Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON372362   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON372362    Full Text (PDF)

Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective

Ahmet Efe

Our argument is that since the Islamic religion is valid and pervasive, its economic results should be more congruent, logical, and beneficial in providing human happiness and easing the burden of worldly life. Whereas the Western style subjugates everything that can serve material progress and capital accumulation as a means of production or productive relations, Islamic philosophy takes the world only as a temporary place but worthwhile to the extent that it preserves life; therein, production is a process that excludes whatever is harmful to humanity and nature, economic growth takes environmental issues and revenue distribution into account and social welfare is not just for wealthy people it is distributed by sincerity to all people in society.
DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON372362   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON372362    Full Text (PDF)

İslam Ekonomisi Perspektifiyle Bir Büyüme Modeli Çerçevesinde Üretim ve Sosyal Refah Fonksiyonu

Ahmet Efe

Bu çalışmamızda İslami bakış açısıyla İslam ekonomisinin büyüme, üretim ve sosyal refah fonksiyonu ile ilgili temelleri incelenmektedir. İddiamız, modern iktisat öğretileriyle analiz edilebilecek şekilde İslam ekonomisinin büyüme, üretim ve sosyal refah fonksiyonunun oluşturulabileceğidir. Ekonomi ve İslam dini çerçevesinde yapılan analizlerde çağdaş ve orijinal bir yaklaşımla kapitalist sisteme nazaran Kuran düzeninin ekonomik hükümleri tesis etmedeki farklılıkları özet olarak ortaya konulmaktadır. Buna göre, dünya hayatını merkeze alarak diğer her şeyi dünyadaki maddi kazanımlar açısından araçsallaştıran batı yaklaşımına nazaran dünyayı, geçici dünya hayatını ve bütün gereklerini ebedi olan ahiret hayatını kazanmak için bir araç olarak görerek her iki hayatı da değerleri kadar önem veren İslami yaklaşımın İslam ekonomisinin büyüme, üretim ve sosyal refah açısından iyileştirici fonksiyonu ortaya konulmaktadır. Üretim; insana ve doğaya zarar vermeyecek şekilde ihtiyaca göre, ekonomik büyüme; çevreyi ve gelir dağılımını dikkate alarak sürdürülebilir bir şekilde ve sosyal refah da; sadece güçlü ve zenginlere değil toplumun tüm kesimlerinin bir birisini gözettiği ve gönüllü paylaştığı bir şekilde farklılığını ortaya koymaktadır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Production and social welfare are relative and interdependent functions in macroeconomics. While the productive capacity of a nation is measured by GDP and its derivatives, social welfare requires the consideration of other determinants such as purchasing power, GDP per capita, minimum wages, unemployment rate, and social security payments. The more GDP per person, the higher the government revenues and social security is an important ceteris paribus assumption in open democracies. For wealthy nations, social welfare expenditure has become one of the biggest challenges of governments and a bottleneck in financial management. The financial mechanism of interest vis-à-vis the banking system provides a platform of exploitation of labor by capital owners. The social culture of wealthy people that do not care about the wellbeing of the poor has a tremendous negative effect over social welfare. 

As a requirement and/or indication of social welfare, the upper and lower classes in human society, that is, the rich and the poor, live at peace when in equilibrium. The basis of that equilibrium is compassion and kindness of the upper classes, and respect and obedience in the lower classes. If the upper classes do not oppress and the lower classes obey laws and rules, social welfare will be sustainable. Now, the individualistic attitude of mind that “So long as I’m full, what is it to me if others die of hunger” lacks compassion for the poor. Furthermore, another deleterious attitude of mind, “You work so that I can eat,” provides a basis of exploitation by upper classes. The first ominous phrase has incited the upper classes to practice oppression, immorality, and mercilessness; while the second has driven the lower classes to hatred and envy and has negated man’s tranquility for several centuries. So too this century, the struggle between capital and labor has been the cause of momentous events in Europe well-known by all. Thus,together with all its societies for good works, all its establishments for the teaching of ethics, all its severe discipline and regulations, it could not reconcile these two classes of mankind, nor could it heal the two fearsome wounds in human life. The Qur’an, however, delegitimizes the first phrase with its injunction to pay zakat. While it uproots the second phrase with its prohibition on usury and interest. Indeed, the Qur’anic verse stands at the door of the world and declares usury and interest to be forbidden. 

In capitalist societies people are exposed to negligence in their social and family relationships and excessiveness in both personal consumption and concerns for superficialities. Economic and social relations in capitalist societies are based on a materialistic point of view, resulting in an unequal wealth distribution and inefficient, wasteful use of economic and social capital. Islam stands in the abovemiddle course between capitalist and socialist systems. Islam advocates a wealth distribution mechanism with a view to realizing a society in which there will be accumulation of wealth but not in monopolistic and oligopolistic terms. Usury, hoarding, and profiteering can only be the act of marginal wrongdoers. A society in which the impoverished and wealthy help the poor with their zakat with the proletariat willing to add value to production processes is not far away according to the Islamic point of view. The socio-economic role of Zakat in Islamic social welfare is proven for its effectiveness in combating chronic poverty, hunger, and social hindrances in society. It is understood that Zakat provides a sustainable mechanism in the economy and social balance of societies, to provide transfer of income from the rich to the poor serving as a bridge between the bottom and the top. Once aptly assessed, efficiently collected, and fairly distributed, it plays the role of solving dangerous socio-economic problems such as poverty, class tensions, unemployment, insurgency, indebtedness, and unfair income distributions. 

