References

• Agassi, J. (1975). Institutional Individualism, The British Journal of Sociology, 26 (2): 144-155. google scholar
• Boettke, P. J. (1989). Evolution and Economics: Austrians as Institutionalist, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Method-ology, 6: 73-89. google scholar
• Braun, E., P. Lewin & N. Cachanosky (2016). Ludwig von Mises’s Approach to Capital as a Bridge between Austrian and Institutional Economics, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12 (4): 847-866. google scholar
• Caldwell, B. (1989), Austrians and Institutionalists: The Historical Origins of Their Shared Characteristics, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 6: 91-100. google scholar
• Colander, D. (2000). The Death of Neoclassical Economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (2): 127-143. google scholar
• Colander, D., R. Holt & J.B. Jr. Rosser (2004). The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics, Review of Political Economy, 16 (4): 485-499. google scholar
• Dekker, E. & P. Kuchar (2019). Lachmann and Shackle: On the Joint Production of Interpretation Instruments, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 37B: 25-42. google scholar
• Dequech, D. (2007). Neoclassical, Mainstream, Orthodox, and Heterodox Economics, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30 (2): 279-302. google scholar
• Dequech, D. (2021). The Future of Heterodox Economics: An Institutional Perspective, Journal of Economic Issues, 55 (3): 578-583. google scholar
• Edgell, S. & R. Tilman (1989). The Intellectual Antecedents of Thorstein Veblen: A Reappraisal, Journal of Economic Issues, 23 (4): 1003-1026. google scholar
• Foss, N. J. & G. Garzarelli (2007). Institutions as Knowledge Capital: Ludwig M. Lachmann’s Interpretative Institutionalism, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31 (5): 789-804. google scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481-510. google scholar
• Hedoin, C. (2009). Weber and Veblen on the Rationalization Process, Journal of Economic Issues, 43 (1): 167-188. google scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (1988). Economics and Institutions. Cambridge: Polity Press. google scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2000). What is the Essence of Institutional Economics?, Journal of Economlc Issues, 34 (2): 317-329. google scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What Are Institutions?, Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (1): 1-25. google scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2021), Debating the Future of Heterodox Economics, Journal of Economlc Issues, 55 (3): 603-614. google scholar
• Jennings, A. & W. William (1994). Evolutionary Economics and Cultural Hermeneutics: Veblen, Cultural Relativism, and Blind Drift, Journal of Economlc Issues, 28 (4): 997-1030. google scholar
• Klein, P. A. (1990), Institutionalism as a School: A Reconsideration, Journal of Economlc Issues, 24 (2): 381-388. google scholar
• Koppl, R. (1998), Lachmann on the Subjectivism of Active Minds, Koppl, R. & G. Mongiovi (Ed.), in Subjectlvlsm and Economlc Analysls: Essays ln Memory of Ludwlg M. Lachmann (61-79), London: Routledge. google scholar
• Koppl, R. & G. Mongiovi (1998), Introduction, Koppl, R. & G. Mongiovi (Ed.), in Subjectlvlsm and Economlc Analysls: Essays ln Memory of Ludwlg M. Lachmann (1-11), London: Routledge. google scholar
• Lachmann, L. M. ([1956] 1978), Capltal and lts Structure, Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, INC. google scholar
• Lachmann, L. M. (1943). The Role of Expectations in Economics as a Social Science, Economlca, 10 (37): 12-23. google scholar
• Lachmann, L. M. (1944). Finance Capitalism?, Economlca, 11 (42): 64-73. google scholar
• Lachmann, L. M. (1951). The Science of Human Action, Economica, 18 (72): 412-427. google scholar
• Lachmann, L. M. (1962). Cost Inflation and Economic Institutions, The South Afrlcan Journal of Economlcs, 30: 177-186. google scholar
• Lachmann, L. M. (1971). The Legacy of Max Weber: Three Essays, Berkeley: The Glendessary Press. google scholar
• Lachmann, L. M. (1976). From Mises to Shackle: An Essay on Austrian Economics and the Kaleidic Society, Journal of Economlc Llterature, 14 (1): 54-62. google scholar
• Lachmann, L. M. (1990). Austrian Economics: A Hermeneutic Approach, Lavoie, D. (Ed.), ln Economlcs and Hermeneutlcs (132-144), London: Routledge. google scholar
• Leathers, C. G. (1990). Veblen and Hayek on Instincts and Evolution, Journal of the Hlstory of Economlc Thought, 12: 162-178. google scholar
• Lewis, P. (2008). Solving the “Lachmann Problem”: Orientation, Individualism, and the Causal Explanation of Socioeconomic Order, The Amerlcan Journal of Economlcs and Soclology, 67 (5): 827-858. google scholar
• Lewis, P. & J. Runde (2007). Subjectivism, Social Structure and the Possibility of Socioeconomic Order: The Case of Ludwig Lachmann, Journal of Economlc Behavlor & Organlzatlon, 62: 167-186. google scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. (2019). Lachmann Practiced Humanomics, Beyond the Dogma of Behaviorism, The Revlew of Austrlan Economlcs, 32: 47-61. google scholar
