Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965   IUP :10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965    Full Text (PDF)

Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin

Neslihan AçıkgözEbru Akköprü

This study focuses on drought and water harvesting issues. The standardized precipitation index (SPI) was used to determine the drought characteristics of the region. To identify potential areas for water harvesting, this study employed analytical hierarchy processes (AHP) from multicriteria decision-making methods and geographic information systems. The results of the drought analysis of SPI made with the data of the Finike Meteorology Station from 1973 to 2021 showed that the dry periods for the last 3 years have been more severe than the previous ones. The study determined six criteria based on the geographical and meteorological characteristics of the area: land use, river distance, geology, slope, precipitation, and temperature. The AHP was used to determine the weights of the criteria, and the results showed that precipitation was the most important criterion, followed by slope, river distance, geology, temperature, and land use. Weighted overlay analysis was performed on the criteria, and it was found that there was a suitable area with 23% strength for water harvesting.

DOI :10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965   IUP :10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965    Full Text (PDF)

Akçay Havzası Aşağı Çığırının (Antalya/Finike) Kuraklık Özelliği ve Su Hasadı Yapılabilecek Potansiyel Alanların Belirlenmesi

Neslihan AçıkgözEbru Akköprü

Akçay havzası aşağı çığırının (Finike/Antalya) kuraklık özelliği ve bu alanda su hasadı yapılabilecek potansiyel alanların belirlenmesi başlıklı bu çalışmada, kuraklık ve su hasadı konuları üzerinde durulmuştur. Bölgenin kuraklık özelliğini belirlerken kuraklık indeksleri arasında yaygın olarak kullanılan standartlaştırılmış yağış indeksi (SYİ) kullanılmıştır. Ardından su toplama sistemlerinden bahsedilmiştir. Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) yöntemlerinden analitik hiyerarşi prosesleri (AHP) ve mekansal analizlerde kullanılan Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS), su hasadı yapılabilecek potansiyel alanların belirlenmesinde kullanılan yöntemlerdir. Finike Meteoroloji İstasyonu 1973-2021 yılları arası verileri ile yapılmış standartlaştırılmış yağış indisinin yıllık ortalama kuraklık analizi sonuçlarına göre son 3 yıldır kurak dönemlerin, daha önceki kurak dönemlere göre daha şiddetli olmasıdır. İnceleme alanının coğrafi ve meteorolojik özellikleri dikkate alınarak 6 kriter belirlenmiştir. Bunlar: Arazi kullanımı, nehir mesafesi durumu, jeoloji, eğim, yağış ve sıcaklıktır. Kriterlerin ağırlıkları AHP ile belirlenmiş ve en fazla önemin yağış olduğu, bunu sırasıyla eğim, nehir mesafesi, jeoloji, sıcaklık ve arazi kullanımının takip ettiği görülmüştür. Kriterlere ağırlıklı çakıştırma analizi yapılarak su hasadı için %23 kuvvetle uygun alan bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Drought is a natural disaster that develops slowly but has a huge impact. The distribution of water resources and precipitation is uneven worldwide, and water is a cycle. Turkey is located in a semiarid/semihumid climatic region, and if a drought disaster occurs, different regions can be affected in various ways. Taking measures before a crisis occurs can delay or reduce the severity of disasters. Therefore, it is essential to harvest rainwater in suitable areas. Water harvesting techniques reduce the effects of water scarcity and drought by collecting rainwater in arid regions (Kuzucu, 2019: 577). The process of accumulating or storing rainwater falling on the surface in arid and semiarid areas with little or no precipitation is known as “water harvesting” (Oweis, et al., 2001: 3; Kuzucu 2013: 6). Water harvesting is a method that has been in use for 40–50 years in many arid regions worldwide. This method is particularly useful in deserts and dry areas with annual precipitation of 50–80 mm (Köksal, 2000; Kuzucu 2013: 3).

To ensure maximum efficiency in water harvesting projects, suitable areas are identified using multicriteria decision methods, remote sensing, and geographic information systems. By conserving water, it is possible to achieve positive effects such as reducing the severity of drought or delaying its onset.

