Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003   IUP :10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003    Full Text (PDF)

Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law

Cüneyt Yüksel

Combating terrorism has become a critical international issue. Terrorist groups now benefit from the opportunities offered by the Internet and social media, utilizing online resources to command, control, and communicate with their networks, and to shape their narratives in ways that speak to public concerns and attract new recruits. Thus far, the international community has developed legal instruments that offer solutions to the problem of Internet and social media use by terrorist groups. Such efforts are being led by the United Nations (UN), the European Council, and the European Union (EU). However, the creation of legal regulations faces difficulties due to the rapid development of novel Internet and social media features. Finding a fair balance between regulations and the protection of individual rights, and in particular, freedom of expression, is difficult. Therefore, most of the debate revolving around this issue centers on finding a balance between the imperative to combat terrorist use of the Internet and social media and the protection of freedom of expression. This article discusses the boundary between state responsibility to combat terrorist content online and the obligation to respect and protect human rights. The article begins by emphasizing the reality of the proliferation of terrorist propaganda online and then expounds the main concepts relating to terrorist group use of the Internet and social media. International regulations and the decisions of international legal bodies pertaining to the proliferation of terrorist content online are then examined. In conclusion, critical issues and solutions offered to combat terrorist use of the Internet and social media are propounded.

DOI :10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003   IUP :10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003    Full Text (PDF)

Uluslararası Hukukta İnternet ve Sosyal Medyanın Terörist Amaçlarla Kullanılmasına Karşı Mücadele ve Çözüm Önerileri

Cüneyt Yüksel

Terörizmle mücadele son yıllarda uluslararası toplumun en önemli meselelerinden biri haline gelmiştir. İnternet ve sosyal medyanın imkânlarından faydalanan terörist gruplar internet ve sosyal medyayı kendi komuta, kontrol ve iletişim koordinasyonlarını sağlamak amacıyla kullanmaya başlamışlardır. Terörist gruplar internet ve sosyal medyayı örgütlenmenin yanı sıra kamuya hitap eden bir söylem şekillendirmek ve potansiyel üyeler çekmek amacıyla da kullanmaktadır. Uluslararası toplum, bilhassa Birleşmiş Milletler (BM), Avrupa Konseyi ve Avrupa Birliği’nin (AB) öncülüğünde, internet ve sosyal medyanın terörist amaçlarla kullanılması meselesine yönelik çözümler geliştirebilmek için çeşitli hukuki enstrümanlar ortaya koymuştur. Ancak internetin ve sosyal medyanın kendine has özelliklerinden dolayı bu alana ilişkin düzenlenmeler yapmak belli zorluklar arz etmektedir. Başta ifade özgürlüğü hakkı olmak üzere kişisel haklar ile bir denge bulmak bu zorlukların başında gelmektedir. Nitekim söz konusu meseleye ilişkin tartışmaların önemli bir kısmı terörist amaçlı içerikle mücadele ile ifade özgürlüğü arasındaki doğru dengeyi bulmak noktasındadır. Bu makalede, devletlerin internet ve sosyal medyadaki terörist içerikle mücadele etme yükümlülüğü, ayrıca bu yükümlülükle beraber insan haklarına saygı duyma ve insan haklarını koruma yükümlülüğü arasındaki sınır ele alınmaktadır. Makalede ilk olarak, terörist propagandanın internet ve sosyal medya üzerinden yaygınlaştırılması olgusu özellikle vurgulanmış, terörist grupların interneti ve bilhassa sosyal medyayı kullanma yolları temel kavramlar açıklanarak değerlendirilmiştir. Daha sonra, internet ve sosyal medya üzerinden terörist içeriğin yayılmasına ilişkin mevcut uluslararası düzenlemeler ve kararlar incelenmiştir. Son olarak, internet ve sosyal medyadaki terörist içerikle mücadelede dikkat edilmesi gereken hususlar ve çözüm önerileri belirtilmektedir. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Terrorism is now a transnational phenomenon that has increasingly become a globalized issue. Because of this, states can no longer combat this problem alone, and multilateral state cooperation and cooperation between states and non-state actors is required. This fact undoubtedly applies to online terrorist activities. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that civil society and IT companies are involved in the global effort to combat the rise of terrorist activities on the Internet and social media. The fight against terrorism through the Internet and social media has, therefore, become a critical issue for the entire international community, including international law. The concept of cyberterrorism has gained considerable importance as terrorist activities can now easily be conducted, supported, and organized directly through social media and the Internet. Terrorist groups have begun to benefit from the possibilities offered by the Internet and social media, utilizing those resources to command, control, and communicate with their networks, and to shape their narratives in ways that speak to public concerns and attract new recruits.

