Research Article


DOI :10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105    Full Text (PDF)

The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision

Tuğba AdalıAlanur Çavlin

Pregnancy outcomes other than live births not only attract the attention of health workers due to potential health risks but also of social scientists as these outcomes can provide clues regarding social injustice, gender inequality, and women’s fundamental human rights. Compared to previous surveys, the results from the 2013 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey indicate a change in abortion levels. Accordingly, the proportion of pregnancies ending in abortion had dropped from 10% in 2008 to 5% in 2013. This study examines this change and the factors affecting abortion. The data mainly come from the 2013 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. The changes in the prevalence of abortion between 2008 and 2013 have been investigated using selected characteristics of women. The factors affecting abortion between 2008 and 2013 have been modeled using logistic regression analyses and have been addressed in two groups, namely demographic and social-economic/cultural determinants. The decline in abortions from 2008 to 2013 is statistically significant. Considering the changes in abortions services provided in public hospitals with the impact of recent political discourses, this finding is expected. Analysis shows that the odds of having an abortion are affected by demographic factors more than socio-economic ones. Pregnancies to women who have ever used a modern contraceptive, which were due to contraceptive failure, and which took place after a son was already born are more likely to end in abortion. Moreover, religiosity is a significant determinant of abortion. 

DOI :10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105    Full Text (PDF)

Türkiye’de Kürtajın Yaygınlığı ve Kürtaj Kararını Etkileyen Faktörler

Tuğba AdalıAlanur Çavlin

Doğumla sonuçlanmayan gebelikler, sadece sebebiyet verebileceği sağlık riskleri açısından sağlık çalışanlarının değil, aynı zamanda sosyal adaletsizlik, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliği ve kadınların temel insan hakları açısından önemli veriler sunabileceğinden sosyal bilimler alanındaki araştırmacıların da ilgisini çekmiştir. 2013 Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması’nın sonuçları, kürtaj düzeyinde önceki araştırma sonuçlarına göre önemli bir farklılığa işaret etmektedir. Araştırmaya göre son 2008-2013 yılları arasında kürtaj oranı ise %10’dan %5’e düşmüştür. Bu çalışmada, kürtaj düzeylerindeki değişim ve kürtaj risklerini etkileyen faktörler incelenmiştir. Çalışmada temel olarak 2013 Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması verileri kullanılmıştır. Analizlerde 2008-2013 yılları arasındaki kürtaj yaygınlığındaki değişim kadınların seçilmiş özellikleri bazında incelenmiştir. Ardından 2008-2013 döneminde gerçekleşen kürtajları etkileyen faktörler lojistik regresyon analizi ile modellenmiştir. Bu modellerde riski etkileyen faktörler demografik ile sosyo-ekonomik ve kültürel belirleyiciler olarak iki grupta incelenmektedir. Kürtaj yaygınlığında 2008-2013 dönemi arasında görülen düşüş istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır. Son yıllarda siyasi söylemin etkisiyle kamu hastanelerindeki kürtaj hizmetinin kısıtlanmış olması dikkate alındığında, bu beklenen bir bulgudur. Çalışmadaki lojistik regresyon analizlerine göre, gebeliklerin kürtaj ile sonuçlanması sosyo-ekonomik özelliklerden çok demografik özellikler ile belirlenmektedir. Modern yöntem kullanmış; gebeliği yöntem başarısızlığıyla oluşmuş; veya halihazırda erkek çocuğu olan kadınların gebeliklerinin kürtajla sonlanma riski daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Ayrıca dindarlığın da kürtajın önemli bir belirleyicisi olduğu görülmüştür. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Apart from live births, induced abortion (hereinafter referred to as abortion) is the most widely studied topic among pregnancy terminations from a multidisciplinary perspective. It is a main topic in demography, is affected deeply by micro-level fertility decisions, and is a topic of population policies that affect this demographic event at a macro level.

