Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine

SUBMITINFORMATION
EnglishTürkçe

Research Article


DOI :10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022   IUP :10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022    Full Text (PDF)

COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY

Adem Uğurlu, Emre Altınkurt, Nilüfer Gözüm, Nurdan Gamze Mumcu Taşlı

Objective: To evaluate the target refractive value before and after surgery in patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery.

Material and Method: Patients diagnosed with cataracts who underwent surgery between January 2015 and March 2017 in the Department of Ophthalmology in Istanbul University’s Faculty of Medicine were accepted in this study. The difference between the target refractive value and the resulting refractive value was recorded as a refractive error.

Results: 150 eyes of 107 patients were accepted and used in this study. The SRK-T formula was applied to 100 eyes and the SRK-2 formula were applied to 50 eyes. The mean targeted refractive value was -0.21±0.17 D in the SRK-T formula group and -0.22±0.29 D in the SRK-2 formula group. The mean resulting refractive value was -0.19±0.37 D in the SRK-T formula group and -0.12±0.77 D in the SRK-2 formula group. The mean refractive error was 0.2±0.25 D in the SRK-T formula group and 0.51±0.59 D in the SRK-2 formula group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.001).

Conclusion: The SRK-T formula gave results which were significantly closer to the refractive target than the SRK-2 formula.

Keywords: Phacoemulsification, refraction, cataract
DOI :10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022   IUP :10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022    Full Text (PDF)

FAKOEMÜLSİFİKASYON CERRAHİSİ YAPILAN HASTALARDA HEDEF REFRAKTİF DEĞER İLE SONUÇ REFRAKTİF DEĞERİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Adem Uğurlu, Emre Altınkurt, Nilüfer Gözüm, Nurdan Gamze Mumcu Taşlı

Amaç: Fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi uygulanan hastalarda cerrahi öncesi hedeflenen refraktif değer ile cerrahi sonrası ortaya çıkan sonuç refraktif değerin karşılaştırılması.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Katarakt tanısı ile Ocak 2015- Mart 2017 arasında İstanbul Üniversitesi İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Göz Hastalıkları biriminde cerrahi uygulanan hastalar çalışmaya alındı. Cerrahi öncesi hedeflenen refraktif değer ile cerrahi sonrası ortaya çıkan sonuç refraktif değer arasındaki fark refraktif hata olarak kaydedildi.

Bulgular: 107 hastanın 150 gözü çalışmaya alındı. 100 gözde SRK-T, 50 gözde SRK-2 formülü kullanıldı. Ortalama hedeflenen refraktif değer SRK-T formülü uygulanan grupta -0,21±0,17 D, SRK-2 formülü uygulanan grupta -0,22±0,29 D idi. Cerrahi sonrası ortalama refraktif değer SRK-T formülü uygulanan grupta -0,19±0,37 D, SRK-2 formülü uygulanan grupta -0,12±0,77 D idi. Ortalama refraktif sapma SRK-T formülü kullanılan grupta 0,2±0,25 D iken, SRK-2 formülü kullanılan grupta 0,51±0,59 D idi ve refraktif sapma değerleri açısından iki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark mevcuttu (p=0,001).

Sonuç: Fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi öncesi SRK-T biyometrik formülü kullanılan grupta SRK-2 biyometrik formülü kullanılan gruba göre anlamlı olarak hedeflenen refraktif değere daha yakın sonuçlar elde edildi. 