The Draft Report prepared by the United Nations (UN) Office on Drugs and Crime and the UN Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force accepts cyberattacks, dissemination of information such as propaganda, and incitement as terrorist activities. The international community has so far created certain international law instruments to develop solutions to the problem of the use of the Internet and social media by terrorist groups. These efforts are being led by the UN, the European Council, and the European Union (EU). This article examines UN Resolutions related to cyberterrorism and regulations set forth regarding the use of the Internet and social media for terrorist purposes. It also scrutinizes the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism and the Convention on Cybercrime. However, the development of legal regulations faces difficulties due to the novel features of the Internet and social media. It should be emphasized that a free and open Internet reflects free and open society based on liberal democratic values. Undoubtedly, the right to freedom of expression is of paramount importance in any democratic society, and any restrictions on exercising this right must be subject to a robust justification test. Finding a fair balance between regulations and the protection of individual rights, in this case, the freedom of expression, is particularly difficult. Therefore, most debate revolves around finding the right balance between the imperative to combat terrorist use of the Internet and social media and the protection of freedom of expression. As the Internet and social media have become indispensable to society, these platforms should be considered as another sphere in which the fight against terrorism will continue. As former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon stated, “The Internet is a prime example of how terrorists can behave in a truly transnational way; in response, states need to think and function in an equally transnational manner.”

This article discusses the boundary between state responsibility to combat online terrorist content and the obligation to respect and protect human rights within the context of international law. It will first emphasize the reality of the proliferation of terrorist propaganda through the Internet and social media and then explain the main concepts of Internet and social media use by terrorist groups. The paper will then examine the international law regulations and decisions of various international legal bodies pertaining to the proliferation of terrorist content through the Internet and social media. In conclusion, it will explain the critical issues and solutions offered to combat the use of the Internet and social media for terrorist purposes.


