Research Article


DOI :10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933   IUP :10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933    Full Text (PDF)

Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241)

Kurban Durmuşoğlu

Mongols began to make a name for themselves in world history during the leadership of Chinggis Khan. They entered the Iranian geography as a result of their struggle with their biggest rival in the west, the Khwarazmshah. The apparent reason that motivated the Mongols was the Utrar incident. The Mongols, led by Chinggis Khan, confronted the Khwarazmshah as revenge for the murder of their ambassadors, or at least used this as an excuse. The Mongols’ struggle with the Khwarazmshah in Khorasan brought tremendous destruction to the region, with Herat being one of the Khorasani cities affected by this destruction. Although the Mongol invasion destroyed the city, this situation was limited to the Chinggis Khan period. Chinggis’ successors did not adopt their father’s policy in an administrative sense. Therefore, this situation is considered the beginning of a new process in Khorasani cities and was seen to affect many areas. Ögedei replaced Chinggis as Khan, and Ögedei Khan’s attitude toward the construction of cities was a turning point not just for Herat but for all Khorasan cities. In this way, Herat entered a period of recovery and development in terms of construction through Ögedei Khan. The construction activities carried out under the management of Ögedei Khan were essential for the redevelopment and improvement of the region. In order to elucidate all of these, the study is mainly based on Persian sources of the period. However, the study also applies Turkish and English sources where necessary. In this context, the study touches upon the destruction experienced in Herat due to the Mongol invasion and covers the construction activities carried out in the region during the reign of Ögedei Khan.

DOI :10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933   IUP :10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933    Full Text (PDF)

Ögedey Han Döneminde Herât’ın İmar Durumu (1229-1241)

Kurban Durmuşoğlu

Moğollar, Cengiz Han liderliğinden itibaren dünya tarihinde adlarından söz ettirmeye başlamıştır. Onlar batıdaki en büyük rakipleri Hârezmşâhlarla olan mücadeleleri sebebiyle İran coğrafyasına girmiştir. Moğolları harekete geçiren görünürdeki sebep ise Otrar olayı olmuştur. Cengiz Han liderliğindeki Moğollar, elçilerinin öldürülmesinin intikamı olarak ya da bunu sebep göstererek Hârezmşâhlarla karşı karşıya gelmiştir. Moğolların Horasan’da Hârezmşâhlarla olan mücadelesi bölgeye büyük bir yıkım getirmiştir. Bu yıkımdan etkilenen Horasan şehirlerinden biri de Herât’tır. Şehir, Moğol istilasıyla yıkılmış olsa da bu durum sadece Cengiz Han dönemiyle sınırlı kalmıştır. Çünkü Cengiz’in ardıllarında, idarî anlamda babalarının politikasını benimsemedikleri görülmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu durum Horasan şehirlerinde yeni bir sürecin başlangıcı olarak kabul edilmekte ve birçok alana etki etttiği görülmektedir. Cengiz Han’ın yerine han olan Ögedey’in imar konusundaki tutumu da bunun bir yansımasıdır. Ögedey Han’ın şehirlerin imarı ile ilgili tutumu bütün Horasan şehirleri gibi Herât için de bir dönüm noktası olmuştur. Bu sayede Herât, Ögedey Han ile birlikte imar anlamında bir toparlanma dönemine girmiş ve gelişim göstermiştir. Ögedey Han’ın yönetimi altında yapılan imar faaliyetleri, bölgenin yeniden kalkınması ve gelişmesi için önem arz etmektedir. Bütün bunların aydınlatılması noktasında çalışma, ağrlıklı olarak dönemin Farsça kaynaklarına dayanmaktadır. Ancak gerekli görüldüğü yerlerde Türkçe ve İngilizce çalışmalara da müracaat edilmiştir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, Moğol istilasıyla Herât’ta yaşanan yıkımlara değinmekte ve Ögedey Han döneminde bölgede yapılan imar faaliyetlerini konu edinmektedir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The Mongols are a tribe that played an important role in medieval world history and came to the fore with their destruction in the Islamic world. The Mongols only played an essential role in world history in the 13th century, when Chinggis Khan founded the Mongol Empire at the beginning of the century. After long struggles, Chinggis gathered all Mongolian tribes under a single state. Chinggis received the title of khan through the kurultai held in 1206 and became the greatest ruler of all steppe tribes. Afterward, Chinggis Khan took control of the Kyrgyz, Merkit, Naiman, and Uighur until 1209. With the administrative, social, and military regulations he made, Chinggis Khan brought the Mongols under a regular organization for the first time in their history and restructured them with the concept of a world state. With the capture of Qara-Khitai lands, the Mongols became neighbors to the Khwarazmshah in the west. However, these neighborly relations did not continue as normal. In 1218, a Mongol caravan of 450 people was slaughtered in Utrar. Their goods were plundered, and the ambassadors were killed. Afterward in the following year, Chinggis Khan went on an expedition against the Khwarazmshah with a strong army. Instead of fighting a pitched battle against the Mongols, 'Alā’al-Din Muhammad Khwarazmshah preferred to fight a defensive war by dividing his army among the cities. However, this attitude ended the Khwarazmshah and resulted in the towns of the Khorasani geography facing the Mongol invasion. Chinggis Khan also sent his youngest son Tolui to Khorasan. After Tolui captured Merv, Nishapur, and Herat, he joined his father in besieging Taleqan between Balkh and Marw al-Rudh. Chinggis Khan spent the summer of 1220 in Nakhshab and then captured Termez. The following year, he crossed the Oxus River and captured Balkh, and the Mongols invaded all Khorasani cities.

