Research Article


DOI :10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031   IUP :10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031    Full Text (PDF)

“The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism

Anke Iman Bouzenita

This paper provides a discussion of aspects of the transhumanist movement and their intellectual and bioethical implications from an Islamic perspective. After an introduction to transhumanism and some of its variations, it discusses the underlying suppositions of transhumanist thought: The supposed absence of the body – mind – soul complex and the idea of volitional evolution of humankind. It then goes on to discuss the notion of enhancement and body modification, on a technological, pharmacological and genetic level from an Islamic point of view. In conclusion, the paper discusses the idea of “the good life”. The paper concludes that, although transhumanism is not a new idea, but rather a conglomerate of old ideas in technologically backed dystopian garb, and although there are obvious disparages between tenets of transhumanism and Islam at a very basic level, Muslims ought to be aware of its trajectory, as influences and repercussions will be felt globally. 

DOI :10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031   IUP :10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031    Full Text (PDF)

“En Tehlikeli Fikir?” Transhümanizm Üzerine İslami Mülahazalar

Anke Iman Bouzenita

Bu makale, transhümanist akımın bakış açılarını ve bunların entelektüel ve biyoetik çıkarımlarını İslami bir perspektiften tartışmaktadır. Transhümanizme ve onun bazı varyasyonlarına bir girişten sonra bu çalışma, transhümanist düşüncenin altında yatan varsayımları ele almaktadır: Beden-akıl-ruh kompleksinin sözde yokluğu ve insanlığın iradi evrimi fikri. Daha sonra, iyileştirme ve beden modifikasyonu kavramlarını teknolojik, farmakolojik ve genetik bir düzlemde İslami bakış açısından tartışmaya devam etmektedir. Sonuç kısmında ise çalışma, “iyi yaşam” düşüncesini konu edinmektedir. Makale, transhümanizmin yeni bir fikir olmayıp aksine teknolojik açıdan desteklenmiş distopik kisvede eski fikirler yığını olmasına ve transhümanizmin ve İslamiyet’in ilkeleri arasında çok temel bir düzeyde ayrılıklar? olmasına rağmen, etkileri ve yansımaları küresel olarak hissedileceği için Müslümanların bunun gidişatının farkında olması gerektiği sonucuna varmaktadır. 