PDF View

References

  • <http://soufangroup.com/news/details/?Article_Id=272> Erişim Tarihi 10 Şubat 2020. google scholar
  • <https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Research_report_internet_ENG.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 16 Ocak 2020, 46. google scholar
  • <https://www.gifct.org> Erişim Tarihi 30 Ocak 2020. google scholar
  • <https://www.un.org/sc/ctc/resources/general-assembly/un-global-counter-terrorism-strategy/> Erişim Tarihi 14 Ocak 2020. google scholar
  • AB, Terörle Mücadele Direktifi (2017) <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017L0541> Erişim Tarihi 14 Şubat 2020. google scholar
  • Ahmet Yıldırım v Türkiye App no 3111/10 (ECHR 18 Aralık 2012) para 48. google scholar
  • Article 19, ‘The Impact of Anti-Terror Laws on Freedom of Expression’ (Submission to ICI Panel of Eminent Jurists on Terrorism, Counterterrorism and Human Rights, Londra, 2006) 7. google scholar
  • Avrupa Birliği, ‘EU rules on terrorist offences and related penalties’ (2002) 2002/475/JHA. google scholar
  • Avrupa Konseyi Bakanlar Komitesi, ‘İnsan Hakları Ve Terörle Mücadele Kılavuz İlkeleri’ (804. Toplantı 11 Temmuz 2002), m. 1. google scholar
  • Avrupa Konseyi Bakanlar Konseyi, ‘Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers on protecting freedom of expression and information in times of crisis’ (26 Eylül 2007) §19. google scholar
  • Avrupa Konseyi Parlamento Meclisi, Tavsiye 1706 (2005) “Medya ve Terörizm”. google scholar
  • Avrupa Konseyi Parlementerler Meclisi, (Tavsiye Kararı 1426 1999), para 5, <http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=16752&lang=en.> Erişim Tarihi 15 Ocak 2020. google scholar
  • Avrupa Konseyi Terörizmin Önlenmesi Sözleşmesi (2005) m. 5. google scholar
  • Avrupa Konseyi, ‘Irkçılık ve Yabancı Düşmanlığı ile Mücadeleye ilişkin Konsey Kararı’ <https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-and-xenophobia/combating-racism-and-xenophobia_en> Erişim Tarihi 14 Şubat 2020. google scholar
  • Banisar D, ‘Speaking of Terror’ (COE 28-29 Mayıs 2009) < https://rm.coe.int/168048622f > Erişim Tarihi 19 Ocak 2020, 20. google scholar
  • Bilgisayar sistemleri yoluyla işlenen ırkçı ve yabancı düşmanlığı niteliğinde eylemlerin suç kabul edilmesiyle ilgili siber suç konulu Sözleşme Ek Protokolü (2002). google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Genel Kurul Kararı (16 Ocak 1997) A/RES/51/210 google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Genel Kurul Kararı ‘Twelfth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice’ (21 Aralık 2010) A/RES/65/230 <http://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and prison%20reform/AGMs/General_Assembly_resolution_65-230_E.pdf > Erişim Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2012. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Genel Kurul Kararı, ‘Birleşmiş Milletler Küresel Terörle Mücadele Stratejisi’ (8 Eylül 2006) A/RES/60/288, para 4. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konsey Kararı (2001) S/RES/1373. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konsey Kararı (9 December 2015) S/RES/2250. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi Kararı (14 Eylül 2005) S/RES/1624. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi Kararı (20 Aralık 2010) S/RES/1963. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi Kararı (2014) S/RES/2178. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi Kararı (8 Ekim 2004) S/RES/1566. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler İnsan Hakları Konseyi ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Martin Scheinin - Australia: Study on human rights compliance while countering terrorism’ (14 Aralık 2006) A/HRC/4/26/Add.3. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler İnsan Hakları Konseyi, “Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Martin Scheinin - Ten areas of best practices in countering terrorism” (22 Aralık 2012) A/HRC/16/51 para 31. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler İnsan Hakları Yüksek Komiserliği (12 Eylül 2011) <https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/gc34.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 17 Şubat 2020. google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Terörle Mücadele Uygulama Görev Gücü, ‘Countering the Use of the Internet for Terrorist Purposes’ (İnternetin Terör Amaçlı Kullanımıyla Mücadele) (2009). google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler Uyuşturucu ve Suç Ofisi, ‘The Use of The Internet For Terrorist Purposes’ (İnternetin terörist amaçlarla kullanımı) (2011) google scholar
  • BM Özel Raportörü Raporu, “Report of The on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression” (2011) A/66/290. google scholar
  • Cassese A, Terrorism, Politics and Law: The Achille Lauro Affair (Princeton University Press 1989) google scholar
  • Chen T M, Jarvis L and Macdonald S, Cyberterrorism: Understanding, Assessment and Response (Springer 2014) 25. google scholar
  • COE, ‘Explanatory Report to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism’ (2005) <https://rm.coe.int/16800d3811> Erişim Tarihi 17 Şubat 2020. google scholar
  • COE, ‘Increasing Co-Operation Against Cyberterrorism and Other Large-Scale Attacks on The Internet’ Resolution 2070 and Recommendation 2077 (2015). google scholar
  • Committee of Experts on Terrorism, ‘Collection of Relevant Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights Related to ‘Apologie du Terrorisme' and 'Incitement to Terrorism'’ (Avrupa Konseyi, Strazburg, 4 Haziran 2004) 6. google scholar
  • Conte A, Human Rights in the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism (Springer 2010). google scholar
  • Conway M, ‘Terrorist Use of the Internet and the Challenges of Governing Cyberspace’ in Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Victor Mauer ve Felisha Krishna-Hensel (eds), Power and Security in the Information Age: Investigating the Role of the State in Cyberspace (Ashgate 2007). google scholar
  • Denning D, ‘Activism, Hacktivism and Cyberterrorism: The Internet as a Tool for Influencing Foreign Policy’ <http://www.nautilus.org/info- policy/workshop/papers/denning.html.> Erişim Tarihi 14 Şubat 2020. google scholar
  • Editorial Board of Pravoye Delo v Shtekel/Ukrayna App no 33014/05 ( ECHR 5 Mayıs 2011) para 61-64. google scholar
  • Erbakan v Turkey App no 59405/00 (ECHR, 6 Temmuz 2006) para 56. google scholar
  • Frias A S, Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights (Council of Europe 2012) . google scholar
  • Ginkel B, ‘Incitement to Terrorism: A Matter of Prevention or Repression?’ (2011) ICCT Research Paper, 1 < https://www.icct.nl/download/file/ICCT-Van-Ginkel-Incitement-To- Terrorism-August-2011.pdf > Erişim Tarihi 20 Ocak 2020. google scholar
  • Handyside v UK App no 5493/72 (ECHR, 7 Aralık 1976) para 49. google scholar
  • Karan U, İfade Özgürlüğü: Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru El Kitabı Serisi-2 (2nd edn, Avrupa Konseyi 2018) . google scholar
  • Letschert R, Staiger I and Pemberton A, Assisting Victims of Terrorism: Towards a European Standard of Justice (Springer 2009). google scholar
  • Murray D, ‘Freedom of Expression, Counter-Terrorism and the Internet in Light of the UK Terrorist Act 2006 and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2009) 27(3) Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 331,352. google scholar
  • NATO, ‘Lisbon Summit Declaration Issued the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Lisbon’ (Lizbon, 20 Ekim 2010). google scholar
  • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘Human Rights, Terrorism and Counter-terrorism’ (Fact Sheet No.32 July 2008) 23-24. google scholar
  • Öktem E, ‘Uluslararası Hukukta Terörizm’ (2004) 5 İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Dergisi 133,133. google scholar
  • OSCE, ‘Background Paper on Human Rights Considerations in Combating Incitement to Terrorism and Related Offences’ (19-20 Ekim 2006) 10. google scholar
  • OSCE, ‘Background Paper on Human Rights Considerations in Combating Incitement to Terrorism and Related Offences’ (19-20 Ekim 2006) 9. google scholar
  • OSCE, OSCE Online Expert Forum Series on Terrorist Use of the Internet: Threats, Responses and Potential Future Endeavours (Final Report, 2013) 8. google scholar
  • Pollitt M M, ‘Cyberterrorism: Fact or Fancy?’ (1998) 1998(2) Computer Fraud and Security 8,8–10. google scholar
  • Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, A/66/290 (2011), para. 18-19. google scholar
  • Schachter O, ‘The Lawful Use of Fore by a State Against Terrorists in Another Country’ in Henry Han (ed), Terrorism & Political Violence : Limits & Possibilities of Legal Control (Oceana Publications 1993) . google scholar
  • Schmid A P, ‘Frameworks for Conceptualising Terrorism’ (2004) 16(2) Terrorism and Political Violence, 197, 205. google scholar
  • Sieber U, ‘Instruments of International Law: Against Terrorist Use of the Internet’ in M Wade and A Maljevic (eds), A War on Terror? The European Stance on a New Threat, Changing Laws and Human Rights Implications ( Springer 2010) . google scholar
  • Terörizmin (Tedhişçiliğin) Önlenmesi ve Cezalandırılmasına ilişkin Sözleşme (1937) m 1(2). google scholar
  • Terörizmin Ortadan Kaldırılmasına ilişkin Strasbourg Sözleşmesi (1977) m. 1. google scholar
  • UN, ‘International Instruments related to the Prevention and Suppression of International Terrorism’ (2008) <https://www.unodc.org/documents/terrorism/Publications/Int_Instruments_Prevention_and_Suppression_Int_Terrorism/Publication_-_English_-_08-25503_text.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 14 February 2020. google scholar
  • UN, ‘Report of the Security Council Working Group established pursuant to resolution 1566 (2004)’ (2005) UN Doc S/2005/789, para 29. google scholar
  • Weimann G, ‘Al Qaeda Has Sent You A Friend Request: Terrorists Using Online Social Networking’ (2011). google scholar
  • Zana v Türkiye App no 18954/91 (ECHR 25 Kasım 1997) para. 51. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Yüksel, C. (2020). Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 40(2), 1089-1112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003


