Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999    Full Text (PDF)

Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization

Murat Kalkan

Germany has been an important country in the emergence and development of social policy practices and the discipline of social policy science and as such has a characteristic position as a welfare state. This is reflected in the field of civil society, with Germany having been analyzed in the literature as an example of a corporatist civil society regime, similar to comparative welfare state studies. In this regard, this study aims to determine the current state of civil society’s conceptualization and organization in Germany, and the main focus of this study involves the social policy-welfare state perspective. For this purpose, the study first analyzes the relationship between social policy and civil society on a conceptual level before evaluating the current situation in Germany through the historical context. As a result and in light of the data obtained from research conducted in recent years, the study observes growth to have occurred in Germany’s civil society organization, but this growth has also been accompanied by a structural transformation. In other words, the ‘corporatization’ and tendency toward ‘professionalization’ are observed to have gained weight in German civil society organizations.

DOI :10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999    Full Text (PDF)

Almanya’da Sivil Toplum Anlayışı ve Organizasyonu

Murat Kalkan

Almanya, sosyal politika uygulamalarının olduğu kadar, sosyal politika bilim disiplininin de hem ortaya çıkmasında hem de gelişmesinde önemli bir ülkedir. Bu çerçevede de sosyal devlet olarak karakteristik bir konumda yer almaktadır. Bunun bir yansıması ise sivil toplum alanında kendini göstermekte ve literatürde, Almanya’nın, karşılaştırmalı refah devleti çalışmalarına benzer şekilde, korporatist bir sivil toplum rejimi örneği olarak ele alındığı anlaşılmaktadır. İşte bu noktada çalışmanın amacı ise, Almanya’daki sivil toplum anlayışının ve örgütlenmesinin, güncel durumunun tespiti olarak belirlenmiş; dayanak noktası sosyal politika-sosyal devlet dönüşümü perspektifi olmuştur. Bunun için çalışmada öncelikle sosyal politika-sivil toplum ilişkisi kavramsal düzlemde ele alınmış daha sonra da Almanya’daki mevcut durum tarihi süreç üzerinden anlamlandırılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Netice olarak, son yıllarda yapılan araştırmalardan elde edilen veriler ışığında, Almanya’nın sivil toplum örgütlenmesinde büyümenin olduğu ama buna yapısal bir dönüşümün eşlik ettiği görülmüştür. Bir başka deyişle Alman sivil toplum örgütlenmesinde ‘işletmecilik’ mantığının ve ‘profesyonelleşme’ eğiliminin giderek ağırlık kazandığı anlaşılmaktadır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The research on civil society and civil society organizations has had a long history. However, it also draws attention as a subject that has been increasingly addressed in recent years. In this respect, civil society and their respective organizations constitute an important field of study regarding social policy, because the qualitative and quantitative status of civil society is accepted as an indicator of the development of countries and societies. Although some issues occur that cannot be unanimously defined, civil societal understandings have developed by being shaped around certain cultural values in the lives of societies. In other words, the forms of organization that these understandings bring with them are inevitably formed with various qualities that change from one country to another. In this respect, the Federal Republic of Germany is a remarkable country. Comparative studies have characterized Germany as a model country regarding its welfare state classifications and categorization of civil society regimes. As a matter of fact, the social policy and welfare state approach that forms the basis of the social structure in Germany has also affected civil society organizations socioeconomically and legally and is an important factor in how they are positioned.

In line with this, this study aims to determine the current situation of the understanding and organization of civil society in Germany. The main question here is how Germany is categorized as a country in civil society regimes and where is the situation heading. Therefore, this study examines the understanding and organization of civil society in Germany as one of the most politically and socioeconomically important countries in the world from the perspective of the transformation of social policy-welfare state understandings and makes an assessment of the current situation in the country.

As in the rest of the world in recent years, the quantitative and qualitative development of organized civil society in Germany has received much attention. The political authorities are interested in various studies and practices and have supported the development of civil society through specific regulations. The analysis this study conducts shows that the first types of civil society organizations in German society in the modern sense were encountered in the 19th century. In this respect, a growing interest is seen to have occurred, one that has been intensifying since the 1990s. Germany can be said to have an above-average position in the world ranking in this regard, and its statistics that reveal the understanding of civil society to have developed through gradual diversification over the years is an indication of this. Unfortunately, no exact number can be given regarding the number of civil society organizations there, which are said to have increased especially after the German unification in 1990. However, research conducted in recent years helps to understand the volunteering and institutional infrastructure of civil society. In this context, both volunteerism and the number of civil society organizations (currently more than 656,000) have increased in Germany.

