Research Article


DOI :10.26650/SP2019-0047   IUP :10.26650/SP2019-0047    Full Text (PDF)

Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles

Ömer Taha SözerSinem Öztürk DursunNeslihan YortanÜlkü GüreşenMehmet Şakiroğlu

University adjustment is one of the most common life challenges that freshman encounter. There may be several individual differences that can either positively or negatively affect the adjustment process. Identifying the individual differences and variables that facilitate the adjustment process is significant to an understanding of students' adjustment difficulties and to hereby providing the opportunity for early intervention. For this reason, this study aims to investigate the direct effect of personality and humor styles on university adjustment and the indirect effect of humor styles on the relationship between personality and university adjustment. Behavioral activation and behavioral inhibition systems, postulated by Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, were taken as a reference to measure personality characteristics. Humor styles were categorized in four different dimensions; self-enhancing, affiliative, self-defeating, and aggressive humor. Participants were 282 freshman students from a public university in Turkey. Of the participants 193 were female and 87 were male. Behavioral Activation-Inhibition Scale, Humor Styles Scale and University Life Scale were applied using a paper-pencil form. The results showed that while university adjustment was negatively predicted by behavioral inhibition, it was positively predicted by behavioral activation. Also, self-defeating humor predicted university adjustment negatively, while self-enhancing and affiliative humor predicted it positively. The results of the mediation analyses revealed that the relationship between behavioral activation and university adjustment was mediated partially by self-enhancing and affiliative humor styles. The mediational role of self-defeating humor in the relationship between behavioral inhibition and university adjustment was also examined, but the result showed that self-defeating humor had no mediational role. According to the results, BIS and self-defeating humor style seem to be risk factors for university adjustment whereas BAS, self-enhancing and affiliative humor styles facilitate this process. Students high in reward sensitivity use positive humor styles when adjusting to university, whereas difficulties in the adjustment process of students high in punishment sensitivity are not due to the use of malignant humor styles. For this reason, recognizing some personality characteristics as risk factors for university adjustment and enhancing positive humor styles as coping strategies may be helpful for dealing with the adjustment process.

DOI :10.26650/SP2019-0047   IUP :10.26650/SP2019-0047    Full Text (PDF)

Kişilik Özellikleri, Mizah Tarzları ve Üniversiteye Uyum Arasındaki Doğrudan ve Dolaylı İlişkiler: Mizah Tarzlarının Aracı Rolü

