Research Article


DOI :10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400   IUP :10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400    Full Text (PDF)

Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning

Ahmet Erhan Şekerci

This study aims to conduct a metaphysical examination of the significance of humans in education within the ontic and epistemic contexts. It focuses on the question of What is human being?, which has been discussed extensively from various dimensions. Furthermore, the study analyzes the subject in terms of the concept of mathesis. In addition to the rational and technical dimensions of education and interpersonal relations, this study introduces the ontic and epistemic dimensions of the subjects and, thus, bring forward a metaphysical view. The main objective is to draw attention to the meaning of the relationship between humans and education by focusing on the Aristotelian metaphysics of being qua being and taking the human being as the center and the most important representative of existence. This study begins by discussing Aristotle’s idea that man is an object and a subject of education before discussing his idea of man’s relationship with metaphysics vis-à-vis education. Lastly, this study considers the aspect of religious education and explains the attachment of man to religion.

DOI :10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400   IUP :10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400    Full Text (PDF)

Epistemik Öznenin Ontik Ben İdraki: Eğitime Metafizik Bir Anlam Kazandırmak

Ahmet Erhan Şekerci

Bu çalışmamızda, varlık olarak insanın, ontik ve epistemik yönden, eğitim eylemindeki yerini ele almaya ve metafizik bağlamda değerlendirmeye çalışacağız. Düşünce tarihinde çokça sorulan ve bir o kadarda farklı ve derinlikli boyutları olan ‘insan nedir?’ sorusunu merkeze alıp, insanın öğrenebilen bir varlık olması açısından konuya yaklaşacağız. Eğitim ve insan ilişkisinin rasyonel ve teknik boyutlarının yanında, insan olmaklık eyleminin içeriğini ifade eden metafizik bakış açısıyla, söz konusu ilişkinin boyutunu ontik ve epistemik yönden sorgulayacağız. Aristo’nun ‘var olmak bakımından varlığın bilimi’ olarak nitelendirdiği metafiziği, varlığın en önemli temsilcisi olan insanı merkeze alarak, insan ve eğitim ilişkisinin anlamına yeniden dikkat çekmeye çalışacağız. Hem öğrenen, hem de öğreten bir varlık olarak insanın, ilk öğrenci ve öğretici rolünü ve mümkün varlık olarak metafizikle kurduğu ilişkiyi eğitim bağlamında tartışacağız. Konuyu daha çok, din eğitimi özelinde ele alıp, insanın eğitimle olan ilişkisini dini ve metafizik bir öz üzerinden, niteliğe dayalı bir yapı içinde izah etmeye çalışacağız.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


This study examines the human condition from the perspective of education and provides a metaphysical justification for humanity’s character regarding education by investigating the ontic and epistemic conditions of human being, as a being receptive of education. Humans are the only beings that follow a conscious process of education through which they advance and become aware of their ontological state. Given their rationality, humans differ from other animals, which are guided by instincts. Thus, learning and teaching are essential to humanity due to its rational and spiritual dimensions.

The world is continuously changing, and humans require constant self-improvement, which renders education indispensable. To find its proper place in the unchanging world, man needs a metaphysical outlook. Hence, the metaphysical foundation of educational activities is justified. This foundation is closely connected to the duality that characterizes humanity, that is, the duality of soul and body, which indicates that man is connected to the metaphysical and material essences. Thus, an educational program that properly addresses this duality will be enduring and efficient. Throughout history, one may find religious and philosophical teachings that identify the dual aspect of man and place emphasis on the metaphysical essence. For example, Christians state that man reflects the image of God, whereas Muslims believe that the soul is Allah’s vicegerent on earth.

Man has the capability to learn, will, believe, think, and reason. Therefore, he is an agent and object of education. Certainly, Adam is a good example in this regard. By receiving divine wisdom, Adam was the first student as well as the first teacher of humanity. Humans, as progenies of Adam, became the only creature that can establish a metaphysical connection with its creator and improve itself through education. Adam is also the first product of man’s metaphysical dimension in that he underwent a selfconscious educational activity. In this regard, the concept of being an Adam expresses the symbolic dimension inherent in the process of man’s self-realization.

