Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JEPR1596632   IUP :10.26650/JEPR1596632    Full Text (PDF)

Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests

Saltuk Ağıralioğlu

In recent years, high inflation has emerged as a common fundamental problem for many countries. Studies investigating the causes of inflation have increased due to the high inflation observed worldwide following the 2008 Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Parallel to this, there has been a growing interest in research examining the effects of monetary policies on inflation. This study analyzes the short- and long-term impacts of the Federal Reserve’s (FED) monetary policies on inflation in the United States through co-integration and causality tests. In particular, asset purchases and sales initiated after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, as interest rate changes failed to produce the desired effects, have provided opportunities to better analyse the impacts of monetary policies. In this research, the period from January 2008 to August 2024, including the COVID-19 era, was examined to determine whether changes in the FED’s balance sheet, the industrial production index, the unemployment rate, and inflation were statistically significant. In this research, based on the results of cointegration, FMOLS, DOLS analysis, and causality tests, increases in the balance sheet were found to have a statistically significant impact on inflation in both the short and long term. Additionally, causality tests revealed that changes in the FED’s balance sheet are a Granger cause of inflation. In the long term, inflation, changes in the balance sheet size, and the industrial production index were identified as causes of changes in unemployment. This finding highlights the importance of central bank balance sheet sizes and the monetary policies influencing these sizes. 

JEL Classification : E58 , E52 , C32
DOI :10.26650/JEPR1596632   IUP :10.26650/JEPR1596632    Full Text (PDF)

2008 Küresel Kriz Sonrası FED’in Para Politikalarının ABD’deki Enflasyon Üzerine Etkilerinin Eşbütünleşme ve Nedensellik Testleri ile Analizi

Saltuk Ağıralioğlu

Son yıllarda yüksek enflasyon ülkelerin ortak temel problemi olarak dikkat çekmektedir. Enflasyonu etkileyen nedenleri araştıran çalışmalar, 2008 Küresel Kriz ve Covid-19 salgını sonrası dünya genelinde görülen yüksek enflasyon yüzünden giderek artmaktadır. Bununla paralel olarak para politikalarının enflasyon üzerindeki etkilerini inceleyen çalışmalar giderek artmakta ve ilgi görmektedir. Bu çalışmada FED’in para politikalarının ABD’deki enflasyon üzerine kısa ve uzun dönemli etkileri eşbütünleşme ve nedensellik testleriyle incelenmiştir. Özellikle 2008 küresel kriz sonrası faiz değişimlerinin istenen etkiyi yapmaması sonucu yapılan varlık alımı ve geri alımları, para politikalarının etkilerinin rahatlıkla incelenmesine olanak sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada Covid-19 dönemini de içeren Ocak 2008- Ağustos 2024 aralığında ABD’de FED’in bilançosundaki değişimin, sanayi endeksindeki değişim, işsizlik oranındaki değişimin ve enflasyon üzerinde etkilerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olup olmadığı incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmada eşbütünleşme, FMOLS, DOLS analizi ve nedensellik testleri sonuçlarına göre, kısa ve uzun dönemde bilançodaki artışların enflasyona neden olması istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Bunun yanında FED’in bilançosundaki değişimlerin, enflasyonun Granger nedeni olduğu nedensellik testlerinde tespit edilmiştir. Uzun dönemde enflasyon, bilanço büyüklüğü ve sanayi üretim endeksindeki değişimin işsizlikteki değişimlerin nedeni olarak tespit edilmesi, merkez bankası bilanço büyüklüklerin ve bu büyüklüğe etki eden para politikalarının önemini göstermektedir. 

JEL Classification : E58 , E52 , C32

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The aim of our study is to investigate the mutual effects of traditional and especially non-traditional monetary policy tools, such as balance sheet expansions, on inflation, unemployment, and industrial production between January 2008 and September 2024, in order to assist central banks in shaping and implementing monetary policies more consciously and effectively. Such analytical approaches can help policymakers evaluate economic outcomes and optimise monetary policy strategies.

Many studies have been conducted on the uncertainty and variability of inflation in the literature. Stock (2007) noted in his study that due to advancements in multivariate models, predicting inflation with a particular model has become much more challenging. It is observed that single-variable models using the widely used Phillips Curve are insufficient in forecasting inflation, particularly in the literature.

In this study, the effects of the industrial production index and the size of the Fed’s balance sheet, along with the unemployment rate, which is part of the Phillips Curve, on inflation will be examined. 

