Research Article


DOI :10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062    Full Text (PDF)

Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey

Mehmet Güven AvcıElif Kıran

Throughout history, education has been one of the most influential means of becoming the ideal individual, and adult education has a special importance to this end. This importance stems from the flexible nature of these education programs and from the fact that adult education is shorter than formal education and thus reaches its aim faster. The notion of development that emerged after the Second World War led to the adoption of a new economic and social understanding that continued until the 1980s. As a result of this understanding, Western capitalist powers sought to sell this understanding to non-Western societies, which they have defined and continue to define as underdeveloped and developing. Though primarily defined in an economic context, the concept of development has gradually come to include social change and the concept of community development is particularly noteworthy. Throughout Turkish history, the notion of development has been discussed through the purview of economics and modernization, the latter being related to social change. Consequently, public education finds itself at the fore in these discussions. This study evaluates the community centers established throughout Turkey in the mid 1950s and their role in societal development.

DOI :10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062    Full Text (PDF)

Türkiye’deki Planlı Kalkınmanın Eğitim Kurumu Olarak Halk Eğitimi Merkezleri

Mehmet Güven AvcıElif Kıran

Eğitim, tarihin her döneminde ekonomik ve toplumsal değişimlerin sonucunda istendik bireye ulaşmanın en önemli aracı olmuştur. Yetişkin eğitimi bu anlamda ayrı bir öneme sahiptir. Bu önem yetişkin eğitiminin örgün eğitime göre daha kısa süreli olması ve dolayısıyla sonuca daha hızlı ulaşması ile uygulanan eğitim programlarının esnek yapısından kaynaklanmaktadır. İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrasında tartışılmaya başlanan kalkınma düşüncesi, 1980’li yıllara kadar sürecek olan yeni bir ekonomik ve toplumsal anlayışın doğmasına yol açmıştır. Kalkınma tartışmaları Batı kapitalist merkezlerinde refah politikaları ile sonuçlanırken, bu merkezlerce “geri kalmış”, “azgelişmiş”, gelişmekte olan” gibi kavramlarla tanımlanan batı dışı toplumlara önerilen ise planlı kalkınma olmuştur. Ekonomik bir içerikle tanımlanan kalkınma kavramı giderek toplumsal değişimleri de içeren bir kavram haline gelmiştir. Kalkınma düşüncesinin Batı dışı toplumlara yansımasında toplumsal içeriğin daha da önem kazandığı görülmektedir. Konuya Türkiye özelinde bakıldığında kalkınma düşüncesinin bir taraftan ekonomik olarak tartışılırken diğer taraftan modernleşme süreci ile birlikte değerlendirilmekte olduğu ve önemli bir toplumsal değişimi hedeflediği görülmektedir. Yürütülen tartışmalarda ise halk eğitimi öne çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışma 1950’li yılların ortalarında kurulmaya başlanan ancak 1960 sonrasında oldukça aktif hale gelen halk eğitimi merkezlerini kalkınma düşüncesi çerçevesinde değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The concept of development has mostly been used as a synonym of or in place of various other concepts like progress, development, modernization, and industrialization. These terms imply that development is directly linked to economic issues. However, as it is the case for every societal issue, the concept of development is also directly linked to diverse fields in addition to the economy. Those studies that examine different facets of development must, therefore, collaborate with other areas of academia. This study highlights the concept of development and how it has manifested practically in society and its relationship with public education in Turkey. Education, as a social institution, occupies a central place in Turkey’s development plans because its modernization period sought to use education to “catch up” with the West in nearly every area and to mold the entire society into a Western one. Together with formal education, public education was instrumentalized to modernize society and—given that development and modernization are used synonymously in Turkish—to cause it to develop. Being both modern and developed are therefore so intrinsically intertwined that it is as if they are merely two sides of the same coin, inseparable from each other. Development prioritizes the progress of countries on social and economical terms, labeling countries, most of which are located outside of the Western world, as being underdeveloped, developing, or undeveloped. This veritable quest for development emerged following the Second World War and has become an issue upon which all industrialized countries, including arch-rivals, have agreed. Mostly supported by international organizations and Western countries, development discourse has evolved into a type of planned development, leading to prescriptions for precipitating socioeconomic development being given to countries considered to be moving too slowly in their journey toward progress. One of the most prominent items of these road maps is education. In addition to formal education, adult education is held to have the potential to instigate rapid progress and development. Seen as a tool for social progress (Lindeman, 1945, p. 4), adult education has undergone constant content changes to align it with the needs of the era. The fact that adult education programs are both short term and flexible facilitates makes them easy to be restructured in accordance with society’s changing needs. Indeed, adult education, given that it allows one to obtain one’s desired goals more rapidly than formal education, has always been given precedence during periods of social upheaval and change. 

