Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jtcd.1265648   IUP :10.26650/jtcd.1265648    Full Text (PDF)

Sahnede Robotlaşma

Zümre Gizem Yılmaz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, posthümanizm felsefesi ışığında robotik bedenlerin konumunu sorgulamak ve bu bedenlerle ilişkisine göre insanların yeniden tanımına katkıda bulunmaktadır. Bunun yanı sıra, bu çalışmada hedeflenen bir diğer nokta artık hayatın pek çok alanında karşımıza çıkan robotların varlığını tiyatro sahnelerinde izleyip robotların sahne sanatlarındaki yerini de tartışmaktır. Dahası, tiyatro sahnelerinde ve konser salonlarında bir süredir karşımıza çıkan robotik bedenlerle karşı karşıya kalan ve bu bedenler vasıtasıyla insanlığın özüne ve süregelen konumuna ulaşan insanların insanlığını kaybetme korkusunun ve endişesinin nedenlerini de ortaya koymaktadır. Bu endişelerin kaynağının insan merkezli bakış açısıyla şekillenen felsefi akımlarla çizilmiş Üstün İnsan algısı olduğunu da gösteren bu çalışma, insanın aslında ne olduğunun robotlar da dâhil olmak üzere pek çok eyleyiciyle ilişkisine göre yeniden anlamlandırılması gerektiğinin altını çizmektedir. 

DOI :10.26650/jtcd.1265648   IUP :10.26650/jtcd.1265648    Full Text (PDF)

Robotization on Stage

Zümre Gizem Yılmaz

This article aims to question the position of robotics and contribute to redefining humans based on their relationships with robotics within the framework of posthumanism. Apart from this, the article further analyzes the place of robots, which humanity is now facing in most of the areas in daily life, by tracing their existence in performance art and on stage. Moreover, this article grasps the essence and ongoing condition of humans through the robotic bodies that have been encountered for some time on theatre stages and in concert halls, thereby underscoring the human fear and anxiety over losing one’s humanity when faced with such bodies. Showcasing how the perception of human superiority as shaped by a human-centered perspective lies at the root of these anxieties, this article underlines the necessity to reconceptualize what being human actually means through humans’ entangled relationships with a number of agents, including robots.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The focal point of this article involves questioning what being human means with regard to the web of dynamic relationships with a number of agencies, including but not limited to robotic bodies, which point to the technological evolution of humanity. The novel dynamics in robotization have paved the way for certain anthropocentric anxieties to lose human agency vis a vis robotic bodies by gaining greater agency to impact their environments. This article aims within the framework of posthumanism to overthrow this anthropocentric anxiety and to shatter the myth of human superiority that was formulated especially in accordance with the Enlightenment’s emphasis on the privilege of reason. By acknowledging the material and discursive interconnectedness in the process of making meaning, posthumanism has become the critical confuting of the anthropocentric positioning of humans as implemented by the humanist and Enlightenment discourses and ideas, hence challenging Cartesian dualism. Posthumanism revisits and redefines what being human means by opposing the separation of body and mind in the form of human existence and by challenging humans’ assumed superior and distinctive position and exceptionalism. In so doing, posthumanism also further criticizes and blurs ontological and epistemological categorizations by highlighting the inevitable and inseparable relations humans have with other agencies such as nonhuman animals, plants, elemental bodies, robotic bodies, toxic formations, seasons, radiation, continental policies, and social and cultural formations. Although posthumanism is not limited to only robotic redefinitions of what being human means, robotization still plays a key role in showcasing humans’ redefinition through posthumanist inquiries. From this perspective, this article aims to analyze how robots prevail in modern society, whether in the workforce or in artistic areas such as performance studies. This article exemplifies two famous robot musicians to trace the beginnings of the robotic presence in the music industry. The first example involves Shimon, a skilled musician developed in 2017 by Prof. Gil Weinberg at the Georgia Institute of Technology for a robotic music project. The second one involves Hatsune Miku, a virtual mixture of the vocal artist Saki Fujita, the anime designer Kei, and Crypton Future Media, Inc., as these two examples already show how robotic bodies have started to prevail in performance art. In addition to these two nonhuman bodies that are famous in the music industry, this article also draws attention to robot actors, in particular to the Seinendan Theatre Company and Osaka University Robot Theatre Project. This article also provides some robot theatre examples within this project, including La Métamorphose (2014) as a co-production of Japanese and French performance art, Sayonara (2013), and I, Worker (2013), all of which were written and directed by Oriza Hirata. Though not included in the above-mentioned robot theatre project, Francesca Talenti’s The Uncanny Valley (2013) and Rimini Protokoll’s Uncanny Valley (2022)  are other examples of robot theatre. All these plays distinctively illustrate the dominance of robot actors on theatre stage as a counterpart to their human colleagues. In addition to these robot performers, the article also acknowledges the conceptual insertion of robotic and virtual bodies into plays long before the material introduction of robotic bodies on stage. A quotation from Caryl Churchill’s Love and Information (2012) illustrates how virtual bodies have been conceptually discussed in dramatic plays. This example also underlines the clash between the virtual/robotic embodiment and physical embodiment that appears in the dichotomy between organic and inorganic bodies. This dichotomy underlines humanity’s ancient fear about losing their essential and organic existence to inorganic machines. This fear is at the heart of blurring the line between life and death, thus indicating humanity’s obsession with defining life in human terms. By granting cogency to the posthumanist redefinition of humanity, this article hints at humanity’s evolution with robotic bodies. American soldier Craig Lundberg showcases how a human body can evolve through constant interaction with robotic and technological extensions and insertions. Upon taking all these examples and theoretical discussions into consideration, this article redefines and revises what being human means using post-humanist ideas with references to a number of robot theatre performers.