Ömer Taha SözerSinem Öztürk DursunNeslihan YortanÜlkü GüreşenMehmet Şakiroğlu

Üniversite uyumu, üniversiteye yeni başlayan gençlerin en sık karşılaştıkları yaşam zorlukları arasındadır. Uyum sürecini olumlu ya da olumsuz etkileyebilecek çeşitli bireysel farklılıklar olabilir. Bu farklılıkların ve uyumu kolaylaştırabilecek değişkenlerin belirlenmesi öğrencilerin yaşayabilecekleri zorlukların anlaşılması açısından önemli olacaktır ve erken müdahale imkanı sunacaktır. Buradan hareketle bu çalışma üniversiteye uyumda kişilik özelliklerinin ve mizah tarzlarının doğrudan etkisini ve kişilik özellikleri ile üniversiteye uyum arasındaki ilişkide mizah tarzlarının dolaylı etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Kişilik özellikleri Pekiştirmeye Duyarlılık Kuramı doğrultusunda önerilen davranışsal aktivasyon ve davranışsal inhibisyon sistemleri referans alınarak değerlendirilmiştir. Mizah tarzları ise kendini geliştirici, kendini yıkıcı, katılımcı ve saldırgan mizah olarak dört farklı boyutta ele alınmıştır. Türkiye’deki bir devlet üniversitesinde birinci sınıf okuyan 282 öğrenci araştırmaya dahil edilmiştir. Katılımcıların 193’ü kadın, 87’si erkektir. Araştırmada Davranışsal Aktivasyon-İnhibisyon Ölçeği, Mizah Tarzları Ölçeği ve Üniversite Yaşamı Ölçeği kağıt-kalem formu olarak uygulanmıştır. Bulgular davranışsal inhibisyonun üniversiteye uyumu negatif, davranışsal aktivasyonun ise üniversiteye uyumu pozitif yönde yordadığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca kendini yıkıcı mizah tarzının üniversiteye uyumu negatif, kendini geliştirici ve katılımcı mizahın ise üniversiteye uyumu pozitif yönde yordadığı saptanmıştır. Yürütülen aracılık analizleri sonuçlarına göre davranışsal aktivasyon ile üniversiteye uyum arasındaki ilişkide kendini geliştirici ve katılımcı mizah tarzlarının kısmi aracı oldukları saptanmıştır. Ayrıca davranışsal inhibisyon ile üniversiteye uyum arasındaki ilişkide kendini yıkıcı mizahın aracı rolü incelenmiş, ancak analiz sonuçları kendini yıkıcı mizah tarzının aracı rolü olmadığını göstermiştir. Sonuçlara göre DİS ve kendini yerici mizah tarzı üniversite uyumu açısından risk faktörleri olarak değerlendirilebilirken DAS, kendini geliştirici ve katılımcı mizah tarzları uyum sürecini kolaylaştırabilir. Ödül duyarlılığı yüksek öğrenciler üniversiteye uyum sağlarken olumlu mizah tarzlarını kullanmakla birlikte, ceza duyarlılığı yüksek öğrencilerin uyum sürecinde yaşadıkları güçlüklerde olumsuz mizah tarzının rolü bulunmamaktadır. Bu sebeple bazı kişilik özelliklerinin üniversite uyumu için risk oluşturabileceğinin farkında olunmasının ve bir baş etme yöntemi olarak olumlu mizah tarzlarının geliştirilmesinin uyum sürecine katkıda bulunabileceği düşünülmektedir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


According to Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, approach and avoidance motivations are two basic biological personality characteristics (Gray, 1982). These motivations are derived from the behavioral activation system (BAS) and the behavioral inhibition system (BIS) in the brain. BAS is activated by the presence of cues for reward and is responsible for positive emotions, whereas BIS is activated by punishing stimuli and is responsible for negative emotions, specifically anxiety and fear. Recent studies show that these two systems are not only related to daily emotions, behaviors and cognitions, but also to pathological conditions such as externalizing and internalizing disturbances (See, Bijttebie, Beck, Claes, & Vandereycken, 2009).

College adjustment is a highly important issue for students, especially for freshmen. The first year of university life may be challenging for some students, but not all of them adapt to this situation to the same degree. Students’ personality may shape the adaptation process via some coping strategies (Carver & Connor-Smith, 2010). So, in stressful conditions individuals may utilize some coping strategies compatible with their personality. Thus, some strategies may facilitate the adaptation process.

Coping strategies are a broad concept in the psychology literature but some strategies like humor have not been investigated as much as others. Coping humor was found to be correlated with less stress (Fritz, Russek, & Dillon, 2017), with less depression (Overholser, 1992) and even with long-term physical health outcomes such as enhanced adjustment to cancer, better physical health and reduced mortality (Romundstad, Svebak, Holen, & Holmen, 2016).

Humor has been categorized into four distinct styles (Martin, Puhlik-Doris, Larsen, Gray, & Weir, 2003). Two of them (self-enhancing and affiliative) are beneficial for oneself and for relationships with others, while the other two (self-defeating and aggressive) are harmful in those areas. Self-enhancing humor provides a support for persons even in stressful conditions by maintaining a humorous outlook on life. Affiliative humor is also a benign humor style in that people joke, act and speak in a humorous way to enhance their relationships with others. Self-defeating humor is a harmful humor style in which people disparage themselves to amuse others in order to gain approval or connection. Aggressive humor is used for establishing superiority over others by means of teasing and ridiculing others.

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the direct effect of BAS/BIS and humor styles on university adjustment. Secondly, the study aims to examine the mediating role of humor styles between BAS/BIS and university adjustment.