Research on the understanding and organization of civil society in different countries shows that Germany is positioned differently from the Anglo-Saxonworld and from Scandinavian countries, aswell as its classification of social policy and existence as awelfare state. It is seen that the relations between non-governmental organizations and the state in Germany are strong and a corporatist approach is adopted. The fact that Germany is seen as one of the models of a corporatist welfare state in which civil society actors play an important role in the welfare mix actually indicates the presence of a wide space for civil society organizations alongside the state, especially regarding the provision of social services and practices to those concerned. First of all, this is the manifestation of the social policy-social state approach that developed in relation to the construction process of the German national state and is nothing more than a path dependency that has developed for over a hundred years.

In Germany, the reforms in the welfare state and especially the social changes caused by demographic developments in recent years have produced important results by affecting the preferences of those in civil society organizations. The civil society organization has shown a growth trend simultaneously accompanied by a structural transformation. This is because the increase in non-profit limited liability companies and the trend toward the informalization of civil society participation has simultaneously paved the way for the weakening of the corporatist institutional foundations of the German civil society understanding. In other words, organized civil society in Germany has grown, and its main characteristic is transformation. The German civil society regime must therefore also seek a position in the context of the transformation of social policies and the welfare state. In this context, these societies can evolve partly toward a liberal civil society regime. This is because the increasing tendency toward ‘corporatization’ and ‘professionalization’ in civil society organization in Germany in recent years will give more space to the market, as well as in the liberal understanding of the civil society regime.


