İstanbul University Journal of Sociology

SUBMITINFORMATION
EnglishTürkçe

Research Article


DOI :10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023    Full Text (PDF)

The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children

Esma Sancar

Parenting styles play an active role in maintaining a healthy parent-child relationship. The digital media tools that have emerged with the development of technology and digitalization occupy an important place in the lives of Generation Z children, who were born in the digital world. Parents are developing new parenting styles for digitalization to both support and protect their children from potential risks of this now indispensable element for children. The study examines how these digital parenting attitudes affect the relationship between parents and their children. The study involved a structured survey of 400 parents of Gen-Z teens. Digital parenting attitudes were examined in the sub-dimensions of supporting children’s use of digital media tools and protecting them from the potential risks of these tools, and multiple regression analysis was used to measure the effect of these dimensions on the parent-child relationship. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the validity and reliability of the scales used. As a result of the research, it was found that both dimensions had a positive and significant effect on the parent-child relationship.

Keywords: digital parenting, generation Z, parent-youth relationship, digital media, parental attitudes
DOI :10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023    Full Text (PDF)

Z Kuşağı Ergen Çocuk Sahibi Ebeveynlerin Dijital Ebeveynlik Tutumlarının Çocukları ile İlişkilerine Etkisi

Esma Sancar

Ebeveynlik biçimleri, ebeveyn-çocuk ilişkisinin sağlıklı sürdürülebilmesinde etkin rol oynamaktadır. Gelişen teknoloji ve dijitalleşme ile birlikte ortaya çıkan dijital medya araçları, dijital dünyanın içine doğan Z kuşağı çocuklarının hayatında önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Ebeveynler de çocukları için artık vazgeçilmez olan bu unsur karşısında hem onları desteklemek, hem de olası risklerden korumak adına dijitalleşmeye yönelik yeni ebeveynlik tutumları geliştirmektedir. Çalışmada bu dijital ebeveynlik tutumlarının, ebeveynlerin ergenlik döneminde olan çocukları ile ilişkisini nasıl etkilediği araştırılmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında Z kuşağı ergen çocuk sahibi 400 ebeveyn ile yapılandırılmış tarama çalışması yapılmıştır. Dijital ebeveynlik tutumları, çocukları dijital medya araçlarını kullanma konusunda destekleme ve bu araçların olası risklerinden koruma alt boyutlarında incelenmiş olup, bu boyutların ebeveynlerin çocukları ile olan ilişkisine etkisini ölçmek için çoklu regresyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Kullanılan ölçeklerin geçerlilik ve güvenilirliklerinin test edilmesinde açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinden faydalanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları ebeveynlerin, dijital medya konusunda çocuklarını hem destekleme hem de koruma yönünde geliştirdikleri dijital ebeveynlik tutumlarının çocukları ile olan ilişkilerini olumlu yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir.

Keywords: dijital ebeveynlik, z kuşağı, ebeveyn-ergen ilişkisi, dijital medya, ebeveynlik tutumları

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The advent of the Internet ushered in a new era known as the Digital Age. The digitization that came with this era also brought social changes. Among all social structures, the family is the one that has been most affected by these changes (Zeybekoğlu Akbaş & Dursun, 2020). In order to maintain the family structure, a healthy communication between families is necessary. This digital revolution has led to a change in the role of parents. Digital parenting has emerged as a new role and the attitudes displayed by parents regarding this role have been named digital parenting attitudes (Bakan & Bakan, 2017; Dursun, 2020; İnan Kaya et al., 2018).

In this study, the effects of the attitudes of Turkish parents of Gen-Z adolescents toward their children’s use of digital media tools on their relationship with their children are investigated. The effects of the parent-child relationship in the adolescent period on children’s social behavior are known. The importance and necessity of this study becomes apparent when considering the indispensable position of information technologies and new communication devices. Moreover, although there are many studies on the impact of parenting attitudes on parent-child relationships (Bi et al., 2018), the lack of research on the impact of digital parenting attitudes on today’s Gen-Z adolescents makes this study unique. The study first provides a definition of digital parenting and explains its importance. It then provides an explanation of Diana Baumrind’s classification of parenting attitudes, which she called "parenting style". Finally, the effects of the adolescent period and the parenting attitudes perceived during it on the parent-adolescent relationship.

