Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences

SUBMITINFORMATION
EnglishTürkçe

Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JARHS2020-732729   IUP :10.26650/JARHS2020-732729    Full Text (PDF)

Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital

Lütfiye Öksüz, Zerrin Aktaş

Objective: This study investigated the cumulative antimicrobial data of bacteria isolated from blood cultures and aimed to contributing to clinicians' empirical treatment selection. Material and Methods: The study included blood cultures studied between January 2018 and May 2019. Only bacteria species that have 30 or more isolates were evaluated. Only the first isolate for each patient was included in the study. The cumulative antibiotic susceptibility limit for empirical treatment was >90%. Results: The most appropriate antibiotics for empirical treatment in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates were vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid. Co-trimoxazole and tetracycline options in addition to vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid were suitable for therapy in methicillin-sensitive S. aureus isolates. Ampicillin and high level-gentamicin alongside vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid were found to be appropriate for empirical treatment in Enterococcus faecalis isolates, while linezolid was the only option in Enterococcus faecium isolates. Although cephalosporins, aminoglycosides and piperacillin tazobactam as well as carbapenems were suitable for empiric therapy in the ESBL-negative group, only carbapenems were found suitable for empirical treatment in Escherichia coli isolates producing extended-spectrum betalactamase. There was no empirical treatment option for ESBL positive Klebsiella pneumoniae. Carbapenem resistance of these bacteria was found to reach 50%. Third and 4th generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides and ciprofloxacin were appropriate for empirical treatment in ESBL negative K. pneumoniae isolates. Conclusion: Due to the high resistance rates in our study, regular surveillance monitoring should be performed. Studies are needed to test the efficacy of antibiotic combinations for multi-resistant organisms, including carbapenem-resistant bacteria.

Keywords: Blood culture, cumulative antibiogram, antimicrobial resistance
DOI :10.26650/JARHS2020-732729   IUP :10.26650/JARHS2020-732729    Full Text (PDF)

Bir Üniversite Hastanesinde Kan Kültürlerinden İzole Edilen Bakterilerin Kümülatif Antibiyogram Sonuçları

Lütfiye Öksüz, Zerrin Aktaş

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, kan kültürlerinden izole edilen bakterilerin kümülatif antimikrobiyal verileri araştırılmış ve klinisyenlerin ampirik tedavi seçimine katkıda bulunulması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya Ocak 2018-Mayıs2019 arasında çalışılan kan kültürleri dahil edilmiştir. Sadece izolat sayısı >30 olan bakteriler değerlendirilmiştir. Her hasta için ilk izolat çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Ampirik tedavi için kümülatif antibiyotik duyarlılık sınırı >%90 olarak kabul edilmiştir. Bulgular: Metisiline dirençli Staphylococcus aureus izolatlarında ampirik tedavi için en uygun antibiyotiklerin vankomisin, teikoplanin ve linezolid olduğu; metisiline duyarlı S. aureus izolatlarında bu antibiyotiklere ek olarak kotrimoksazol ve tetrasiklin seçeneklerinin olduğu bulunmuştur. Enterococcus faecalis izolatlarında vankomisin, teikoplanin ve linezolide ek olarak ampisilin ve yüksek düzey gentamisinin ampirik tedaviye uygun olduğu bulunurken, Enterococcus faecium izolatlarında tek ampirik tedavi seçeneğinin linezolid olduğu belirlenmiştir. Genişlemiş spektrumlu beta laktamaz oluşturmayan grupta karbapenemlere ek olarak 3. ve 4. kuşak sefalosporinler, aminoglikozidler ve piperasilin+tazobaktam ampirik tedavi için uygun olmasına rağmen, GSBL oluşturan Escherichia coli izolatlarında sadece karbapenem grubu antibiyotikler ampirik tedavi için uygun bulunmuştur. GSBL pozitif Klebsiella pneumoniae için ampirik tedavi seçeneği olmadığı ve bu grupta karbapenem direncinin % 50’ye ulaştığı bulunmuştur. GSBL negatif izolatlarda 3. ve 4. kuşak sefalosporinler, karbapenemler, aminoglikozidler ve siprofloksasinin ampirik tedavi için uygun olduğu bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda elde edilen yüksek direnç oranları nedeniyle, düzenli sürveyans takibinin yapılması gerekmektedir. Karbapenemleri de kapsayan çoğul dirençli mikroorganizmalar için antibiyotik kombinasyonlarının etkinliğini test eden çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır. 

