Research Article


DOI :10.26650/sty.2025.1599107   IUP :10.26650/sty.2025.1599107    Full Text (PDF)

An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque

Sevinç Gök İpekçioğluŞakir ÇakmakLemye Gündüz

Yeşil Mosque/Zaviye, one of the most popular works of its period, is of great importance not only for its architectural foundation and ornaments but also as a building symbolising the rebirth of the Ottoman Empire. It is also a structure of gratitude to the Ahis and Abdals who supported Mehmed I’s ascension to the throne. The building, which is frequently mentioned by historical sources and the subject of researchers’ analyses, still needs to be examined in many ways. Within the scope of our study, the magnificent stone decorations of the building were examined and it was determined that the unfinished parts of the decorations on the north façade were more than known. It was understood that these decorations, which were never made, the contours of the ornaments were drawn and left raw, the depth was not given and the details were not processed, were present along the entire north façade, but attention was paid to the systematic and unobtrusive placement of these deficiencies. In addition to the identifi? cation of unfinished ornaments, answering the question of why they could not be completed is also among the aims of our study. Researchers who conduct studies on the Green Mosque and similar unfinished buildings usually attribute this situation to political and economic reasons. However, when the subject is analysed in the specific case of the Green Mosque, it is seen that neither political nor economic reasons sufficiently answer the question of why the decorations could not be completed. The failure to complete the decorations of such an important building in this period, when the Ottoman Empire was revived, a relatively peaceful period was experienced, and no economic problems were recorded, must be due to the deteriorating health of Mehmed I.

DOI :10.26650/sty.2025.1599107   IUP :10.26650/sty.2025.1599107    Full Text (PDF)

Bursa Yeşil Cami’nin Yarım Kalan Taş Süslemeleri Hakkında Bir Değerlendirme

Sevinç Gök İpekçioğluŞakir ÇakmakLemye Gündüz

Devrinin en gözde eserlerinden biri olan Yeşil Cami/Zaviye, yalnızca mimari kuruluşu ve süslemeleriyle değil, Osmanlı Devleti’nin yeniden doğuşunu simgeleyen bir yapı olması açısından da büyük önem taşır. Aynı zamanda, I. Mehmed’in tahta çıkmasına destek veren Ahilere ve Abdallara yönelik bir şükran yapısıdır. Tarihi kaynakların sıklıkla bahsettiği, araştırmacıların da incelemelerine konu olan yapı, hala birçok yönden incelenmeye muhtaçtır. Çalışmamız kapsamında yapının muhteşem taş süslemeleri incelenmiş ve kuzey cephede yer alan bezemelerin tamamlanmamış kısımlarının bilinenden fazla olduğu saptanmıştır. Hiç yapılmayan, süsleme konturları çekilip ham bırakılan, derinliği verilmeyen ve detayları işlenmeyen bu süslemelerin bütün kuzey cephe boyunca var olduğu, ancak bu eksikliklerin sistemli bir şekilde, göze batmadan yerleştirilmesine dikkat edildiği anlaşılmıştır. Yarım kalan süslemelerin tespitinin yanı sıra neden tamamlanamadıkları sorusunun yanıtlanması da çalışmamızın amaçları arasındadır. Yeşil Cami ve benzeri yarım kalmış çeşitli yapılara ilişkin çalışmalar yürüten araştırmacılar bu durumu genellikle siyasi ve ekonomik nedenlere bağlamaktadırlar. Ancak konu Yeşil Cami özelinde irdelendiğinde gerek siyasi gerekse ekonomik bir gerekçenin, süslemelerin neden bitirilemediği sorusunu yeterince yanıtlamadığı görülmektedir. Osmanlı Devleti’nin yeniden canlandığı, nispeten huzurlu bir dönemin yaşandığı, ekonomik açıdan da herhangi bir sıkıntının kayıtlara geçmediği bu dönemde, bu kadar önemli bir yapının süslemelerinin tamam? lanamaması, I. Mehmed’in kötüye giden sağlığından kaynaklanmış olmalıdır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Yeşil Mosque/Zaviye, one of the most popular works of its period, is of great importance not only for its architectural foundation and ornaments but also for being a building symbolising the rebirth of the Ottoman Empire. It is also a structure of gratitude to the Ahis and Abdals who supported Mehmed I’s ascension to the throne. The building, which is frequently mentioned by historical sources and the subject of researchers’ investigations, is still in need of research in many ways. Within the scope of our study, the magnificent stone decorations of the building were examined and it was determined that the incomplete parts of the decorations on the north façade were more than known. In the publications, it is generally mentioned that there are incompletions, but their scope and characteristics are not mentioned. The incomplete parts are only on the north façade, and the incompletions have different qualities. Examples include those that were not executed at all, those that were left raw with only the contours of the motifs indicated, and those that lacked depth and detail.