Our argument is that since the Islamic religion is valid and pervasive, its economic assumptions, requisites, and results should be more congruent, logical, and beneficial in providing human happiness and easing the burden of worldly life. Whereas the Western style subjugates everything that can serve material progress and capital accumulation as the means of production or productive relations. Islamic philosophy takes the worldly life only as a temporary place but worthwhile to the extent that it preserves life; therein, production is a process that excludes whatever is harmful to humanity and nature, economic growth takes environmental issues and revenue distribution into account and social welfare is not simply synonymous with the capital accumulation of wealthy people, but rather embraces distribution to all people in society.


PDF View

References

  • Akthar, M. (1993). Modelling the economic growth of an İslamic economy. The American Journal of Islamic Social Studies, 10(4), 491-511. google scholar
  • Ansari, M. I. (1994). Islamic perspectives on sustainable development. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 11(3), 394-402. google scholar
  • Aström, Z. H. (2011). Paradigm shift for sustainable development: The contribution of Islamic economics. Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 1(1), 73-84. google scholar
  • Choudhury, M. A. (1991). Micro-macro interface in Islamic economic theory. The Middle East Business and Economic Review, 3(1), 29-38. google scholar
  • Çayıroğlu, Y. (2014). İslâm iktisadının karakteristik özellİkleri. İslam Hukuku Araştırmaları Dergisi, 24, 149-183. google scholar
  • Gundolf, K., & Filser, M. ( 2013). Management research and religion: A citation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 177-185. google scholar
  • Haneef, M. A., & Furqani, H. (2009). Contemporary Islamic Economics: The Missing Dimension of Genuine Islamization. Thoughts on Economics, 19(4), 29-48. google scholar
  • Hill, L. E. (1989). Cultural determinism or emergent evolotion: An analysis of the controversy between clarenve ayres and david miller. Journal of Economik Issues, 23(2), 465-471. google scholar
  • Jha, Y. (2013). Examining the meta-principles of modern economics and their implications for Islamic banking and finance. Islamic Sciences, 11(2), 169-184. google scholar
  • Khan, M. F. (2013). Theorizing Islamic economics: Search for a framework for Islamic economic analysis. Islamic Economics 26(1), 209-242. google scholar
  • Koehler, B. (2011). The economist Mohammed Ibn Abdullah (570-632). Economic Affairs, 31(1), 109-111. google scholar
  • Marsuki, M. Z. (2009). Religious agendas towards sustainable development: An Islamic perspective. Malaysian Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 7, 22-38. google scholar
  • Minkenberg, M. (2007). Democracy and religion: Theoretical and empirical observations on the relationship between Christianity, Islam and Liberal Democracy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(6), 887-909. google scholar
  • Nakvi, N. H. (1985). Ekonomi ve ahlak. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları. google scholar
  • Nienhaus, V. (2013). Method and substance of Islamic economics: Moving where? Islamic Economics, 26(1), 169-202. google scholar
  • Nursi, B. S. (1956). Lemalar. İstanbul: Envar Neşriyat. google scholar
  • Nursi, B. S. (1960). Mektubat. İstanbul: Envar Neşriyat. google scholar
  • Riis, O. (1989). The Role of religion in legitimating the modern structuration of society. Acta Sociologia, 32(2), 137-153. google scholar
  • Sadeq, A. H. M. (1989). Mobilization of resources for development. The American Journal of İslamic Social Studies, 6(2), 239-256. google scholar
  • Shittu, A. B. (2014). The Qur’anic worldview: A springboard for cultural reform. Intellectual Discourse, 22(2), 239-242. google scholar
  • Siddiqi, M. (1983). İssues in banking. London: The İslamic Foundation. google scholar
  • Steigerwald, D. (2005). Our new cultural determinizm. Society, January 1, 71-75. google scholar
  • Wilber, C. K. (1974). The ‘new’ economic history re-examined: R. H. Tawney on the origins of capitalism. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 33(3), 249-258. google scholar
  • Zaman, A. (2012). Crisis in Islamic economics: Diagnosis and prescriptions. Islamic Economics, 25(1), 143-166. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Efe, A. (2017). Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective. Istanbul Journal of Economics, 67(2), 31-58. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON372362


AMA

Efe A. Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective. Istanbul Journal of Economics. 2017;67(2):31-58. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON372362


ABNT

Efe, A. Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective. Istanbul Journal of Economics, [Publisher Location], v. 67, n. 2, p. 31-58, 2017.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Efe, Ahmet,. 2017. “Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective.” Istanbul Journal of Economics 67, no. 2: 31-58. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON372362


Chicago: Humanities Style

Efe, Ahmet,. Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective.” Istanbul Journal of Economics 67, no. 2 (Dec. 2024): 31-58. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON372362


Harvard: Australian Style

Efe, A 2017, 'Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective', Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 31-58, viewed 24 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON372362


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Efe, A. (2017) ‘Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective’, Istanbul Journal of Economics, 67(2), pp. 31-58. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON372362 (24 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Efe, Ahmet,. Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective.” Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 67, no. 2, 2017, pp. 31-58. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON372362


Vancouver

Efe A. Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective. Istanbul Journal of Economics [Internet]. 24 Dec. 2024 [cited 24 Dec. 2024];67(2):31-58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON372362 doi: 10.26650/ISTJECON372362


ISNAD

Efe, Ahmet. Production, Social Welfare, and Growth: An Islamic Economics Perspective”. Istanbul Journal of Economics 67/2 (Dec. 2024): 31-58. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON372362



TIMELINE


Submitted29.12.2016
Accepted28.09.2017
Published Online29.12.2017

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.