To determine the suitable analysis method for our variables, unit root tests will be conducted initially. If all variables are found to be stationary at the I(1) level, the presence of co-integration will be tested. If co-integration exists, the causality relationship between the variables will be examined using short- and long-term VEC Granger tests, and the analyses will be interpreted accordingly

According to the results of the DOLS test, it has been determined that the increase in the Fed’s balance sheet has significant and positive effects on inflation. This result confirms the general expectation that an increase in the balance sheet would increase inflation. Additionally, according to the DOLS test results, the increase in the industrial production index and changes in unemployment also have statistically significant and positive effects on inflation.

In the short term, changes in the Fed’s balance sheet are found to be the Granger cause of inflation. Another notable aspect of these tests is the significant Granger causality effect of Federal Reserve System’s monetary policies on the Industrial Production Index (IPE) used as data to gauge the intensity of monetary policies. Additionally, the Fed is found to be the Granger cause of the IPE. Both the Fed and unemployment (UNE) have been identified as Granger causal factors of the IPE. These results demonstrate the significance of short-term monetary policies in determining the impact of changes in the Fed’s balance sheet on inflation.

In our study, which uses data from January 2008 to August 2024, we conducted co-integration tests for the relevant variables (Table 7) and analysed causality relationships among them. According to FMOLS and DOLS analyses (Table 9), changes in the Federal Reserve’s (FED) balance sheet have a significant and positive impact on inflation. The test results indicate a long-term relationship among the variables (Table 10). Based on the Granger Causality tests, changes in the size of the FED’s assets cause one-directional changes in inflation (Table 10). In summary, increases in the FED’s balance sheet appear to be a driver of inflation, a relationship that is also statistically confirmed. 

This study aligns with the findings of Mishkin (2009), Swanson (2018), Driscoll (2022), and Romer and Romer (2023). Increases in the FED’s assets, both in the short and long term, contribute to inflation alongside the money supply, while abnormally low policy interest rates intensify inflationary pressures. Our study reveals that asset purchases and balance sheet expansions, as monetary policy tools, have significant inflationary effects. Regarding the long-term causality tests, all variables are found to be the long-term Granger cause of both Fed assets (FEDA) and unemployment (UNE).

This study examines the effects of Federal Reserve’s monetary policies on inflation, particularly analysing the impact of balance sheet expansion post-2008 and during the COVID-19 era. According to DOLS analyses, changes in the Fed’s balance sheet have significant effects on inflation. Granger Causality tests suggest that increases in Federal Reserve System’s assets unilaterally lead to changes in inflation. Furthermore, the study explores the long-term effects of inflation, monetary policies, and industrial index changes on unemployment, emphasising the need for caution in inflation and monetary policies for countries aiming to increase employment. Lastly, it suggests the usefulness of investigating the effects of balance sheet size on inflation in developing countries in future research, while also considering scenarios where national currencies are not reserve currencies. 