In the Middle Ages, the struggle of states to establish superiority over each other took place in different dimensions. While these were sometimes bloody and destructive, other times they were peaceful. The battle of the Mongols in the Khorasan geography attracts attention for its bloody and violent dimensions. The Mongols’ struggle with the Khwarazmshah, one of the political actors of the period, brought a significant change to Khorasani geography. Once the Mongols took over the entire Khorasan geography, they tried to establish administrative order there through new administrations. Perhaps the Mongols needed to pass the test successfully in the Khorasani geography in order to prove their maturity and emerge as a political and military power.

The Mongol invasion is one of the most talked about events in the Middle Ages. Through this period of invasion that started under the leadership of Chinggis Khan, many residential areas either suffered significant damage or were destroyed entirely. The greatest of these destructions occurred in the Khorasani geography. The Mongols are in fact remembered in world history for their destruction. This situation had emerged due to a strategy the Mongols implemented in the places they captured. What happened in Transoxiana and the Khorasani geography significantly impacted the formation of this image. Of course, sources differ in terms of the extent of this destruction. In addition to those who’ve stated that the destruction was not as great as thought, some approaches show this to have been a natural situation. Among the reasons behind the destruction the Mongols carried out, the first thing one see is that it had been a military strategy. The Mongols used this strategy to devastate the border regions, with the aim being to make an area clear for subsequent conquests. Another reason that came to the fore in the Mongols’ destruction was their sense of revenge. The invasions Chinggis Khan carried out had started with the murder of Mongol ambassadors and reached very different dimensions in the cities where members of the Mongol dynasty had been killed. The Mongols inflicted much greater destruction in the Khorasani cities they’d captured with a passion for revenge. In addition to religious and ethnic elements, other elements such as the strategic locations of the regions, the disobedience of the locals, steppe tactics, nomadic life, and the betrayal of the Khwarazmshah come to the fore as reasons for the destruction. Based on all these approaches, briefly describing what the Mongols did in Khorasan as barbarism may lead to a mistake in explaining what happened in the region. In this respect, evaluating the policy the Mongols followed in the cities of Khorasan would be a more accurate approach due to the strategy they implemented to establish dominance in the region.

The literature has a massive gap in terms of construction after the 1220s in the Khorasani cities that had been exposed to Mongol invasion. The Mongols changed the landscape of every town they went to. After the Utrar incident caused by the Khwarazmshah, Chinggis Khan led the Mongols to take action as revenge for the murder of their ambassadors, or at least used this as an excuse. Thus, the Mongols’ pursuit of 'Alā’al-Din Muhammad Khwarazmshah significantly destroyed the Iranian geography. The cities of Khorasan in Iran received the most significant share of this destruction. Herat, a Khorasani town, had also been destroyed by the Mongol invasion.. Ögedei declared a general amnesty and made many grants. After reorganizing the internal administration, he resumed the reconstruction that had been on hold for a long time. While Chinggis Khan had sent Chormaqan Noyan to Iran in 1231 for the planned Near East expedition, he had marched to China. Through bureaucrats such as Chin Timur and Korguz in Iran, Ögedei Khan organized the internal administration of large regions that had been captured during the war and turned into ruins. Therefore, these administrators initiated development activities in the geography of Khorasan and Herat. 