Researchers have produced various arguments about the missing parts, stating that some of the ornaments were processed on the building, some were processed in workshops and added to the building as cladding in the last stage. In line with our investigations, the stonemasons processed the ornaments in a certain order and that the incomplete motifs are present in the slabs. This conclusively proves that the stone ornaments were carved not on the building but on the ground, in workshops and added to the building at the last stage.

In our study, we also discussed the idea that the ornaments may have been changed during the repairs carried out at various times. Our investigations revealed that there were some renovations on the north façade of the building, but these new parts were quite few and did not extend to the entire façade. Since the decorations are worked on the slabs, it is seen that the finished parts and the unfinished parts are on the same slab. This shows that the parts could not have been replaced during the repairs, that is, they were left unfinished. As a matter of fact, as we have mentioned before, there are many examples in which the details could not be worked out and the depth of the engraving could not be given.

Within the scope of our research, it was also understood that there are various letters in the round medallions in the windows. When these letters were compared, traces were found that the letters "elif, lam-elif and beautiful he" were repeated or planned. When these letters are combined, it is predicted that the word "Allah" was intended to be repeated five times reasonably. This assertion is based on traces and information. A different feature of the unfinished ornaments was also identified. When it became necessary to place these ornaments, which were processed in line with a general plan, in the building before they were completed, it is understood that care was taken to end the missing motifs with rounded lines in a relatively unobtrusive way, as if they were not missing. 

We have also made important observations regarding the distribution of the incomplete ornaments. The incomple? tions on the outer mihrabs, which are completely similar in terms of size and ornamentation, have been distributed so as not to attract too much attention. The deficiencies in the corners of the conch are located in different areas in both outer mihrabs. A similar process was applied to the rectangular panels forming the mihrab niches. The presence of unfinished ornaments on the upper part of both mihrab niches and the presence of incomplete fine incised contours support this view. 

In addition to identifying the unfinished ornaments, answering the question of why they could not be completed is among the main objectives of our study. Researchers conducting studies on the Green Mosque and similar unfinished buildings generally attribute this situation to political and economic reasons. However, when the subject is analysed in the specific case of the Green Mosque, it is seen that neither political nor economic reasons sufficiently answer the question of why the decorations could not be completed. We believe that the failure to complete the decorations of such an important building in this period, when the Ottoman Empire was revitalised, a relatively peaceful period was experienced, and no economic problems were recorded, was based on different reasons. As a matter of fact, when Ottoman chronicles and historical sources are analysed, it is understood that there is no resource problem regarding the construction of the building. Historians such as Âşık Paşazade, while providing information about the reign of Mehmed I, stated that he built an imaret in Bursa and asked for a few heathen villages to endow this structure, and that the villages of Gebze, Hereke and Darıca came under the sultan's sultanate. 

The construction of the building was completed while Mehmed I was still alive. In this case, the argument that the decorations were left unfinished due to the sultan’s death does not seem appropriate. It can also be argued that the rough construction of the building was completed, Mehmed I died before the decorations were finished, and after his death the stone decorations were left unfinished. However, this is not a very realistic explanation. As a matter of fact, the magnificent rich tile decorations of the building were completed in 1424. This is clear evidence that the interest in the building did not end after the death of Mehmed I, and that his son (Murad II) or his wife (Emine Hatun) made the necessary efforts to finish the building. In the context of these explanations, we think that Mehmed I's deteriorating health was the reason why the stone decorations of the building were left unfinished. Ottoman chronicles, historiographers and researchers are unanimous, albeit with different accounts, that Mehmed I suffered from an illness. This suggests that the reason why the decorations were not finished was the sultan's illness. As a matter of fact, it is understood that there was a danger that Mehmed I would not be able to see and worship in the Green Mosque, which was a structure of gratitude to the Ahi and Abdals, and which was made a great effort to be the most beautiful work of its era, due to his illness. Considering that diseases such as epilepsy and stroke were especially emphasised and that his illness was worsening, we believe that the building was hastily placed in its place before the decorations on the north façade were completed and that Sultan Mehmed I opened and used the building during his relatively healthy days.