Method

The participants in the study were 282 freshman students from a state university in Turkey with the mean age of 19.56 (SD = 1.36), and their ages ranged from 17 to 29 years. 193 of the participants were female (68.5%) and 87 participants were male (30.9%). Students were provided with the Turkish version of the BIS/BAS Scale, Humor Styles Questionnaire and University Adjustment Scale. IBM’s software SPSS for Windows was used for all analyses. Mediational analyses were conducted by the Model 4 of PROCESS for SPSS (Hayes, 2016).

Results

The results of the Pearson correlation indicated that both BAS and BIS were associated with university adjustment (r(280) = .18 and r(280) = -.15, respectively). Of all the humor styles, affiliative humor showed the strongest relation with the outcome (r(280) = .31). Selfenhancing and self-defeating humor were correlated with university adjustment, (r(280) = .18 and r(280) = -.19, respectively). Direct effects of personality and humor styles on university adjustment were calculated by multiple linear regression analyses. Results showed that the model was significant (R2 = .24, F(5, 276) = 17.82, p < .001). University adjustment was negatively predicted by behavioral inhibition (B = -0.72, SE = 0.48) while it was positively predicted by behavioral activation (B = 0.97, SE = 0.40). Furthermore, self-defeating humor negatively predicted university adjustment (B = -1.25, SE = 0.22) and the two positive humor styles, self-enhancing (B = 0.77, SE = 0.26) and affiliative humor (B = 1.43, SE = 0.27), positively predicted it. According to the results of the mediational analyses, while both selfenhancing and affiliative humor styles partially mediated the relationship between BAS and university adjustment, self-defeating humor did not mediate the relationship between BIS and university adjustment.

Discussion

In this study BAS/BIS and humor styles independently predicted university adjustment. According to the results, BIS and self-defeating humor style seem to be risk factors for university adjustment whereas BAS, self-enhancement and affiliative humor styles facilitate this process. Students who are high in reward sensitivity adjust to university partly via using positive humor styles, whereas difficulties in the adjustment process of students who are high in punishment sensitivity are not due to the use of malignant humor styles. In the light of the positive features of humor (Ruch & McGhee, 2014), incorporating a positive humor style as a coping strategy into counseling or orientation programs may be helpful for students.

Although this study has contributed a new understanding to the adjustment literature, methodological limitations of the study should be taken into consideration in interpreting the results. The cross-sectional nature of this research prevents making inferences about causal relationships. Longitudinal and, in particular, daily diary writing or experience sampling studies would be helpful to understand the humor processes in real life situations and to draw causal inferences regarding adjustment.


