Studies in Psychology

SUBMITINFORMATION
EnglishTürkçe

Research Article


DOI :10.26650/SP2020-0022   IUP :10.26650/SP2020-0022    Full Text (PDF)

Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties

Ferzan Curun, Başak Beydoğan Tangör, Elif Çolakoğlu Kaya

The studies on predictors of an authentic personality (which is defined as knowing and being faithful to oneself despite the possible influences of the external environment), are somewhat limited. The purpose of this study is to examine the mediating role of emotion regulation difficulties in the relationship between positive/negative affectivity and authentic personality. Three scales previously adapted to Turkish were used: The Authenticity Scale, The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule and The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. The study was carried out with 184 students (120 females and 64 male) from a private university in Istanbul. The participants were from various departments (psychology, health management, international trade, occupational health and safety, pharmacy, biology, English literature) as well as from different class levels (from 1st to 4th class, graduate level). The mean age was 20.75 (SD = 1.97). To test the main aim of the study, two separate mediation analyses were carried out by using PROCESS Macro. The results revealed that emotion regulation difficulties partially mediated the relationships between both positive affectivity and authentic personality as well as negative affectivity and authentic personality. When the results obtained from the models were examined, it was found that, compared to positive affectivity, negative affectivity had a stronger effect on authentic personality. According to the results, it can be argued that compared to those with lower levels of positive affectivity, those with higher levels of positive affectivity have a greater advantage in reaching their authentic personality. Furthermore, compared to those who have lower levels of negative affectivity, those who have higher levels of negative affectivity might be disadvantaged in reaching their authentic personality. The results of the study reveal that interventions aimed at reducing emotion regulation difficulties may enable individuals to support their authentic personality. It can be said that this is more important for individuals with high levels of negative affectivity.

Keywords: Difficulties in emotion regulation, positive affectivity, negative affectivity, authentic personality
DOI :10.26650/SP2020-0022   IUP :10.26650/SP2020-0022    Full Text (PDF)

Olumlu/Olumsuz Duygulanım ve Özgün Kişilik: Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüklerinin Aracı Rolü

Ferzan Curun, Başak Beydoğan Tangör, Elif Çolakoğlu Kaya

Kişinin kendini bilmesi ve olası tüm dışsal baskılara rağmen kendine sadık kalabilmesi temelinde tanımlanan özgün kişiliğin yordayıcılarını inceleyen çalışmalar alan yazında görece sınırlı sayıdadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, olumlu/olumsuz duygulanım ile özgün kişilik arasındaki ilişkide duygu düzenleme güçlüklerinin aracı rolünü incelenmektir. Çalışmada Otantiklik Ölçeği, Olumlu ve Olumsuz Duygulanım Ölçeği ve Duygu Düzenleme Güçlükleri Ölçeği olmak üzere Türkçeye çevrilmiş olan üç ölçek kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışma İstanbul’daki bir vakıf üniversitesinin çeşitli bölümlerinde (sırasıyla Psikoloji, Sağlık Yönetimi, Uluslararası Ticaret, İşletme, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği, Eczacılık, Biyoloji, İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı) lisans ve lisansüstü olmak üzere farklı sınıf düzeylerinde öğrenimine devam eden 184 üniversite öğrenci (120 kadın ve 64 erkek) ile yürütülmüştür. Katılımcıların yaşlarının ortalamasının 20.75 (SS= 1.97) olduğu bulgulanmıştır. Çalışmanın temel amacını test etmek için PROCESS Macro kullanılarak iki ayrı aracılık analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular, duygu düzenleme güçlüklerinin hem olumlu duygulanım ile özgün kişilik, hem de olumsuz duygulanım ile özgün kişilik arasındaki ilişkilerde kısmi aracı role sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Modellerden elde edilen sonuçlar incelendiğinde, olumlu duygulanıma kıyasla olumsuz duygulanımın özgün kişilik üzerinde daha güçlü etkiye sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Bulgulara göre, düşük düzeyde olumsuz duygulanıma sahip olan bireylerin, olumsuz duygulanım düzeyi yüksek olan bireylere kıyasla özgün kişiliğe ulaşma açısından daha avantajlı oldukları ileri sürülebilir. Öte yandan, düşük düzeyde olumlu duygulanıma sahip olan bireylerin, yüksek düzeyde olumlu duygulanıma sahip bireylere kıyasla özgün kişiliğe ulaşma açısından daha dezavantajlı olduğu görülmektedir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, duygu düzenleme güçlüklerinin azaltılmasını amaçlayan müdahalelerin, bireylerin özgün kişiliklilerinin desteklenmesine imkân sağlayabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bunun özellikle olumsuz duygulanım düzeyi yüksek olan bireyler açısından daha fazla öneme sahip olduğu ileri sürülebilir.