PDF View

References

  • Aktive Bürgerschaft e.V, (2014). Deutsche zivilgesellschaftliche Traditionen, http://www.aktive-buergerschaft.de/buergergesellschaft/basismformationen/entwicklung_und_diskurs/deutsche_traditionen#.VKGxXv9ACM. (19.12.2014). google scholar
  • Alber, J. (1989). Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich. N. Blüm H. F. Zacher (Ed.), 40 Jahre Sozialstaat Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. 783-795. google scholar
  • Alscher, M., Priller, E. (2013). Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (Ed.), Datenreport 2013: Ein Sozialbericht für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bonn: Bun-deszentrale für politische Bildung (bpb). 350-356. google scholar
  • Alscher, M., Priller, E., Burkhardt, L. (2021). Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (Ed.), Datenreport 2021: Ein Sozialbericht für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (bpb). ss. 399-407. google scholar
  • Althammer, J. W., Lampert, H., Sommer, M. (2014). Lehrbuch der Sozialpolitik. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. google scholar
  • Anheier, H. K., List, R. A. (2005). A Dictionary of Civil Society, Philanthropy and the Non-Profit Sector, London and New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Arriagada, C., Karnick, N. (2022). Motive für freiwilliges Engagement, Beendigungsgründe, Hinderungsgründe und Engagementbereitschaft. J. Simonson, N. Kelle, C. Kausmann, C. Tesch-Römer (Ed.), Freiwilliges Engagement in Deutschland: Der Deutsche Freiwilligensurvey 2019. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 125-149. google scholar
  • Aslan, S. (2010). Sivil toplum ve demokrasi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(2). 357-374. google scholar
  • Aykaç, B., Durgun, Ş. (2014). Hükümet Dışı Bir Örgütlenme Olarak Dini Topluluklar ve Sivil Toplum Düşüncesi. G. Durgun, U. Saran, Y. Pustu (Ed.), Türk Dünyası Sivil Toplum Zirvesi Bildiriler Kitabı, Ankara: Kamu Araştırmaları Vakfı Yayınları. 589-602. google scholar
  • Ayverdi, İ. (2011). Misalli Büyük Türkçe Sözlük (4. Bs). C. 3, İstanbul: Kubbealtı Neşriyat. google scholar
  • Backer, G., Naegele, G., Bispinck, R., Hofemann, K., Neubauer, J. (2010). Sozialpolitik und soziale Lage in Deutschland: Band 1- Grundlagen, Arbeit, Einkommen und Finanzierung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. google scholar
  • Baş, M. F. (2022). Almanya’ da Gönüllülük. M. Şentürk (Ed.), Dünyada Gönüllülük Çalışmaları, Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. 19-38. google scholar
  • Böhnisch, L., Schröer, W. (2016). Das Sozialpolitische Prinzip: Die eigene Kraft des Sozialen an den Grenzen des Wohlfahrtsstaats. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. google scholar
  • Bundesverband Deutscher Stiftungen. (2014). Zahlen, Daten, Fakten zum deutschen Stiftungswesen, Berlin: Bundesverband Deutscher Stiftungen e.V. google scholar
  • Bundesverband Deutscher Stiftungen. (2023a). Stiftungsbestand, Dichte und Wachstum 2022.Stiftungsbestand-Dichte-Wachstum-2022.pdf. (10.05.2023)_ google scholar
  • Bundesverband Deutscher Stiftungen. (2023b). Stiftungserrichtungen 1990-2022. https://www.stiftungen.org/fileadmin/stiftungen_org/Stiftungen/ Zahlen-Daten/2022/Stiftungserrichtungen-1990-2022.pdf (10.05.2023). google scholar
  • Charities Aid Foundation. (2022). World Giving Index 2022. https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-research/caf_world_giving_index_2022_210922-final.pdf. (28.04.2023). google scholar
  • Einolf, C. J. (2015). The Social Origins of the Nonprofit Sector and Charitable Giving. P. Wiepking, F. Handy, (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 509-529. google scholar
  • Erdem, T. (1997). Sivil topluma kavramsal bir bakış. Bilig-Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(Yaz 97), 207-214. google scholar
  • Frech, S. (2007). Bürgerschaftliches Engagement. Der Bürger im Staat, (4/2007). 202-203. google scholar
  • Freise, M., Zimmer, A. (2019a). Zivilgesellschaft und Wohlfahrtsstaat in Deutschland: Eine Einführung. M. Freise, M., A. Zimmer. (Ed.), Zivilgesellschaft und Wohlfahrtsstaat im Wandel: Akteure, Strategien und Politikfelder. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 3-22. google scholar
  • Freise, M., Zimmer, A. (2019b). Zivilgesellschaft und Wohlfahrtsstaat in Deutschland: Ein kurzer Ausblick. I M. Freise, M., A. Zimmer. (Ed.), Zivilgesellschaft und Wohlfahrtsstaat im Wandel: Akteure, Strategien und Politikfelder. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 395-402. google scholar
  • Gensicke, T. (2006). Bürgerschaftliches Engagement in Deutschland, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 12/2006 (Marz). 9-16. google scholar
