Research Article


DOI :10.26650/LITERA2020-0027   IUP :10.26650/LITERA2020-0027    Full Text (PDF)

Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis

Kadir Can Dilber

The concept of mimesis (imitation) developed by Aristotle, producing the foundations of Plato, forms the essence of today’s recognition of art and literature. According to Aristotle, as long as the subject can relate to the object, pure production continues; otherwise there is no production with the world of Ideas. The phase of entering into the imitated object integrating with it and feeling it comes into action. Aristotle describes this phase as “that everything is perceived through opposites”. At the beginning of the 1900s, German philosophers emphasized the importance of humannature relations and developed the concept of einfühlung/empathy based on Aristotle’s principle. With the evolution of this theory, objects are reconsidered not only as simple objects but also as objects in which subjects identify with them, give feeling and interact with them. Translated into English as empathy, this concept is also called “feeling into” because it does not fully correspond. Einfühlung is not only a concept but also a theory. Although the thoughts on this theory are extensive, it is seen that a general comprehensive framework has not yet been established and comparative examinations have not been done. This study covers the examination and comparison of story examples from German, American and Turkish literature in the context of the relationship between the object created as an imitation element and the subject, rather than providing extensive information about the emergence, development and problems of the Einfühlung concept. In this context, the stories of Franz Kafka’s Die Sorge des Hausvaters (1919), Odradek an ambiguous entity with Ernest Hemingway’s Cat in the Rain (1925) and Samovar (1935) by Sait Faik Abasıyanık stories will be analyzed according to the einfühlung/empathy theory.

DOI :10.26650/LITERA2020-0027   IUP :10.26650/LITERA2020-0027    Full Text (PDF)

Odradek’in Belirsizliğinde Yağmur’daki Kedi’yi Semaver’de Kaybetmek -Mimesis’in Odağında Einfühlung’u Keşfetmek-

Kadir Can Dilber

Platon’un temellerini atıp Aristo’nun geliştirdiği mimesis (taklit) kavramı bugünün sanat ve edebiyat anlayışının özünü oluşturur. Aristo’ya göre subje, obje ile ilişki kurabildiği sürece salt üretim devam eder aksi taktirde idealar dünyası ile bir üretim söz konusu değildir. Taklit edilen objenin içerisine girmek onunla bütünleşmek onu hissetmek evresi devreye girer. Aristo bu evreyi “her şeyin karşıtlıkları aracılığıyla algılandığı” şeklinde tanımlar. 1900’lü yılların başında doğa ile insan ilişkisinin önemine daha çok değinen Alman filozoflar, Aristo’nun prensibinden hareketle einfühlung/ özdeşleyim kavramını geliştirirler. Bu teorinin ortaya çıkmasıyla birlikte objelerin sadece basit birer varlık olarak değil aynı zamanda subjelerin onlarla özdeşleştiği onlara his kazandırdığı ve etkileşim sağladığı varlıklar olarak yeniden değerlendirilir. İngilizceye “empathy” olarak çevrilen bu kavram tam olarak karşılığını sağlamadığı için “feeling into” olarak da adlandırılır. Einfühlung sadece bir kavram değil aynı zamanda bir teoridir. Bu teori üzerine yazılan çalışmalar çok fazla olmasına rağmen genel kapsamlı bir çerçevenin henüz oluşturulamadığı ve karşılaştırmalı çalışmaların yapılmadığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışma Einfühlung kavramının ortaya çıkışı, gelişimi ve problemleri hakkında geniş bilgiler vermekten ziyade, taklit unsuru olarak yaratılan objenin subje ile ilişkisi bağlamında Alman, Amerikan ve Türk edebiyatlarından öykü örneklerinin incelenmesini ve karşılaştırılmasını kapsar. Bu bağlamda öncelikle Franz Kafka Die Sorge des Hausvaters (1919) öyküsündeki belirsiz bir varlık olan Odradek ile Ernest Hemingway’ın Cat in the Rain (Yağmur’daki Kedi) (1925) ve Sait Faik Abasıyanık’ın Semaver (1935) öyküleri einfühlung/özdeşleyim teorisi çerçevesinde incelenmeye çalışılacaktır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Plato’s determination based on the cave forms the basis of today’s concept of art. According to him, everything in the world we live in is mimesis. According to him, everything in the world in which lives is imitation. The imitation cannot express what is real, so it is unnecessary and should not be used. The wood that exists in nature becomes a cedar with the skill of the carpenter, and the painter paints it because he sees it. Unlike Plato, his student Aristotle states that the world can be gripped with the concept of imitation. According to him, things are not only imitations by the artist, but they are also the ones that close the deficiency of nature and provide pleasure in the individual.

