Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON405372   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON405372    Full Text (PDF)

The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development

Rahmi ÇetinSongül Karadaş

This study aims to examine the long-term macroeconomic performance of South Korea during the period 1963–2015 by using certain macroeconomic variables. In the 1960s, South Korea was a typical developing country with poor natural resources, low production, and a small domestic market. By following an outward-looking development strategy and other policies, South Korea has transformed itself from an agriculture-intensive economy into one of the world’s most dynamic industrial economies within 40 years.The study concludes that the combination of an outward-looking development strategy, a well-educated and well-disciplined labor force, and technological innovation is mainly responsible for Korea’s long-term growth success. In addition, the country’s close ties with Japan and the US have contributed to its high growth performance due to substantial foreign aid obtained from these developed countries.



DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON405372   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON405372    Full Text (PDF)

Han Nehri Mucizesi: Ekonomik Kalkınmada Güney Kore Örneği

Rahmi ÇetinSongül Karadaş

Bu makalenin amacı Güney Kore’nin 1963-2015 döneminde göstermiş olduğu makroeknomik performansı çeşitli uluslar arası kuruluşların sağladığı temel makroekonomik veriler yardımıyla betimsel analiz yöntemi kullanalarak incelemektir. Ülke 1962 yılından itibaren uygulamaya koyduğu dışa açık kalkınma politikasıyla tarım ağırlıklı bir ülke konumundan 40 yıl gibi kısa bir zaman dilimi içerisinde dünyanın en dinamik endüstriyel ekonomilerinden birisi konumuna yükselmiştir. Bu çalışmada, Güney Kore’nin uzun dönemli ekonomik büyümesinde dışa açık kalkınma modelinin, iyi eğitimli ve disipline edilmiş işgücünün ve teknolojik yeniliklerin ve bunların birbiriyle uyumlu çalışmasının etkili olduğu görülmektedir. Ayrıca bu başarıda ülkenin Japonya ve ABD ile olan yakın ilişkileri sebebiyle kalkınmada gerekli dış yardımların zamanında ve uygun şartlarda elde edilmesinde önemli rol oynamıştır.

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


South Korea has had remarkable economic performance since the early 1960s. It has transformed itself from an agriculture-intensive economy into one of the world’s most dynamic industrial economies within 40 years. In the early 1960s, South Korea was a typical developing country with poor natural resources and production, a small domestic market, and a large population. South Korea grew at a speed of 7.3% annually between 1967 and 2015, reaching $27.000 per capita income. Unfortunately, this level of growth was interrupted three times during this period— first in 1980, second in 1998 after the Asian financial crisis, and third in 2009. After each of these crises, the recovery of the economy was fairly quick and more rapid than anyone expected. However, there seems to have been a permanent decline in growth potential because the average gross domestic product growth rate remained at 4.4% over the 2001–2009 period.

Korea’s gross national product in 1962 was only 2.3 billion US dollar (in 1980 constant prices) or $87 per capita, which was mainly obtained from the primary sectors of the economy. International trade was also at a very low level; in 1962, the volume of exports was only $55 million while the volume of imports was $390 million. However, today, the nation is the fourth largest economy in Asia and the 11th largest economy in the world. The high growth performance in the South Korean economy was largely financed by foreign savings from Japan and the US. South Korea experienced a low level of savings in both public and private sectors until about 1985. After 1985, however, the domestic saving rates in the economy gradually increased and borrowing rates from abroad decreased along with the prices of petrol and other materials.

South Korea achieved its economic miracle within 40 years, something that took more than a century for Western countries to accomplish. This economic success is called the “Miracle on the Han River” in the literature and its development strategy has been copied by newly developing countries. In its first part, this paper aims to illustrate the superior economic performance and economic structure of the country during the last century; in the second part, it investigates what sort of policies are behind this long-term growth success. Voluminous literature on Korean growth performance attributes South Korea’s growth success to various internal and external factors. Among the internal factors, the government’s outward-looking development strategy (supported by industrialization and trade policies), a welleducated and well-disciplined labor force (supported by educational policy), and technological innovations have special importance. These three factors have successfully combined to bring about an economic miracle. In addition, an external factor—the country’s close ties with Japan and the US and the subsequent and substantial foreign aid from these two countries—has contributed to this high growth performance.