This study examines whether the attitudes of parents of Gen-Z adolescents toward their children’s digital media use affect their relationships with their children. Parental attitudes will be examined in two different forms: attitudes of approval of their children’s effective use of digital media tools, and attitudes of protection of their children from the possible risks of digital media. The hypotheses are as follows: 

H1: Parents’ attitude of approval of their children’s use of digital media has a positive effect on their relationship.

H2: Parents’ attitude of protecting their children from the risks of digital media has a positive effect on their relationship. 

This study is an exploratory research using a general survey model. The data were collected through the method of Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing model, using pre-prepared questionnaires. The research population of this study consists of digital parents of Gen-Z adolescents in Turkey. WHO defines the adolescent period as 10-19 years old. The research sample consists of parents of 10-19 years old adolescents who regularly use the Internet and live in Istanbul, Ankara and Izmir, the three cities with the highest population density in Turkey. The scope of this research includes 234 mothers and 166 fathers, each of whom is the parent of only one adolescent. The research was conducted using the snowball sampling method. Participants were contacted by phone prior to the study, and parents who regularly used the Internet were asked to complete a survey form, as they were more likely to be new media literate.

Parenting attitudes were measured using the Digital Parenting Attitude Scale developed by İnan Kaya et al. (2018). The scale consists of two subscales and a total of 12 items. The Parent-Adolescent Relationship Scale developed by Hair et al. (2020) was used to measure the parent-adolescent relationship from the parent’s side. The original scale of Hair et al. (2020) was developed to measure the parent-adolescent relationship from the adolescent side and consisted of two scales and 8 questions. The new scale is used to measure the relationship from the parent side and consists of a single scale with 7 questions. A 5-point Likert scale was used for the responses. Higher score means stronger relationship.

The regression analysis method was chosen to measure the effect of attitudes towards digital parenting on the relationship between parents and Generation Z adolescents. The regression model was created in such a way that the Parent-Adolescent Child Relationship Scale was the dependent variable and the subdimensions of the Digital Parenting Scale were the independent variables. SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 21.0 were used for data analysis. 

Factor analysis was used on the data collected from the pilot program with 33 participants. Two questions that showed low correlation were removed, resulting in the final scale of a single factor 5 questions. The final scale was administered to 400 parents. The scale was first tested for validity and reliability using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

The KMO test result was 0.807 and the Bartlett’s test result was very close to 0.000, and the data is suitable for factor analysis. As a result of the factor analysis, it was found that the factor belonging to the scale accounted for 59.29% of the total variance. Cronbach’s alpha for this factor was calculated as 0.804, and the scale was considered reliable. To test the structural validity of the scale, CFA was applied using the maximum likelihood method. As a result of the analysis, the fit index values were calculated as CMIN/DF=2.918, CFI=0.987, RMSEA=0.070, GFI=0.987, NFI=0.980, IFI=0.987. Considering this, it was assessed that all index values were significant, the level of model fit was very good and the Parent-Adolescent Child Relationship Scale provided structural validity.

It has been expressed by İnan Kaya et al. (2018) that the Digital Parenting Attitude Scale is a safe and valid measurement tool and the reliability has been tested again with EFA for this sample group. Again, both dimensions of the scale were shown to be reliable. Before proceeding with the multiple regression analysis, the necessary prerequisites were tested in turn. After ensuring that the variables had a normal distribution, the correlation analysis was used to test whether there was a linear relationship between the variables. The correlation value between the independent variables was found to be 0.430 and the VIF value was found to be 1.227, and it was seen that there was no problem with multicollinearity. As a result of the analysis, the extreme values were removed, the standardized errors were between -2.763 and 2.387, and the maximum Cook’s distance was calculated as 0.126, and it was seen that there was no problem in terms of extreme values. Then, the interpretation of the regression analysis was started by testing that the errors of the estimates had a normal distribution and that the conditions of homoscedasticity were met.