Education is a life-long process, which aims to guide man by improving its experience, manners, and abilities. Metaphysics involves an inquiry into being qua being. Therefore, education helps humans to conduct this inquiry properly. Education is also an important element of the metaphysical truth. Being human is to be a being that can learn. The ontic and epistemic heights of man are, therefore, possible only if humans acquire metaphysical consciousness and personal mental independence.

The most important aspect of educational activity is to provide the individual with mental freedom, that is, enabling humans to become aware of themselves as moral agents. For education to be maintained and yield results that conform to human values, educational institutions should uphold moral values. In the contemporary world, education is not simply the transmission of information from one generation to another. Instead, it may be considered a means for helping people develop their personal identity in connection with metaphysical ideals. However, this manner of understanding education is problematic, especially in religious education and education in the humanities. The reason behind this notion is that the conformist and ideological perspectives lead to the loss of the ontological dimension of education, which transforms education into an instrumentalization at best and a dangerous weapon at worst. For this reason, the metaphysical foundation of education in relation to the realization of humanity should be carefully considered.

Educational activities play an important role in humanity’s construction of civilizations. Throughout history, humans continue to bend nature to their will through education. The practical and technical dimensions of educational activities are considered sufficient for highlighting the metaphysical dimension of education. This study argues that this perspective of education is crucial to understanding the many problems of humanity in the past, present, and future. Every ideological or political movement has certain ideals concerning human beings. Therefore, any thought or activity devoid of meaning that complies with these ideals poses a significant danger to humanity. Ideological and political movements adopt this strategy to guarantee their subsistence. Thus, educational policies reflect certain ideological paradigms that underlie the milestones of human civilization.

However, interestingly and ironically, satisfactory results were never achieved throughout history despite efforts and policies regarding humanity and education to satisfy human expectations. The reasons for this failure are hidden in human existential conditions. Other suggestions and applications eliminated and rendered useless the responses to these problems and strategies developed under certain spatiotemporal conditions. The ideological and political limits of such responses and strategies, their emphasis on quantities, and the achievement of fast results in theory and practice led to various forms of mental destruction in the generations that were subject to them. This scenario may then be identified as the major cause of mental and physical disasters as a result of wars. Given these facts, one should accept that activities that do not acknowledge the moral values of humanity and, as such, deviate from the metaphysical dimension of humanity, are considered destructive.

The educational perspectives developed during the Enlightenment centralized humanity and assigned a dominant role to it in the relationship between human beings and nature. Such a dominant role was never assigned to humanity in history. However, during the 19th and 20th centuries, humanity did not only enjoy the good opportunities provided by the age of knowledge but also witnessed global disasters. In our time, humanity has totally lost its world of meaning with which it makes sense of its existence or has attempted to find meaning in certain deceptions. Thus, humanity has lost its metaphysical perspective. These notions are seemingly a result of the polarization between ideological engagements that oscillate between the absolute and nothingness and quantity-centered educational policies, both of which seem unlikely to be overcome.

Thus, this study points out that human beings are rational and have free will. Human beings can learn, teach, govern, and be governed, due to their rational and spiritual capabilities. However, quantity-centered educational techniques, given their reductive and marginalizing ideological strategies, will only lead humanity to cut ties with the existential world of meaning and transform humans into mere objects of education without orientation. The solution to this problem is addressing the causes in an appropriate manner. In other words, educational activities should be established with an awareness of the meaning of human existence and in relation to the metaphysical dimension of human existence with consideration of the relevant ontic and epistemic conditions. Thus, this study investigates how human beings should be educated, such that the metaphysical dimension of human existence is also appropriately emphasized. 