Three policies should be mentioned here. First, the country’s outward-looking development strategy began with Park’s military regime in 1961. Government intervention in the industrialization policy was significant and determined as to which sectors should be supported. In the first stage of industrialization, production was oriented toward light industrial goods, whereas in the second stage—starting from the mid-1970s—its orientation shifted to heavy machinery and chemical industries. Incentives were also provided to these new sectors that become important. At the end of the 1970s, South Korea began to export items such as ships, semiconductors, electronic equipment, and television sets. After the 1980s, the incentive system was completely changed and was allocated to sectors and large firms that spend money on research and development.

Secondly, South Korea has spent quite a large amount of money on education in order to develop its human resources. Reflecting this investment in education, the school enrolment rate at the tertiary level in Korea increased from 16 percent in 1980 to 52.5 percent in 2000 and 70 percent in 2016. Finally, in 1962, due to the lack of technological capability, Korea had to rely on foreign sources of technology. South Korea set a technology policy to promote the inward transfer of foreign technologies while simultaneously developing domestic capacity to digest, assimilate, and improve upon the transferred technologies.


PDF View

References

  • Ağır, H. (2010). Türkiye ile Güney Kore’de bilim ve teknoloji politikalarının karşılaştırılması. The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, 5(2), 43–55. google scholar
  • Arslanhan, S. ve Kurtsal, Y. (2010). Güney Kore inovasyondaki başarısını nelere borçlu? Türkiye için çıkarımlar. Türkiye Ekonomi Politikaları Araştırma Vakfı Politika Notu, Eylül, 1–15. google scholar
  • Barro, R. J., & Lee, J-W. (2001). International data on educational attainment: Updates and implications, Oxford Economic Papers, 53(3), 541–563. google scholar
  • Chang, K-S. (2011). South Korea under compressed modernity: Familial political economy in transition. London, UK: Routledge. google scholar
  • Cho, Y. J. (1997). Government Intervention, rent distribution and economic development in Korea. In M. Aoki, H. Kım & M. Okuno-Fujiwara (Eds.), The role of government in East Asian economic development: Comparative institutional analysis (pp. 208-232). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. google scholar
  • Cho, Y. J., & Kim, J-K. (1995). Credit policies and the industrialization of Korea, World Bank Discussion Papers, 286, 1–94. google scholar
  • Cole, D. C., & Lyman, P. (1971). Korean development: The interplay of politics and economics, Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Colins, S. M. (1990). Lessons for development from the experience in Asia: Lessons from Korean economic growth. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 104–107. google scholar
  • Collins, S., & Park, W-A. (1989). External debt and macroeconomic performance in South Korea. In J. D. Sachs (Ed.), Developing country debt and the world economy (pp. 121–140). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Dornbusch, R., & Park, Y. C. (1987). Korean growth policy, brookings papers on economic activity, economic studies program. The Brookings Institution, 18(2), 389–454. google scholar
  • Günay, C. (2005). Türkiye ve Güney Kore’de uzun dönemli büyüme: Karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. (Doktora Tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. google scholar
  • Güngör, G. ve Göksu, A. (2013). Türkiye’de eğitim finansmanı ve ülkeler arası bir karşılaştırma. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 20(1), 59–72. google scholar
  • Hong, Y. S. (2010). Private-Public alliances for export development: The Korean case. Serie Comercio Internacional, 102, 1–97. google scholar
  • Kim, K., & Leipziger, D. M. (1993). Korea: A case of government-led development. Washington, DC: The World Bank. google scholar
  • Kim, K., & Kim, S-J-K. (1997). Korean economic development: An overview. In D. S. Cha, K. S. Kim & D. H. Perkins (Eds.), The Korean economy: Performance and vision for the 21st century (pp. 3–56). Seoul, Korea: Korea Devolopment Instute. google scholar
  • Kim, L., & Seong, S-M. (1997). Science and technology: Public policy and private strategy. In D. S. Cha, K. S. Kim & D. H. Perkins (Eds.), The Korean economy: Performance and vision for the 21st century (pp. 383–425). Seoul: Korea: Korea Devolopment Instute. google scholar
  • Krueger, A. O. (1987). The ımportance of economic policy in development: Contrasts between Korea and Turkey. The National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 2195, 1–56. google scholar
  • Levent, F., & Gökkaya, Z. (2014). Education policies underlying South Korea’s economic success. Journal Plus Education, 10(1), 275–291. google scholar
  • Noland, M. (2012). Korea’s growth performance: Past and future. Asian Economic Policy Review, 7, 20–42. google scholar
  • Noland, M., & Pack, H. (2003). Industrial policy in an Era of Globalization: Lessons from Asia. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. google scholar
  • OECD Data. (2017). Erişim adresi: https://data.oecd.org/trade/current-account-balance.htm google scholar
  • Öz, S. (2008). Küresel rekabette son aşamaya ulaşmak: Güney Kore. İstanbul: Türk Sanayicileri ve İş İnsanları Derneği. google scholar
  • Peuch, J. (2011). The educational system in South Korea : A case study. Retrieved from http://jpeuch.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/jonathan-peuch the korean-educational-system-in-globalization.pdf google scholar
  • Radelet, S., Sachs, J., & Lee, J. W. (2001). Determinants and prospects of economic growth in Asia. International Economic Journal, 15(3), 1–29. google scholar
  • Rhee, Y. W., Rosse-Larson, B., & Pursell, G. (1984). Korea’s competitive edge: Managing the entry into world markets. London, UK: The Johns Hopkins University Press. google scholar
  • Sakong, II. (1993), Korea in the world economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. google scholar
  • Sarıay, M. A. İ. (2006). Güney Kore Kalkınma Modeli, Güney Kore Devleti’nin kalkınmadaki rolü ve örnek bir ülke olarak Türkiye’ye Uygulanabilirliği. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kırıkkale. google scholar
  • Song, B-N. (1990). The rise of Korean economy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Song, B-N. (2003). The rise of Korean economy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Stern, J. J., Kim, J-B., Perkins, D. H., & Yoo, J-H. (1995). Industrialization and the State: The Korean heavy and chemical industry drive. Cambridge,UK: Harvard Institute for International Development. google scholar
  • The World Bank. (2017). World development indicators online, databank. Retrieved from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators google scholar
  • T.C. Ekonomi Bakanlığı. (2017). Erişim adresi: https://www.ekonomi.gov.tr google scholar
  • United Nations ESCAP (1976) Guidelines for development of industrial technology in Asia and The Pacific. Bangkok, Thailand: Bangkok United Nations Centre. google scholar
  • Vogel, E. F. (1991), The four little dragons: The spread of industrialization in East Asia. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Westphal, L. E., Rhee, Y. W., & Pursell, G. (1981). Korean Industrial Competence: Where it came from. Staff Working Paper, 469, 1–76. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Çetin, R., & Karadaş, S. (2018). The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development. Istanbul Journal of Economics, 68(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON405372