PDF View

References

  • Chen H., Cûrdia V. & Ferrero A. (2012). The Macroeconomic Effects of Large-scale Asset Purchase Programmes. The Economic Journal, 122(564), 289-315, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02549.x google scholar
  • DickeY, D.A. & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimates for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431. google scholar
  • Driscoll R. (2022). The Federal Reserve’s QE Practices Impact on Inflation: A Comparative AnalYsis of the GFC and Covid-Eras. CMC Senior Theses, 3049. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/3049 google scholar
  • Engle, R.F., & Granger, W.J.; (1987).Cointegration and Error Correction:Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, 55, 107-123 ve 251-276. google scholar
  • Fuhrer J. C. (2011). “The Role Expectations in U.S. Inflation DYnamics” Working papers No:11-11 Federal Reserve of Boston. google scholar
  • Galbraith, J.K. ,Giovannoni, O.G. & Russo, A. J. (2007). The Fed’s Real Reaction Function MonetarY PolicY, Inflation, UnemploYment, InequalitY - and Presidential Politics. LevY Economics Institute Working Paper, No.511. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1006822 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1006822 google scholar
  • Hasenzagl T., Pellegrino F., Reichlin L., & Ricco G.; (2020) “A Model of the Fed's View on Inflation”. The Review of Economics and Statistics ,104 (4), 686-704. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00974 google scholar
  • Ivascu L., Sarfraz M., Mohsin M., Naseem S., & Öztürk I. (2021). The Causes of Occupational Accidents and Injuries in Romanian Firms: An Application of the Johansen Cointegration and Granger CausalitY Test. Internatioal Journal of Environmental Research Public Health, 18(7634). google scholar
  • Jahrimi A.A., Mihai M.M., & Yang T.T. (2023). Inflation and US EconomY in 2022. Journal of Financila Professionals, Ocak 2023, 11-16. google scholar
  • Johansen S. (1988). Statistical analYsis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic DYnamics and Control, 12( 2-3),P 231-254, ISSN 0165-1889, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3. google scholar
  • Johansen S., & Juselius K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for MoneY. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210. google scholar
  • Mullineaux D. J. (1980). UnemploYment, Industrial Production, and Inflation UncertaintY in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, 62(2), 163-169. google scholar
  • Öztürk Z. A. (2011). TürkİYe’nin G-20 Ülkeleri ile Finansal Bütünleşmesinin Analizi: Vektör Hata Düzeltme Modellerinde İki Rejimli Eşik Değerli Eşbütünleşme Testi Yaklaşımı. İstanbul Üniversitesi SosYal Bilim Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 29-38. google scholar
  • Pantula S. G. (1989). Testing for Unit Roots in Time Series Data. Econometric TheorY , 5(2), 256-71, https://doi.org/10.1017/s 0266466600012421. google scholar
  • Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical Values For Cointegratıon Tests In Heterogeneous Panels With Multiple Regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 644-670. google scholar
  • Rochon L.R. (2022). The general ineffectiveness of monetarY policY or the weaponization of inflation. Chapters in: SYlvio Kappes & Louis-Philippe Rochon & Guillaume Vallet (ed.). The Future of Central Banking, chapter:1, pages 20-36, Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar
  • Romer C.D., & Romer D.H. (2023). Presidential Address: Does MonetarY PolicY Matter? The Narrative Approach after 35 Years. American Economic Review, 113 (6), 1395-1423. doi: 10.1257/aer.113.6.1395 google scholar
  • Salisu A.A., & Isah K.O. (2018). Predicting US inflation: Evidence from a new approach Economic Modelling ,71, 134-158. ISSN 0264-9993 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.12.008.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999317313111) google scholar
  • Stock, J.H., & Watson, M.W. (2007). WhY Has U.S. Inflation Become Harder to Forecast?. Journal of MoneY, Credit and Banking, 39, 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00014.x google scholar
  • Swanson E.T. (2018). The Federal Reserve Is Not VerY Constrained bY the Lower Bound on Nominal Interest Rates, Brookings Papers on Economic ActivitY, (2), 555-572. google scholar
  • Wolters, M.H., & Tillmann P. (2015). The changing dYnamics of US inflation persistence: a quantile regression approach. Studies in Nonlinear DYnamics & Econometrics, 19(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2013-0080 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Ağıralioğlu, S. (2025). Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 12(1), 180-194. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1596632


AMA

Ağıralioğlu S. Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests. Journal of Economic Policy Researches. 2025;12(1):180-194. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1596632


ABNT

Ağıralioğlu, S. Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, [Publisher Location], v. 12, n. 1, p. 180-194, 2025.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ağıralioğlu, Saltuk,. 2025. “Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches 12, no. 1: 180-194. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1596632


Chicago: Humanities Style

Ağıralioğlu, Saltuk,. Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches 12, no. 1 (Mar. 2025): 180-194. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1596632


Harvard: Australian Style

Ağıralioğlu, S 2025, 'Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests', Journal of Economic Policy Researches, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 180-194, viewed 10 Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1596632


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ağıralioğlu, S. (2025) ‘Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests’, Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 12(1), pp. 180-194. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1596632 (10 Mar. 2025).


MLA

Ağıralioğlu, Saltuk,. Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, pp. 180-194. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1596632


Vancouver

Ağıralioğlu S. Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests. Journal of Economic Policy Researches [Internet]. 10 Mar. 2025 [cited 10 Mar. 2025];12(1):180-194. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1596632 doi: 10.26650/JEPR1596632


ISNAD

Ağıralioğlu, Saltuk. Analysis of the Effects of FED’s Monetary Policies on Inflation in the USA After the 2008 Global Crisis Through Co-integration and Causality Tests”. Journal of Economic Policy Researches 12/1 (Mar. 2025): 180-194. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1596632



TIMELINE


Submitted05.12.2024
Accepted20.01.2025
Published Online14.02.2025

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.