References

• Ahmed, Sara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004. google scholar
• Angus, Bill. “Metadrama, Authority and the Roots of Incredulity.” In Drama and the Postmodern, edited by Daniel K. Jernigan, 45-60. New York: Cambria Press, 2008. google scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. Postmodern Ethics. Oxfordshire: Wiley-Blackwell, 1993. google scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds, New Hampshire: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. google scholar
• Belsey, Catherine. “Postmodern Love: Questioning the Metaphysics of Desire,” New Literary History 25, no. 3, (1994): 683-705. https: //www.jstor.org/stable/469473 google scholar
• Berlant, Lauren. Desire/Love. New York: Punctum Books, 2012. google scholar
• Bertha, Csilla. “Theatre within the Theatre, Play within the Play—Self-Reflexivity in Jim Nolan’s Blackwater Angel.” In Focus: Papers in English Literary and Cultural Studies, ed. Maria Kurdi, 93-104. Pecs: University of Pecs Press, 2012. google scholar
• Danesi, Marcel. The History of the Kiss!: The Birth of Popular Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. google scholar
• Felski, Rita. “In the Name of Love.” In Love, Etc.: Essays on Contemporary Literature and Culture, edited by Rita Felski and Camilla Schwartz, 1-24. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2024. google scholar
• Fisher, Gerhard, and Bernhard Greiner. “The Play within the Play: Scholarly Perspectives.” In The Play within the Play: The Performance of Meta-Theatre and Self-Reflection, edited by Gerhard Fisher and Bernhard Greiner, xi-xvi. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007. google scholar
• Geis, Deborah. “Sarah Ruhl.” In The Methuen Drama Guide to Contemporary American Playwrights, edited by Martin Middeke et. al, 261-278. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 2014. google scholar
• hooks, bell. All About Love: New Visions. New York: Harper Collins, 2000. google scholar
• Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Parody. New York: Routledge, 1991. google scholar
• Illouz, Eva. Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997. google scholar
• Illouz, Eva. Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. Cornwall: Polity Press, 2012. google scholar
• Isherwood, Charles. “‘Stage Kiss,’ a Sarah Ruhl Comedy, at Playwrights Horizons,” New York Times, March 2, 2014. https://www.nytimes.com/ 2014/03/03/theater/stage-kiss-a-sarah-ruhl-comedy-at-playwrights-horizons.html. google scholar
• McNulty, Eugene. “Parody, Metatheatre, and the Postmodern Turn: A Secret History of Irish Drama.” In Drama and the Postmodern, edited by Daniel K. Jernigan, 61-84. New York: Cambria Press, 2008. google scholar
• Muse, Amy. The Drama and Theatre of Sarah Ruhl. London: Methuen Drama, 2018. google scholar
• Nancy, Jean Luc. “Shattered Love.” In The Inoperative Community, edited by Peter Connor, 82-109. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991. google scholar
• Phillips, Adam. On Kissing, Tickling and Being Bored: Psychoanalytic Essays on the Unexamined Life. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1993. google scholar
• Ruhl, Sarah. Stage Kiss. New York: Samuel French, Inc., 2012. google scholar
• Shepherd-Barr, Kirsten. Science on Stage: From Doctor Faustus to Copenhagen. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006. google scholar
• Sorian, Adina. “Living in Liquid Times: Precariousness and Plasticity in Forced Entertainment’s Tomorrow’s Parties.” In Of Precariousness: Vulnerabilities, Responsibilities, Communities in 21st-Century British Drama and Theatre, edited by Mireia Aragay and Martin Middeke, 141-155. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2017. google scholar
• Stöckl, Korbinian. Love in Contemporary British Drama: Traditions and Transformations of a Cultural Emotion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2021. google scholar
• Sypher, Wylie. “Aesthetic of Revolution: The Marxist Melodrama.” The Kenyon Review 10, no. 3 (1948): 431-44. http://wwwjstor.org/stable/ 4332964. google scholar

Citations