The 1994 ICPD Conference in Cairo recognized that women should have access to reproductive health services that would also allow them to control their fertility. The provision of safe abortion services during the first 10-12 weeks of a pregnancy is recognized as part of this access. Eliminating unwanted pregnancies and maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion were parts of the Millennium Development Goals and currently part of Sustainable Development Goals (Sedgh, Singh, & Hussain, 2014; World Health Organization [WHO], 2015). 

Globally speaking, abortion levels have been going down in developed countries since the 1990s (down from 46 abortions per 1,000 women to 27 per 1,000); however, this does not necessarily hold for developing countries (fluctuating between 39 to 36 per 1,000 women). In Turkey, the trend has been a downward one since the mid1980s, an era marked by the enactment of a population law that legalized abortion on demand up to the tenth week of pregnancy. An increase in the percentage of pregnancies ending in abortion was observed in demographic surveys following this law, but a consistent trend has been observed since (Table 1). Since the beginning of the 1980s, the use of modern contraceptives has been increasing, and total fertility rate has been decreasing; both of which are in line with the abortion trend.

On the other hand, the drop in the level of abortions from 2008 to 2013 was somehow sharper than expected, where the number of induced abortions per 100 pregnancies dropped by half from 10 to 5. The confidence intervals of these estimates are non-overlapping (Adalı, Çavlin, & Berktaş, 2015). A closer look into these two years reveals that contraception use and total fertility rate remained at similar levels. Thus, this study aims to investigate whether the decline can be attributed to a specific group of women and to find out which pregnancies end in abortion based on data from 2013.

Data and Method

The study mainly uses data from the 2013 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, a large-scale household survey that interviewed 11,794 households and 9,746 women. The survey is based on a multistage, stratified cluster sample. Analysis has been done using the Complex Samples module of SPSS 23, which allows for these design variables and sample weights to be taken into account. All the interviewed women were asked detailed information about their reproductive history over the five years preceding the survey date using a calendar module. Monthly information on the use of contraceptives, discontinuation of contraception and the reasons for it, pregnancies, and pregnancy outcomes were recorded in this module. The data used in this study is based on this calendar data, where each case is an event defined by a terminated pregnancy (through a live birth, an abortion, a miscarriage, or a stillbirth). To study the determinants of abortion, an indicator variable that takes the value of 1 if pregnancy ended in an abortion has been defined as the dependent variable.

Theoretical Framework

The determinants of abortion have been categorized under two main headings in this study: demographic determinants and socio-economic/cultural determinants. The variables under these two headings have been selected according to the literature. Among the demographic determinants are: the woman’s age at time of abortion, whether the current pregnancy will cause her to exceed her ideal number of children, whether she has had a son, whether she has previously had an abortion, whether she has ever used modern contraceptives, and whether the current pregnancy was a result of contraceptive failure. The selected socio-economic and cultural determinants are: type of place of residence as (i.e., urban or rural), region, education level, household wealth index, woman’s employment status, mother tongue, and religiosity (as defined by certain practices).

Results

A comparison of two surveys from 2008 and 2013 reveals that abortion declined in all subgroups of women, regardless of age, socio-economic status, or parity. Looking at the magnitude of the decline, the decline appears more rapid for more educated women and women in wealthier households. The logistic regression analysis has been carried out in two steps, with only demographic determinants as the first step and with all variables combined in the second step. The significant determinants in the first model are age (higher odds of abortion for higher ages), previous abortion experience (higher odds if yes), modern contraceptive use (higher odds if yes), and contraceptive failure as cause of pregnancy (higher odds when pregnancy unplanned). When demographic variables were controlled for, no socio-economic variables proved significant. Only religiosity is signficant among this block of variables, with the pregnancies to women who are less religious having higher odds of being terminated through an abortion. The addition of this block of variables also changed the significance of one demographic variable that compares the odds of having an abortion for women with at least one son, and women with daughters only against having no children; and the odds of abortion significantly increase for the foremost category.