PDF View

References

  • Akdur, S. ve Durak-Batıgün, A. D. (2017). Mizah tarzları ile kişilik özellikleri, kişilerarası ilişki tarzları ve psikolojik sağlık arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20(39), 1-10. google scholar
  • Akhunlar Turgut, M. N., Sarıot Ertürk, Ö., Karslı, F. ve Şakiroğlu, M. (2018). Algılanan stres ve üniversite yaşamına uyum ilişkisinde bir aracı değişken: Ayrılık anksiyetesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2018044072 google scholar
  • Aladağ Bayrak, Ö. ve Bülbül, T. (2013). Meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin yükseköğretim yaşamına uyum düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 3(2), 6-20. google scholar
  • Aladağ, M., Kağnıcı, D. Y., Tuna, M. E. ve Tezer, E. (2003). Üniversite yaşamı ölçeği: Ölçek geliştirme ve yapı geçerliliği üzerine bir çalışma. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi,2(20), 41-47. google scholar
  • Alkan, N. (2014). Humor, loneliness and acceptance: Predictors of university drop-out intentions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 1079-1086. google scholar
  • Aydın, G. (1993). İç-dış kontrol odağı inancı ile durumluk mizah tepkisi arasındaki ilişki. II. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi Bilimsel Çalışmaları (s. 87-98). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Baker, R. W. ve Siryk, B. (1984). Measuring adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 179–189. google scholar
  • Barlow, D. H., Sauer-Zavala, S., Carl, J. R., Bullis, J. R. ve Ellard, K. K. (2014). The nature, diagnosis, and treatment of neuroticism: Back to the future. Clinical Psychological Science, 2(3), 344-365. google scholar
  • Besser, A. ve Zeigler-Hill, V. (2011). Pathological forms of narcissism and perceived stress during the transition to the university: The mediating role of humor styles. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(3), 197-221. doi: 10.1037/a0024826 google scholar
  • Beyaz, Ş. (2004). Heyecan Arama Gereksinimi ve Akran Baskısının Ergenlerin Risk Alma Eğilimleriyle İlişkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. google scholar
  • Bijttebier, P., Beck, I., Claes, L. ve Vandereycken, W. (2009). Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory as a framework for research on personality–psychopathology associations. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(5), 421-430. google scholar
  • Cann, A., Norman, M. A., Welbourne, J. L. ve Calhoun, L. G. (2008). Attachment styles, conflict styles and humour styles: Interrelationships and associations with relationship satisfaction. European Journal of Personality, 22, 131-146. doi:10.1002/per.666 google scholar
  • Cann, A., Zapata, C. L. ve Davis, H. B. (2011). Humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: Perceived versus self-reported humor styles as predictors of satisfaction. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research,24(1), 1-20. google scholar
  • Carver, C. S. ve Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review Of Psychology, 61, 679-704. google scholar
  • Carver, C. S. ve White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67(2), 319. google scholar
  • Ceyhan, A. A. (2006). An investigations of adjustment levels of Turkish university students with respect to perceived communications skill levels. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(4), 367-380.Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 317-332. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.005 google scholar
  • Corr, P. J. ve Cooper, A. J. (2016). The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1427-1440. google scholar
  • Credé, M. ve Niehorster, S. (2012). Adjustment to college as measured by the student adaptation to college questionnaire: A quantitative review of its structure and relationships with correlates and consequences. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 133-165. Doi: 10.1007/s10648-011-9184-5M google scholar
  • Demirci, M. K. (2019). Evli bireylerin öznel iyi oluş düzeyleri ile mizah tarzları, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların doyumu ve evlilik uyumu arasındaki ilişkilerin değerlendirilmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Trabzon Üniversitesi/Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Trabzon. google scholar
  • Derryberry, D. ve Reed, M. A. (1994). Temperament and attention: Orienting toward and away from positive and negative signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1128-1139. google scholar
  • Dumanlı, Ş. ve Köroğlu, Ö. (2018). Turist rehberlerinin stresle başa çıkma tarzları ile mizah tarzları arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Journal of Yasar University,13(52), 328-342. google scholar
  • Duru, E. (2016). Üniversiteye uyum sürecinde yalnızlığı yordamada sosyal destek ve sosyal bağlılığın doğrudan ve dolaylı rolleri. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(29) 13-24. google scholar
  • Dyson, R. ve Renk, K. (2006). Freshmen adaptation to university life: Depressive symptoms, stress, and coping. Journal of Clinical Psychology,62(10), 1231-1244. google scholar
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas. google scholar
  • Feldt, R. C., Graham, M. ve Dew, D. (2011). Measuring adjustment to college: Construct validity of the student adaptation to college questionnaire. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,44(2), 92-104. google scholar
  • Ford, T. E., Lappi, S. K. ve Holden, C. J. (2016). Personality, humor styles and happiness: Happy people have positive humor styles. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(3), 320-337. google scholar
  • Ford, T. E., McCreight, K. A. ve Richardson, K. (2014). Affective style, humor styles and happiness. Europe’s Journal of Psychology,10(3), 451-463. google scholar
  • Franken, I. H. ve Muris, P. (2006). BIS/BAS personality characteristics and college students’ substance use. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1497-1503. google scholar