Sig.=0.000 and B=0.206 coefficients of the independent variable "Approval" indicate that this variable has a significant positive effect on the dependent variable "Relationship" and the H1 hypothesis is accepted. Sig.=0.000 and B=0.186 coefficients of the independent variables "Protection" indicate that the variable has a significant positive effect on the dependent variable "Relationship" and H2 hypothesis is accepted. This result shows that the parents of Generation Z children who try to both support and protect their children in the use of digital media tools have a positive effect on their relationships with their children.

According to the results of the regression analysis, both scales of digital parenting attitudes have a positive effect on the parentchild relationship. The results of the analysis of the first scale, that is, the approval scale, show that parents’ supportive attitude toward their children’s use of digital media has a positive effect on the parent-child relationship. The Acceptance Scale includes parents’ evaluations related to motivating their children to take advantage of digital media platforms for education, information acquisition, and communication. The results of the analysis of the second scale, that is, the protection scale, show that parents’ attitudes towards protecting their children from the possible risks of digital media have a positive effect on their relationship. The protection scale includes parents’ anxiety about the risks of using digital media platforms and the harmful effects of overuse, as well as their demands for restrictions to protect their children from these dangers.

Baumrind examines parental attitudes in three categories: authoritarian, democratic, and permissive. Maccoby and Martin examined these three categories as "responsiveness" and "demandingness". Responsiveness includes awareness of children’s needs, support, and attitudes toward self-expression and self-management, whereas demandingness includes efforts at supervision, discipline, and control. The study examines parents’ permissive and protective attitudes as responsiveness and demandingness. The study may imply that parents’ approval and protection behaviors indicate that digital parenting attitudes have an effect on the parent-child relationship. The results of the study correlate with those of the research concluding that democratic parenting attitudes shape parent-adolescent relationships. Following Sümer & Güngör’s (1999) findings that adolescents’ satisfaction is directly related to the approval and interest they receive from their parents, parents’ approval of their children’s use of digital media has a positive effect on their relationship with their children.