Conclusion and Discussion

The findings imply that the rapid decline in recent years could not be attributed to a specific socio-economic group. The regression analysis shows that such determinants are not significant when controlling for demographic variables. The fact that contraception use has not changed remarkably between 2008 and 2013 leads to questioning the supply side of abortion services. In the last decade, Turkey has witnessed a change in population policies where government officials have made public anti-abortion statements. Despite no changes to the 1983 law, multiple studies by NGOs and universities have shown signs of abortion services vanishing from public hospitals (Bianet, 2015; Mor Çatı Kadın Sığınağı Vakfı, 2015; O’Neil, 2017; Topgül, Adalı, Çavlin, & Dayan, 2017). The decline in abortions in Turkey might be attributed to this situation, which would call for measures to ensure women regain their right to reproductive health services.


PDF View

References

  • Adalı, T., Çavlin, A., & Berktaş, E. (2015). The prevalence of spontaneous and induced abortions and the factors affecting them. In 2013 Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması İleri Analiz Çalışması [Further Analysis of the 2013 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey] (pp. 139–173). Ankara: Elma Teknik Basım Matbaacılık. google scholar
  • Agadjanian, V. (2002). Is “abortion culture” fading in the former Soviet Union? Views about abortion and contraception in Kazakhstan. Studies in Family Planning, 33(3), 237–248. google scholar
  • Agadjanian, V., & Qian, Z. (1997). Ethnocultural identity and induced abortion in Kazakhstan. Studies in Family Planning, 28(4), 317–329. google scholar
  • Agrawal, S. (2008). Determinants of induced abortion and its consequences on women’s reproductive health: Findings from India’s National Family Health Surveys. Calverton, MD: Macro International. google scholar
  • Akın, A. ve Bertan, M. (1996). Türkiye’de ana sağlığı, aile planlaması hizmetleri ve isteyerek düşükler [Maternal health, family planning services, and abortions in Turkey]. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması İleri Analiz Sonuçları [Further Analysis of Turkey Demographic and Health Survey]. Calverton, Maryland: T.R. Ministry of Health & Macro International. google scholar
  • Akın, A., & Enünlü, T. (2002). Türkiye’de isteyerek düşükler [Abortions in Turkey]. In A. Akın (Ed.), Türkiye’de ana sağlığı aile planlaması hizmetleri ve isteyerek düşükler. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması 1998 İleri Analiz Sonuçları [Further Analysis of the 1998 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey]. Ankara, Turkey: TAP Vakfı & UNFPA. Bianet. (2015). Ankara’daki 30 kamu hastanesinden sadece üçü kürtaj yapıyor [Only 3 out of 30 hospitals in Ankara perform abortions]. Retrieved from http://bianet.org/bianet/kadin/164877ankara-daki-30-kamu-hastanesinden-sadece-ucu-kurtaj-yapiyor google scholar
  • Bongaarts, J., & Westoff, C. F. (2000). The potential role of contraception in reducing abortion. Studies in Family Planning, 31(3), 193–202. google scholar
  • Bose, S., & Trent, K. (2006). Socio-demographic determinants of abortion in India: A north–south comparison. Journal of Biosocial Science, 38(2), 261–282. google scholar
  • Bradley, S. E. K., Croft, T., & Rutstein, S. O. (2011). The impact of contraceptive failure on unintended births and induced abortions: Estimates and strategies for reduction. DHS Analytical Studies No. 22. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Macro International. google scholar
  • Çavlin, A., & Ergöçmen, B. (2013). Ethno-cultural analysis of abortion and contraception: The cases of Turkey and selected Asian states. Nüfusbilim Dergisi, 32–33, 45–63. Çavlin, A., Tezcan, S. ve Ergöçmen, B. (2014). Kadınların bakış açısından kürtaj [Abortion from the perspective of women]. Nüfusbilim Dergisi, 34, 53–69. google scholar
  • Center for Reproductive Rights. (n.d.). The world’s abortion laws. Retrieved from https:// reproductiverights.org/worldabortionlaws?country=GRC google scholar
  • Chae, S., Desai, S., Crowell, M., Sedgh, G., & Singh, S. (2017). Characteristics of women obtaining induced abortions in selected low- and middle-income countries. PLoS ONE, 12(3). https:// dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172976 google scholar
  • Dickson, K. E., Jewkes, R. K., Brown, H., Levin, J., Rees, H., & Mavuya, L. (2003). Abortion service provision in South Africa three years after liberalization of the law. Studies in Family Planning, 34(4), 277–284. google scholar
  • Elul, B. (2011). Determinants of induced abortion: An analysis of individual, household, and contextual factors in Rajasthan, India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 43(1), 1–17. Fehring, R. J., & Ohlendorf, J. (2007). The influence of religiosity on contraceptive use and abortion in the United States. Nursing Faculty Research and Publications, 52. Fetters, T., & Samandari, G. (2015). Abortion incidence in Cambodia, 2005 and 2010. Global Public Health, 10(4), 532–544. google scholar
  • Fişek, N. (1967). Prof. Dr. Nusret Fişek’in kitaplaşmamış yazıları: Ana çocuk sağlığı, nüfus sorunları ve aile planlaması (Vol. 2) [Prof. Dr. Nusret Fişek’s unpublished writings: Mother child health, population problems, and family planning]. In Türkiye’de nüfus planlaması [Population planning in Turkey]. Retrieved from http://www.ttb.org.tr/n_fisek/kitap_2/28.html google scholar
  • Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (1987). 1983 Turkish Population and Health Survey. Ankara, Türkiye: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Ministry of Health & DHS Macro International. google scholar
  • Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (1989). 1988 Turkish Population and Health Survey. Ankara, Türkiye: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Ministry of Health & DHS Macro International. google scholar
  • Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (1994). 1993 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. Ankara, Türkiye: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Ministry of Health & DHS Macro International. google scholar
  • Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (1999). 1998 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. Ankara, Türkiye: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Ministry of Health, United Nations Population Fund & USAID. google scholar
  • Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2004). 2003 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. Ankara, Türkiye: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Presidency State Planning Organization & European Union. google scholar
  • Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2009). 2008 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey. Ankara, Türkiye: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Ministry of Health, T.R. Presidency State Planning Organization & TÜBİTAK. google scholar
  • Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2014). 2013 Turkey demographic and health survey. Ankara, Türkiye: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Ministry of Development & TÜBİTAK. google scholar
  • Henshaw, S. K., & Kost, K. L. (2008). Trends in the characteristics of women obtaining abortions, 1974 to 2004. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute. google scholar
  • Jilozian, A., & Agadjanian, V. (2016). Is induced abortion really declining in Armenia? Studies in Family Planning, 47(2), 163–178. google scholar
  • Jones, R. K., Finer, L. B., & Singh, S. (2010). Characteristics of US abortion patients, 2008. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute. google scholar
  • Jones, R. K., & Kost, K. (2007). Underreporting of induced and spontaneous abortion in the United States: An analysis of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Studies in Family Planning, 38(3), 187–197. google scholar
  • Lim, L., & Singh, K. (2014). Termination of pregnancy and unsafe abortion. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 28(6), 859–869. google scholar
  • MacFarlane, K. A., O’Neil, M. L., Tekdemir, D., & Foster, A. M. (2017). It was as if society didn’t want a woman to get an abortion: A qualitative study in Istanbul, Turkey. Contraception, 95(2), 154–160. google scholar
  • Mor Çatı Kadın Sığınağı Vakfı. (2015). Kürtaj yapıyor musunuz? “Hayır yapmıyoruz!” [Are you proving abortions? “No we are not!”]. Retrieved from https://www.morcati.org.tr/tr/anasayfa/290-kurtaj-yapiyor-musunuz-hayir-yapmiyoruz Norman, W. V. (2012). Induced abortion in Canada 1974–2005: Trends over the first generation with legal access. Contraception, 85(2), 185–191. google scholar
  • Nüfus Planlaması Hakkında Kanun (1965). Retrieved from https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/ KANUNLAR_KARARLAR/kanuntbmmc048/kanuntbmmc048/kanuntbmmc04800557.pdf google scholar
  • Nüfus Planlaması Hakkında Kanun (1983). Retrieved from http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ MevzuatMetin/1.5.2827.pdf google scholar
  • O’Neil, M. L. (2017). The availability of abortion at state hospitals in Turkey: A national study. Contraception, 95(2), 148–153. google scholar
  • Sedgh, G., Bearak, J., Singh, S., Bankole, A., Popinchalk, A., Ganatra, B., … Alkema, L. (2016). Articles on abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: Global, regional, and sub-regional levels and trends. The Lancet, 388(10041), 258–267. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S01406736(16)30380-4 google scholar
  • Sedgh, G., Singh, S., ve Hussain, R. (2014). Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Studies in Family Planning, 45(3), 301–314. Senlet, P., Cagatay, L., Ergin, J., & Mathis, J. (2001). Bridging the gap: Integrating family planning with abortion services in Turkey. International Family Planning Perspectives, 27(2), 90–95. google scholar
  • Senlet, P., Curtis, S. L., Mathis, J., & Raggers, H. (2001). The role of changes in contraceptive use in the decline of induced abortion in Turkey. Studies in Family Planning, 32(1), 41–52. google scholar
  • Singh, S., Remez, L., Sedgh, G., Kwok, L., & Onda, T. (2018). Abortion worldwide 2017: Uneven progress and unequal access. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/ report_pdf/abortion-worldwide-2017.pdf google scholar
  • Topgül, C., Adalı, T., Çavlin, A. ve Dayan, C. (2017). Sisteme değil isteğe bağlı hizmet: Sağlık çalışanları gözünden İstanbul’da kürtaj ve aile planlaması hizmetlerinin durumu [Not Regulatory But Arbitrary Service: The Situation of Abortion and Family Planning Services in İstanbul From the Viewpoint of Health Care Professionals]. Ankara. google scholar
  • United Nations. (1995). Uluslararası Nüfus ve Kalkınma Konferansında kabul edilen eylem planı, Kahire, 5-13 Eylül 1994 [The accepted action plan at the International Population and Development Conference, Cairo, Egypt September 5-13, 1994]. Ankara, Turkey: TİSAMAT. google scholar
  • Wang, C. (2014). Induced abortion patterns and determinants among married women in China: 1979 to 2010. Reproductive Health Matters, 22(43), 159–168. google scholar
  • Westoff, C. F. (2005). Recent trends in abortion and contraception in 12 countries. DHS Analytical Studies No.8. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro. google scholar
  • World Health Organization. (2015). Health in 2015: from millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. Switzerland: WHO Press. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Adalı, T., & Çavlin, A. (2019). The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 39(2), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105