Of course, the construction activities in Herat were closely related to Ögedei’s attitude on this issue. Ögedei Khan attached importance to development. After a while, the Mongols under Ögedei started construction work in the cities they had captured through destruction and founded new cities. Karakorum was established near old Ordu-Baliq, and water wells were opened in various places during Ögedei Khan’s rule. This attitude also manifested itself in places far from the center. Thus, Ögedei Khan attempted to erase the traces of the Mongolian invasion that had brought tremendous destruction to Herat after becoming the head of the Mongolian State. In this context, Ögedei Khan had his hands full reconstructing the places that had fallen into ruin during the reign of Chinggis Khan and entered a recovery process. From the outset, however, the construction activities in the Khorasani geography should be said to have been carried out at a lower level, unlike the cities of Transoxiana. Because the Mongols had plundered the towns in the Khorasani geography several times, the region’s development was not at the desired level.

Since the reign of Ögedei Khan, construction activities in Herat have been supported, and the Mongol State provided some support in this regard. The construction works in Herat were initiated by a group of Herat residents who’d returned to the city after the Mongol invasion. However, when considering the conditions of the period, what they did was extremely limited. After Ögedey Khan's reconstruction edict, the construction works in the city progressed much faster. Ögedei’s efforts to bring back the artisans who’d migrated from the region should be evaluated in this context. Another critical step that accelerated the development activities is that the administrators who’d been appointed to the region were integrating themselves and acting alongside the people in the region. Activating water channels to revitalize agriculture in the region was extremely important for the region’s development. In addition, the fact that the administrators personally took part in these activities alongside the people shows that the Mongols’ view of the region had changed. Therefore, through the construction activities carried out in Herat under Ögedei Khan rule, the population in the region increased, and Herat became an important center where artisans carried out their activities in its bazaars and markets. The study is mainly based on Persian sources of the period. However, it also benefits from Turkish and English sources when deemed necessary. In this context, the study first examines the destruction experienced in Herat during the Mongol invasion and under the reign of Chinggis Khan. The study then emphasizes the construction activities that were carried out in the region during the reign of Ögedei Khan and conveys the overall results of this.