Long-range meteorology bulletin, monthly, annual, and average data of precipitation and temperature parameters of Finike Meteorology Station, located in the lower part of the Akçay basin, were obtained from the GDM in 4 region.

A location map that denotes the study area’s boundaries and location along with topography, slope, hydrology, soil, and land use maps was obtained from General Directorate of Maps (GDM). A temperature distribution map was created using the Lapse rate formula in the ArcGIS 10.5 program, and precipitation distribution maps were created using Kriging analysis.

The standardized precipitation index (SPI) is the most used index to determine drought conditions in any region (Türkeş, 2012: 15). Using the method developed by Mckee et al., (1993), the SPI value is calculated by converting the precipitation value into a numerical value (Arslan et al., 2016: 190). This index can be calculated for different periods, such as 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 48 months. To accurately calculate SPI values, at least 30 years of data are necessary (Mckee et al., 1993; Arslan et al., 2016: 191). To ensure accuracy, 51 years of data (1970–2021) were used in this study, and the “SPI SL 6.exe” program was used for calculation.

The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method is the most used method for eligibility analysis (Güler and Yomralıoğlu, 2017; Uyan, 2017; Gürkan et al., 2021; Ödeker and Bayar, 2021; Akıncı et al., 2015; Ertunç and Çay, 2020; Akıncı et al., 2012; Yalçın and Yüce, 2018). Herein, six criteria were first determined using the AHP method: slope, land use, geology, stream distance, rainfall, and temperature. To evaluate the importance of these criteria, 15 comparative matrices were created, and 10 experts were asked to complete a questionnaire using Saaty’s 1–9 scale. The geometric averages of the completed questionnaires were used to calculate consistency and weight ratios. The “Super Decisions” program was utilized to determine the weights of each criterion. These weights were then used in the reclassification process of the maps using the ArcGIS 10.5 program. The resulting “Reclassified” maps were overlapped with the “Weighted Overlay” analysis to identify suitable potential areas using spatial analysis.

This study utilized various methods and techniques. The standardized precipitation index was used to examine drought, and an annual average drought analysis was conducted for the basin. Suitability analysis methods were employed to identify potential areas for water harvesting. The analytical hierarchy process, a multicriteria decision-making method, played a crucial role in this study. This method helped determine the criteria and their weights, creating a vector of priorities. Criteria classification was done using the obtained weight values and geographic information systems, and a map showing suitable areas was generated using the weighted overlay method.

Based on data from the Finike Meteorology Station, the annual average drought analysis of the standardized precipitation index between 1973 and 2021 showed that the area was neither completely dry nor completely humid. However, the last three years had more severe dry periods compared to previous years.

Geographic information systems were used to determine potential areas for water harvesting and conduct spatial analysis. However, it is important to note that these systems require additional methods, such as analytical hierarchy, to support them. Herein, criteria were determined, expert opinions were used to determine their weights, classification was performed, and then weighted overlapping analysis was applied. This led to the identification of strong suitable areas, moderately suitable areas, low-level suitable areas, and unsuitable areas in the Akçay basin for water harvesting. 