PDF View

References

  • Akça, E. P., Tekgül, N., Karademirci, E., & Öngen, K. (2016). Adolescence period: physical growth, psychological and social development process. Turkish Family Physician, 3(4), 10-16. google scholar
  • Alles-Jardel, M., Fourdrinier, C., Roux, A., & Schneider, B. H. (2002). Parents’ structuring of children’s daily lives in relation to the quality and stability of children’s friendships. International Journal of Psychology, 37(2), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000289 google scholar
  • Amod Choudhary. (2020). Smartphones and their impact on human relationships. Review of Business & Finance Studies, 5(2), 9-18. Retrieved from http://cmrindia.com/shelf/smartphones-and-their-impact-on-human-relationships/ google scholar
  • Aşkın, D. (2021). Teknoloji çağında aile olmak, djital aileler, djital ebeveynlik ve aile içi yabancılaşma. Z. S. Adıgüzel, E. Dikici, & O. Tire (Ed.), Aile ve sosyolojisi içinde (s. 196-212). Eğitim Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Atalay, D., & Özyürek, A. (2021). Çocuk yetiştirme stillerinin bağlanma stilleri, benlik değerlendirmeleri ve yakın ilişkiler üzerindeki etkisi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 30, 815-834. google scholar
  • Bakan, U., & Bakan, U. (2017). Facebook’ta aile ilişkileri ve sosyal medya adanmışlığına yönelik bir içerik analizi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(20), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.284457 google scholar
  • Baumrind, D. (1971). Harmonius parents and their preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 4, 99-102. google scholar
  • Baumrind, D. (1972). An exploratory study of socialization effects on black-white comparisons. Wiley, 43(1), 261-267. google scholar
  • Bayraktar, F., Sayıl, M., & Kumru, A. (2009). Liseli ergenler ve üniversiteli gençlerde benlik saygısı: ebeveyn ve akrana bağlanma, empati ve psikolojik uyum değişkenlerinin rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 48-63. google scholar
  • Bayzan, Ş. (2022). Türkiye’deki çocukların ve ebeveynlerin bilinçli ve güvenli internet kullanım deneyim ve alışkanlıkları. https://www.guvenliweb.org.tr/dosya/5Jo68.pdf google scholar
  • Bi, X., Yang, Y., Li, H., Wang, M., Zhang, W., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2018). Parenting styles and parent-adolescent relationships: the mediating roles of behavioral autonomy and parental authority. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02187 google scholar
  • Bilgiç, H. G., Duman, D., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). Djital yerlilerin özellikleri ve çevrim içi ortamların tasarlanmasındaki etkileri. Akademik Bilişim’11 - XIII. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri içinde (s. 257-263). Malatya. google scholar
  • Branje, S. (2018). Development of parent-adolescent relationships: conflict interactions as a mechanism of change. Child Development Perspec-tives, 12(3), 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12278 google scholar
  • Brosch, A. (2016). When the child is born into the internet: shareting as growing trend among parents. The Educational Review, 43(21), 225-235. google scholar
  • Buckingham, D. (2006). Digital generations: children, young people, and the new media. Routledge. google scholar
  • Bülbül, S. H. (2004). Ergen etiği. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, 13(6), 206-210. google scholar
  • Burnett, C., & Wilkinson, J. (2005). Holy Lemons! Learning from children’s uses of the Internet in out-of-school contexts. Literacy (Formerly Reading), 39(3), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9345.2005.00416.x google scholar
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32, 470-483. google scholar
  • Çalapkulu, Ç., & Alp, F. (2020). Dijital ebeveynler ile çocukların sosyal medya kullanimi üzerindeki mahremiyet ilişkisi.Nişantaşı Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8 (2), 132-144. google scholar
  • Çetinkaya, L., Sütçü, S. S. (2016). Çocukların gözüyle ebeveynlerinin bilişim teknolojileri kullanimlarina yönelik kisitlamalari ve nedenleri. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.58102 google scholar
  • Csobanka, Z. E. (2016). The Z generation. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 6 (2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1515/atd-2016-0012 google scholar
  • Darling, N. (1999). Parenting style and its correlates. ERIC Digest, 1-7. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED427896.pdf google scholar
  • Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487 google scholar
  • Demos, J., & Demos, V. (1989). Tarihsel açıdan ergenlik. Adolescence in Historical Perspective, 22 (2), 755-767. google scholar
  • Deniz, G., Aydın, S., & Odabaş, D. (2022). Ankara il merkezindeki ortaokul ve lise öğrencilerinin djital oyun bağimliliği ve anne baba tutumlarinin incelenmesi. Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi, 4(1), 43-55. google scholar
  • Derman, O. (2008). Ergenlerde psikososyal gelişim. Adolesan Sağlığı II içinde (s. 19-21). google scholar
  • Digital 2022:Turkey. (2022). DataReportal - Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-turkey google scholar
  • Dursun, C. (2020). Djital ebeveynin djital çocuklari: İlk djital çocuk kanali Pepee TV üzerinden ebeveyn-çocuk ilişkisinin dönüşümünün değerlendirilmesi. 9. Türkiye Lisansüstü Çalışmalar Kongresi içinde (s. 333-344). Kocaeli. google scholar
  • co, U. (1993). Can television teach? In The screen education reader (pp. 95-107). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22426-5_7 google scholar
  • Erikson, E. (1959). Identity and life cycle. University Press. google scholar
