Article


DOI :10.16917/sd.00668   IUP :10.16917/sd.00668    Full Text (PDF)

UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES

Remi M. Hajjar

This article examines how and why many contemporary US mainstream military advisors—as compared to Special Forces advisors—often work from a position of disadvantage when conducting unconventional advising missions. Post-9/11 deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan have caused the US military to adapt to myriad complexities, including a renewed need for the widespread execution of the unconventional military advising mission by the Special Forces and conventional units. Although Special Forces typically possessed both the organizational flexibility and historical knowledge and skills to successfully perform military advising, the conventional military experienced some strains as it adapted to this nontraditional mission. This empirical work examines how the US military changed to conduct military advising missions, with a special focus on conventional forces. US military mainstream advisors cultivated a multifaceted “Swiss Army knife” of advisory skills—including warrior, peacekeeper–diplomat, information age technology, leader, and other essential cultural tools—to conduct the unorthodox mission. As soldiers build Swiss Army knives of advisory skills, they produce ripples of cultural change in the armed forces, which indicates the emergence of a more sophisticated, postmodern US military culture.


PDF View

References

  • Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Dimaggio, P. J. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 263–287. google scholar
  • Ender, M. G. (2009). American soldiers in Iraq: McSoldiers or innovative professionals? New York, NY: Routledge google scholar
  • French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1960). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 607–623). New York, NY: Harper and Row. google scholar
  • Geertz, C. J. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic. google scholar
  • Grdovic, M. (2008). The advisor challenge. Special Warfare, 21(1), 22–28. Retrieved from http:// www.soc.mil/swcs/swmag/assets/08Jan.pdf google scholar
  • Griswold, W. (1994). Cultures and societies in a changing world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. google scholar
  • Hajjar, R. M. (2010). A new angle on the U.S. Military’s emphasis on developing cross-cultural competence: Connecting in-ranks’ cultural diversity to cross-cultural competence. Armed Forces & Society, 36(2), 247–263. google scholar
  • Hajjar, R. M. (2014a). Emergent postmodern US Military culture. Armed Forces & Society, 40(1), 119–145. google scholar
  • Hajjar, R. M. (2014b). Military warriors as peacekeeper-diplomats: Building productive relationships with foreign counterparts in the contemporary military advising mission. Armed Forces & Society, 40(4), 647–672. google scholar
  • Hajjar, R. M. (2014c). What lessons did we (Re-) learn about military advising after 9/11? Military Review, November–December, 62–75. google scholar
  • Hajjar, R., & Ender, M. G. (2005). McDonaldization in the US Army: A threat to the profession. In D. M. Snider & L. J. Matthews (Eds.), The future of the army profession (pp. 515–530). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Custom Publishing Company. google scholar
  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. google scholar
  • Kelty, R., & Bierman, A. (2013). Ambivalence on the front lines: Perceptions of contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. Armed Forces & Society, 39(1), 5–27. google scholar
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. google scholar
  • Montgomery, J. D. (1998). Toward a role-theoretic conception of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 92–125. google scholar
  • Moskos, C. C., Williams, J. A., & Segal, D. R. (Eds.). (2000). The postmodern military: Armed forces after the Cold War. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Moskos, C. C., Wood, F. R. (Eds.). (1988). The military: More than just a job? Washington, DC: Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defense. google scholar
  • Nagl, J. (2008). Institutionalizing adaptation: It’s time for an army advisor command. Military Review, September–October, 21–26. google scholar
  • Perez Jr., C. (2012). The soldier as lethal warrior and cooperative political agent: On the soldier’s ethical and political obligations toward the indigenous other. Armed Forces and Society, 38(2), 177–204. google scholar
  • Ramsey III, R. D. (2006). Advising indigenous forces: American advisors in Korea, Vietnam, and El Salvador. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press. google scholar
  • Ritzer, G. (1975). Professionalization, bureaucratization and rationalization: The views of Max Weber. Social Forces, 53(4), 627–634. google scholar
  • Schein, E. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
  • Segal, D. R., & Segal, M. W. (1983). Change in military organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 151–170. google scholar
  • Segal, D. R., & Segal, M. W. (1993). Peacekeepers and their wives: American participation in the multinational forces and observers. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. google scholar
  • Segal, D. R., Reed, B. J., & Rohall, D. E. (1998). Constabulary attitudes of National Guard and regular soldiers in the U.S. Army. Armed Forces and Society, 24(4), 535–548. google scholar
  • Sewell, W. F. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29. google scholar
  • Sookermany, A. M. (2012). What is a skillful soldier? An epistemological foundation for understanding military skill acquisition in (Post) modernized armed forces. Armed Forces & Society, 38(4), 582–603. google scholar
  • Stoker, D. (Ed.). (2008). Military advising and assistance: From mercenaries to privatization, 1815–2007. New York, NY: Routledge. google scholar
  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286. google scholar
  • Swidler, A. (2001). Talk of love: How culture matters. University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Turner, J. H. (1988). A theory of social interaction. Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • US Armed Forces. (2009). Advising: Multi–service tactics, techniques, and procedures for advising foreign forces. Retrieved from http://www.alsa.mil/library/mttps/advising.html google scholar
  • Williams, J. A. W. (2008). The military and society: Beyond the postmodern era. Orbis, 52, 217–235. google scholar
  • Winslow, D. (2007). Military organization and culture from three perspectives: The case of army. In G. Caforio (Ed.), Social sciences and the military: An interdisciplinary overview (pp. 67–88). London, UK: Routledge. google scholar
  • Yukl, G., & Tracey, B. J. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(2), 525–535. google scholar
  • Zalmon, A. (2006). Waging the first postmodern war. World Policy Journal, 23(4), 35–42. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Hajjar, R.M. (2015). UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 3(31), 93-120. https://doi.org/10.16917/sd.00668


AMA

Hajjar R M. UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. 2015;3(31):93-120. https://doi.org/10.16917/sd.00668


ABNT

Hajjar, R.M. UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, [Publisher Location], v. 3, n. 31, p. 93-120, 2015.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Hajjar, Remi M.,. 2015. “UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 3, no. 31: 93-120. https://doi.org/10.16917/sd.00668


Chicago: Humanities Style

Hajjar, Remi M.,. UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 3, no. 31 (Dec. 2024): 93-120. https://doi.org/10.16917/sd.00668


Harvard: Australian Style

Hajjar, RM 2015, 'UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES', İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 3, no. 31, pp. 93-120, viewed 22 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.16917/sd.00668


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Hajjar, R.M. (2015) ‘UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES’, İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 3(31), pp. 93-120. https://doi.org/10.16917/sd.00668 (22 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Hajjar, Remi M.,. UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 3, no. 31, 2015, pp. 93-120. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.16917/sd.00668


Vancouver

Hajjar RM. UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 22 Dec. 2024 [cited 22 Dec. 2024];3(31):93-120. Available from: https://doi.org/10.16917/sd.00668 doi: 10.16917/sd.00668


ISNAD

Hajjar, RemiM.. UNCONVENTIONAL MILITARY ADVISING MISSION CONDUCTED BY CONVENTIONAL US MILITARY FORCES”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 3/31 (Dec. 2024): 93-120. https://doi.org/10.16917/sd.00668



TIMELINE


Submitted26.05.2015
Accepted07.12.2015
Published Online30.12.2015

SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.