PDF View

References

  • Akkuzu, G. P. (2008). "Küresel Su Krizi ve Su Hasadı Teknikleri." google scholar
  • Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 75-85. Alkay, E. (2014). Şehir Planlamada Analiz ve Değerlendirme Teknikleri. İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Altunay, K. (2018). Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Proje Seçimi: Kobi Projelerinin Ön Değerlendirmesine Yönelik google scholar
  • Uygulama. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara: Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu. google scholar
  • Ammar Adham, M. R. (2016: 108-120). Identification of suitable sites for rainwater harvesting structures in arid and semi-arid regions: A review. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. google scholar
  • Aslıhan Korkmaz, B. E. (2018). İçme Suyu Temin ve Dağıtım Sistemlerindeki Su Kayıplarının Kontrolü. 1. Uluslararası İçmesuyu Ve Atıksu Sempozyumu, (s. 49-60). Afyonkarahisar. google scholar
  • Bayar, B. Ö. (2021). CBS Teknolojileri ve AHP ile Bağ Alanları için Uygun Yer Seçimi: Denizli İli Örneği. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi 30/1, s. 125-141. google scholar
  • Burak Gürkan, B. Ö. (2021). Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) Ortamında Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesiyle (AHP) Organik Gübre Üretim Tesisi Uygunluk Analizi: Tekirdağ İli Örneği. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 18/4, s. 718-729. google scholar
  • Centre for Development and Environment, CDE. (2013). Water Harvesting Guidelines to Good Practice. Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) and Institute of Geography, University of Bern; Rainwater Harvesting Implementation Network (RAIN), Amsterdam; MetaMeta, Wageningen; The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Rome. google scholar
  • Çay, E. E. (2020). Havaalanı Yer Seçiminde Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) Kullanımı. Konya Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 8/2, s. 200-210. google scholar
  • Esen, H. Ö. (2008). Uygulamalı Yöneylem Araştırması, Yöneticiler için Bilgisayar Destekli Karar Modelleri. İstanbul: Çağlayan Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Güler Önder, E. Ö. (2013). Yoğun Bakım Hemşirelerinin İş Tatminine Etki Eden Faktörlerin Önem Derecelerinin Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi Yöntemi İle Belirlenmesi. KSÜ İİBF Dergisi, Cilt 3/ No 2, 195-216. google scholar
  • Gülnaziye Özgün, B. V. (2020). Standart Yağış Indeksi(SPI) Metodu Kullanılarak Kuraklık Analizi ve Bursa Doğancı Barajı ile Ilişkilendirilmesi. Academic Platform, 879. google scholar
  • Halil Akıncı, A. Y. (2012, Ekim 16-19). AHP Yöntemi ile Tarıma Uygun Alanların Belirlenmesi. IV. Uzaktan Algılama ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Sempozyumu . Zonguldak. google scholar
  • Halil Akıncı, A. Y. (2015). Büyük Barajların Tarım Arazileri Üzerindeki Etkilerinin İncelenmesi ve Artvin ’de CBS ve AHP Yöntemi Kullanılarak Alternatif Tarım Arazilerinin Belirlenmesi. Ankara: TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası 15. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı. google scholar
  • Imzahim A. Alwan, N. A. (2020). Potential Water Harvesting Sites Identification Using Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation in Maysan Province, Iraq. nternational Journal of Geo-Information. google scholar
  • İnci Örs, S. S. (2011). «Su Hasadı Teknikleri, Yapıları ve Etkileri.» Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 65-71. google scholar
  • Köksal, H. (2000). Yüzey akış suyu kazanım teknikleri. Teknik Bülten. google scholar
  • Kuzucu, M. (2013). Yarı Kurak Alanlarda Mikro Havza Su Hasadı Tekniğinin Genç Antep Fıstığı Ağaçlarının Gelişimi, Toprak ve Su Korunumuna Etkileri. Doktora Tezi. Adana. google scholar
  • McKee, T. D. (1993). The Relation of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, s. 179-184. google scholar
  • McKee, T. D. (1993). The Relation of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, s. 179-184. google scholar
  • Michael Ward, C. P. (2021). Using AHP and Spatial Analysis to Determine Water Surface Storage Suitability in Cambodia. Water,13/3. google scholar
  • Mustafa Recep İrcan, N. D. (2021). Standartlaştırılmış Yağış İndisi (SYİ) Yöntemi ile Şanlıurfa İli Kuraklık Analizi. Coğrafya Dergisi, s. 7. google scholar
  • NOORI, S. K. (2021). “Sıte Suıtabılıty in Water Harvestıng Management Usıng Remote Sensıng Data and Gıs Technıques: A Case Study of Sulaımanıyah Provınce, Iraq. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul: Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu. google scholar
  • Onur Arslan, A. B. (2016). Standartlaştırılmış Yağış İndisi Yöntemiyle Kızılırmak Havzasının Meteorolojik Kuraklık Analizi. Niğde Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi Cilt:5/Sayı:2, s. 188-194. google scholar
  • Saaty, T. (1990). How to Make a Decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operation Research, s. 9-26. google scholar
  • Saaty, T. L. (1977). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, s. 234-281. google scholar
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. California: McGraw-Hill International Book Company. google scholar
  • Saaty, T. L. (1990). Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process:Planning, Priority, Setting, Resource Allocation. Pittsburgh: : RWS Publications. google scholar
  • Suresh, R. (2002). Soil and water conservation engineering. Standard Publishers Distributors: New Delhi, India. google scholar
  • Şanlısoy, A. (2002). İstanbul>daki Su Toplama Havzalarında Yaşanan Sorunlar, Nedenleri ve Çözüm Önerileri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul: Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu. google scholar
  • Şimşek, N. Ö. (2014: 308). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve Analitik Ağ Süreci Yöntemleri ile Online Alışveriş Site Seçimi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi/22 . google scholar
  • TC. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. (2019). Batı Akdeniz Havzası Taşkın Yönetim Planı. Ankara: Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü. google scholar
  • Theib Oweis, D. P. (2001). Water harvesting: indigenous knowledge for the future of the drier environments. İCARDA, Aleppo, Syria, 40 pp. Aleppo, Syria: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. google scholar
  • Turan, E. S. (2018). Türkiye’nin İklim Değişikliğine Bağlı Kuraklık Durumu. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 63-69. google scholar
  • Türkeş, M. (2012). Türkiye’de Gözlenen ve Öngörülen İklim Değişikliği, Kuraklık ve Çölleşme. Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi, 1-32. google scholar
  • Umut Pekin Timur, S. E. (2012). "Kentsel Alanlar ve Yerleşkelerde Su Hasadı Teknikleri; Planlama ve Tasarım." Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 170-174. google scholar
  • Uyan, M. (2017). Güneş enerjisi santrali kurulabilecek alanların AHP yöntemi kullanılarak CBS destekli haritalanması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi /23 (4), s. 343-351. google scholar
  • Yılmaz, M. (2010). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci AHS ve Bir Uygulama: Lider bir Kütüphane Müdürü Seçimi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 24/2, s. 206-234. google scholar
  • Yomralıoğlu, D. G. (2017). Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi ile Düzenli Deponi Yer Seçimi: İstanbul İli Örneği. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, s. 262-269. google scholar
  • Yüce, C. Y. (2018). Burdur İlindeki Mevcut Güneş Enerjisi Santrallerinin (GES) Mekansal Uygunluğunun Değerlendirilmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 10(2), s. 132140. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Açıkgöz, N., & Akköprü, E. (2023). Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin. Journal of Geography, 0(47), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965