PDF View

References

  • Acar, Türkan. “Bursa’daki Tabhaneli Camiler.” Yüksek Lisans tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir: 2007. google scholar
  • Acar, Türkan. “Anadolu Türk Mimarisinde Tabhaneli Camiler.” Doktora tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir: 2011. google scholar
  • Acar, Türkan, "Tabhaneli Camilerin Tipolojisi Üzerine Bir Deneme." SDÜ Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 28:303-326. Nisan 2013. google scholar
  • Anonim Osmanlı Kroniği (1299-1512). Hazırlayan Necdet Öztürk, Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Vakfı. İstanbul: 2000. google scholar
  • Aru, Kemal Ahmet. Türk Kenti. İstanbul: YEM Yayınları, 1998. google scholar
  • Âşık Paşazâde. Osmanoğulları’nın Tarihi Tevarih-i Al-i Osman. Hazırlayan M. Ali Yekta Saraç ve Kemal Yavuz, M. A. İstanbul: Gökkubbe, 2007. google scholar
  • Ayverdi, Ekrem Hakkı. Osmanlı Mimarisinde Çelebi ve II. Sultan Murad Devri II. İstanbul: 1972. google scholar
  • Cezar, Mustafa. Mufassal Osmanlı Tarihi, Resimli-Haritalı. Cilt 1. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 2010. google scholar
  • Çakmak, Şakir. “Tabhaneler ve Gezici Dervişler.” Erken Osmanlı Sanatı Beyliklerin Mirası içinde 156-157, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 1999. google scholar
  • Çakmak, Şakir. Erken Dönem Osmanlı Mimarisinde Taçkapılar (1300-1500). Ankara: T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları/2719, Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 2001. google scholar
  • Çelebi, Evliya. Evliya Çelebi Seyahatnamesi. 2. Cilt 1. Kitap, Hazırlayan Yücel Dağlı ve Seyit Ali Kahraman, İstanbul: YKY, 2005. google scholar
  • Çiftçi, Cafer. “Bâni-i Sânî Sultan Çelebi Mehmed’in Hayatı ve Dönemin Siyasi Olayları.” Vefâtının 600. Yılı Münâsebetiyle Sultan Çelebi Mehmed ve Devri Sempozyumu (17-18 Haziran 2021) (2022): 1-14. google scholar
  • Danişmend, İsmail Hâmi. İzahlı Osmanlı Tarihi Kronolojisi, M. 1258-1512 H. 656-918. Cilt 1. İstanbul: Türkiye Yayınevi, 1971. google scholar
  • Demir, Aydoğan. “Bursa.” Erken Osmanlı Sanatı Beyliklerin Mirası içinde 96-97, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 1999. google scholar
  • Demir, Aydoğan. “XIV-XV. Yüzyılda Batı Anadolu Tarihi.” Erken Osmanlı Sanatı Beyliklerin Mirası içinde 6-11, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 1999. google scholar
  • Demiralp, Yekta. “Sultanlar Kenti Bursa.” Erken Osmanlı Sanatı Beyliklerin Mirası içinde 97-98, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 1999. google scholar
  • Demiriz, Yıldız. Osmanlı Mimarisi’nde Süsleme, I, Erken Devir (1300-1453), İstanbul: 1979. google scholar
  • Emecen, Feridun Mustafa. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun Kuruluş ve Yükseliş Tarihi (1300-1600). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2016. google scholar
  • Emir, Sedat. Erken Osmanlı Mimarlığında Çok-İşlevli Yapılar: Kentsel Kolonizasyon Yapıları Olarak Zaviyeler. I-II, Akademi Kitabevi, İzmir: 1994. google scholar
  • Eyice, Semavi. "İlk Osmanlı Devrinin Dini-İçtimai Bir Müessesesi: Zaviyeler ve Zaviyeli- Camiler", İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Dergisi. 23/1-2, 1962-1963: 1-80. google scholar
  • Gabriel, Albert. Une Capitale Turque Brousse Bursa. I Texte, Paris: 1958: 79-94. google scholar
  • Giese, Friedrich. Anonim Tevârîh-i Âl-i Osman. Hazırlayan Nihat Azamat. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Yayınları Edebiyat Fakültesi Basımevi, 1992. google scholar
  • Hâdidi. Tevârih-i Âl-i Osman (1299-1523). Hazırlayan Necdet Öztürk. İstanbul: 1991. google scholar
  • İbn Battuta. İbn Battuta Seyahatnamesi I. Hazırlayan Aykut, A. S. İstanbul: YKY, 2000. google scholar
  • İnalcık, Halil. “Osmanlı Devleti’nin Kuruluşu.” Türkler 9 (2002): 66-80. google scholar
  • İnancık, Halil. “Mehmed I.” Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi. 28: 391-394. Ankara: 2003. google scholar
