Research Article


DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010    Full Text (PDF)

Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey

Ceren Ark YıldırımMarc Smyrl

The concept of social innovation has grown in popularity in policy circles as a remedy both to government and market failure. We can usefully define social innovation as a new approach to meeting social needs by the empowerment of individuals through collaborative actions of governments, private enterprises, and civil society actors. The emergence of this new approach is best explained as a process of translation, by which we mean the movement of concepts across first sectoral and then national boundaries. In this process, imported elements are combined with existing ones to create new policy instruments. We first discuss the development of the social innovation approach through the translation of policy elements from the economic to the social sector.  We then illustrate the further translation of policy elements across national borders through two Turkish examples of the use of smart cards to deliver social benefits. 

DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010    Full Text (PDF)

Çevirideki Sosyal Inovasyon: Türkiye’deki Yeni Refah Devleti Politika Aracı

Ceren Ark YıldırımMarc Smyrl

Yönetim ve piyasa başarısızlığına bir çare olarak görülen, sosyal inovasyon politika çevrelerinde giderek popülerlik kazanmaktadır. Sosyal inovasyonu, bireyleri güçlendirerek ve kar getiren işletmelerin ve sivil toplum aktörlerinin katılımı ile sosyal ihtiyacın karşılanabileceğini kabul eden yenilikçi bir yaklaşım olarak tanımlayabiliriz. Bu yeni yaklaşımın ortaya çıkışı, politika çevirisi kavramıyla açıklanabilir. Biz, politika çevirisini (policy translation), kavramların öncelikli olarak sektörel sonra da ulusal sınırlar arasındaki hareketi olarak tanımlamaktayız. Bu süreçte, ithal edilen elemanlar, var olan elemanlar ile birleşip yeni bir politika aracı yaratmaktadır. İlk olarak, sosyal inovasyon yaklaşımının gelişimini, politika unsurların ekonomik sektörden sosyal sektöre çevirisi (translation) aracılığıyla tartışacağız. Daha sonra da, ulusal sınırların ötesine geçen politika unsurların çevirisini sosyal refah yardımları için kullanılan iki akıllı kart örneği ile göstereceğiz. 