AMA

Çetin R, Karadaş S. The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development. Istanbul Journal of Economics. 2018;68(1):93-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON405372


ABNT

Çetin, R.; Karadaş, S. The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development. Istanbul Journal of Economics, [Publisher Location], v. 68, n. 1, p. 93-112, 2018.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Çetin, Rahmi, and Songül Karadaş. 2018. “The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development.” Istanbul Journal of Economics 68, no. 1: 93-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON405372


Chicago: Humanities Style

Çetin, Rahmi, and Songül Karadaş. The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development.” Istanbul Journal of Economics 68, no. 1 (Dec. 2024): 93-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON405372


Harvard: Australian Style

Çetin, R & Karadaş, S 2018, 'The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development', Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 93-112, viewed 7 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON405372


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Çetin, R. and Karadaş, S. (2018) ‘The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development’, Istanbul Journal of Economics, 68(1), pp. 93-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON405372 (7 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Çetin, Rahmi, and Songül Karadaş. The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development.” Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 68, no. 1, 2018, pp. 93-112. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON405372


Vancouver

Çetin R, Karadaş S. The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development. Istanbul Journal of Economics [Internet]. 7 Dec. 2024 [cited 7 Dec. 2024];68(1):93-112. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON405372 doi: 10.26650/ISTJECON405372


ISNAD

Çetin, Rahmi - Karadaş, Songül. The Miracle on the Han River: South Korean Economic Development”. Istanbul Journal of Economics 68/1 (Dec. 2024): 93-112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON405372



TIMELINE


Submitted13.03.2018
Accepted16.05.2018
Published Online27.06.2018

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.