Keywords: Kan kültürü, kümülatif antibiyogram, antimikrobiyal direnç

PDF View

References

  • 1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data; Approved Guideline—Fourth Edition. CLSI document M39-A4. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014. Available from: URL: http:/ www.standard@ clsi.org google scholar
  • 2. Kohlmann R, Gatermann SG. Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data- The Influence of Different Parameters in a Routine Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. PLoS ONE. 2016:11(1):e0147965. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0147965 google scholar
  • 3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 27th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. Available from: URL: http:/ www.clsi.org google scholar
  • 4. Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Uzmanları için Antibiyotik Duyarlılık verilerinin analizi ve sunumu rehberi. KLİMUD Kaynak No: 15, Ankara, Mayıs 2019. Available from: URL: https://www.klimud.org/ content/44/rehberler google scholar
  • 5. Singer M, Deutschman C, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016; 315(8): 801-10. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287 google scholar
  • 6. Kumar A, Ellis P, Arabi Y, Roberts D, Light B, Parrillo JE, et al. Initiation of Inappropriate Antimicrobial Therapy Results in a Fivefold Reduction of Survival in Human Septic Shock. CHEST. 2009; 136: 1237-1248. DOI: 10.1378/ chest.09-0087 google scholar
  • 7. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:268-81. google scholar
  • 8. Şafak B, Kılınç O. 2010-2015 yılları arasında kan kültürlerinde üreyen mikroorganizmalar ve antibiyotik duyarlılıkları. KLİMİK Dergisi. 2016;29(2):60-4. DOI: 10.5152/kd.2016.15 google scholar
  • 9. EARSS Annual Report 2008 On-going surveillance of S.pneumoniae, S.aureus, E.coli, E.faecium, E.faecalis, K.pneumoniae, P.aeruginosa Available from: URL: http:// www. ecdc.europa.eu/en/activities/surveillance/ EARS-Net/Documents/2008_EARSS_ Annual_ Report.pdf). google scholar
  • 10. Telli M, Okulu Y, Pat Y. Staphylococcus aureus suşlarında metisiline direnç oranındaki değişim: Metisiline direnç azalıyor mu? ANKEM Derg. 2018;32(3):103-8. doi: 10.5222/ankem.2018.1816 google scholar
  • 11. Ulusal Antibiyotik Direnç Sürveyans Sistemi (UAMDSS) 2016 yıllık raporu. Available from: URL: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/ Mikrobiyoloji_Referans_Laboratuvarlari_ve_ Biyolojik_Urunler_DB/uamdss/yillik_raporlar/ UAMDSS_2016_Rapor.pdf google scholar
  • 12. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe. Annual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) 2017. Available from: URL: https://www.ecdc. europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/EARSNet-report-2017-update-jan-2019.pdf google scholar
  • 13. Veeraraghavan B, Walia K. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile & resistance mechanisms of Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) priority pathogens from India. Indian J Med Res. 2019;149(2): 87-96. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_214_18 google scholar
  • 14. Er H, Aşık G, Yoldaş Ö, Demir C, Keşli R. Kan kültürlerinde izole edilerek tanımlanan mikroorganizmaların ve antibiyotik direnç oranlarının belirlenmesi. Türk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg. 2015;45(1):48-54. doi:10.5222/ TMCD.2015.048 google scholar
  • 15. Adaleti R, Kansak N, Aslan M, Aksaray S. Cumulative Antibiogram Test Results of Isolated Microorganisms from Blood Culture Samples at Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital. Haydarpaşa Numune Med J. 2019;59(3):HNHJ-43650 [Epub ahead of print]: HNHJ-43650 | DOI: 10.14744/hnhj.2019.43650. google scholar
  • 16. Kılınç Ç, Güçkan R, Kahveci M, Kayhan Y, Pirhan Y, Özalp T. Kan kültürlerinde üreyen Gram negatif izolatların dağılımı ve antibiyotik direnç profilleri. Int J Basic Clin Med. 2015;3(3):125-30. google scholar
  • 17. Coşkun USŞ. Kan kültürlerinde üreyen mikroorganizmalar ve antibiyotik duyarlılıkları. ANKEM Derg. 2018;32(2):45-52. doi: 10.5222/ ankem.2018.045 google scholar
  • 18. Shorr AF. Review of studies of the impact on Gram-negative bacterial resistance on outcomes in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37(4):1463-9. DOI: 10.1097/ CCM.0b013e31819ced02 google scholar
  • 19. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). EUCAST warnings concerning antimicrobial susceptibility testing products or procedures. Available from: URL: http://www.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria/ warnings/ (Alıntılanma tarihi 19.08.2019) google scholar
  • 20. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST): European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 8.1. 2018. Available from: URL: http://www.eucast.org/ fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/ Breakpoint_tables/v_9.0_Breakpoint_Tables. pdf (Alıntılanma tarihi 19.08.2019) google scholar
  • 21. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, CLSI AST News Update. 2016:1(2):1-9. https://clsi.org/media/1700/clsi-news-winter-2016. pdf (Alıntılanma tarihi 19.08.2019) google scholar
  • 22. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Recommendations for MIC determination of colistin (polymyxin E) as recommended by the joint CLSI-EUCAST Polymyxin Breakpoints Working Group. Vaxjo: EUCAST; 2016. Available from: URL: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/ PDFs/EUCAST_files/General_documents/ Recommendations_for_MIC_determination_ of_colistin_March_2016.pdf. (Alıntılanma tarihi 19.08.2019) google scholar
  • 23. Beckton Dickinson. Urgent Field Safety Notice. January 15, 2018. Available from: URL: https://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/da/udstyr/ sikkerhedsmeddelelser/2018/01/bd-phoenixgram-negative-panels-containing-colistin/~/ edia/28798D06546141A9B603E3802DE887AF. ashx (Alıntılanma tarihi 19.08.2019 google scholar
  • 24. Simner PJ, Bergman Y, Trejo M, Roberts AA, Marayan R, Tekle T, et al. Two-site evaluation of the colistin broth disk elution test to determine colistin in vitro activity against Gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microb. 2019;57(2):e0116318. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01163-18. (Alıntılanma tarihi 19.08.2019) google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Öksüz, L., & Aktaş, Z. (2020). Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital. Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences, 3(2), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/JARHS2020-732729