  • Jorga, Nicolae. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihi. Cilt 1. Hazırlayan Erhan Afyoncu, Çeviren Nilüfer Epçeli, İstanbul: Yeditepe Yayınevi, 2000. Kaplanoğlu, Raif. Bursa Anıtları Ansiklopedisi. Bursa: 1994. google scholar
  • Karaaslan, Yusuf Ziya. “Sultan Çelebi Mehmed’in Lalası ve Akıl Hocası Bayezid Paşa.” Hazırlayan Cafer Çiftçi, Vefâtının 600. Yılı Münâsebetiyle Sultan Çelebi Mehmed ve Devri Sempozyumu (17-18 Haziran 2021) (2022): 371-402. google scholar
  • Karamağaralı, Haluk. “Erzurum’daki Hâtuniye Medresesi’nin Tarihi ve Bânisi Hakkında Mülâhazalar.” Selçuklu Araştırmaları Dergisi, Malazgirt Zaferi Özel Sayısı 900. Yıl III (1971): 209-240. google scholar
  • Kepecioğlu, Kâmil. Bursa Kütüğü. Cilt 3. İstanbul: Bursa Büyükşehir Belediyesi, 2009. google scholar
  • Koyunluoğlu, A. Memduh Turgut. İznik ve Bursa Tarihi. Bursa: Bursa Vilayet Matbaası, 1935. google scholar
  • Kuban, Doğan. Osmanlı Mimarisi. İstanbul: YEM Yayınları, 2007. google scholar
  • Neşrî, Mevlânâ Mehmed. Cihânnümâ [6. Kısım: Osmanlı Tarihi (687-890/1288-1485)]. Hazırlayan Prof. Dr. Necdet Öztürk. İstanbul: Bilge Kültür Sanat, 2008. google scholar
  • Oğuzoğlu, Yusuf. “Sultan Çelebi Mehmed’in Osmanlı Medeniyetine Armağanı: Bursa Yeşil Cami.” Hazırlayan Cafer Çiftçi, Vefâtının 600. Yılı Münâsebetiyle Sultan Çelebi Mehmed ve Devri Sempozyumu (17-18 Haziran 2021) (2022): 35-51. google scholar
  • Oruç Beğ. Tevârîh-i Âl-i Osman. Hazırlayan Necdet Öztürk. İstanbul: 2007. google scholar
  • Öney, Gönül. Erken Osmanlı Sanatı Beyliklerin Mirası. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 1999. google scholar
  • Özbek, Yıldıray. Osmanlı Beyliği Mimarisinde Taş Süsleme (1300-1453). Ankara: 2002. google scholar
  • Sakaoğlu, Necdet. “Mehmed I (Çelebi)”. Yaşamları ve Yapıtlarıyla Osmanlı Ansiklopedisi. İkinci Baskı. 2: 79-82. İstanbul: YKY, 2008. google scholar
  • Şükrullah, XV’inci Asır Tarihçisi. Dokuz Bey Türkler ve Osmanlı Sultanları Tarihi. Hazırlayan Hüseyin Nihal Atsız. İstanbul: Arkadaş Basımevi, 1939. google scholar
  • Şükrullah. Behcettüttevârîh. Hazırlayan Nihal Atsız Çiftçioğlu. İstanbul: Türkiye Yayınevi, 1947. google scholar
  • Tirmizi. Sünen-i Tirmizi. Hazırlayan Abdullah Parlıyan, Cilt: 2, Konya: 2004. google scholar
  • Tuncer, Orhan Cezmi. “Taşın Bezeme Şekli Üzerine Düşünceler.” VII: Vakıf Haftası Konuşmalar ve Tebliğler (1990): 231-246. google scholar
  • Turgut, Vedat. “Yıldırım Bayezid’in ‘Müeyyed’ Oğlu: Çelebi Sultan Mehmed.” Hazırlayan Cafer Çiftçi, Vefâtının 600. Yılı Münâsebetiyle Sultan Çelebi Mehmed ve Devri Sempozyumu (17-18 Haziran 2021) (2022): 411-519. google scholar
  • Tüfekçioğlu, Abdülhamit. Erken Dönem Osmanlı Mimarîsinde Yazı. Ankara: T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı Sanat Eserleri, 2001. google scholar
  • Uzunçarşılı, İsmail Hakkı. Osmanlı Tarihi I. 8. Baskı. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 2003. google scholar
  • Uzunçarşılı, İsmail Hakkı. Osmanlı Tarihi, Anadolu Selçukluları ve Anadolu Beylikleri Hakkında Bir Mukaddime ile Osmanlı Devleti’nin Kuruluşundan İstanbul’un Fethine Kadar. 1. Cilt. 9. Baskı. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 2008. google scholar
  • Uzunçarşılı, İsmail Hakkı. Dünya Tarihi, Osmanlı Tarihi. Anadolu Selçukluları ve Anadolu Beylikleri Hakkında Bir Mukaddime ile Osmanlı Devleti’nin Kuruluşundan İstanbul’un Fethine Kadar. Cilt 1, 7. Baskı. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, 2011. google scholar
  • Yaşamları ve Yapıtlarıyla Osmanlılar Ansiklopedisi. Cilt 2. İstanbul: Y.K.Y., 2. Baskı, 2008. google scholar
  • Yücel, Erdem. “Bursa Yeşil Külliyesi.” Arkitekt 318 (1965): 31-35. google scholar
  • Zinkeisen, Johann Wilhelm. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihi. Cilt 1. Çeviren Nilüfer Epçeli. İstanbul: Yeditepe, 2011. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Gök İpekçioğlu, S., Çakmak, Ş., & Gündüz, L. (2025). An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque. Journal of Art History, 0(34), 305-332. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2025.1599107