The concept of mimesis (imitation) developed by Aristotle, producing the foundations of Plato, forms the essence of today’s recognition of art and literature. According to Aristotle, as long as the subject can relate to the object, pure production continues; otherwise, there is no production with the world of Ideas. The phase of entering into the imitated object, integrating with it, and feeling it comes into action. Aristotle describes this phase as “that everything is perceived through opposites”. At the beginning of the 1900s, German philosophers emphasized the importance of human-nature relations and developed the concept of Einfühlung/Empathy based on Aristotle’s principle.  

The relationship of the subject with the objects begins to be evaluated more clearly in the framework of the Einfühlung/Empathy theory in the early 19th century. With the emergence of this theory, objectives are re-evaluated not only as single entities, but as entities that the subjects identify with, bring feelings and interact with. Although the thoughts on Einfühlung/Empathy theory are many, it is seen that a general comprehensive framework has not been established yet.

When the sense of pleasure in literary texts is considered, three different imitations are encountered. Firstly, the empathy form, in which the subject relates to the object, begins in the process of creating the artwork. The author selects and reproduces beings from the world of phenomena. Secondly is the connection of the text produced with the reader where the feeling of pleasure comes to the forefront. Thirdly, the process of empathy the characters in the text with the beings, where the analysis provides a complete understanding of the second stage.

Franz Kafka’s story Die Sorge des Hausvaters (printed in 1919) written between 1914 and 1917 has a critical peculiarity that can be distinguished from others. He calls “Odradek” this entity produced in the text as both a subject and an object. This entity, which stands out as an object in the way that the Family Father perceives, becomes a subject later in the story.

Ernest Hemingway’s Cat in the Rain story was published in 1925 and is one of the most controversial texts on it. Hemingway’s Cat in the Rain is one of the most appropriate texts for Einfühlung/Empathy in terms of short story examples. When the text is divided into construction segments, it is seen that imitation is actually between two subjects and two objects.

Sait Faik Abasıyanık’s Samovar story written in 1935 is a text-based on Ali’s mother who works as a worker in the factory and his relationship with the samovar. Unlike Hemingway’s “Cat in the Rain” story, the object appears to have a direct effect on the subject. When the text is read carefully, it is noteworthy that the samovar is positioned in the text to provide katharsis (purification), as well as to perceive Einfühlung/Empathy as an object.

Consequently, the concept of Einfühlung/Empathy will be explored in a junction as an essential method for understanding the world of phenomena that modern human beings are continually producing to escape, not even in the context of art and literature, but also imprisoned him.