After the Second World War, Western capitalism implemented Keynesian welfare policies and non-Western societies were motivated toward development through industrialization as a way to achieve prosperity. Managing development in a planned way has been presented as the basic prerequisite for receiving foreign aid and investments. This requirement ensures the controlled integration of so-called underdeveloped countries while also allowing for third-party countries to intervene whenever they deemed it necessary (TMMOB, 2007, p. 6). The desire of non-Western countries to reconstruct their society through the planned development approach proposed by the West laid the groundwork for both adult and public education’s significance during this period. 

During the years following the Second World War, Turkey began to employ public education flirt with the notion of public education. However, it was not until 1960 that public education became a fundamental education policy, at which point public education centers were founded throughout the country. Directly tethered to the concepts of development, modernization and progress, public education and the curriculum it would teach were organized accordingly.

A look at the timeline of adult education in Turkey reveals that periodical changes have occurred in response to the needs of each period. Established in the 1930s, Community Houses (Halk Evleri) were instrumental in disseminating the national identity that the new regime wanted to impose. During the 1960–1980s, however, public education centers that conducted both cultural and professional activities emerged to inoculate the prevailing notion of development during that period as a transition from public education to non-formal education was underway at that time. Naturally, this brought about changes in educational content. After 1980, neo-liberal policies highlighted the concept of life-long learning instead of non-formal education, and adult education was again reorganized to fit this ideology.

The literature examining this period reveals that public education was presented as the solution to many perceived social woes, like the economy, culture, women, youth, democracy, regional differences, and leisure. Many issues were dealt with in relation to public education. This understanding has also been resonated in the development plans executed since 1963. Specifically, public education was widely included in the first two development plans.  

The post-Second World War notion of development and the Western model of planned development were implemented after the 1960 military coup in Turkey. The first fiveyear development plan prepared by the State Planning Organization was published in January 1963. Eleven development plans have since been made. However, planned development was an economic and political choice only between 1960 and 1980. The growing influence of neo-liberal policies after 1980 led to a change in Turkey’s economic and political understanding, as was the case for the entire world. Accordingly, we have chosen the first four development plans and the importance of public education described in these plans to constitute the core issue of this study. We have examined several aims of public education included in these plans, including educating women, environmental consciousness, technical information, and vocational education. With all that said, however, it still must be emphasized that all forms of such education were formulated to reach the ultimate goal of being developed, modernized, and westernized.