AMA

Gök İpekçioğlu S, Çakmak Ş, Gündüz L. An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque. Journal of Art History. 2025;0(34):305-332. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2025.1599107


ABNT

Gök İpekçioğlu, S.; Çakmak, Ş.; Gündüz, L. An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque. Journal of Art History, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 34, p. 305-332, 2025.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Gök İpekçioğlu, Sevinç, and Şakir Çakmak and Lemye Gündüz. 2025. “An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque.” Journal of Art History 0, no. 34: 305-332. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2025.1599107


Chicago: Humanities Style

Gök İpekçioğlu, Sevinç, and Şakir Çakmak and Lemye Gündüz. An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque.” Journal of Art History 0, no. 34 (Aug. 2025): 305-332. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2025.1599107


Harvard: Australian Style

Gök İpekçioğlu, S & Çakmak, Ş & Gündüz, L 2025, 'An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque', Journal of Art History, vol. 0, no. 34, pp. 305-332, viewed 16 Aug. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2025.1599107


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Gök İpekçioğlu, S. and Çakmak, Ş. and Gündüz, L. (2025) ‘An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque’, Journal of Art History, 0(34), pp. 305-332. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2025.1599107 (16 Aug. 2025).


MLA

Gök İpekçioğlu, Sevinç, and Şakir Çakmak and Lemye Gündüz. An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque.” Journal of Art History, vol. 0, no. 34, 2025, pp. 305-332. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2025.1599107


Vancouver

Gök İpekçioğlu S, Çakmak Ş, Gündüz L. An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque. Journal of Art History [Internet]. 16 Aug. 2025 [cited 16 Aug. 2025];0(34):305-332. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2025.1599107 doi: 10.26650/sty.2025.1599107


ISNAD

Gök İpekçioğlu, Sevinç - Çakmak, Şakir - Gündüz, Lemye. An Evaluation on the Unfinished Stone Decorations of Bursa Green Mosque”. Journal of Art History 0/34 (Aug. 2025): 305-332. https://doi.org/10.26650/sty.2025.1599107



TIMELINE


Submitted10.12.2024
Accepted19.05.2025
Published Online30.06.2025

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.