PDF View

References

  • Al-Attar, Maryam. “Food Ethics: A Critique on some Islamic Perspectives on Genetically Modified Food.” Zygon. Journal of Religion and Science. 52, no. 1 (2017): 53-75. google scholar
  • Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad b. Ismācīl. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. N.d, accessed August 30, 2018. http://shamela.ws/browse.php/book-1681 google scholar
  • Al-Nawawi, Abū Zakariyā’ Yaḥyā b. Sharaf. Hadith Nawawi. N.d., accessed October 16, 2018. https://sunnah.com/nawawi40#4. google scholar
  • Al-Qurṭubī, Abū cAbd Allāh Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. Al-Jāmic li-aḥkām al-Qur’ān. N.d. accessed October, 16, 2018. http://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/ google scholar
  • Al-Shāṭibī, Ibrāhīm b. Muḥammad Al-Muwāfaqāt. Al-Qāhira: Dār Ibn cAffān, 1997. google scholar
  • Al-Tirmidhī, Muḥammad b. cĪsā. Sunan al-Tirmidhī. n.d. accessed October, 16, 2018. http://shamela.ws/browse.php/book-7895. google scholar
  • Athar, Shahid. “Enhancement Technologies and the Person: an Islamic View.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 1 (Spring, 2008): 59-65. google scholar
  • Atighetchi, Dariusch. Islamic Bioethics: Problems and Perspectives. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine 31. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. google scholar
  • Benedikter, Roland and Katja Siepmann. “’Transhumanism’: A New Global Political Trend?” Challenge 59, no. 1 (2016): 47-59. google scholar
  • Bilgili, Alper. “An Ottoman Response to Darwinism: İsmail Fennî on Islam and Evolution.” British Journal for the History of Science. 48, no 4 (2015): 565-82. doi: 10.1017/S0007087415000618. google scholar
  • Bostrom, Nils. “A History of Transhumanist Thought.” Journal of Evolution and Technology 14, no.1 (2005): 1-25. google scholar
  • Bostrom, Nils. The Transhumanist FAQ. World Transhumanist Association. 2003, accessed August 25, 2018, http://transhumansim.org/index.php/WTA/faq/. google scholar
  • Bouzenita, Anke. “Bioethics.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Science, and Technology in Islam. Oxford Islamic Studies Online, 2015, http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t445/e30 google scholar
  • Bouzenita, Anke. “Changing Creation or Harnessing Nature: The Reception of Biotechnology in the Islamic World.” Islamic Studies 48, no. 4 (Winter 2009): 499-523. google scholar
  • Chamsi-Pasha, Hassan and Mohammad Ali Al-Bar. Contemporary Bioethics: Islamic Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015. google scholar
  • Dajani, Rana. “Islam and Evolution: Is there a Controversy?” Lecture given at The Faraday Institute for Science and Religion, February 2015, accessed September 10, 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etP_YJ5jWsY google scholar
  • De Grey, Aubrey. “Radical Life Extension: Technological Aspects.” In: Religion and the Implications of Radical Life Extension, edited by Calvin Mercer and Derek F. Maher, 13-24. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. google scholar
  • Djati, M. Sasmito. “Beyond Biotechnology: Human Enhancement Technology and Pursuit for Happiness.” (An Islamic perspective of bioethics case study) Jurnal Pembangunan dan Alam Lestari 1, no. 1 (2010): 1-13. University of Brawijaya. Accessed October 10, 2018. https://doaj.org/article/e076e37654c64448b2dfe311df79fe9e google scholar
  • FM-2030 (Fereidoun M. Esfandiary). Are you a transhuman? Monitoring and Stimulating Personal Growth in a Rapidly Changing World. New York: Warner Books, 1989. google scholar
  • Franco, Alexandra M. “Symposium Article: Transhuman Babies and Human Pariahs: Genetic Engineering, Transhumanism, Society and the Law.” Children’s Legal Rights Journal 37, no. 2 (2017):185- 218. google scholar
  • Fukuyama, Francis. “Transhumanism.” Foreign Policy, October 23, 2009. http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/23/transhumanism/. google scholar
  • Fukuyama, Francis. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnological Revolution.New York: Picador, 2003. google scholar
  • Guessoum, Nidhal. “Islam and Science: The Next Phase of Debates.” Zygon 50, no. 4 (2015): 854-876. google scholar
  • Guessoum, Nidhal. “Islamic Theological Views on Darwinian Evolution.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. Doi10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.36 google scholar
  • Guessoum, Nidhal. Islam’s Quantum Question Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science. London and New York: I.B. Tauris, 2011. google scholar
  • Habermas, Jürgen. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003. google scholar
  • Hefner, Philip. “The Animal that Aspires to be an Angel: The Challenge of Transhumanism.” Dialog: A Journal of Theology 48, no. 2 (September 2009): 158-167. google scholar
  • Hughes, James. Citizen Cyborg. Why Democratic Societies must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press, 2004. google scholar
  • Huxley, Julian. “Transhumanism.” Ethics in Progress 6, no. 1 (2015): 12-16. doi: 10.14746/eip.2015.1.2. Reprinted from Huxley, Julian. New Bottles for New Wine. London: Chatto and Windus, 1957, p. 13-17. google scholar
  • Huxley, Julian. Religion without Revelation. New York and London: Harper and Brothers, 1929. google scholar
  • Ibn Kathīr, cImād al-Dīn Abū l-Fidā’. Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr. N.d., accessed October 10, 2018, http://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/ google scholar
  • Jensen, Steven J. “The Roots of Transhumanism.” Nova et Vetera, English Edition, 12, no. 2 (2014):515-541. google scholar
  • Keck Futures Initiative. The Informed Brain in a Digital World: Interdisciplinary Research Team Summaries. IDR Team Summary 7: What are the limits of the Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) and how can we create reliable systems based on this creation. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2013. www.nps.edu. google scholar
  • Kurzweil, Ray. “Reinventing Humanity: The Future of Human-Machine Intelligence.” The Futurist (March-April 2006): 39-40; 42-46. google scholar
  • Lee, Joseph. “Cochlear Implantation, Enhancements, Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Some Human Questions.” Science Engineering Ethics, 22 (2016): 67-92. google scholar
  • Marḥaba, Ismācīl Ghāzī. “Taḥsīn al-Nasl. Dirāsah fiqhiyah ṭibbiyah.” Ḥawliyat kulliyat Dār alculūm. Al-Qāhirah (2012): 249-296. google scholar
  • Mavani, Hamid. “Islam-God’s Deputy: Islam and Transhumanism.” In: Mercer, Calvin and Derek F. Maher (eds). Transhumanism and the Body: The World Religions Speak. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 67-83. google scholar
  • Mercer, Calvin and Derek F. Maher (eds). Religion and the Implications of Radical Life Extension. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. google scholar
  • Mercer, Calvin and Derek F. Maher (eds). Transhumanism and the Body. The World Religions Speak. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. google scholar
  • Mobayed, Tamem. Immortality on Earth: Transhumanism through Islamic lenses. Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research, 2017. google scholar
  • Mohd Noor, Siti Nurani. “Enhancement.” Oxford Encyclopedia on Islamic Bioethics, 2018. google scholar
  • More, Max. Transhumanism: Toward a Futurist Philosophy. 1990. Accessed October 15, 2018. http://www.maxmore.com/transhum.htm. google scholar
  • Murad, Abdul Hakeem (Timothy Winter). “Transhumanism and Islam”, 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOWrrRpQVco Accessed 5/11/2018 google scholar
  • Musa, Aisha Y. “A Thousand Years, Less Fifty: Toward a Quranic View of Extreme Longevity,” In: Religion and the Implications of Radical Life Extension, edited by Calvin Mercer and Derek F. Maher, 123-133. google scholar
  • Muslim, Abū l-Ḥussayn b. al-Ḥajjāj. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. n.d., accessed October 15, 2018, http://shamela.ws/browse.php/book-1727. google scholar
  • Nor, Siti Nurani Mohd. “Human Genetic Technologies and Islamic Bioethics”. In: GenEthics and Religion, edited by G. Pfleiderer, G. Brahier and K. Lindpaintner, 129–137. Basel: Karger, 2010. (DOI:10.1159/000315608) google scholar
  • Nyazee, Imran Ahsan Khan. Islamic Jurisprudence: Uṣūl Al Fiqh. The Other Press, Kuala Lumpur, 2003. google scholar
  • Parks, Bob. “Go Hack yourself * Not really.” Popular Science. (September 2015): 60-63. Accessed September, 15, 2018. https://www.popsci.com/tags/september-2015. google scholar
  • Pilsch, Andrew. Transhumanism. Evolutionary Futurism and the Human Technologies of Utopia. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press. 2017. google scholar
  • Porter, Allen. “Bioethics and Transhumanism.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (2017): 237-260. Doi:10.1093/jmp/jhx001. google scholar
  • Quazi, Faisal, Don Fette, Syed S. Jafri, Aasim I. Padela (2018). “Framing the Mind-Body Problem in Contemporary Neuroscientific and Sunni Islamic Theological Discourse.” The New Bioethics 24, no. 2 (2018) 158-175, DOI:10.1080/2002877.2018.1438835 google scholar
  • Ranisch, Robert and Stefan Lorenz Sorgner (eds). Post- and Transhumanism. An Introduction. Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main. 2014. google scholar
  • Rembold, Stefanie. “‘Human Enhancement’? It’s all about ‘Body Modification”! Why We Should Replace the Term ‘Human Enhancement’ with ‘Body Modification’.” Nanoethics 8 (2014): 307-315. google scholar
  • Ruse, Michael. Darwinism as Religion. What Literature Tells Us About Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. google scholar
  • Schneider, Susan. “Future Minds: Transhumanism, Cognitive Enhancement and the Nature of Persons.” University of Pennsylvania: Neuroethics Publications (2008) Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs/37. google scholar
  • Setia, Adi. “Freeing Maqasid and Maslaha from Surreptitious Utilitarianism,” Islamic Sciences 14, no. 2 (2016): 127 -158. google scholar
  • Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz. Transhumanismus. Die gefährlichste Idee der Welt”!? Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 2016. google scholar
  • Stove, David Charles. Darwinian Fairytales: Selfish Genes, Errors of Heredity, and Other Fables of Evolution. New York: Encounter Books, 2007. google scholar
  • Subboor, Ahmed. “Islam, Evolution and Darwinism.” 2017, accessed August, 10, 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riqCx84rhfY. google scholar
  • Sutton, Agneta. “Transhumanism: A New Kind of Promethean Hubris.” The New Bioethics, 21, no. 2 (2015): 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1179/2050287715Z.00000000060 google scholar
  • Wehling, Elisabeth. Politisches Framing: Wie eine Nation sich ihr Denken einredet - und daraus Politik macht. Berlin: Ullstein, edition medienpraxis, 2018. google scholar
  • Weindling, Paul. “Julian Huxley and the Continuity of Eugenics in Twentieth-century Britain’.” Journal of Modern European History 10, no. 4 (2012): 480-499. doi: [10.17104/1611-8944_2012_4] google scholar
  • Wingeier, Brett. “How Are Brain-Machine Interfaces Being Used In Medicine Today?” Quora. Accessed September, 18, 2018, https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2018/02/05/how-are-brainmachine-interfaces-being-used-in-medicine-today/#5eb0e6742e87 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Bouzenita, A. (2018). “The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism. darulfunun ilahiyat, 29(2), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031