  • Grande, E. (2021). Wie wichtig istdie Zivilgesellschaft?: Einführende Bemerkungen. B. Grande, E. Grande, U. Hahn (Ed.), Zivilgesellschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Aufbrüche, Umbrüche, Ausblicke. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. 13-20. google scholar
  • Hohendanner, C., Priemer, J., Rump, B., Schmitt, W. (2019). Zivilgesellschaft als Arbeitsmarkt. H. Krimmer (Ed.), Datenreport Zivilgesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 93-112. google scholar
  • Hummel, S., Pfirter, L., Strachwitz, R. G. (2022). Zur Lage und den Rahmenbedingungen der Zivilgesellschaft in Deutschland: ein Bericht. (Opuscula, 159). Berlin: Maecenata Institut für Philanthropie und Zivilgesellschaft. google scholar
  • Kalkan, M. (2020). Almanya’da sosyal politika-sosyal devlet. Düşünce ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (3), 167-170. google scholar
  • Kalkan, M. (2022). Sosyal Politika Açısından Almanya’da Emek Piyasasının Organizasyonu. Ankara: TAEM (Türk Metal Sendikası Araştırma ve Eğitim Merkezi) Yayınları. google scholar
  • Kamlage, J.-H. (2008). The Awaking Giant: The Development Of Civil Society Infrastructure in Germany.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1804851. (08.05.2023). google scholar
  • Karnick, N., Simonson, J., Hagen, C. (2022). Organisationsformen und Leitungsfunktionen im freiwilligen Engagement. J. Simonson, N. Kelle, C. Kausmann, C. Tesch-Römer (Ed.), Freiwilliges Engagement in Deutschland: Der Deutsche Freiwilligensurvey 2019. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 183-202. google scholar
  • Kaufmann, F.-X. (2013). Thinking About Social Policy: The German Tradition. F.-X. Kaufmann (Ed.), Thinking About Social Policy: The German Tradition. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. 23-153. google scholar
  • Kayagil, M. E. (2016). Tarihsel Perspektiften Japonya’da Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları. Çalışma ve Toplum, 4(51), 1769-1792. google scholar
  • Kessler, G. (1945). İçtimaî Siyaset. (Çev. Orhan Tuna). İstanbul: Millî Mecmua Basımevi. google scholar
  • Klein, A. (2000). Der Diskurs der Zivilgesellschaft. (Münsteraner Diskussionspapiere zum Nonprofit-Sektor, 6). Münster: Universitat Münster. google scholar
  • Kocabaş, F. (2010). Sosyal Politika Aracı Olarak Kâr Amacı Gütmeyen Kuruluşlar, İstanbul: Nisan Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Kocka, J. (2001): Zivilgesellschaft: Zum Konzept und semer sozialgeschichtlichen Verwendung. J. Kocka, P. Nolte, S. Randeria, S. Reichardt, (Ed.) Neues über Zivilgesellschaft. Aus historisch-sozialwissenschaftlichem Blickwinkel. Discussion Paper P01-801. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB). 4-21. google scholar
  • Kocka, J. (2002). Das Bürgertum als Trager von Zivilgesellschaft - Traditionslinien, Entwicklungen, Perspektiven, in: Enquete-Kommission „Zukunft des Bürgerschaftlichen Engagements“ Deutscher Bundestag (Hrsg.): Bürgerschaftliches Engagement und Zivilgesellschaft. Wies-baden: Springer Fachmedien. ss. 15-22. google scholar
  • Kocka, J. (2003). Zivilgesellschaft in historischer Perspektive. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 16(2), 29-37. google scholar
  • Kocka, J. (2004). Zivilgesellschaft in historischer Perspektive. R. Jessen, S. Reichardt, A. Klein, A. (Ed.), Zivilgesellschaft als Geschichte: Studien zum 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 29-42. google scholar
  • Kocka, J. (2010). Civil Society and Dictatorship in Modern German History. Hanover: University Press of New England google scholar
  • Krimmer, H. (2018). Konturen und Strukturwandel der organisierten Zivilgesellschaft. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 31(1-2), 195-203. google scholar
  • Krimmer, H., Schubert, P., Tahmaz, B. (2022). Informalisierung, Deinstitutionalisierung, Politisierung: Überlegungen zum Strukturwandel von Zivilgesellschaft. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 35(3), 467-483. google scholar
  • Kucur, F. (2021). Sosyal Bilimleri Yeniden Düşünmek. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • May, M. (2011). Sosyal Politikada Karşılaştırmalı Çalışmaların Rolü. (Çev. Ş. Gökbayrak). P. Alcock, M. May, K. Rowlingson (Ed.), Sosyal Politika: Kuramlar ve Uygulamalar. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi. 543-554. google scholar
  • Özdemir, S. (2004). Kâr Gütmeyen Kuruluşlar (KGK) ve Sosyal Refah'ın sağlanmasında artan rolü. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, (48), 129-161. google scholar
  • Özdemir, S. (2007). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Refah Devleti, İstanbul: İstanbul Ticaret Odası Yayınları. google scholar
  • Özdemir, S., Başel, H., Şenocak, H. (2009). Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları (STK)’nın Artan Önemi ve Üsküdar’da Faaliyet Gösteren Bazı STK’lar Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, (56). 151-234. google scholar