Keywords: Fakoemülsifikasyon, refraksiyon, katarakt

PDF View

References

  • 1. Kanski JJ, Bowling B. Eyelids. Nischal KK, Pearson A. Clinical Ophtalmology A systematic approach 7th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier/Saunders; 2011. p. 270-285. [CrossRef] google scholar
  • 2. Apple DJ, Rabb MF. Ocular Pathology, 4th. St Louis: MosbyYear Book. 1991. google scholar
  • 3. Liu YC, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta JS. Cataracts. Lancet 2017;S0140-6736(17)30544-5. google scholar
  • 4. Yanoff M. Ophthalmology. Mosby 2004:1370-1. google scholar
  • 5. Cankaya C, Doğanay S. Göz İçi Lens Gücü Hesaplaması ve Optik Biometri. Glo-Kat 2011;6:207-14. google scholar
  • 6. Alastair K.O.Deniston,Philip I.Murray, Oxford Handbook of Ophthalmology, Oxford Universıty Press 2014:300-29. google scholar
  • 7. Jeong J, Song H, Lee JK, Chuck RS, Kwon JW. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas. BMC Ophthalmol 2017;17(1):62. google scholar
  • 8. Liesegang TJ, Skuta GL, Cantor LB. Fundamentals and Principles of Ophthalmology Section 2. 1st ed. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2003: 44-5. google scholar
  • 9. Afsun S, Pedram H. Clinically Relevant Biometry. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012;23(1):47-53. google scholar
  • 10. Jeganathan VS, Robin AL, Woodward MA. Refractive error in underserved adults: causes and potential solutions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2017;28(4):299-304. 11. Goebels S, Pattmöller M, Eppig T, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:2387-93. google scholar
  • 12. Karabela Y, Eliacik M, Kaya F. Performance of the SRK/T formula using A-Scan ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification in eyes with short and long axial lengths. BMC Ophthalmol 2016;16:96. google scholar
  • 13. Hui S, Yi L. Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:931-4. google scholar
  • 14. Suto C, Shimamura E, Watanabe I. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:2366-72. google scholar
  • 15. Kaya V, Küçüksümer Y, Yılmaz OF. Kısa aksiyel uzunluğu olan gözlerde IOL formüllerinin karşılaştırılması. T Oft Gaz 2001;31:57-60. google scholar
  • 16. Oderinlo O, Hassan AO, Oluyadi FO, Ogunro AO, Okonkwo ON, Ulaikere MO, Ashano O.Refractive aim and visual outcome after phacoemulsification: A 2-year review from a Tertiary Private Eye Hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20(2):147-52. google scholar
  • 17. Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW, et al. Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes: Evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:1946-55. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Uğurlu, A., Altınkurt, E., Gözüm, N., & Mumcu Taşlı, N.G. (2020). COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 83(2), 113-118. https://doi.org/10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022


AMA

Uğurlu A, Altınkurt E, Gözüm N, Mumcu Taşlı N G. COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. 2020;83(2):113-118. https://doi.org/10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022


ABNT

Uğurlu, A.; Altınkurt, E.; Gözüm, N.; Mumcu Taşlı, N.G. COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, [Publisher Location], v. 83, n. 2, p. 113-118, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Uğurlu, Adem, and Emre Altınkurt and Nilüfer Gözüm and Nurdan Gamze Mumcu Taşlı. 2020. “COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY.” Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine 83, no. 2: 113-118. https://doi.org/10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022


Chicago: Humanities Style

Uğurlu, Adem, and Emre Altınkurt and Nilüfer Gözüm and Nurdan Gamze Mumcu Taşlı. “COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY.” Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine 83, no. 2 (Nov. 2024): 113-118. https://doi.org/10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022


Harvard: Australian Style

Uğurlu, A & Altınkurt, E & Gözüm, N & Mumcu Taşlı, NG 2020, 'COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY', Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 113-118, viewed 15 Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Uğurlu, A. and Altınkurt, E. and Gözüm, N. and Mumcu Taşlı, N.G. (2020) ‘COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY’, Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 83(2), pp. 113-118. https://doi.org/10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022 (15 Nov. 2024).


MLA

Uğurlu, Adem, and Emre Altınkurt and Nilüfer Gözüm and Nurdan Gamze Mumcu Taşlı. “COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY.” Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, vol. 83, no. 2, 2020, pp. 113-118. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022


Vancouver

Uğurlu A, Altınkurt E, Gözüm N, Mumcu Taşlı NG. COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine [Internet]. 15 Nov. 2024 [cited 15 Nov. 2024];83(2):113-118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022 doi: 10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022


ISNAD

Uğurlu, Adem - Altınkurt, Emre - Gözüm, Nilüfer - Mumcu Taşlı, NurdanGamze. “COMPARISON OF THE TARGET REFRACTIVE VALUE AND THE RESULTING REFRACTIVE VALUE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY”. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine 83/2 (Nov. 2024): 113-118. https://doi.org/10.26650/IUITFD.2019.0022



TIMELINE


Submitted04.03.2019
Accepted10.10.2019
Published Online24.03.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.