PDF View

References

  • Alâeddin Ata Melik Cüveynî, Târîh-i Cihânguşâ. 3 cilt. Tashih Muhammed b. Abdulvahhâb Kazvînî. Tahran: İntişârât-i Donyâ-yi Kitâb, 1329 hş. google scholar
  • Allsen, Thomas T. Commodity and Exchange in the Mongol Empire A cultural history of Islamic textiles. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1997. google scholar
  • Barry, Michael. Figurative Art in Medieval Islam and the Riddle of Bihzâd of Herât (1465-1535). Paris: Flammarion, 2004. google scholar
  • Barthold, V. V. Moğol İstilasına Kadar Türkistan. Hazırlayan Hakkı Dursun Yıldız. İstanbul: Kronik Yayınları, 2017. google scholar
  • Barthold, W. An Historical Geography of Iran. Çeviren Svat Soucek. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984. google scholar
  • Biran, Michal. “Rulers and City Life in Mongol Central Asia (1220-1370)”, Turko-Mongol Rulers, Cities and City Life içinde, 257-283. Editör David Durand- Guedy. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2013. google scholar
  • Çiftçi, Fatih. “Mongol Defeat-Khwarazmshah Victory: 1221 Battle of Parwan” Oğuz-Türkmen Araştırmaları Dergisi VI/2 (2022): 84-135. google scholar
  • Fasîh Ahmed b. Celâleddin Muhammed Hâfî, Mucmel-i Fasîhî. 3 cilt. Tashih Mahmûd Ferruh. Meşhed: Kitâbufuruş-i Bastan, 1341 hş. google scholar
  • Fiye, R. N. “Harât”. The Encyclopaedia of İslam (New Edition). 3: 177-178. Leiden: Brill, 1986. google scholar
  • Frye, Richard N. “Two Timurid Monuments in Herat”, Artibus Asiae 11/3 (1948): 206-211. google scholar
  • Gıyâseddîn b. Humâmeddîn el-Hüseynî Hândmîr, Habîbu’s-siyer. 4 cilt. Hazırlayan Muhammed Debîr Siyâkî. Tahran: Kitâbfurûş-i Hayyâm, 1333 hş. google scholar
  • Golombek, Lisa. “The Resilince of the Friday Mosque: The Case of Herat” Muqarnas 1 (1983): 95-102. google scholar
  • Hartog, Leo De. Cengiz Han, Dünyanın Fatihi. Çeviren Serkan Uzun. Ankara: Dost Yayınları, 2003. google scholar
  • İbn Havkal, Sûrat el-Arz (10. Asırda İslâm Coğrafyası). Çeviren Ramazan Şeşen. İstanbul: Yeditepe Yayınları, 2017. google scholar
  • İbnü’l-Esîr, el-Kâmil fi’t-Tarih. 12 cilt. Çeviren A. Özaydın-A. Ağırakça. İstanbul: Bahar Yayınları, 1987. google scholar
  • İbnü’t Tıktaka, El-Fahrî (Devlet İdaresi, Halifeler, Vezirler Tarihi, 632-1258). Çeviren Ramazan Şeşen. İstanbul: Bilge Kültür Sanat, 2016. google scholar
  • İstahri, Mesâliku’l-Memâlik (Ülkelerin Yolları Değerlendirme-Metin). Çeviren Murat Ağarı. İstanbul: Ayışığıkitapları, 2019. google scholar
  • Jackson, Peter. The Mongols and the Islamic Worldfrom Conquest to Conversion. London: Yale University Press, 2017. google scholar
  • Kaya, Çetin. “Büyük Moğol Ulusu’nda İlk Veliaht Tayini Hususuna Dair Bir İnceleme” USAD 14 (2021): 23-34. google scholar
  • Kaya, Çetin. “Harezmşahlar Tarihinde Han Melik’in Yeri ve Önemi”, Genel Türk Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi 6/11 (2024): 67-76. google scholar
  • Klimburg, Max. “The Architecture, Arts and Handicrafts”, From the Past andfor the Future Safeguarding the Cultural Heritage ofAfghanistan Jam and Herat içinde, 63-68. France: Unesco, 2015. google scholar
  • Köprülü, Fuad. Türk Edebiyatı Tarihi. İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat, 1980. google scholar
  • Mahendrarajah, Shivan. “The Iranian Interlude: From Mongol Decline to Timur’s Invasion”, Iran After the Mongols içinde, 153-176. Editör Sussan Babaie. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019, 159-176. google scholar
  • Manz, Beatrice Forbes, “The Mongol Conquest of Iran”, The Mongol World içinde, 196-212. Editör Timothy May and Michael Hope. London-New York: Routledge, 2022. google scholar
  • May, Timothy, “The Mongol Art of War and the Tsunami Strategy”, Golden Horde Civilization no. 8 (2015): 31-35. google scholar
  • Minhâc-ı Sirâc el-Cûzcânî, Tabakât-ı Nâsırî (Moğol İstilasına Dair Kayıtlar), Çeviren ve notlandıran Mustafa Uyar, İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat, 2016. google scholar
  • Moğolların Gizli Tarihi. Çeviren Ahmet Temir. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, 2016. google scholar
  • Morgan, D. O. “Ögedey”. The Encyclopaedia ofIslam (New Edition). 8: 162-163. Leiden: Brill, 1995 google scholar
  • Morgan, David. Medieval Persia 1040-1797. London: Routledge, 2016. google scholar
  • Morgan, O. “The Mongols in Iran 1219-1256”, The Coming of the Mongols The Idea ofIran içinde, VII, 4553. Editör David O. Morgan-Sarah Stewart. London-New York: I.B. Tauris, 2018. google scholar
  • Mu‘înu’d-din Muhammed Zamçî İsfizârî, Ravzâtu’l-cennât fî evsâfi medîneti’l-Herât. 2 cilt. neşr. Seyyid Muhammed Kâzım İmâmî. Tahran: İntişarat-ı Danişgah, 1338 hş. google scholar
  • Muhammed b. Ahmed el-Mukaddesî, İslam Coğrafyası (Ahsenü’t-Takâsîm). Çeviren Ahsen Batur. İstanbul: Selenge Yayınları, 2015. google scholar
  • Muhammed b. Hâvendşâh b. Mahmûd Mîrhând, Târîh-i Ravzatu’s-safâ. 15 cilt. Tashih Cemşid Kiyanfer. Tahran: İntişârât-ı Esâtîr, 1380 hş. google scholar
  • Mülâyim, Selçuk. “Herat Cuma Camii”. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 17: 218-2219. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 1998. google scholar
  • Nicolle, David. The Mongols Warlords: Genghis Khan, Kublai Khan, Hulegu, Tamerlane. New York: Firebird Books, 1990. google scholar
  • Özdemir, H. Ahmet. Moğol İstilâsı Cengiz ve Hülâgû Dönemleri. İstanbul: İz Yayınları 2018. google scholar
  • Özgüdenli, Osman G., “Cengiz Han ve Moğol İmparatorluğu”, Ortaçağ’da Türkler, Moğollar, İranlılar (Kaynaklar ve Araştırmalar) içinde, 211-244. İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat, 2020. google scholar
  • Özgüdenli, Osman Gazi. “Ögedey Han”. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 34: 21-22. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 2007. google scholar
  • Reşîdüddîn Fazlullâh Hemedânî, Câmi‘u’t-Tevârîh. 5 cilt. Tashih. Muhammed Rûşen-Mustafa Mûsevî, Tahran: Neşr-i Elbruz, 1373 hş. google scholar
  • Rezevî, Seyyid Ebû’l-Fazl. “Câygâh-i Senâyi‘-i Kârhâneî der İktisâd ve Câmi‘a-i ‘Ahd-i Îlhânân”, Îrân-i Nâmegi 1 (1399 hş.): 37-55. google scholar
  • Sâbitî, Seyyid ‘Alî Mü’yyîd-i. Târîh-i Nîşâbûr. Tahran: Silsile-i İntişârât-i Encumen-i Âsâr-i Millî, 2525 şş. google scholar
  • Şahin, Mustafa. “Moğol Döneminin Yöneticilerinden Melik Mecneddîn-i Kalyonî ve Oğlu Şemseddîn Muhammed-i Kalyonî”, Tarih Okulu Dergisi 7/XVII (2014): 155-163. google scholar
  • Şahin, Mustafa. “Ögedey Kağan’ın Herât Emîri Uygur Türk’ü Harlıg”, Bilig 84 (2018): 23-43. google scholar
  • Seyf bin Muhammed bin Ya‘kûb el-Herevî. Târîh-nâme-yi Herât. neşr. Muhammed Zubeyr es-Siddikî. Calcutta 1943. google scholar
  • Spuler, Berthold. İran Moğolları Siyaset, İdare ve Kültür İlhanlılar Devri 1220-1350. Çeviren Cemal Köprülü. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, 2011. google scholar
  • Tetevî, Mollâ Ahmed ve Asâf Hân Kazvînî. Târîh-i Elfî. 6 cilt. Tashih Gulâm Rızâ Tabâtabâyî Mecd. Tahran: Şirket-i İntişârât-i ‘İlmî ve Fehengî, 1382 hş. google scholar
  • Togan, Zeki Velidi. “Herât”. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 5/1: 529-442. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi, 1987. google scholar
  • Wilber, Donald N. The Architecture of Islamic Iran The Il Khanid Period. Princeton-New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1955. google scholar
  • Zakeri, Mohsen. “The ‘Ayyârân of Khurasan and the Mongol Invasıon”, Proceedings of the ThirdEuropean Conference ofIranian Studies içinde, 269-276. Editör Charles Melville. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1999. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Durmuşoğlu, K. (2024). Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241). Journal of Turkology, 34(1), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933