PDF View

References

  • 1961 Anayasası. (1961, 07 09). 1961 Anayasası. 09 19, 2020 tarihinde Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasa Mahkemesi: https://www.anayasa.gov.tr/tr/mevzuat/onceki-anayasalar/1961-anayasasi/ google scholar
  • Adelman, I. (2000). Fifty years of economic development: What have we learned? Paper prepared for the World Bank European Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, World Bank, Washington, D.C. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/625131468761704307/pdf/28737. pdf google scholar
  • Alkın, İ. (1970). Türkiye’de sanayi politikası. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 30(1-4), 377–423. google scholar
  • Barbaros, F. ve Karatepe, İ. (2009). 60’lı yıllarda Türkiye’ye planlamadan bakış. Ege Akademik Bakış, 9(1), 261–289. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı. (t.y.). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları nelerdir? https:// www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/tr/home/sustainable-development-goals.html google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler. (2000). Binyıl kalkınma hedefleri. https://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/tr/ home/mdgoverview/millennium-development-goals.html google scholar
  • Buyruk, H. (2016). Ekonomik kalkınma hedefinden bin yıl kalkınma hedeflerine: Eğitim-kalkınma ilişkisine dair bir çözümleme. Mülkiye Dergisi, 40(1), 111–142. google scholar
  • Coven, M., & Shenton, R. (1995). The invention of development. In J. Crush (Ed.), Power of development (pp. 27–44). Routledge. google scholar
  • Crewe, E., & Harrison, E. (1999). Whose development: An ethnography of aid. Zed Books. google scholar
  • Crush, J. (1995). Imagining development. In J. Crush (Ed.), Power of development (pp. 1–27). Routledge. google scholar
  • Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. (1963). Birinci beş yıllık kalkınma planı. Yazar. google scholar
  • Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. (1968). İkinci beş yıllık kalkınma planı. Yazar. google scholar
  • Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. (1973). Üçüncü beş yıllık kalkınma planı. Yazar. google scholar
  • Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. (1979). Dördüncü beş yıllık kalkınma planı. Yazar. google scholar
  • Esteva, G. (2010). Development. In W. Sachs (Ed.), The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (2nd ed, pp. 1–24). Zed Books. google scholar
  • Fitcher, J. H. (2016). Sosyoloji nedir? (N. Çelebi, çev.). Anı Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Geray, C. (1968). Toplum kalkınmasının ekonomik ve sosyal yönleri. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 19, 155–166. google scholar
  • Geray, C. (1978). Halk eğitimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Köymen, N. (1960). Büyük aydınlığa doğru. Nebioğlu Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Kurtkan, A. (1975). Sosyolojik açıdan eğitim yoluyla kalkınmanın esasları. Halk Eğitimi, 2–5. google scholar
  • Lindeman, E. (1945). Adult education. The Journal Of Educational Sociology, 19, 4–13. google scholar
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (1956). Halk eğitimi umum müdürlüğü kurulması hakkında kanun lahiyası ve mucip Sebepleri. Maarif Basımevi. google scholar
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (1973). Halk eğitimi yıllığı 1960-1970. Yazar. google scholar
  • Okçabol, R. (2006). Halk eğitimi (yetişkin eğitimi). Ütopya yayınevi. google scholar
  • Resmi Gazete. (1960, 10 5). Devlet pIanlama teşkilâtının kurulması hakkında kanun. s. 2274–2276. google scholar
  • Resmi Gazete. (1963, 06 01). Halk eğitimi merkezleri yönetmeliği. s. 11–13. google scholar
  • Rist, G. (2010). Development as a buzzword. In A. Cornwall & D. Eade (Eds.), Deconstructing development discourse: Buzzwords and fuzzwords (pp. 19–29). Practical Action Publishing and Oxfam. google scholar
  • Rostow, W. W. (1960). The sages of economic growth: A communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Sachs, W. (2010). The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (2nd ed). Zed Books. google scholar
  • Takım, A. (2012). Demokrat parti döneminde uygulanan ekonomi politikaları ve sonuçları. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 67, 165. google scholar
  • TMMOB. (2007). Ülke örnekleri ile kalkınma ve sanayileşme modelleri TMMOB Sanayi Kongresi 2007 Oda Raporu. Yazar. google scholar
  • Türk, H. (1968). Niçin halk eğitimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 87–110. google scholar
  • wikipedia.org. (t.y.). İnsani Gelişme Endeksi. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%B0nsani_ Geli%C5%9Fme_Endeksi google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Avcı, M.G., & Kıran, E. (2020). Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 40(2), 863-887. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062


AMA

Avcı M G, Kıran E. Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. 2020;40(2):863-887. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062


ABNT

Avcı, M.G.; Kıran, E. Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, [Publisher Location], v. 40, n. 2, p. 863-887, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Avcı, Mehmet Güven, and Elif Kıran. 2020. “Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 40, no. 2: 863-887. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062


Chicago: Humanities Style

Avcı, Mehmet Güven, and Elif Kıran. Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 40, no. 2 (May. 2024): 863-887. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062


Harvard: Australian Style

Avcı, MG & Kıran, E 2020, 'Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey', İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 863-887, viewed 13 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Avcı, M.G. and Kıran, E. (2020) ‘Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey’, İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 40(2), pp. 863-887. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062 (13 May. 2024).


MLA

Avcı, Mehmet Güven, and Elif Kıran. Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 40, no. 2, 2020, pp. 863-887. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062


Vancouver

Avcı MG, Kıran E. Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 13 May. 2024 [cited 13 May. 2024];40(2):863-887. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062 doi: 10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062


ISNAD

Avcı, MehmetGüven - Kıran, Elif. Community Houses: Education Institutions for Planned Development in Turkey”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 40/2 (May. 2024): 863-887. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.2.0062



TIMELINE


Submitted12.06.2020
Accepted20.11.2020
Published Online31.12.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.