Keywords: Duygu düzenleme güçlükleri, olumlu duygulanım, olumsuz duygulanım, özgün kişilik

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The present study is based on the model proposed by Wood, Linley, Maltby, Baliousis and Joseph (2008) which considered authenticity as a dispositional construct (i.e. authentic personality) composed of three dimensions, namely; self-alienation, accepting external influence and authentic living. Positive affectivity (PA) and negative affectivity (NA) (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) as well as emotion regulation difficulties (Gratz & Roemer, 2004) were considered as predictors of authentic personality in the present study. It is hypothesized that those who are high in PA will experience lower levels of emotion regulation difficulties and higher levels of authentic personality. That is, those with high PA will be more likely to have a positive outlook for themselves as well as accepting and being motivated to express their authentic personality. Secondly, it is hypothesized that those high in NA will experience higher levels of emotion regulation difficulties and lower levels of authentic personality. Both NA and emotion regulation difficulties can be seen as possible obstacles for individuals to reach and/or to act according to their authentic personality. Lastly, it is hypothesized that emotional regulation difficulties will mediate the relationship between PA/NA and authentic personality. The hypotheses of the study were tested on a group of Turkish university students.

Method

After getting the required ethical permission for the study, the data was collected from university students (120 female and 64 male) from a private university in Istanbul. The mean age was 20.75 (SD = 1.97) and ranged from 18 to 27. The participants were from various departments (psychology, health management, international trade, occupational health and safety, pharmacy, biology, English literature) as well as from different class levels (from 1st to 4th class and graduate level). Three scales which were previously adapted to Turkish, namely, the Authenticity Scale (AS), the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) were used. In order to test the hypotheses of the study, two separate mediation analyses were carried out by PROCESS Macro (Hayes, 2017).

Results

PA was found to be significantly related to emotion regulation difficulties and authentic personality as r(182) = - .26, p < .01 and r(182) = .34, p < .01, respectively. NA was found to be related significantly to emotion regulation difficulties and authentic personality as r(182) = .63, p < .01 and r(182) = -.51, p < .01, respectively. The correlation between emotion regulation difficulties and authentic personality was found to be r(182) = - .48, p < .01.

Two separate mediational models were also tested in the study. The partially standardized indirect effects (95% LLCI and ULCI) were found to be significant for both models. The LLCI and ULCI were between -.11 and -.58 for the first mediational model, and between .05 and .20 for the second mediational model. The results of the correlational and mediational analyses supported all the hypotheses of the study.

Discussion 

The results revealed that emotion regulation difficulties partially mediated the relationships between both positive affectivity and authentic personality as well as negative affectivity and authentic personality. Compared to positive affectivity, negative affectivity was found to have a stronger effect on authentic personality. The results implied that compared to those with lower levels of positive affectivity, those with higher levels of positive affectivity are more advantaged in reaching their authentic personality. Furthermore, compared to those who have lower levels of negative affectivity, those who have higher levels of negative affectivity might be disadvantaged in reaching their authentic personality. The results emphasized the mediator role of emotion regulation difficulties on the relationship between positive/negative affectivity and authentic personality.

NA and PA are considered as stable individual differences, whereas emotion regulation difficulties can be seen as more open to clinical and counseling interventions. The results of the study implied that interventions on emotion regulation difficulties may also be important for increasing one’s subjective experience of authentic personality, which itself is in relation to better psychological health of individuals. Therefore, PA represents an affective resource for reaching authentic personality whereas NA can be seen as an obstacle for reaching and acting according to one’s authentic personality. Therefore, those who are high in NA may benefit from learning better ways for overcoming their chronic negative affectivity which may block their authentic personality. There are some limitations to this study. Firstly, the findings were obtained from a sample group consisting of students from a private university in Istanbul, therefore they may be generalized to university students with similar demographic properties. Future studies can also diversify data by using different groups of participants other than university students. Finally, the results are based on relational analysis, this point should be taken into account when interpreting the causeeffect relationship between research variables.