AMA

Yüksel C. Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law. Public and Private International Law Bulletin. 2020;40(2):1089-1112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003


ABNT

Yüksel, C. Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, [Publisher Location], v. 40, n. 2, p. 1089-1112, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Yüksel, Cüneyt,. 2020. “Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law.” Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40, no. 2: 1089-1112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003


Chicago: Humanities Style

Yüksel, Cüneyt,. Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law.” Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40, no. 2 (May. 2024): 1089-1112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003


Harvard: Australian Style

Yüksel, C 2020, 'Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law', Public and Private International Law Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1089-1112, viewed 18 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Yüksel, C. (2020) ‘Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law’, Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 40(2), pp. 1089-1112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003 (18 May. 2024).


MLA

Yüksel, Cüneyt,. Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law.” Public and Private International Law Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 2, 2020, pp. 1089-1112. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003


Vancouver

Yüksel C. Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law. Public and Private International Law Bulletin [Internet]. 18 May. 2024 [cited 18 May. 2024];40(2):1089-1112. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003 doi: 10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003


ISNAD

Yüksel, Cüneyt. Combating Terrorist Use of the Internet and Social Media: Recommended Solutions within the Scope of International Law”. Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40/2 (May. 2024): 1089-1112. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.2.819003



TIMELINE


Submitted31.10.2020
Accepted30.11.2020
Published Online13.12.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.