  • Erözkan, A. (2012). Ergenlerde kaygı duyarlığı ve ebeveyn tutumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 12(1), 43-57. google scholar
  • Erten, P. (2019). Z kuşağinin djital teknolojiye yönelik tutumlari. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 20(3), 190-202. google scholar
  • Esmali Kooraneh, A., & Amirsardari, L. (2015). Predicting early maladaptive schemas using Baumrind’s parenting styles. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 9(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17795/jpbs952 google scholar
  • Evci, N., & Aylar, F. (2017). Derleme: Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanılması. The Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 389-412. https://doi.org/10.16990/SOBIDER.3386 google scholar
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage. google scholar
  • Ghazali, R., Ahmad, A., Uli, J., Suandi, T., & Hassan, S. A. (2008). Commitment to change among managers in a selected service or-ganization in Malaysia. The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review, 6(8), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/v06i08/42519 google scholar
  • Günal, A., Pekçetin, S., Demirtürk, F., Şenol, H., Hâkansson, C., & Wagman, P. (2020). Validity and reliability of the Turkish Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-T). Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 27(7), 493-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2019.1673479 google scholar
  • Gunuc, S., & Dogan, A. (2013). The relationships between Turkish adolescents’ Internet addiction, their perceived social support and family activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2197-2207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.011 google scholar
  • Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştirma yöntemleri felsefe - yöntem -analiz (5th ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Hair, E. C., Moore, K. A., Garrett, S. B., Kinukawa, A., Lippman, L. H., & Michelson, E. (2020). The Parent-Adolescent Relationship Scale. In What do children need to flourish? (pp. 183-202). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23823-9_12 google scholar
  • Hall, G. S. (2005). Adolescence its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion and education Vol 1. (Speacial Ed.). Elibron Classics. google scholar
  • İnan Kaya, G., Mutlu Bayraktar, D., & Yılmaz, Ö. (2018). Djital Ebeveynlik Tutum Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 149-173. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.390626 google scholar
  • Jang, K. S., Hwang, S. Y., & Choi, J. Y. (2008). Internet addiction and psychiatric symptoms among Korean adolescents. Journal of School Health, 78(3), 165-171. https://doi.Org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00279.x google scholar
  • Kabakçı Yurdakul, İ., Dönmez, O., Yaman, F., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2013). Digital parenting and changing roles. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences (Vol. 12, pp. 883-896). Gaziantep Üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Kasikci, D. N., Çagiltay, K., Karakuş, T., Kurşun, E., & Ogan, C. (2014). Internet habits and safe internet use of children in turkey and europe. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 230-243. google scholar
  • Kelleci, M., Güler, N., Sezer, H., & Gölbaşı, Z. (2009). Lise öğrencilerinde internet kullanma süresinin cinsiyet ve psikiyatrik belirtiler ile ilişkisi. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 8(3), 223-230. google scholar
  • Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K., & Chang, R. (2008). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students’ use of technology. Hello! Where Are You in the Landscape of Educational Technology? Proceedings Ascilite Melbourne 2008, 484-492. google scholar
  • Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20160307122823 google scholar
  • Koç, M. (2004). Gelişim psikolojisi açisindan ergenlik dönemi ve genel özellikleri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(2), 231-256. google scholar
  • Kubey, R. W., Lavin, M. J., & Barrows, J. R. (2001). Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: early findings. Journal of Communication, 51(2), 366-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02885.x google scholar
  • Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology, 09(08), 2207-2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126 google scholar
  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396 google scholar
  • Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: parent child interaction. In I. E. M. Herherington & P. H. Mussen (Eds.), Socialization, personality and social development (pp. 1-101). Wiley. google scholar
  • Martmez, I., & Garma, J. F. (2007). Impact of Parenting Styles on Adolescents’ Self-Esteem and Internalization of Values in Spain. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 338-348. google scholar
  • McKinsey & Company. (2020). Future of work: Turkey’s talent transformation in the digital era. google scholar
  • Moawad, G. E. N. A., & Ebrahem, G. G. S. (2016). The relationship between use of technology and parent-adolescents social relationship. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(14), 168-178. google scholar
  • Oliva, A. (2006). Relaciones familiares Y desarrollo adolescente. Anuario de Psicologia, 37(3), 209-223. google scholar
  • Özgür, H. (2019). Online game addiction among turkish adolescents: The effect of internet parenting style. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1), 47-68. google scholar
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. MCB Univeristy Press, 9(5), 1-6. google scholar