  • Piekenbrock, D., Hennig, A. (2013). Einführung in die Volkswirtschaftslehre und Mikroökonomie. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Gabler. google scholar
  • Priemer, J., Bischoff, A., Hohendanner, C., Krebstakies, R., Rump, B., Schmitt, W. (2019). Organisierte Zivilgesellschaft. Krimmer, H. (Ed.), Datenreport Zivilgesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 7-54. google scholar
  • Rosenski, N. (2012). Die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung des Dritten Sektors. Wirtschaft und Statistik-WISTA, Marz 2012. 209-217. google scholar
  • Roth, R. (2001). NGOs und transnationale soziale Bewegungen als Akteure für eine Weltzivilgesellschaft, http://www.boeU-hessen.de/archivseite/pol/ngos.htm. (28.02.2023). google scholar
  • SachBe, C. (2002a). Traditionslinien bürgerschaftlichen Engagements in Deutschland. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, (9). 3-5. google scholar
  • SachBe, C. (2002b). Traditionslinien bürgerschaftlichen Engagements. Enquete-Kommission „Zukunft des Bürgerschaftlichen Engagements“ Deutscher Bundestag (Ed.), Bürgerschaftliches Engagement und Zivilgesellschaft, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. 23-28. google scholar
  • Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally. VOLUNTAS: International Journal ofVoluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(3), 213-248. google scholar
  • Schmidt, M. G. & Ostheim, T. (2007). Der Aufbau staatlicher Sozialpolitik im deutschen Kaiserreich. M. G. Schmidt, T. Ostheim, N. A. Siegel, R. Zohlnhöfer (Ed.), Der Wohlfahrtsstaat: Eine Einführung in den historischen und internationalen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 123-130. google scholar
  • Schmidt, M. G. (2021). Geschichte der Zivilgesellschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. B. Grande, E. Grande, U. Hahn (Ed.), Zivilgesellschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 21-34. google scholar
  • Schubert, P., Tahmaz, B. & Krimmer, H. (2023a). Erste Befunde des ZiviZ-Survey 2023 — Zivilgesellschaft in Krisenzeiten: Politisch aktiv mit geschwachten Fundamenten. Berlin: ZiviZ im Stifterverband. google scholar
  • Schubert, P., Tahmaz, B. & Krimmer, H. (2023b). ZiviZ-Survey 2023: Methodenbericht. Berlin: ZiviZ im Stifterverband. google scholar
  • Schubert, P., Tahmaz, B., Krimmer, H. (2022). Vereine in Deutschland im Jahr 2022: Aktuelle Zahlen zum Strukturwandel der unterschiedlichen Geschwindigkeiten. (Discussion Paper-Ausgabe 03, 04. Juli 2022). Berlin: ZiviZ im Stifterverband. google scholar
  • Schuppert, G. F. (2002). Aktivierender Staat und Zivilgesellschaft—Versuch einer Verhaltnisbestimmung. Enquete-Kommission „Zukunft des Bürgerschaftlichen Engagements“ Deutscher Bundestag (Ed.), Bürgerschaftliches Engagement und Zivilgesellschaft, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, 185-207. google scholar
  • Sesselmeier, W., Somaggio, G., Yollu, A. (2006). Mögliche Implikationen dergegenwartigenArbeitsmarktreformenfür die zukünftige Entwicklung der Arbeitslosenversicherung. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. google scholar
  • Seyyar, A. (2008). İngilizce-Almanca Karşılıklı ve Türkçe Açıklamalı Sosyal Siyaset Terimleri: Ansiklopedik Sözlük, Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Sezen, Y. (2005). Hümanizm ve Türkiye, İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Simonson, J., Kelle, N., Kausmann, C., Karnick, N., Arriagada, C., Hagen, C., Hameister, N., Huxhold, O., Tesch-Römer, C. (2021). Freiwilliges Engagement in Deutschland: Zentrale Ergebnisse des Fünften Deutschen Freiwilligensurveys (FWS 2019). Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. google scholar
  • Simonson, J., Kelle, N., Kausmann, C., Tesch-Römer, C. (2022a). Einleitung: Zwanzig Jahre Deutscher Freiwilligensurvey. J. Simonson, N. Kelle, C. Kausmann, C. Tesch-Römer, (Ed.), Freiwilliges Engagement in Deutschland: Der Deutsche Freiwilligensurvey 2019. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 11-28. google scholar
  • Simonson, J., Kelle, N., Kausmann, C., Tesch-Römer, C. (2022b). Freiwilliges Engagement im Zeitvergleich. J. Simonson, N. Kelle, C. Kausmann, C. Tesch-Römer, (Ed.), Freiwilliges Engagement in Deutschland: Der Deutsche Freiwilligensurvey 2019. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 53-65. google scholar
  • Spengler, N., Hubrich, D.-K., Tamm, T., Alscher, M., Priller, E. (2011). Landkarte zur Datenlage: Dritter Sektor/Zivilgesellschaft (Projektbericht). Zivilgesellschaft in Zahlen. Heidelberg-Berlin: Centrum für soziale Investitionen und Innovationen (CSI), Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). google scholar
  • Spengler, N., Priemer, J. (2011). Daten zur Zivilgesellschaft: Eine Bestandsaufnahme, Essen: Stifterverband. google scholar