  • Fritz, H. L., Russek, L. N. ve Dillon, M. M. (2017). Humor use moderates the relation of stressful life events with psychological distress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,43(6), 845-859.Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality,74(1), 175-222. google scholar
  • Gallagher, D. J. (1996). Personality, coping, and objective outcomes: Extraversion, neuroticism, coping styles, and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(3), 421-429. google scholar
  • Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the function of the septo-hippocampal system. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4(3), 269-288. google scholar
  • Hayes, A. F. (2016). Process 2.16.1 [Bilgisayar programı]. Erişim Adresi: http://www.processmacro.org/download.html google scholar
  • Heponiemi, T., Keltikangas-Järvinen, L., Puttonen, S. ve Ravaja, N. (2003). BIS/BAS sensitivity and self-rated affects during experimentally induced stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(6), 943-957. google scholar
  • Hickman, G. P. ve Andrews, D. (2003). Humor and college adjustment: The predictive nature of humor, academic achievement, authoritative parenting styles on the initial adjustment of male and female first-year college students. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 15(2), 61-81. google scholar
  • Hickman, G. P. ve Crossland, G. L. (2004). The predictive nature of humor, authoritative parenting style, and academic achievement on indices of initial adjustment and commitment to college among college freshmen. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 6(2),225-245. google scholar
  • Hundt, N. E., Kimbrel, N. A., Mitchell, J. T. ve Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2008). High BAS, but not low BIS, predicts externalizing symptoms in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 565-575. google scholar
  • İkiz, F. E. ve Otlu, B. M. (2015). Üniversite yaşamına uyum sürecinde yaşanan sorunlar ve başa çıkma yolları. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(4) 35-52. doi: 10.18026/cbusos.93556 google scholar
  • Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Henderson, A. S., Jacomb, P. A., Korten, A. E. ve Rodgers, B. (1998). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 49-58. google scholar
  • Kaba, İ. ve Keklik, İ. (2016). Öğrencilerin üniversiteye uyumlarında psikolojik dayanıklılık ve psikolojik belirtiler. Hacettepe Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2) 98-113. google scholar
  • Karahan, F., Sardoğan, M. E., Özkamalı, E. ve Dicle, A. N. (2005). Üniversite 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin üniversiteye uyum düzeylerinin sosyokültürel etkinlikler açısından incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(30), 63-72. google scholar
  • Korotkov, D. ve Hannah, T. E. (1994). Extraversion and emotionality as proposed superordinate stress moderators: A prospective analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 787–792. google scholar
  • Kuiper, N. A. (2010). Introductory comments: Special issue of EJOP on humor research in personality and social psychology (editorial). Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6, 1-8. google scholar
  • Kuiper, N. A., Kirsh, G. A. ve Leite, C. (2010). Reactions to humorous comments and implicit theories of humor styles. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6(3), 236-266. doi:10.5964/ejop.v6i3.215. google scholar
  • Knyazev, G. G., Wilson, G. D. ve Slobodskaya, H. R. (2008). Behavioural activation and inhibition in social adjustment. P.J. Corr (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality içinde (s. 415-430). New York: Cambridge University Press. Lazarus, R. S. ve Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer. google scholar
  • Litman, J. A. (2006). The COPE inventory: Dimensionality and relationships with approach- and avoidance-motives and positive and negative traits. Personality and Individual differences, 41(2), 273-284. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.032 google scholar
  • Lu, L. (1994). University transition: Major and minor life stressors, personality characteristics and mental health. Psychological medicine, 24(1), 81-87. google scholar
  • Mardaga, S. ve Hansenne, M. (2007). Relationships between Cloninger’s biosocial model of personality and the behavioral inhibition/approach systems (BIS/BAS). Personality and Individual Differences, 42(4), 715-722. google scholar
  • Martin, R.A. (2001). Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 504–519. google scholar
  • Martin, R. A., Kuiper, N. A., Olinger, L. J. ve Dance, K. A. (1993). Humor, coping with stress, self-concept, and psychological well-being. Humor, 6, 89-89. google scholar
  • Martin, R.A. ve Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1313–1324. google scholar
  • Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J. ve Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48-75. google scholar
  • McCrae, R. R. ve Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. google scholar
  • Meyer, B., Olivier, L. ve Roth, D. A. (2005). Please don’t leave me! BIS/BAS, attachment styles, and responses to a relationship threat. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(1), 151-162. google scholar
  • Overholser, J. C. (1992). Sense of humor when coping with life stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(7), 799-804. google scholar
  • Overholser, J. C. ve Adams, D. M. (1997). Stressful life events and social support in depressed psychiatric inpatients. T.W. Miller (Ed.), Clinical disorders and stressful life events içinde (s. 121-141). Connecticut: International Universities Press. google scholar
  • Özbay, Y., Palancı, M., Kandemir, M. ve Çakır, O. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öznel iyi oluşlarının duygusal düzenleme, mizah, sosyal öz-yeterlilik ve başa çıkma davranışları ile yordanması. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 10(2), 325-345. google scholar
