Research Article


DOI :10.26650/iutd.1601095   IUP :10.26650/iutd.1601095    Full Text (PDF)

Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912)

Toroshan Özdamar

French silkworm eggs dominated the market in Ottoman silkworm cocoon production centers since the mid-nineteenth century. This study examines the indigenous silkworm egg production efforts of the Ottoman Public Debt Administration (OPDA) in the last period of the Ottoman Empire, the competition of indigenous silkworm races with French silkworm races, and their exports based on the reports of the French Chamber of Commerce in Istanbul. As a result, OPDA’s efforts to produce indigenous eggs in the Bursa region attracted the reaction of the French capital. Bursa silkworm eggs, also called Baghdad white, achieved great success in terms of yield in a short period of time. Consequently, they became the main competitor of the French yellow silkworm both within the Ottoman Empire and in foreign markets such as the Iran, Caucasus, and Turkestan.

DOI :10.26650/iutd.1601095   IUP :10.26650/iutd.1601095    Full Text (PDF)

İstanbul Fransız Ticaret Odası’na Göre Osmanlı Devleti’nde Yerli İpek Böceği Tohumu Üretimi ve Rekabet (1890-1912)

Toroshan Özdamar

Fransız menşeili ipek böceği tohumları, 1870′lerden itibaren Osmanlı ipek böceği tohumu piyasasına hâkim olmuştu. Bu çalışmada, Osmanlı’nın son döneminde Düyûn-ı Umûmiyye tarafından yürütülen yerli ipek böceği tohumu üretim çalışmaları, yerli tohumların Fransız tohumları ile olan rekabeti ve ihracatı gibi hususlar, İstanbul Fransız Ticaret Odası raporları temel alınarak incelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, Düyûn-ı Umûmiyye’nin Bursa bölgesinde yürüttüğü yerli tohum üretim çalışmaları, Fransız sermayesinin tepkisini çekmiştir. Bağdat beyazı olarak da adlandırılan Bursa üretimi yerli ipek böcekleri, verim olarak çok başarılı olmuştur. Dolayısıyla hem Osmanlı dâhilinde hem de İran, Kafkasya, Türkistan gibi dış pazarlarda Fransız menşeili sarı ipek böceklerinin en büyük rakibi haline gelmiştir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


After the silkworm diseases that spread to the Ottoman provinces after the 1860s, the indigenous Baghdad white silkworms began to disappear. Consequently, healthy yellow silkworm eggs were imported to the Ottoman Empire from the Var, Alpes-Maritime, and Corsica regions of France. Due to their compatibility with the prevailing climatic conditions in the Ottoman Empire and their capacity to produce high yields of cocoons, the French yellow silkworm race came to dominate the market for silkworm eggs between the years 1880 and 1890. However, Ottoman Public Debt Administration (OPDA), the Ottoman authority responsible for the collection of silk taxes, initiated initiatives aimed at the reproduction and popularization of the indigenous Baghdad race of silkworm eggs. However, these efforts posed a threat to the interests of French silkworm egg producers and traders, who had secured a significant market share in the Ottoman Empire. Consequently, the French capital, which constituted the most significant actor within the Ottoman silk industry, and OPDA became rivals in the production of silkworm eggs. This rivalry can be observed in the reports published by the French Chamber of Commerce and the Lyon Silk Merchants Association. In particular, the Revue Commerciale du Levant, a monthly bulletin of the French Chamber of Commerce in Istanbul, which published reports from its members and French consular staff operating in the major commercial centers of the Ottoman Empire, frequently mentioned this rivalry. This study addresses matters pertaining to the response of French merchants to the OPDA silkworm egg production initiatives and the competition between indigenous and French silkworm eggs in the domestic and foreign markets. It is based on the Revue Commerciale du Levant bulletin.