PDF View

References

  • Acun-Kapıkıran, N. (2015). Psikolojik gereksinimlerin doyumu ve duygu gereksinimi: Özgün benliğin aracı rolü. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 5(43), 1–10. google scholar
  • Akın, Ü. (2014). Does authenticity predict subjective happiness of Turkish teacher candidates. Journal of Educational & Instructional Studies in the World, 4(2), 48–54. google scholar
  • Akın, A. ve Akın, Ü. (2014). Authenticity as a predictor on hope in Turkish univeristy students. Education Sciences and Psychology, 28(2), 64–70. google scholar
  • Akyunus-İnce, M. (2012). Cognitive aspects of personality disorders: Influences of basic personality traits, cognitive emotion regulation and interpersonal problems. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). ODTÜ, Ankara. google scholar
  • Baker, Z. G., Tou, R. Y., Bryan, J. L. ve Knee, C. R. (2017). Authenticity and well-being: Exploring positivity and negativity in interactions as a mediator. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 235–239. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.018 google scholar
  • Baumann, N., Kaschel, R. ve Kuhl, J. (2007). Affect sensitivity and affect regulation in dealing with positive and negative affect. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 239–248. doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.05.002 google scholar
  • Blair, K. A., Denham, S. A., Kochanoff, A. ve Whipple, B. (2004). Playing it cool: Temperament, emotion regulation, and social behavior in preschoolers. Journal of School Psychology, 42(6), 419–443.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.10.002 google scholar
  • Boyraz, G. ve Kuhl, M. L. (2015). Self-focused attention, authenticity, and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.029 google scholar
  • Bradley, B., DeFife, J. A., Guarnaccia, C., Phifer, J., Fani, N., Ressler K. J. ve Westen, D. (2011). Emotion disregulation and negative affect: Association with psychiatric symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72 (5), 685–691. doi: 10.4088/jcp.10M06409BLU google scholar
  • Butler, E. A., Lee, T. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? Emotion, 7(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.30 google scholar
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık: Conway, A. M., Tugade, M. M., Catalino, L. I., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions: Form, function, and mechanisms. The Oxford handbook of happiness içinde (s. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199557257.013.0003. google scholar
  • Cooper, A. B., Sherman, R. A., Rauthmann, J. F., Serfass, D. G. ve Brown, N. A. (2018). Feeling good and authentic: Experienced authenticity in daily life is predicted by positive feelings and situation characteristics, not trait-state consistency. Journal of Research in Personality, 77, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.005 google scholar
  • Diamond, L. M. ve Aspinwall, L. G. (2003). Emotion regulation across the life span: An integrative perspective emphasizing self-regulation, positive affect, and dyadic processes. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 125–156. doi: 10.1023/A:1024521920068 google scholar
  • English, T. ve John, O. P. (2013). Understanding the Social Effects of Emotion Regulation: The Mediating Role of Authenticity for Individual Differences in Suppression, Emotion, 13(2), 314–329. doi: 10.1037/A0029847 google scholar
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218 google scholar
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). The value of positive emotions: The emerging science of positive psychology is coming to understand why it’s good to feel good. American Scientist, 91(4), 330–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 google scholar
  • Gençöz, T. (2000). Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: A study of validity and reliability. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15,19–28. google scholar
  • Gratz, K. L. ve Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factorstructure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. doi: 10.1007/s10862-008-9102-4 google scholar
  • Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781 google scholar
  • Gross, J. J. ve John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348. doi: 1037/0022-3514.85.2. google scholar
  • Hamilton, J. L., Burke, T. A., Stange, J. P., Kleiman, E. M., Rubenstein, M., Scopelliti, K. A., ...ve Alloy, L. B. (2017). Trait affect, emotion regulation, and the generation of negative and positive interpersonal events. Behavior Therapy, 48(4), 435–447. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.01.006 google scholar
  • Hallion, L. S., Steinman, S. A., Tolin, D. F. ve Diefenbach, G. J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS) and its short forms in adults with emotional disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 539. |https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00539 google scholar
  • Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. C.R. Snyder ve S. J. Lopez (Ed.). Handbook of Positive Psychologyiçinde (s. 382–394). New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications. google scholar
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2. Baskı). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. google scholar
  • İlhan, T. ve Özdemir, Y. (2013). Otantiklik ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(40), 142–153. google scholar
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. ve Karakitapoğlu-Aygün Z. (2004). Self-construals and values in different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130(4), 277–306. doi: 10.3200/MONO.130.4.277-306 google scholar
  • Kernis, M. H. ve Goldman, B. (2006). A Multicomponent Conceptualization of Authenticity: Theory and Research, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283–357. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38006-9 google scholar
  • Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R. and Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, Emotion, and Well-being: Good Feelings in Japan and the United States, Cognition & Emotion, 14(1), 93–124. doi: 10.1080/026999300379003 google scholar
  • Knoll, M. ve Van Dick, R. (2013). Authenticity, employee silence, prohibitive effect of organizational identification. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(4), 346–360. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2013.804113 google scholar
  • Lenton, A. P., Slabu, L., Sedikides, C. ve Power, K. (2013). I feel good, therefore I am real: Testing the causal influence of mood on state authenticity. Cognition & Emotion, 27(7), 1202–1224. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.778818 google scholar
  • Lopez, S. J. (2011). The encyclopedia of positive psychology. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Markus, H. R. ve Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224 google scholar
  • .Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Culture and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 5, 420–430. doi:10.1177/1745691610375557 google scholar
  • Mesquita, B. (2001). Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 68–74. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.68 google scholar
  • Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R. ve Pereg, D. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 77–102. doi: 10.1023/A:1024515519160 google scholar
  • Moneta, G. B., Vulpe, A. ve Rogaten, J. (2012). Can positive affect “undo” negative affect? A longitudinal study of affect in studying. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 448–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.011 google scholar
  • Ochsner, K. N. ve Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(5), 242–249. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 google scholar
  • Pinto, D. G., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M. ve Day, L. (2012). A behavioral test of Horney’s linkage between authenticity and aggression: People living authentically are less-likely to respond aggressively in unfair situations. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 41–44. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 google scholar
  • Preece, D. A., Becerra, R., Robinson, K., Dandy, J. ve Allan, A. (2018). Measuring emotion regulation ability across negative and positive emotions: The Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI). Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 229–241. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.025 google scholar
  • Quirin, M., Pruessner, J. C. ve Kuhl, J. (2008). HPA system regulation and adult attachment anxiety: individual differences in reactive and awakening cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33(5), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.01.013 google scholar
  • Preacher, K. J. ve Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 google scholar
  • Rugancı, N. R. (2008). The relationship among attachment style, affect regulation, psychological stres and mental construct of the relational world. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). ODTÜ, Ankara. google scholar
  • Salmela, M. (2005). What is emotional authenticity? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2005.00273.x google scholar
  • Sarıçam, H. (2015). Life satisfaction: Testing a structural equation model based on authenticity and subjective happiness. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46 (2), 278–284. doi: 10.1515/ppb-2015-0034 google scholar
  • Satıcı, S. A., Kayış, A. R. ve Akın, A. (2013). Investigating the predictive role of social self-efficacy on authenticity in Turkish university students. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 572–580. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/02.07.pr0.112.2.519-528 google scholar
  • Scharf, M. ve Mayseless, O. (2010). Finding the authentic self in a communal culture: developmental goals in emerging adulthood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 130, 83–95.doi: 10.1002/cd.283 google scholar
  • Sheldon, K. M. ve Ryan, R. M. (2011). Positive psychology and self-determination theory: A natural interface. Human autonomy in Cross-Cultural Context içinde (s. 33–44). Springer, Dordrecht. google scholar
  • Seto, E. ve Schlegel, R. J. (2017). Becoming your true self: Perceptions of authenticity across the lifespan. Self and Identity, 17(3), 310v326. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2017.1322530 google scholar
  • Slabu, L. Lenton, A. P., Sedikides, C. ve Bruder, M. (2014). Trait and state authenticity across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psyhology, 45(9), 1347–1373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114543520 google scholar
  • Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston:Allyn and Bacon. google scholar
  • Taşçıoğlu, C. ve Tosun, L. P. (2018). Facebook’taki benlik sunumları, otantiklik ve psikolojik iyi oluş. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi,6(12), 103–125. doi: 10.7816/nesne-06-12-06 google scholar
  • Tamir, M. ve Mauss, I. B. (2011). Social cognitive factors in emotion regulation: Implications for well-being. Emotion Regulation and Well-being içinde (s. 3 1–47). Springer, New York, NY. google scholar
  • Tortella-Feliu, M., Balle, M. ve Sese, A. (2010). Relationship between negative affectivity, emotion regulationi anxiety and depressive symptoms in adolescents examined through structural equation modeling. Journal of Anxiety Disordrs, 24(7), 686–683. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.04.012 google scholar
  • Tugade, M. M. ve Fredrickson, B. L. (2007). Regulation of positive emotions: Emotion regulation strategies that promote resilience. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(3), 311–333. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9015-4 google scholar
  • Turliuc, M. N. ve Bujor, L. (2013). Emotion regulation between determinants and consequences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 848–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.218 google scholar
  • Vess, M., Leal, S. A., Hoeldtke, R. T., Schlegel, R. J. ve Hicks, J. A. (2016).True self-alienation positively predicts reports of mindwandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 45, 89–99. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.018 google scholar
  • Wang, Y. ve Li, Z. (2018). Authenticity as a mediator of the relationship between power contingent self-esteem and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1066. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01066. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01066 google scholar
  • Watson, D. (2005). Positive affectivity: The disposition to experience pleasurable emotional states. Handbook of Positive Psychology (Ed. C. R. Snyder ve Shane J. Lopez) içinde (s.106-119). Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199396511.001.0001 google scholar
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A. ve Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063 google scholar
  • Watson, D. ve Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96(2), 234–254. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.2.234 google scholar
  • Wenzel, A. J. ve Lucas-Thompson, R. G. (2012). Authenticity in college-aged males and females, how close others are perceived, and mental health outcomes. Sex Roles, 67(5-6), 334–350. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0182-y google scholar
  • White, N. J. ve Tracey, T. J. G. (2011). An examination of career indecision and application to dispositional authenticity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.09.015 google scholar
  • Wickham, R. E., Williamson, R. E., Beard, C. L., Kobayashi, C. L. ve Hirst, T. W. (2016). Authenticity attenuates the negative effects of interpersonal conflict on daily well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.11.006 google scholar
  • Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M. ve Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of authenticity scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3), 385–399. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.385 google scholar
  • Yöntem, M. K. ve İlhan, T. (2013). Benlik kurguları ve otantikliğin özgecilik üzerindeki yordayıcı gücünün incelenmesi. Turkish Studies, 8(8), 2291–2302. doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.5477 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Curun, F., Beydoğan Tangör, B., & Çolakoğlu Kaya, E. (2020). Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties. Studies in Psychology, 40(2), 599-623. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0022