PDF View

References

  • Abasıyanık, S. F. (2004). Semaver. İstabul: YKY. google scholar
  • Anar, T. (2013). “Edebiyat eserlerini anlamak ve yorumlamak için farklı bir yöntem: Einfühlung teorisi. Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi 49, 23–46. google scholar
  • Aristo. (1935). On th Soul. London: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Baker, C. (1952). Hemingway: The writer as artist. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Baker, C. (1981). Ernest Hemingway, selection letters. New York: Scribner. google scholar
  • Barthes, R. (2006). Yazının sıfır derecesi. (T. Yücel, Çev.). İstanbul : Metis Yayınları. google scholar
  • Benjamin, W. (2015). Kafka üzerine. (D. Kurt, Çev.). İstanbul: Altıkırkbeş Yayın. google scholar
  • Baudrillard, J. (2010). Nesneler sistemi. (O. Adanır, A. Karamollaoğlu, Çev.). İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Chatman, S. (2001). Some sunshine on “Cat in the Rain”. Narrative, Vol. 9, No.2, Contemporary Narratology, 217–222. google scholar
  • Flaubert, G. (2005). Letters about Madame Bovary . New York: W.W. Norton & Company. google scholar
  • Freud, S. (2016). Psikanalize giriş dersleri. (S. Budak, Çev.). Ankara: Öteki Yayınları. google scholar
  • Hagopian, J. V. (1963). Symmetry in “Cat in the Rain”. College English, Vol. 24, No. 3 , 220–222. google scholar
  • Hamacher, W. (1996). Premises: essays on philosophy and literature from Kant to Celan. (trans. Peter Fenves). London: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Heidegger, M. (2007). Sanat eserinin kökeni. Ankara: De Ki Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Hemingway, E. (2017). The short stories of Ernest Hemingway. (Edit. S. Hemingway) Newyork: Scribner. google scholar
  • Hikmet, N. (1987). Sanat ve edebiyat üstüne yazılar. (Haz. Aziz Çalışlar). İstanbul: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları. google scholar
  • Issı, A. C. (2018). “Alternatif bir okuma denemesi Sait Faik Abasıyanık’ın hikâyelerini nesnelerinden dolaşmak”. (Ed. A. Cüneyt Issı, Tuncay Bolat), Hikâye kuran nesneler. Ankara: Hece Yayınları. google scholar
  • Kafka, F. (2012). Bütün Öyküler. (K. Şipal, Çev). İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Lipps, T. (1903). Ästhetik . Hamburg und Leipzig. Lodge, D. (1980). Analysis and ınterpretation of the realist text: A pluralistic approach to Ernest Hemingway’s “Cat in the Rain. Poetics Today, 1(4) 5–22. google scholar
  • Lukacs, G. (1998). Tarih ve sınıf bilinci . (Y. Öner, Çev.). İstanbul: Belge Yayınları. google scholar
  • Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: philosphy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
  • Naci, F. (2008). Sait Faik’in hikâyeciliği. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Nowak, M. “The Complicated History of Einfühlung.” Argument:Biannual Philosophical Journal. 1(2), 301–326. google scholar
  • Platon. (1995). Devlet. (S. Eyüboğlu, M.A. Cimcoz, Çev). İstanbul: Remzi Kitapevi. google scholar
  • Prandtl, A. (1910). Die Einfühlung. Leipzig. google scholar
  • Schapiro, M. (1968). The still life as a personel object-A note on Heidegger and van Gogh. Berlin, Heidelberg: In: Simmel M.L. (eds) The Reach of Mind. Springer. google scholar
  • Steegmuller, F. (1939). Flaubert and Madame Bovary, a double portrait. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux. Stein, E. (2008). Zum problem der Einfühlung. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder. google scholar
  • Tunalı, İ. (2008). Felsefenin ışığında modern resim. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Vischer, R. (1873). Uber Das Optische Formgefuhl: Ein Beitrag zur Aesthetik. Leipzig: Credner. google scholar
  • Wispé, L. (1987). History of the concept of empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Cambridge studies in social and emotional development. Empathy and its development (p. 17–37). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Worringer, W. (1985). Soyutlama ve özdeşleyim (İ. Tunalı, Çev.). İstanbul: Remzi Kitapevi. google scholar
  • Zizek, S. (2014). Paralaks (S. Gürses, Çev.). İstanbul: Encore Yayınları. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/stereotyping (25/12/2019). google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Dilber, K. (2020). Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 30(1), 223-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0027


AMA

Dilber K. Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies. 2020;30(1):223-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0027


ABNT

Dilber, K. Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, [Publisher Location], v. 30, n. 1, p. 223-243, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Dilber, Kadir Can,. 2020. “Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis.” Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 30, no. 1: 223-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0027


Chicago: Humanities Style

Dilber, Kadir Can,. Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis.” Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 30, no. 1 (Jun. 2025): 223-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0027


Harvard: Australian Style

Dilber, K 2020, 'Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis', Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 223-243, viewed 6 Jun. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0027


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Dilber, K. (2020) ‘Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis’, Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 30(1), pp. 223-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0027 (6 Jun. 2025).


MLA

Dilber, Kadir Can,. Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis.” Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, vol. 30, no. 1, 2020, pp. 223-243. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0027


Vancouver

Dilber K. Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies [Internet]. 6 Jun. 2025 [cited 6 Jun. 2025];30(1):223-243. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0027 doi: 10.26650/LITERA2020-0027


ISNAD

Dilber, Kadir Can. Lost Cat in The Rain in Samovar in the Ambiguous of Odradek -Exploring Einfühlung/Empathy at the Focus of Mimesis”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 30/1 (Jun. 2025): 223-243. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2020-0027



TIMELINE


Submitted13.02.2020
Accepted03.03.2020
Published Online24.06.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.