AMA

Açıkgöz N, Akköprü E. Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin. Journal of Geography. 2023;0(47):85-100. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965


ABNT

Açıkgöz, N.; Akköprü, E. Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin. Journal of Geography, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 47, p. 85-100, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Açıkgöz, Neslihan, and Ebru Akköprü. 2023. “Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin.” Journal of Geography 0, no. 47: 85-100. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965


Chicago: Humanities Style

Açıkgöz, Neslihan, and Ebru Akköprü. Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin.” Journal of Geography 0, no. 47 (May. 2024): 85-100. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965


Harvard: Australian Style

Açıkgöz, N & Akköprü, E 2023, 'Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin', Journal of Geography, vol. 0, no. 47, pp. 85-100, viewed 6 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Açıkgöz, N. and Akköprü, E. (2023) ‘Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin’, Journal of Geography, 0(47), pp. 85-100. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965 (6 May. 2024).


MLA

Açıkgöz, Neslihan, and Ebru Akköprü. Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin.” Journal of Geography, vol. 0, no. 47, 2023, pp. 85-100. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965


Vancouver

Açıkgöz N, Akköprü E. Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin. Journal of Geography [Internet]. 6 May. 2024 [cited 6 May. 2024];0(47):85-100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965 doi: 10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965


ISNAD

Açıkgöz, Neslihan - Akköprü, Ebru. Drought Features of the Akçay Lower Catchment Area (Antalya/Finike) and Identifying Potential Areas for Water Harvesting in the Basin”. Journal of Geography 0/47 (May. 2024): 85-100. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2023-1254965



TIMELINE


Submitted22.02.2023
Accepted20.07.2023
Published Online05.01.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.