PDF View

References

  • Alper, Ömer Mahir. Varlık ve İnsan: Kemalpaşazâde Bağlamında Bir Tasavvurun Yeniden İnşası. İstanbul: Klasik Yayınları, 2010. google scholar
  • Aristoteles. Metafizik. Çeviren Ahmet Arslan. İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınları, 2010. google scholar
  • ———. Nikomakhos’a Etik. Çeviren Saffet Babür. Ankara: Ayraç Yayınları, 1997. google scholar
  • ———. Politika. Çeviren Mete Tunçay. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1993. google scholar
  • ———. Ruh Üzerine. Çeviren Ömer Aygün ve Y. Gurur Sev. İstanbul: Pinhan Yayınları, 2019. google scholar
  • Aydın, Mehmet Zeki. “Sokrates’in Doğurtma (Buldurma) Yöntemi”. İçinde Doğudan Batıya Düşüncenin Serüveni, editör Celal Türer ve Hakan Olgun, 1. bs, 2:141-54. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2015. google scholar
  • Canatan, Kadir. İnsan Felsefesi. İstanbul: Beyan Yayınları, 2018. google scholar
  • Cassirer, Ernest. İnsan Üstüne Bir Deneme. Çeviren Necla Arat. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1980. google scholar
  • Cevizci, Ahmet. Eğitim Felsefesi. İstanbul: Say Yayınları, 2018. google scholar
  • Çağbayır, Yaşar. Ötüken Türkçe Sözlük. C. 2. 5 c. İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınları, 2007. google scholar
  • Çetinkaya, Bayram Ali. Felsefe Tarihi Antik Doğu’dan Modern Batı’ya. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 2017. google scholar
  • Demirkol, Murat. “13. Yüzyılın Bilge ve Kelamcı Filozofu Nasireddin Tûsi”. İçinde İslam Felsefesi El Kitabı, editör Bayram Ali Çetinkaya, 283-302. Ankara: Grafiker Yayınları, 2017. google scholar
  • Deniz, Gürbüz. İnsan Hürriyetinin Metafizik Temelleri. İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık, 2017. google scholar
  • Descartes, Rene. Ruhun İhtirasları. Çeviren Mehmet Karasan. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, 1997. google scholar
  • Durusoy, Ali. “İbn Sînâ Felsefesi’nde İnsan”. İçinde Doğu’dan Batıya Düşüncenin Serüveni, editör Abdullah Kahraman, 1. bs, 5:971-80. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2015. google scholar
  • Erden, Münire. Eğitim Bilimlerine Giriş. Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınları, 2011. google scholar
  • Ergün, Mustafa. Eğitim Felsefesi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2015. google scholar
  • Fârâbî, Ebu Nasr el-. Farabî’nin Üç Eseri: Mutluluğu Kazanma (Tahsilu’s-Sa’ade) Eflatun Felsefesi ve Aristo Felsefesi. Çeviren Hüseyin Atay. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Yayınları, 1974. google scholar
  • ———. İdeal Devlet:”el Medinetü’l Fâzıla”. Çeviren Ahmet Arslan. Ankara: Divan Kitap, 2015. google scholar
  • Giladi, Avner. “Islamic Educational Theories in the Middle Ages: Some Methodological Notes with Special Reference to al-Ghazali”. British Society of Middle Eastern Studies 14, sy 1 (1987). google scholar
  • Gutek, Gerarld L. Eğitime Felsefi ve İdeolojik Yaklaşımlar. Çeviren Nesrin Kale. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınları, 2019. google scholar
  • Hafız, Muharrem. “Platon ve Siyâset Felsefesi”. İçinde Doğudan Batıya Düşüncenin Serüveni, editör Celal Türer ve Hakan Olgun, 1. bs, 2:167-90. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2015. google scholar
  • İbn Sînâ. Kitâbu’ş-Şifa (Metafizik). Çeviren Ekrem Demirli ve Ömer Türker. İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık, 2004. google scholar
  • Kant, Immanuel. “Aydınlanma Nedir? Sorusuna Yanıt (1784)”. Çeviren Nejat Bozkurt. Toplumbilim Aydınlanma Özel Sayısı, sy 11 (Temmuz 2000). google scholar
  • ———. Eğitim Üzerine: Ruhun Eğitimi-Ahlak Eğitim- Pratik Eğitim. Çeviren Ahmet Aydoğan. İstanbul: Say Yayınları, 2013. google scholar
  • Kayacık, Ahmet. “Bağdad Okulu”. İçinde Doğudan Batıya Düşüncenin Serüveni, editör Abdullah Kahraman, 1. bs, 5:265-76. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2015. google scholar
  • Koç, Ahmet. “İhvân-ı Safâ ve Eğitim”. editör İsmail Çalışkan, 1. bs. C. 6. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2015. google scholar
  • Kranz, Walter. Antik Felsefe. Çeviren Suat Baydur. İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınları, 1984. google scholar
  • Kuçuradi, İonna. Etik. Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, 2006. google scholar
  • ———. İnsan ve Değerleri. Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, 2013. google scholar
  • ———. Nietzsche ve İnsan. İstanbul: Yankı Yayınları, 1967. google scholar
  • Kutluer, İlhan. “İnsan”. İçinde TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, 22:320-23. Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 2000. google scholar
  • Küken, Gülnihal. Felsefe Açısından Eğitim. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 1996. google scholar
  • Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. İnsan Soyunun Eğitimi Aydınlanma, Din ve Eğitim. Çeviren Ahmet Aydoğan. İstanbul: Say Yayınları, 2011. google scholar
  • Locke, John. Eğitim Üzerine. Çeviren Aylin Uğur. Ankara: Yeryüzü Kitabevi, 2004. google scholar
  • Mengüşoğlu, Takiyyüddin. İnsan Felsefesi. İstanbul: Doğu Batı Yayınları, 2017. google scholar
  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. Böyle Söyledi Zerdüşt. Çeviren Mustafa Tüzel. Hasan Âli Yücel Klasikler Dizisi. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2016. google scholar
  • Özcan, Muttalip. İnsan Felsefesi: İnsanın Neliği Üzerine Bir Soruşturma. Ankara: Bilgesu Yayıncılık, 2016. google scholar
  • Platon. Devlet. Çeviren Sabahattin Eyüpoğlu ve M.Ali Cimcoz. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1992. google scholar
  • ———. “Gorgias”. İçinde Diyaloglar, çeviren Melih Cevdet Anday. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 2010. google scholar
  • ———. “Kharmides”. İçinde Diyaloglar, çeviren Tanju Gökçöl. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 2010. google scholar
  • ———. “Menon”. İçinde Diyaloglar, çeviren Adnan Cemgil. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 2010. google scholar
  • ———. Phaidon (Ruh Üstüne). Çeviren Nazife Kalaycı. İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi, 2012. google scholar
  • ———. “Theaitetos”. İçinde Diyaloglar, çeviren Macit Gökberk. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 2010. Platon, ve Teoman Aktürel. “Sokrates’in Savunması”. İçinde Diyaloglar. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 2010. google scholar
  • Scheler, Max. İnsanın Kozmos’taki Yeri. Çeviren Tomris Mengüşoğlu. İstanbul: Yaprak Yayınları, 1988. google scholar
  • Twain, Mark. İnsan Nedir? Çeviren Esra Şimşek. İstanbul: Turkuaz Kitap, 2020. google scholar
  • Wilson, Edward O. İnsanın Varlığının Anlamı. Çeviren Zeynep Sezer. İstanbul: Olvido Yayınları, 2017. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Şekerci, A.E. (2021). Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning. darulfunun ilahiyat, 32(2), 503-530. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400