  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2005). Datenreport 2004: Zahlen und Fakten über die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (bpb). google scholar
  • Strachwitz, R. G. (2020). Basiswissen Zivilgesellschaft. (Opuscula, 140). Berlin: Maecenata Institut für Philanthropie und Zivilgesellschaft. google scholar
  • Strachwitz, R., Priller, E., Triebe, B. (2020). Handbuch Zivilgesellschaft. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. google scholar
  • Şahin, L., Öztürk, M. (2008). Küreselleşme sürecinde sivil toplum kuruluşları ve Türkiye’de durumu. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, (54). 3-29. google scholar
  • Şenkal, A. (2003). Küreselleşme, sosyal politikanın dönüşümü ve sivil toplum örgütleri. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, (45), 97-123. google scholar
  • Şenkal, A. (2011). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Sosyal Politika. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları. google scholar
  • Taşçı, F. (2020). Sosyal Refah: Bütüncül Bir Perspektif. İstanbul: İktisat Yayınları. google scholar
  • TDK. (2011). Türkçe Sözlük (11. Baskı). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları. google scholar
  • Tokol, A. (2012). Sosyal Politikanın Tarafları. A. Tokol, Y. Alper. (Ed.). Sosyal Politika. Bursa: Dora Yayıncılık. 37-76. google scholar
  • TÜSEV. (2006). Türkiye’de Sivil Toplum: Bir Değişim Süreci (Uluslararası Sivil Toplum Endeksi Projesi Türkiye Ülke Raporu), İstanbul: TÜSEV Yayınları. google scholar
  • Uğur, S. (2011). Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarının Sosyal Yardım ve Sosyal Hizmet Faaliyetleri, Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Yumurtacı, A. (2019). Tarihsel süreçte Almanya’da kar amacı gütmeyen kuruluşların gelişimi ve yapısı. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(17). 119-143. google scholar
  • Zimmer, A. (2000). Einleitung. A. Zimmer, E. Priller. (Ed.), Der deutsche Nonprofit-Sektor im gesellschaftlichen Wandel: Zu ausgewahlten Ergeb-nissen der deutschen Teilstudie des international vergleichenden Johns Hopkins Projektes, Münster: Westfalischer Wilhelms-Universitat. 3-15. google scholar
  • Zimmer, A. (2007). Vereine-Zivilgesellschaft konkret. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. google scholar
  • Zimmer, A. (2019). Wohlfahrtsstaatlichkeit in Deutschland: Tradition und Wandel der Zusammenarbeit mit zivilgesellschaftlichen Organisa-tionen. M. Freise, A. Zimmer, (Ed.), Zivilgesellschaft und Wohlfahrtsstaat im Wandel: Akteure, Strategien und Politikfelder. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 23-54. google scholar
  • ZiviZ. (2023). ZIVIZ-SURVEY: Die zentrale reprasentative Datenerhebung zur organisierten Zivilgesellschaft in Deutschland. https://www.ziviz.de/ziviz-survey. (10.04.2023). google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Kalkan, M. (2023). Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(84), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999


AMA

Kalkan M. Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization. Journal of Social Policy Conferences. 2023;0(84):209-226. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999


ABNT

Kalkan, M. Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 84, p. 209-226, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kalkan, Murat,. 2023. “Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 84: 209-226. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kalkan, Murat,. Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 84 (May. 2024): 209-226. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999


Harvard: Australian Style

Kalkan, M 2023, 'Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization', Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 84, pp. 209-226, viewed 18 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kalkan, M. (2023) ‘Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization’, Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(84), pp. 209-226. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999 (18 May. 2024).


MLA

Kalkan, Murat,. Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 84, 2023, pp. 209-226. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999


Vancouver

Kalkan M. Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization. Journal of Social Policy Conferences [Internet]. 18 May. 2024 [cited 18 May. 2024];0(84):209-226. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999 doi: 10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999


ISNAD

Kalkan, Murat. Civil Society in Germany: Its Conceptualization and Organization”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0/84 (May. 2024): 209-226. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1274999



TIMELINE


Submitted31.03.2023
Accepted14.06.2023
Published Online12.07.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.