AMA

Öksüz L, Aktaş Z. Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital. Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences. 2020;3(2):35-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/JARHS2020-732729


ABNT

Öksüz, L.; Aktaş, Z. Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital. Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 3, n. 2, p. 35-44, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Öksüz, Lütfiye, and Zerrin Aktaş. 2020. “Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital.” Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences 3, no. 2: 35-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/JARHS2020-732729


Chicago: Humanities Style

Öksüz, Lütfiye, and Zerrin Aktaş. “Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital.” Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences 3, no. 2 (Dec. 2024): 35-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/JARHS2020-732729


Harvard: Australian Style

Öksüz, L & Aktaş, Z 2020, 'Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital', Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 35-44, viewed 22 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JARHS2020-732729


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Öksüz, L. and Aktaş, Z. (2020) ‘Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital’, Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences, 3(2), pp. 35-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/JARHS2020-732729 (22 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Öksüz, Lütfiye, and Zerrin Aktaş. “Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital.” Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, 2020, pp. 35-44. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JARHS2020-732729


Vancouver

Öksüz L, Aktaş Z. Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital. Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences [Internet]. 22 Dec. 2024 [cited 22 Dec. 2024];3(2):35-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JARHS2020-732729 doi: 10.26650/JARHS2020-732729


ISNAD

Öksüz, Lütfiye - Aktaş, Zerrin. “Cumulative Antibiogram Results of Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures in a University Hospital”. Journal of Advanced Research in Health Sciences 3/2 (Dec. 2024): 35-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/JARHS2020-732729



TIMELINE


Submitted05.05.2020
Accepted16.06.2020
Published Online10.07.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.