• Mirowski, P. (1987). The Philosophical Bases of Institutionalist Economics, Journal of Economlc Issues, 21 (3): 1001-1038. google scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Instltutlons, Instltutlonal Change and Economlc Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• O’Hara, P. A. (2002). The Contemporary Relevance of Thorstein Veblen’s Institutional-Evolutionary Political Economy, Hlstory of Economlcs Revlew, 35 (1): 78-103. google scholar
• Özveren, Y. E. (1998), An Institutionalist Alternative to Neoclassical Economics?, Revlew, 21 (4): 469-530. google scholar
• Perlman, M. (1986). Subjectivism and American Institutionalism, Kirzner, I. M. (Ed.), in Subjectlvlsm, Intelllglblllty and Economlc Under-standlng (268-280), Hampshire: The Macmillan Press. google scholar
• Plotkin, S. & R. Tilman (2011). The Polltlcal Ideas of Thorsteln Veblen, New Haven & London: Yale University Press. google scholar
• Prychitko, D. L. (1994). Ludwig Lachmann and the Interpretive Turn in Economics: A Critical Inquiry into the Hermeneutics of the Plan, Advances ln Austrlan Economlcs, 1: 303-319. google scholar
• Rothbard, M. N. (1989). The Hermeneutical Invasion of Philosophy and Economics, The Revlew of Austrlan Economlcs, 3: 45-59. google scholar
• Rothbard, M. N. (1995), The Present State of Austrian Economics, Journal des Economlstes et des Etudes Humalnes, 6 (1): 43-89. google scholar
• Rutherford, M. (1992). Thorstein Veblen and the Problem of the Engineers, Internatlonal Revlew of Soclology, 3 (3): 125-150. google scholar
• Rutherford, M. (1994a). Austrian Economics and American (Old) Institutionalism, Boettke, P. J. (Ed.), in The Elgar Companlon to Austrlan Economlcs (529-534), England: Edward Elgar. google scholar
• Rutherford, M. (1994b). Instltutlons ln Economlcs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Rutherford, M. (1998). Veblen’s Evolutionary Programme: A Promise Unfulfilled, Cambrldge Journal of Economlcs, 22: 463-477. google scholar
• Samuels, W. J. (1989). Austrian and Institutional Economics: Some Common Elements, Research ln the Hlstory of Economlc Thought and Methodology, 6: 53-71. google scholar
• Samuels, W. J. (1990). The Self-Referentiability of Thorstein Veblen’s Theory of the Preconception of Economic Science, Journal of Economlc Issues, 24 (3), 695-718. google scholar
• Samuels, W. J. (1993). Thorstein Veblen and the Place of Science, Soclety, 30: 76-82. google scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. ([1954] 2006). Hlstory of Economlc Analysls, London: Routledge. google scholar
• Searle, J. R. (2005). What is an Institution?, Journal of Instltutlonal Economlcs, 1 (1): 1-22. google scholar
• Stoor, V. H. (2019). Ludwig Lachmann’s Peculiar Status Within Austrian Economics, The Revlew of Austrlan Economlcs, 32: 63-75. google scholar
• Taiko, T., F. Almeida & R. G. Fernandez (2020). Thorstein Veblen’s Institutional Economics and Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky’s Behavioral Economics: An Analysis of Convergent Points, Brazlllan Journal of Polltlcal Economy, 40 (4): 746-765. google scholar
• Tilman, R. (2004). Karl Mannheim, Max Weber, and the Problem of Social Rationality in Thorstein Veblen, Journal of Economlc Issues, 38 (1): 155-172. google scholar
• Torr, C. (2019). Lachmann, Keynes, and Subjectivism, Research ln the Hlstory of Economlc Thought and Methodology, 37b: 69-81. google scholar
• Torr, C. S. W. (1992). Lachmann and Hodgson on Institutions, The South Afrlcan Journal of Economlcs, 60 (1): 131-136. google scholar
• Vaughn, K. I. (1992). The Problem of Order in Austrian Economics: Kirzner vs. Lachmann, Revlew of Polltlcal Economy, 4 (3): 251-274. google scholar
• Veblen, T. ([1899] 2007), The Theory of the Lelsure Class, Oxford, Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Veblen, T. ([1919] 1961), The Place of Sclence ln Modern Clvlllsatlon and Other Essays, New York: Russell and Russell. google scholar
• Veblen, T. (1898). Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science? The QuarterlyJournal of Economics, 12 (4): 373-397. google scholar
• Veblen, T. (1918), The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts, New York: B. W. Huebsch. google scholar
• Waller, W. T. (1982). The Evolution of the Veblenian Dichotomy: Veblen, Hamilton, Ayres, and Foster, Journal of Economic Issues, 16 (3): 757-771. google scholar
• Weed, F. J. (1981), Interpreting ‘Institutions’ in Veblen’s Evolutionary Theory, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 40 (1): 67-78. google scholar
• Wynarczyk, P. (1992). Comparing Alleged Incommensurables: Institutional and Austrian Economics as Rivals and Possible Complements?, Review of Political Economy, 4 (1): 18-36. google scholar
• Yılmaz, F. (2007). Veblen and the Problem of Rationality, Journal of Economic Issues, 41 (3): 841-862. google scholar

Citations