015;8:28-34. google scholar
  • Hao P-J, Wang Z-G, Xu Q-C, Xu S, Li Z-R, Yang P-S, Liu Z-H. Effect of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell in peri-implant bone defect after immediate implant: An experiment study in beagle dogs. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7:4131. google scholar
  • Abu-Seida AM. Efficacy of diclofenac sodium, either alone or together with cefotaxime sodium, for control of postoperative pain in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 2012;7:180-6. google scholar
  • Abboud KM, Abu-Seida AM, Hassanien EE, Tawfik HM. Biocompatibility of NeoMTA Plus versus MTA Angelus as delayed furcation perforation repair materials in a dog model. BMC Oral Health 2021;21:1-11. google scholar
  • Song SJ, Lauber C, Costello EK, Lozupone CA, Humphrey G, Berg-Lyons D, Caporaso JG, Knights D, Clemente JC, Nakielny S. Cohabiting family members share microbiota with one another and with their dogs. Elife 2013;2:e00458. google scholar
  • Agarwal R, Singh RP, Gupta V, Singh J. Influence of cutting force on temperature, microcracks, and chip morphology during rotary ultrasonic bone drilling: An in-vitro study. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2022;44:301. google scholar
  • Stacchi C, Troiano G, Montaruli G, Mozzati M, Lamazza L, Antonelli A, Giudice A, Lombardi T. Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: Osseodensification drills versus piezoelectric surgery. A multi-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2023;25:133-40. google scholar
  • Basta DG, Abu-Seida AM, El-Batouty KM, Tawfik HM. Effect of combining platelet-rich fibrin with synthetic bone graft on the healing of intrabony defects after apicectomy in dogs with periapical pathosis. Saudi Endod J 2021;11:300-7. google scholar
  • Noble B, Alini M, Richards RG. Bone microdamage and cell apoptosis. Eur Cell Mater 2003;6:46-55. google scholar
  • Pandey RK, Panda SS. Drilling of bone: A comprehensive review. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2013;4:15-30. google scholar
  • Tian JH, Neiva R, Coelho PG, Witek L, Tovar NM, Lo IC, Gil LF, Torroni A. Alveolar ridge expansion: Comparison of osseodensification and conventional osteotome techniques. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:607-10. google scholar
  • Sultana A, Makkar S, Saxena D, Wadhawan A, Kusum CK. To compare the stability and crestal bone loss of implants placed using osseodensification and traditional drilling protocol: A clinicoradiographical study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2020;20:45-51. google scholar
  • Witek L, Alifarag AM, Tovar N, Lopez CD, Gil LF, Gorbonosov M, Hannan K, Neiva R, Coelho PG. Osteogenic parameters surrounding trabecular tantalum metal implants in osteotomies prepared via osseodensification drilling. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2019;24:e764. google scholar
  • Rochefort GY. The osteocyte as a therapeutic target in the treatment of osteoporosis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2014;6:79-91. google scholar
  • Das U, Mohanty G, Mohanty R. Osseodensification: A new era of implant osteotomy. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2020;14. google scholar
  • Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, Turek T, Seeherman H, Wozney JM. Locally delivered rhBMP-2 enhances bone ingrowth and gap healing in a canine model. J Orthop Res 2004;22:58-65. google scholar
  • Kold S, Rahbek O, Vestermark M, Overgaard S, S0balle K. Bone compaction enhances fixation of weight-bearing titanium implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;431:138-44. google scholar
  • Tabassum A, Wismeijer D, Hogervorst JMA, Tahmaseb A. Comparison of proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblast-like cells harvested during implant osteotomy preparation using two different drilling protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2020;35. google scholar
  • Mello-Machado RC, Sartoretto SC, Granjeiro JM, Calasans-Maia JdA, de Uzeda MJPG, Mourâo CFdAB, Ghiraldini B, Bezerra FJB, Senna PM, Calasans-Maia MD. Osseodensification enables bone healing chambers with improved low-density bone site primary stability: An in vivo study. Sci Rep 2021;11:15436. google scholar
  • Huwais S, Meyer EG. A novel osseous densification approach in implant osteotomy preparation to increase biomechanical primary stability, bone mineral density, and bone-to-implant contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:27-36. google scholar
  • Fontes Pereira J, Costa R, Nunes Vasques M, Salazar F, Mendes JM, Infante da Câmara M. Osseodensification: An alternative to conventional osteotomy in implant site preparation: A systematic review. J Clin Med 2023;12. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Ibrahim, R., Ahmed, M.A., Abu-seida, A., Hanafy, M., & Moshy, S.E. (2019). The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla. European Oral Research, 0(0), -. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251469910


AMA

Ibrahim R, Ahmed M A, Abu-seida A, Hanafy M, Moshy S E. The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla. European Oral Research. 2019;0(0):-. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251469910


ABNT

Ibrahim, R.; Ahmed, M.A.; Abu-seida, A.; Hanafy, M.; Moshy, S.E. The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla. European Oral Research, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 0, p. -, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ibrahim, Reham A.h., and Mohamed Adel Ahmed and Ashraf M. Abu-seida and Mahmoud Hanafy and Sara El Moshy. 2019. “The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla.” European Oral Research 0, no. 0: -. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251469910


Chicago: Humanities Style

Ibrahim, Reham A.h., and Mohamed Adel Ahmed and Ashraf M. Abu-seida and Mahmoud Hanafy and Sara El Moshy. The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla.” European Oral Research 0, no. 0 (May. 2025): -. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251469910


Harvard: Australian Style

Ibrahim, R & Ahmed, MA & Abu-seida, A & Hanafy, M & Moshy, SE 2019, 'The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla', European Oral Research, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. -, viewed 22 May. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251469910


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ibrahim, R. and Ahmed, M.A. and Abu-seida, A. and Hanafy, M. and Moshy, S.E. (2019) ‘The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla’, European Oral Research, 0(0), pp. -. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251469910 (22 May. 2025).


MLA

Ibrahim, Reham A.h., and Mohamed Adel Ahmed and Ashraf M. Abu-seida and Mahmoud Hanafy and Sara El Moshy. The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla.” European Oral Research, vol. 0, no. 0, 2019, pp. -. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251469910


Vancouver

Ibrahim R, Ahmed MA, Abu-seida A, Hanafy M, Moshy SE. The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla. European Oral Research [Internet]. 22 May. 2025 [cited 22 May. 2025];0(0):-. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251469910 doi: 10.26650/eor.20251469910


ISNAD

Ibrahim, Reham A.h. - Ahmed, MohamedAdel - Abu-seida, Ashraf M. - Hanafy, Mahmoud - Moshy, SaraEl. The effects of osseodensification versus conventional drilling technique on bone osteotomy with and without implant placement in dog’s maxilla”. European Oral Research 0/0 (May. 2025): -. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20251469910



TIMELINE


Submitted19.04.2024
Accepted22.07.2024
Published Online12.03.2025

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.