  • Özdemir, S., Sezgin, F., Kaya, Z ve Recepoğlu, E. (2011). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin stresle başa çıkma tarzları ile kullandıkları mizah tarzları arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 17(3), 405-428. google scholar
  • Plessen, C. Y., Franken, F. R., Ster, C., Schmid, R. R., Wolfmayr, C., Mayer, A. M., ... Maierwieser, R. J. (2020). Humor styles and personality: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the relations between humor styles and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 154. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109676 google scholar
  • Porterfield A. I. (1987). Does sense of humor moderate the impact of life stress on psychological and physical well-being? Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 306-317. google scholar
  • Pritchard, M. E., Wilson, G. S. ve Yamnitz, B. (2007). What predicts adjustment among college students? A longitudinal panel study. Journal of American College Health, 56(1), 15-22. google scholar
  • Rahat, E. ve İlhan, T. (2016). Coping styles, social support, relational self-construal, and resilience in predicting students’ adjustment to university life. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16,187–208. google scholar
  • Rasmussen, S. A., Elliott, M. A. ve O’Connor, R. C. (2012). Psychological distress and perfectionism in recent suicide attempters: The role of behavioural inhibition and activation. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(6), 680-685. google scholar
  • Reisoğlu, S. ve Yazici, H., (2017). The role of university students’ five factor personality traits, humorstyles, and emotional intelligence on their interpretation of subjective well-being. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(4), 888-912. doi: 10.7596/taksad.v6i4.973 google scholar
  • Romundstad, S., Svebak, S., Holen, A. ve Holmen, J. (2016). A 15-year follow-up study of sense of humor and causes of mortality: The Nord-Trondelag health study. Psychosomatic Medicine,78, 345-353. google scholar
  • Rosenman, S. ve Rodgers, B. (2006). Childhood adversity and adult personality. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40(5), 482-490. google scholar
  • Ruch, W. ve McGhee, P. E. (2014). Humor intervention programs. A.C. Parks ve S.M. Schueller (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of positive psychological interventions içinde (s. 179-189). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. google scholar
  • Safranek, R. ve Schill, T. (1982). Coping with stress: Does humor help? Psychological Reports, 51, 222. google scholar
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312. google scholar
  • Şişman, S. (2012). Davranışsal Inhibisyon Sistemi/Davranışsal Aktivasyon Sistemi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Psikoloji Çalışmaları Dergisi, 32(2), 1-22. google scholar
  • Tuna, M. E. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in coping strategies as predictors of university adjustment of Turkish and U.S. students. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. google scholar
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2019, Haziran). Yükseköğretim İstatistikleri. Erişim Adresi https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr google scholar
  • Updegraff, J. A., Gable, S. L. ve Taylor, S. E. (2004). What makes experiences satisfying? The interaction of approach-avoidance motivations and emotions in well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 496-504. google scholar
  • Vella-Zarb, R. A. ve Elgar, F. J. (2010). Predicting the ‘freshman 15’: Environmental and psychological predictors of weight gain in first-year university students. Health Education Journal, 69(3), 321-332. google scholar
  • Vervoort, L., Wolters, L. H., Hogendoorn, S. M., De Haan, E., Boer, F. ve Prins, P. J. (2010). Sensitivity of Gray’s behavioral inhibition system in clinically anxious and non-anxious children and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 629-633. google scholar
  • Viana, A. G. ve Gratz, K. L. (2012). The role of anxiety sensitivity, behavioral inhibition, and cognitive biases in anxiety symptoms: Structural equation modeling of direct and indirect pathways. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(10), 1122-1141. google scholar
  • Vilaythong, A.P., Arnau, R. C., Hosem, D. R. ve Mascaro, N. (2003). Humor and hope: Can humor increase hope? Humor, 16(1), 79-89. google scholar
  • Voigt, D. C., Dillard, J. P., Braddock, K. H., Anderson, J. W., Sopory, P. ve Stephenson, M. T. (2009). BIS/BAS scales and their relationship to risky health behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(2), 89-93. google scholar
  • Warbah, L., Sathiyaseelan, M., Vijayakumar, C., Vasantharaj, B., Russell, S. ve Jacob, K. S. (2007). Psychological distress, personality, and adjustment among nursing students. Nurse education today, 27(6), 597-601. google scholar
  • Yalım, D. (2007). First year college adjustment: The role of coping, ego-resiliency, optimism and gender. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Middle East Technical University, The Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara. google scholar
  • Yerlikaya, E. (2003). Mizah tarzları ölçeğinin uyarlama çalışması. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana, Türkiye. google scholar
  • Yıldız, A. D. (2018). Erken dönem uyum bozucu şemalar ve yalnızlığın üniversite uyum düzeyi ile ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 33(81), 82-96. google scholar
  • Yue, X., Hao, X. ve Goldman, G. (2010). Humor styles, dispositional optimism, and mental health among undergraduates in Hong Kong and China. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 11, 173-188. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Sözer, Ö.T., Öztürk Dursun, S., Yortan, N., Güreşen, Ü., & Şakiroğlu, M. (2020). Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles. Studies in Psychology, 40(2), 533-559. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0047