PDF View

References

  • Ağartan, T. I. (2015). Explaining large-scale policy change in the Turkish healthcare system: Ideas, institutions, and political actors. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 40(5), 971–999. google scholar
  • Almirall, E., Lee, M., & Wareham, J. (2012). Mapping Living Labs in the landscape of innovation methodologies. Technology Innovation Management Review., 12-18. https://timreview.ca/article/603 google scholar
  • Angelini et al. (2016). Senior Living Lab: An Ecological Approach to Foster Social Innovation in an Ageing Society. Future Internet , 8(4): 50, https://doi.org/10.3390/fi8040050 google scholar
  • Aydin, U. and Kirişçi K. (2013). With or without the EU: Europeanization of asylum and competition policies in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 18(3), pp. 375-395. google scholar
  • Ark, C. & Smyrl, M. (2017). Innovation Ouverte et ‘Living Labs’: Production et Traduction d’un Modèle Européen. Revue Française d’Administration Publique, (161), 89-102. google scholar
  • Ark-Yıldırım, C. (2018). Cash Assistance by Smart Card: from multiple functions to multiple legitimacies of a municipal social policy instrument. Turkish Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2018.1454836. google scholar
  • Ayres, C. (1944 – reprinted 1975). The Theory of Economic Progress. Kalamazoo, MI: New Issues Press, Western Michigan University. google scholar
  • Bache, I. and Jordan, A. (2006). Europeanization and domestic change. In The Europeanization of British politics, (Ed.) I. Bache and A. Jordan, 17–36. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Behrens, P. and Smyrl, M. (1999). A conflict of rationalities: EU regional policy and the single market. Journal of European Public Policy , 6(3) , 419-435. google scholar
  • Bilgehan, Z., (2017, October,14) Mülteci Hesabı, Hürriyet, Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/amp/ multeci-hesabi-40644078 google scholar
  • Buğra A., & Candaş A. (2011), change and continuity under an eclectic social security regime: The case of Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 47(3), 515-528. google scholar
  • Buğra A., & Keyder Ç., (2006). The turkish welfare regime in transformation. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3), 211-228. google scholar
  • Campbell, J. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Chalmers, D. (2012). Social innovation: An exploration of the barriers faced by innovating organizations in the social economy. Local economy, 28(1), 17-34 google scholar
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Curley, M., & Salmelin, B. (2013). Open Innovation 2.0: a New Paradigm. Brussels: European Commission. google scholar
  • Davies, A., Caulier-Grice, J. & Norman, W. (2012). Introduction to Innovation: A literature review of the methods and policies for innovation’, a deliverable of the project: The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe’ (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Program. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research. google scholar
  • De Kort et al. (2015). Organization of labor, quality of work and relational conditions in Care Living Labs. Paper presented to the Open Living Lab Days conference, Istanbul. google scholar
  • DG REGIO (Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy). (2014). Enabling Synergies Between European Structural and Investment Funds. Brussels: European Commission. google scholar
  • DG CONNECT (Directorate General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology). (2014). Open Innovation Yearbook, 2014. Brussels: European Commission. google scholar
  • DG CONNECT (Directorate General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology). (2015). Open Innovation Yearbook, 2015. Brussels: European Commission. google scholar
  • DG INFSO. (Directorate General for Information Society and Media). (2009). Living Labs for User-Driven Open Innovation: An Overview of the Living Labs” Methodology, Activities and Achievements. Brussels: European Commission. google scholar
  • Dubé, P., Sarrailh, J., Billebaud, C., Grillet, C., Zingraff, V. and Kostecki, I. (2014). Le Livre Blanc des Living Labs (1st ed.). Montréal : Umvelt. google scholar
  • Duman Selman, Y. (2011). Regional Innovation Policy: An Analysis of Turkey’s Aegean, Marmara, East Anatolia and Southeast Anatolia Regions, Alternatives: Turkish Journal Of International Relations, Cilt: 10, Sayı :1 , ss: 37-57. google scholar
  • Dutilleul, B. et ali. (2010). Unpacking European Living Labs : Analyzing Innovation’s Social Dimensions. Central European Journal of Public Policy 4(1), 60-85. google scholar
  • EU Commission. (1995). Green Paper on Innovation (Com 95-688). Brussels: European Commission. google scholar
  • EU Commission. (2013). Guide to Social Innovation. Brussels: European Commission. EU Commission (2015) Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook : 2015. Brussels : European Commission. google scholar
  • EU Commission (2016a) Fact Sheet, Managing The Refugee Crises, EU-Turkey Statement, Brussels, 4 October 2016, Retrieved, May 2018 from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-3218_en.htm google scholar
  • EU Commission (2016b) Fact Sheet, Brussels 8 September 2016, Retrieved, May 2018 from: http://europa.eu/ rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-2989_en.htm google scholar
  • EU Presidency. (2000). Presidency Conclusions: Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000. google scholar
  • EU Presidency. (2006). Networked Business and Government: Something Real for the Lisbon Strategy. 20 November 2006. google scholar
  • Esping-Andersen,, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. google scholar
  • Evans, P. & Hall R., (2015). Girls Making History: Summary report communities culture funded research pilot. Paper presented to the Open Living Lab Days conference, Istanbul. google scholar
  • Franz, Y. (2015). Designing Social Living Labs in Urban Research. Technical Innovation Management Review. 2012. Special Issue on Living Labs (September 2012). google scholar
  • Garcia-Robles, A. et ali. (2015). Introducing ENoLL and its Living Lab Community. Brussels: ENoLL. google scholar
  • Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Hassenteufel, P. and De Maillard, J. (2013). Convergence, transfert et traduction: Les apports de la comparaison internationale. Gouvernement et Action Publique 3: 3, pp. 377-393. google scholar
  • Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven and London: Yale University Press google scholar
  • Hochgerner, J. (2011). The analysis of social innovations as social practice. In: bridges vol. 30, July 2011, http:// ostaustria.org/325-categories-all/magazine/volume-30-july-20-2011/feature-articles/5708-the-analysis-ofsocial-innovations-as-social-practice. google scholar
  • Holzinger, K. and Knill, C. (2005). Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy 12: 5, pp. 775-796. google scholar
  • Kingdom, J. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy. New York: Harper Collins Publishers. google scholar
  • Le Grand, Julian. (2003). Motivation, Agency and Public Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Leys et al. (2015). Care Living Lab Flanders: Social and Open Innovation. Paper presented to the Open Living Lab Days conference, Istanbul. google scholar
  • Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation: What It Is, Why It Matters and How It Can Be Accelerated, Working Paper, Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, Oxford Saïd Business School google scholar
  • Morel, N., Palier, B., Palme, J., eds. (2011). Toward a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press. google scholar
  • Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: G. Duckworth. google scholar
  • OECD. (2012) Science, Technology And Industry Outlook, http://www.oecd.org/turkey/sti-outlook-2012turkey.pdf google scholar
  • OECD. (2016). Social Innovation Policy Framework for Croatia. Paris: OECD South East Europe Regional Programme. google scholar
  • OECD (2018), Social spending (indicator). doi: 10.1787/7497563b-en (Accessed on 22 May 2018). https:// stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SOCX_AGG; google scholar
  • Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier K., Miller, D. T., (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 6 (4 ), 37-43. google scholar
  • Republic of Rwanda – Minsistry in Charge of Emergency Management. (2016). Smart Card Use for Refugees Launched. Retrieved November 2018 from: http://midimar.gov.rw/index.php?id=45&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=112&cHash =87ba18759c3cd3a8e181a06de5cd47ff google scholar
  • Reynolds, S., Madeleine G., & Heales, C. (2016). Social Innovation Policy in Europe: where next? SI Policy in Europe. Social Innovation Community: an H2020 research and innovation Project under grant agreement no:693883. google scholar
  • Saurruger, S. and Yves S. (2006). L’Européanisation comme procéssus de transfert de politique publique. Reveu Internationale de Politique Comparée, 13(2), pp. 179-211. google scholar
  • Schuurman, D. (2015). Bridging the Gap Between Open and User Innovation? PhD Dissertation presented jointly to the University of Ghent and the Free University of Brussels. google scholar
  • Schuurman D. et al. (2015). Living Labs: A Systematic Literature Review. Paper presented to the Open Living Lab Days conference, Istanbul. google scholar
  • Smyrl, M. (2008). French Regional Elites and EC Regional Development Policy. In Smyrl, Marc & William Genieys. Elites, Ideas, and the Evolution of Public Policy. Palgrave-MacMillan. google scholar
  • Smyrl, M. (2014). Beyond Interests and Institutions: US Health Policy and the Surprising Silence of Big Business. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 39: 1, pp, 5-34. google scholar
  • TEPSIE (Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Social Innovation in Europe). (2012). An Introduction to Innovation Studies for Social Innovators. (Deliverable 1.3 of the FP7 project TEPSIE) google scholar
  • World Food Program (WFP) – Turkey. (2017). The Emergency Social Safety Net (ESSN) and the Grand Bargain, Retrieved, May 2018 from: https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/WFP-0000021046/download/ google scholar
  • Yilmaz, G. (2017). It is voluntary transfer! Exploring Healthcare Reforms in Turkey. Turkish Studies 18: 4, pp. 665-687. google scholar
  • Zito, A. ed. (2013) Learning and Governance in the EU Policy Making Process. London and New York: Routlage. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Ark Yıldırım, C., & Smyrl, M. (2019). Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 28(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010


