References

• Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. google scholar
• Andrew, D. (1984). Concepts in FILM THEORY. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Aras, G. (2017). Literature and film: Different approaches to two narrrative forms. CÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 41(2), 33-54. https://cujos.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/tr/download/article-file/392514 google scholar
• Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Texas: U of Texas Press. google scholar
• Baldick, C. (1990). Dictionary of literary terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text (S. Heath, Trans.). New York: The Noonday Press. google scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. google scholar
• Bialkowski, B. (2001). Facing up to the question of fidelity: The example of A Tale of Two Cities. Literature Film Quarterly, 29(3), 203-209. google scholar
• Brownen, M. & Ringham, F. (2006). Key terms in Semiotics. Bloomsbury Publishing: Continuum. google scholar
• Bryant J. (2013). Textual identity and adaptive revision: Editing adaptation as a fluid text. Adaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 46-67. google scholar
• Cardwell, S. (2007). Adaptation studies revisited: Purposes, perspectives, and inspiration. In J. M. Welsh & P. Lev (Eds.). The literature/film reader: Issues of adaptation (pp. 51-64). Toronto: Scarecrow. google scholar
• Cartmell, D. & Whelehan, I. (2007). Introduction-literature on screen: A synoptic view. In D. Cartmell and I. Whelehan (Eds.). The Cambridge companion to literature on screen (pp. 1-12). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. google scholar
• Chair, L.C. (2006). Literature into film: Theory and practical approaches. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Co. google scholar
• Corrigan, T. (2017). Defining adaptation. In T.M. Leitch (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of adaptation studies (pp. 3548). UK: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Desmond, J. & Hawkes, P. (2006). Adaptation: Studying film and literature. New York: McGraw-Hill. google scholar
• Ellis, J. (1982). The literary adaptation: An introduction. Screen, 23(1), 3-5. google scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discource and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Genette, G. (1997). Palimpsests: Literature in the second degree (C. Newman & C. Doubinsky, Trans.). London: University of Nebraska Press. google scholar
• Hutcheon, L. (2013). A theory of adaptation. New York: Routledge. google scholar
• Hutton, S. (2011). Before Frankenstein. In J. A. Hayden (Ed.). The new science and women’s literary discourse: Prefiguring Frankenstein (pp. 17-28). New York: Palgrave McMillan. google scholar
• Irmak, Ç. (Producer). (2023). Yaratılan [TV series]. Netflix Films. google scholar
• Irwin, W. (2004). Against intertextuality. Philosophy and Literature, 28(2), 227-242. google scholar
• Karadağ, Ö. (2003, Aralık). Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein in nineteenth century Ottoman İstanbul: Function of appropriation and performance in Çağan Irmak’s Creature [Öz]. Akademik Bilişim Konferansında sunulan bildiri, Theatre and Drama Studies Conference II, Adaptation, Appropriation and Translation, İstanbul. Erişim: https://www.academia.edu/106476556/CFP_2nd_Theatre_and_Drama_Studies_Conference_TDN_ Adaptation_Appropriation_Translation_2023_ google scholar
• Kiraly, H. (2013). The medium strikes back- ‘Impossible adaptation’ revisited. In J. Bruhn, A. Gjelsvik & E. F. Hanssen (Eds.). Adaptation studies: New challenges, new directions. London: Bloomsbury Academic. google scholar
• Kline, K. E. (1996). The accidental tourist on page and on screen: Interrogating normative theories about film adaptation. Literature Film Quarterly, 24(1), 70-83. google scholar
• Kristeva, J. (1986). The Kristeva reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. google scholar
• Leitch, T. (2003). Twelve fallacies in contemporary adaptation theory. Criticism, 45(2), 149-71. google scholar
• Livingston, P. (2010). On the appreciation of cinematic adaptations. Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind, 4(2), 104-127. google scholar
• McFarlane, B. (1996). Novel to film: An introduction to the theory of adaptation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. google scholar
• Newman, C. (1985). The postmodern aura. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. google scholar
• Özsoy, N. (2020). Osmanlı medyasında batılılaşma, din ve gelenek. Academic Social Resources Journal, 5(13), 251258. google scholar
• Palmer, R. B. (2017). Continuation, adaptation studies, and the never-finished text. In J. Grossman (Ed.). Adaptation in visual culture: Images, texts, and their multiple worlds (pp. 73-99). London: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Perin, C. (1946). Tanzimat edebiyatında Fransız tesiri. İstanbul: Pulhan Matbaası. google scholar
• Ray, R. B. (2000). The field of ‘Literature and Film’. In J. Naremore (Ed.). Film Adaptation. London: Athlone Press. google scholar
• Rich, A. (1972). When we dead awaken: Writing as re-vision. College English, 34 (1), 18-30. google scholar
• Sanders, J. (2006). Adaptation and appropriation. Canada: Routledge. google scholar
• Scognamillo, G. (1973). Türk sinemasında yabancı uyarlamalar. İstanbul: Yedinci Sanat. google scholar
• Shelley, M. (1993). Frankenstein or, the modern Prometheus. The Project Gutenberg eBook. google scholar
• Sinyard, N. (1986). Filming literature: The art of screen adaptation. London: Croom Helm. google scholar
• Smith, M. (1995). Engaging characters: Fiction, emotion, and the cinema. Oxford: Clarendon Press. google scholar
• Stam, R. (2000). Beyond fidelity: The dialogics of adaptation. In J. Naremore (Ed.). Film adaptation (pp. 54-78). Great Britain: The Athlone Press. google scholar
• ________(2005). Introduction: The theory and practice of adaptation. In R. Stam & A. Raengo (Eds.). Literature and film: A guide to the theory and practice of film adaptation (pp. 1- 52). Malden, MA: Blackwell. google scholar
• Thornburg, M. K. P. (1984). The monster in the mirror. Michigan: UMI Research Press. google scholar
• Wagner, G. (1975). The novel and the cinema. Cranbury, New Jersey: Associated University Presses, Inc. google scholar
• Whelehan, I. (2006). Adaptations: The contemporary dilemmas. In D. Cartmell & I. Whelehan (Eds.). Adaptations: From text to screen, screen to text (pp. 3-19). London: Routledge. google scholar

Citations