Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Interventions in Patients Diagnosed with Cancer: A Systematic Review
Samet Baş, Gülay DirikKanser Tanısı Olan Kişilerde Kabul ve Kararlılık Terapisi Uygulamaları: Sistematik Bir Derleme
Samet Baş, Gülay DirikStudies indicate that cancer causes a negative effect on both the physical and psychological health status of patients. Meta-analysis and review studies demonstrate that psychological therapies show promising effects on reducing the stress levels of cancer survivors and increasing their quality of life (De la Torre-Luque, Gambara, López & Cruzado, 2015; Linden & Girgis, 2012). The concept of acceptance has an important role in the course of the cancer disease. This concept includes acceptance of both the disease itself and the altered body image after treatment (e.g., as common in breast cancer patients). Research indicates that acceptance of the cancer disease increases the commitment to cancer and treatment process (Kamińska et al., 2014). Although Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) interventions are quite limited, they are promising as an important alternative treatment in reducing the symptoms of cancer survivors (Fashler, Weinrib, Azam ve Katz, 2018). More detailed studies such as systematic reviews or meta-analyses are needed to examine the existing studies in terms of methodological issues and study results. For this reason, a systematic review was carried out in examining the current status of ACT-based treatment studies in the context of cancer patients.
Method
The EBSCOhost, Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar, ULAKBIM, and TR Dizin databases were used to search examples of literature which included studies up to August 2018. The keywords “cancer” and “acceptance and commitment therapy” or “ACT” were used for studies in English and Turkish languages. A total of 205 studies were identified with this search, and then repeated articles were excluded. Following the title and summary review, articles which did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. The full text of the remaining 15 studies were examined in detail.
Results
In total, 1200 people with different types of cancer (mainly breast cancer), were included and various ACT based interventions were implemented through the remaining 15 studies. Almost two thirds of the participants were female (N = 745; 62%) and mainly adults between the ages 12-75 (M = 49.8). The findings were gathered according to their common goals such as psychological flexibility, psychological symptoms and fear of recurrence etc. Eight of the nine studies (89%) measuring psychological flexibility showed significant increases within the group compared to the pre-test and post-test and the gains were maintained for up to 12 months. In all four studies - including the control group - significant differences were observed between the groups and the gains of the treatment group were maintained for up to six months.
In eight studies measuring depression (89%), within group differences decreased significantly after ACT treatment and gains remained for up to three months. In addition, in four of the five studies (80%) using the control group, the differences between the groups decreased significantly for depression. The gains were maintained for up to three months after treatment. In seven of the eight studies (88%) measuring anxiety levels, significant differences were found within the group, while the gains were maintained in the three-month follow-up assessment. In the control group comparisons, in three of the five studies (60%), the differences between the groups significantly decreased in terms of anxiety level. The gains were maintained in follow up assessments up to three months later. For stress, significant improvements were observed within the group in four studies, while the gains were maintained for up to 12 months. However, in the comparison of the control group, differences between the groups were significant only in one study. These gains continued for up to three months.
Significant improvements were found in quality of life and related variables in all eight studies following the ACT treatment. In addition, treatment gains were maintained for up to 12 months. In terms of group differences, in three studies using no-treatment and treatment as the usual control conditions, significant differences were found between the groups in post-test and follow-up assessments for up to six months. Only in the study with normal care control groups, was there no significant difference between the groups in quality of life. In addition to these factors, studies showed that there were significant improvements in posttraumatic growth, spirituality, recurrence anxiety, emotional control and suppression of thoughts compared to both pre-treatment and control groups. Moreover, significant improvements were observed in mindfulness, pain and related symptoms, burnout, sleep problems, and sedentary behaviors compared to the only pre-treatment group. All the gains were maintained after the interventions for an average of 4.1 months for within groups and 5 months on a between-groups basis.
Discussion
As a result, ACT based intervention methods show effective results in reducing the psychological problems of survivors with different types of cancer as a new treatment approach. Although the results show that ACT is an effective treatment for many symptoms of cancer survivors, more controlled, randomized and long-term studies are needed.