AMA

Şekerci A E. Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning. darulfunun ilahiyat. 2021;32(2):503-530. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400


ABNT

Şekerci, A.E. Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning. darulfunun ilahiyat, [Publisher Location], v. 32, n. 2, p. 503-530, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Şekerci, Ahmet Erhan,. 2021. “Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning.” darulfunun ilahiyat 32, no. 2: 503-530. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400


Chicago: Humanities Style

Şekerci, Ahmet Erhan,. Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning.” darulfunun ilahiyat 32, no. 2 (May. 2024): 503-530. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400


Harvard: Australian Style

Şekerci, AE 2021, 'Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning', darulfunun ilahiyat, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 503-530, viewed 8 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Şekerci, A.E. (2021) ‘Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning’, darulfunun ilahiyat, 32(2), pp. 503-530. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400 (8 May. 2024).


MLA

Şekerci, Ahmet Erhan,. Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning.” darulfunun ilahiyat, vol. 32, no. 2, 2021, pp. 503-530. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400


Vancouver

Şekerci AE. Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning. darulfunun ilahiyat [Internet]. 8 May. 2024 [cited 8 May. 2024];32(2):503-530. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400 doi: 10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400


ISNAD

Şekerci, AhmetErhan. Ontic Apperception of an Epistemic Subject: Giving Education a Metaphysical Meaning”. darulfunun ilahiyat 32/2 (May. 2024): 503-530. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2021.32.2.1000400



TIMELINE


Submitted24.09.2021
Accepted23.11.2021
Published Online27.12.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.