  • Richard, L. M., & Steinberg. (2004). Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed.). John Wiley&Sons Inc. google scholar
  • Richards, R., McGee, R., Williams, S. M., Welch, D., & Hancox, R. J. (2010). Adolescent screen time and attachment to parents and peers. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(3), 258. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.280 google scholar
  • Sadıkoğlu, Z. Z. (2021). Risk bilinçli annelik: Uzman risk söylemlerinin annelik deneyimi üzerindeki etkisi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 41(1), 43-71. google scholar
  • Şahin, F. E., & Cevher, F. N. (2007). Türk toplumunda aile-çocuk ilişkilerine genel bir bakiş. Uluslararası Asya ve Kuzey Afrika Çalışmaları Kongresi içinde (s. 775-790). Ankara. google scholar
  • Saylık, F. Z., & Gezici Yalçın, M. (2018). Investigation of the effects of authoritarian vs. democratic parental attitudes, and parental attachment on shame and guilt by quasi-experimental method. Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology, 38(2), 95-127. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP404167 google scholar
  • Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006 google scholar
  • Shek, D. T. L. (2002). Parenting characteristics and parent-adolescent conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 23(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X02023002002 google scholar
  • Sugimura, K., Crocetti, E., Hatano, K., Kaniusonyte, G., Hihara, S., & Zukauskiene, R. (2018). A cross-cultural perspective on the rela-tionships between emotional separation, parental trust, and identity in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(4), 749-759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0819-4 google scholar
  • Sümer, N., & Güngör, D. (1999). Çocuk yetiştirme stillerinin bağlanma stilleri, benlik değerlendirmeleri ve yakin ilişkiler üzerindeki etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14(44), 35-58. google scholar
  • TÜİK. (2021). Çocuklarda Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, 2021. Yazar. google scholar
  • TÜİK. (2022a). Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları, 2022. Yazar. google scholar
  • TÜİK. (2022b). Doğum İstatistikleri, 2022. Yazar. google scholar
  • Ul Hadia, N., Abdullah, N., & Sentosa, I. (2016). An easy approach to exploratory factor analysis: marketing perspective. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(1), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2016.v6n1p215 google scholar
  • Van den Heuvel, A., Van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., Van Rooij, A. J., & Van de Mheen, D. (2012). Meeting online contacts in real life among adolescents: The predictive role of psychosocial wellbeing and internet-specific parenting. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 465-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.018 google scholar
  • Yay, M. (2019). Dijital ebeveynlik. https://yesilaymarket.com/Data/EditorFiles/DjitalEbeveynlik.pdf google scholar
  • Young, K. S. (2004). Internet addiction. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 402-415. https://doi.Org/0.1177/0093650208321782 google scholar
  • eybekoğlu Akbaş, Ö., & Dursun, C. (2020). Teknolojinin aileye etkisi: değişen ailenin djital ebeveyn ve çocuklari. Turkish Studies-Social Sciences, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.43395 google scholar
  • Zomey, N. R., & Kay, R. H. (2016). Technology use in early childhood education. Journal of Educational Informatics, 1(25), 1-25. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Sancar, E. (2023). The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 43(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023


AMA

Sancar E. The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. 2023;43(1):54-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023


ABNT

Sancar, E. The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, [Publisher Location], v. 43, n. 1, p. 54-67, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Sancar, Esma,. 2023. “The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 43, no. 1: 54-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023


Chicago: Humanities Style

Sancar, Esma,. “The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 43, no. 1 (May. 2024): 54-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023


Harvard: Australian Style

Sancar, E 2023, 'The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children', İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 54-67, viewed 20 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Sancar, E. (2023) ‘The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children’, İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 43(1), pp. 54-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023 (20 May. 2024).


MLA

Sancar, Esma,. “The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 43, no. 1, 2023, pp. 54-67. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023


Vancouver

Sancar E. The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 20 May. 2024 [cited 20 May. 2024];43(1):54-67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023 doi: 10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023


ISNAD

Sancar, Esma. “The Impact of Gen-Z Parents’ Digital Parenting Attitudes on Their Relationship with Their Children”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 43/1 (May. 2024): 54-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2023.43.1.0023



TIMELINE


Submitted30.03.2023
Accepted12.07.2023
Published Online03.08.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.