AMA

Durmuşoğlu K. Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241). Journal of Turkology. 2024;34(1):185-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933


ABNT

Durmuşoğlu, K. Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241). Journal of Turkology, [Publisher Location], v. 34, n. 1, p. 185-199, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Durmuşoğlu, Kurban,. 2024. “Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241).” Journal of Turkology 34, no. 1: 185-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933


Chicago: Humanities Style

Durmuşoğlu, Kurban,. Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241).” Journal of Turkology 34, no. 1 (Dec. 2024): 185-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933


Harvard: Australian Style

Durmuşoğlu, K 2024, 'Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241)', Journal of Turkology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 185-199, viewed 23 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Durmuşoğlu, K. (2024) ‘Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241)’, Journal of Turkology, 34(1), pp. 185-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933 (23 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Durmuşoğlu, Kurban,. Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241).” Journal of Turkology, vol. 34, no. 1, 2024, pp. 185-199. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933


Vancouver

Durmuşoğlu K. Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241). Journal of Turkology [Internet]. 23 Dec. 2024 [cited 23 Dec. 2024];34(1):185-199. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933 doi: 10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933


ISNAD

Durmuşoğlu, Kurban. Construction Status of Herat During the Period of Ögedei Khan (1229-1241)”. Journal of Turkology 34/1 (Dec. 2024): 185-199. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuturkiyat.1393933



TIMELINE


Submitted21.11.2023
Accepted05.05.2024
Published Online28.06.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.