AMA

Bouzenita A. “The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism. darulfunun ilahiyat. 2018;29(2):201-228. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031


ABNT

Bouzenita, A. “The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism. darulfunun ilahiyat, [Publisher Location], v. 29, n. 2, p. 201-228, 2018.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Bouzenita, Anke Iman,. 2018. ““The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism.” darulfunun ilahiyat 29, no. 2: 201-228. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031


Chicago: Humanities Style

Bouzenita, Anke Iman,. “The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism.” darulfunun ilahiyat 29, no. 2 (Jun. 2025): 201-228. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031


Harvard: Australian Style

Bouzenita, A 2018, '“The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism', darulfunun ilahiyat, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 201-228, viewed 6 Jun. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Bouzenita, A. (2018) ‘“The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism’, darulfunun ilahiyat, 29(2), pp. 201-228. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031 (6 Jun. 2025).


MLA

Bouzenita, Anke Iman,. “The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism.” darulfunun ilahiyat, vol. 29, no. 2, 2018, pp. 201-228. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031


Vancouver

Bouzenita A. “The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism. darulfunun ilahiyat [Internet]. 6 Jun. 2025 [cited 6 Jun. 2025];29(2):201-228. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031 doi: 10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031


ISNAD

Bouzenita, Anke Iman. “The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism”. darulfunun ilahiyat 29/2 (Jun. 2025): 201-228. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2018.29.2.0031



TIMELINE


Submitted20.11.2018
Accepted05.12.2018

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.