AMA

Ark Yıldırım C, Smyrl M. Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences. 2019;28(1):99-115. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010


ABNT

Ark Yıldırım, C.; Smyrl, M. Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 28, n. 1, p. 99-115, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ark Yıldırım, Ceren, and Marc Smyrl. 2019. “Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 28, no. 1: 99-115. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010


Chicago: Humanities Style

Ark Yıldırım, Ceren, and Marc Smyrl. Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 28, no. 1 (Apr. 2021): 99-115. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010


Harvard: Australian Style

Ark Yıldırım, C & Smyrl, M 2019, 'Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey', Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 99-115, viewed 14 Apr. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ark Yıldırım, C. and Smyrl, M. (2019) ‘Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey’, Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 28(1), pp. 99-115. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010 (14 Apr. 2021).


MLA

Ark Yıldırım, Ceren, and Marc Smyrl. Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1, 2019, pp. 99-115. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010


Vancouver

Ark Yıldırım C, Smyrl M. Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences [Internet]. 14 Apr. 2021 [cited 14 Apr. 2021];28(1):99-115. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010 doi: 10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010


ISNAD

Ark Yıldırım, Ceren - Smyrl, Marc. Social Innovation in Translation: New Welfare Instruments in Turkey”. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 28/1 (Apr. 2021): 99-115. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0010



TIMELINE


Submitted13.06.2018
Accepted04.03.2019
Published Online29.03.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.