AMA

Curun F, Beydoğan Tangör B, Çolakoğlu Kaya E. Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties. Studies in Psychology. 2020;40(2):599-623. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0022


ABNT

Curun, F.; Beydoğan Tangör, B.; Çolakoğlu Kaya, E. Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties. Studies in Psychology, [Publisher Location], v. 40, n. 2, p. 599-623, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Curun, Ferzan, and Başak Beydoğan Tangör and Elif Çolakoğlu Kaya. 2020. “Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties.” Studies in Psychology 40, no. 2: 599-623. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0022


Chicago: Humanities Style

Curun, Ferzan, and Başak Beydoğan Tangör and Elif Çolakoğlu Kaya. “Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties.” Studies in Psychology 40, no. 2 (May. 2024): 599-623. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0022


Harvard: Australian Style

Curun, F & Beydoğan Tangör, B & Çolakoğlu Kaya, E 2020, 'Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties', Studies in Psychology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 599-623, viewed 17 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0022


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Curun, F. and Beydoğan Tangör, B. and Çolakoğlu Kaya, E. (2020) ‘Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties’, Studies in Psychology, 40(2), pp. 599-623. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0022 (17 May. 2024).


MLA

Curun, Ferzan, and Başak Beydoğan Tangör and Elif Çolakoğlu Kaya. “Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties.” Studies in Psychology, vol. 40, no. 2, 2020, pp. 599-623. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0022


Vancouver

Curun F, Beydoğan Tangör B, Çolakoğlu Kaya E. Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties. Studies in Psychology [Internet]. 17 May. 2024 [cited 17 May. 2024];40(2):599-623. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0022 doi: 10.26650/SP2020-0022


ISNAD

Curun, Ferzan - Beydoğan Tangör, Başak - Çolakoğlu Kaya, Elif. “Positive/ Negative Affectivity and Authentic Personality: The Mediator Role of Emotion Regulation Difficulties”. Studies in Psychology 40/2 (May. 2024): 599-623. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0022



TIMELINE


Submitted24.04.2019
Accepted03.07.2020
Published Online11.12.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.