PDF View

References

  • Asimov, Isaac. I, Robot. New York, Gnome Press, 1950. google scholar
  • Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007. google scholar
  • Batukan, Can. Anima-lizm: İnsan, Hayvan ve Bitkilerde Ruh Üzerine. İstanbul: Altıkırkbeş Yayınları, 2016. google scholar
  • Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013. google scholar
  • Brooks, Rodney A. Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. New York: Pantheon Books, 2002. google scholar
  • Blinded Merseyside soldier ‘sees’ with tongue device. BBC. 2010. Erişim: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/mobile/ uk_news/england/merseyside/8568485.stm google scholar
  • Churchill, Caryl. Love and Information. Londra: Nick Hern Books, 2012. google scholar
  • Collins, Nick. “Trading Faures: Virtual Musicians and Machine Ethics.” Leonardo Music Journal 21, (2011): 35-40. google scholar
  • Courtland, Rachel. Review: The Uncanny Valley, a Play by Francesca Talenti that Puts a Robot Actor on Stage. Spectrum. (2015). Erişim: https://spectrum.ieee.org/geek-life/reviews/review-the-uncanny-valley google scholar
  • Dawkins, Richard. River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life. Londra: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1995. google scholar
  • Derrida, Jacques. “The Animal That Therefore I am (More to Follow).” Çeviren David Wills. Critical Inquiry 28. 2, (2002): 369-418. google scholar
  • Dinello, Daniel. Technophobia!: Science Fiction Visions of Posthuman Technology. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, 2005. google scholar
  • Haraway, Donna J. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991. google scholar
  • Hayles, Katherine N. “How We Became Posthuman: Ten Years On An Interview with N. Katherine Hayles.” Paragraph 33.3, (2010): 318-330. google scholar
  • Hayles, Katherine N. “Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to Cognisphere.” Theory, Culture and Society 23, (2006): 159-166. google scholar
  • Hassan, Ihab. “Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Posthumanist Culture?” The Georgia Review 31.4, (1977): 830-850. google scholar
  • Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. New York: Vintage, 2004. google scholar
  • Jones, Steve. The Language of the Genes: Biology, History and the Evolutionary Future. Londra: Flamingo, 2000. google scholar
  • Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. google scholar
  • Pepperell, Robert. The Posthuman Condition: Consciousness Beyond the Brain. Bristol: Intellect Books, 2003. google scholar
  • “Rimini Protokoll’den Tekinsiz Vadi.” https://teboyun.com/rimini-protokollden-tekinsiz-vadi/ google scholar
  • Rosner, Krisztina. “The Gaze of the Robot: Oriza Hirata’s Robot Theatre.” The Theatre Times (2018). Erişim: https://thetheatretimes.com/the-gaze-of-the-robot/ google scholar
  • Shimon Robot. Erişim: https://www.shimonrobot.com/info google scholar
  • Soloski, Alexis. “SeinendanTheater Company and Osaka University Robot Theater Project Written and Directed by Oriza Hirata. Rev. of Sayanora and I, Worker, dir. Oriza Hirata.” Theatre Journal 65. 3, (2013): 400-402. google scholar
  • Steckenfinger, Shawn A. ve Asif A. Ghazanfar. “Monkey Visual Behavior Falls into the Uncanny Valley.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106. 43, (2009): 1836218366. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Yılmaz, Z.G. (2023). Sahnede Robotlaşma. Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy, 0(36), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.26650/jtcd.1265648


AMA

Yılmaz Z G. Sahnede Robotlaşma. Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy. 2023;0(36):47-62. https://doi.org/10.26650/jtcd.1265648


ABNT

Yılmaz, Z.G. Sahnede Robotlaşma. Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 36, p. 47-62, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yılmaz, Zümre Gizem,. 2023. “Sahnede Robotlaşma.” Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy 0, no. 36: 47-62. https://doi.org/10.26650/jtcd.1265648


Chicago: Humanities Style

Yılmaz, Zümre Gizem,. Sahnede Robotlaşma.” Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy 0, no. 36 (May. 2024): 47-62. https://doi.org/10.26650/jtcd.1265648


Harvard: Australian Style

Yılmaz, ZG 2023, 'Sahnede Robotlaşma', Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy, vol. 0, no. 36, pp. 47-62, viewed 18 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jtcd.1265648


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yılmaz, Z.G. (2023) ‘Sahnede Robotlaşma’, Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy, 0(36), pp. 47-62. https://doi.org/10.26650/jtcd.1265648 (18 May. 2024).


MLA

Yılmaz, Zümre Gizem,. Sahnede Robotlaşma.” Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy, vol. 0, no. 36, 2023, pp. 47-62. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jtcd.1265648


Vancouver

Yılmaz ZG. Sahnede Robotlaşma. Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy [Internet]. 18 May. 2024 [cited 18 May. 2024];0(36):47-62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jtcd.1265648 doi: 10.26650/jtcd.1265648


ISNAD

Yılmaz, ZümreGizem. Sahnede Robotlaşma”. Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy 0/36 (May. 2024): 47-62. https://doi.org/10.26650/jtcd.1265648



TIMELINE


Submitted15.03.2023
Accepted22.05.2023
Published Online12.06.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.