AMA

Sözer Ö T, Öztürk Dursun S, Yortan N, Güreşen Ü, Şakiroğlu M. Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles. Studies in Psychology. 2020;40(2):533-559. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0047


ABNT

Sözer, Ö.T.; Öztürk Dursun, S.; Yortan, N.; Güreşen, Ü.; Şakiroğlu, M. Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles. Studies in Psychology, [Publisher Location], v. 40, n. 2, p. 533-559, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Sözer, Ömer Taha, and Sinem Öztürk Dursun and Neslihan Yortan and Ülkü Güreşen and Mehmet Şakiroğlu. 2020. “Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles.” Studies in Psychology 40, no. 2: 533-559. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0047


Chicago: Humanities Style

Sözer, Ömer Taha, and Sinem Öztürk Dursun and Neslihan Yortan and Ülkü Güreşen and Mehmet Şakiroğlu. Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles.” Studies in Psychology 40, no. 2 (May. 2024): 533-559. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0047


Harvard: Australian Style

Sözer, ÖT & Öztürk Dursun, S & Yortan, N & Güreşen, Ü & Şakiroğlu, M 2020, 'Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles', Studies in Psychology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 533-559, viewed 17 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0047


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Sözer, Ö.T. and Öztürk Dursun, S. and Yortan, N. and Güreşen, Ü. and Şakiroğlu, M. (2020) ‘Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles’, Studies in Psychology, 40(2), pp. 533-559. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0047 (17 May. 2024).


MLA

Sözer, Ömer Taha, and Sinem Öztürk Dursun and Neslihan Yortan and Ülkü Güreşen and Mehmet Şakiroğlu. Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles.” Studies in Psychology, vol. 40, no. 2, 2020, pp. 533-559. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0047


Vancouver

Sözer ÖT, Öztürk Dursun S, Yortan N, Güreşen Ü, Şakiroğlu M. Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles. Studies in Psychology [Internet]. 17 May. 2024 [cited 17 May. 2024];40(2):533-559. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0047 doi: 10.26650/SP2019-0047


ISNAD

Sözer, ÖmerTaha - Öztürk Dursun, Sinem - Yortan, Neslihan - Güreşen, Ülkü - Şakiroğlu, Mehmet. Direct and Indirect Relationships Between Personality Characteristics, Humor Styles and University Adjustment: The Mediating Role of Humor Styles”. Studies in Psychology 40/2 (May. 2024): 533-559. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0047



TIMELINE


Submitted04.07.2019
Accepted11.06.2020
Published Online18.11.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.