AMA

Adalı T, Çavlin A. The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. 2019;39(2):359-378. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105


ABNT

Adalı, T.; Çavlin, A. The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, [Publisher Location], v. 39, n. 2, p. 359-378, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Adalı, Tuğba, and Alanur Çavlin. 2019. “The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 39, no. 2: 359-378. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105


Chicago: Humanities Style

Adalı, Tuğba, and Alanur Çavlin. The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 39, no. 2 (Jun. 2024): 359-378. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105


Harvard: Australian Style

Adalı, T & Çavlin, A 2019, 'The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision', İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 359-378, viewed 26 Jun. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Adalı, T. and Çavlin, A. (2019) ‘The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision’, İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 39(2), pp. 359-378. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105 (26 Jun. 2024).


MLA

Adalı, Tuğba, and Alanur Çavlin. The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 39, no. 2, 2019, pp. 359-378. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105


Vancouver

Adalı T, Çavlin A. The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 26 Jun. 2024 [cited 26 Jun. 2024];39(2):359-378. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105 doi: 10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105


ISNAD

Adalı, Tuğba - Çavlin, Alanur. The Prevelance of Induced Abortion in Turkey and the Factors Affecting Its Decision”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 39/2 (Jun. 2024): 359-378. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0105



TIMELINE


Submitted15.03.2019
Accepted04.12.2019
Published Online30.12.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.