In order to facilitate the development and popularization of indigenous silkworm egg production, the OPDA initially established the Bursa School of Sericulture (Bursa Harîr Dâruttalîmi). Those who received diplomas from the school and the incentives offered by the Ottoman government saw a significant increase in the amount of indigenous silkworm eggs used in Bursa and Izmit, two regions with a high production of cocoons. At the time of the founding of the Bursa School of Sericulture in 1888, the proportion of native Bursa silkworm eggs of the Baghdad white race used in the aforementioned regions was only 20%. However, by 1890, this figure had reached 65%, and by 1896, it had reached 98%. Consequently, the market share of French silkworm eggs in Bursa and Izmit was effectively negligible. In the Aleppo, Beirut, and Damascus provinces, the second largest silk production center and the largest silkworm egg market of the Ottoman Empire, the use of indigenous silkworm eggs never reached the desired levels, remaining at approximately 10-15% of the total. In the aforementioned provinces, which the French merchants designated as the Syrian region, it can be posited that both physical and political factors contributed to the underutilization of indigenous silkworm eggs. One of the main physical reasons is that indigenous silkworms consume more mulberry leaves than French silkworms. In addition, the raw silk factories of the region were very conservative in spinning cocoons produced from French yellow silkworms. Political factors are associated with the influence of France in the region. It is a historical fact that the region, especially around Beirut, was perceived as a natural area of political expansion for the French. It can be surmised that this fact was instrumental in exempting the region from silkworm eggs regulations and practices. As a matter of fact, even though the OPDA was engaged in activities such as the promotion of mulberry cultivation in the region, it is understood that it did not make intensive efforts in the use of indigenous races. 

Bursa region became a leading exporter of silkworm eggs during this period. Especially after 1895, more than half of the silkworm eggs produced in the Bursa region were exported to Iran, Caucasus and Turkestan. Before the introduction of Bursa silkworm eggs, one of the most important suppliers of these regions was France. Therefore, Bursa silkworm eggs became the biggest competitor of French silkworm eggs not only in the domestic market but also in Iran, the Caucasus and Turkestan. Bursa producers exported an average of 400.000 boxes of eggs to these regions annually with an estimated value of 2.500.000 francs. It should be noted that these figures do not include possible unregistered exports from eastern Anatolia, where OPDA control was weak. Thus, even with their exports to the Caucasus and Turkestan alone, Bursa producers reduced the volume of trade in French silkworm eggs. On the other hand, it should be noted that French merchants in Bursa acted as intermediaries in exports to these regions.

French merchants, who were the dominant element in the Ottoman silk industry, showed different reactions to indigenous silkworm egg production. The French operating in the Bursa and Izmit regions recognized that indigenous eggs increased cocoon yields and thus raw silk production. They also established companies producing indigenous silkworm eggs in the region and started to earn income from the egg trade. The French operating in Aleppo, Beirut and Damascus provinces, on the other hand, were prejudiced against indigenous silkworms and criticized the work of the Ottoman government and OPDA. They even believed that OPDA was harming French interests in the Ottoman silk sector. 

In the end, OPDA's efforts to produce indigenous silkworm eggs, supported by the Ottoman government, were successful and made the Ottoman Empire an important actor on a global scale. Nevertheless, it would not be inaccurate to assert that OPDA, which in our economic history is often discussed with concepts such as imperialism and resource exploitation, created a new resource for the Ottoman finance and farmers, at least in this sector, rather than exploitation. 


PDF View

References

  • Revue commerciale du Levant: Bulletin mensuel de la Chambre de commerce française de Constantinople (RCL) google scholar
  • Chambre de commerce française de Constantinople: Bulletin mensuel (CCFC) google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la sole en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1886, Imprimerie Pitrat Aine, Lyon 1887. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1891, Imprimerie Pitrat Aine, Lyon 1892. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1893, Imprimerie Pitrat Aine, Lyon 1894. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1894, Imprimerie Pitrat Aine, Lyon 1895. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1895, Imprimerie Pitrat Aine, Lyon 1896. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1896, Imprimerie Pitrat Aine, Lyon 1897. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1897, Imprimerie ALexandre Rey, Lyon 1898. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1900, Imprimerie A. Rey et Cie, Lyon 1901 google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1899, Imprimerie ALexandre Rey, Lyon 1900. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1901, Imprimerie A. Rey et Cie, Lyon 1902. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1902, Imprimerie A. Rey et Cie, Lyon 1903. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1904, Imprimerie A. Rey et Cie, Lyon 1905. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1905, Imprimerie A. Rey et Cie, Lyon 1906. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1906, Imprimerie A. Rey et Cie, Lyon 1907. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1908, Imprimerie A. Rey et Cie, Lyon 1909. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1911, Imprimerie A. Rey, Lyon 1912. google scholar
  • Syndicat de L'Union des marchands de soie de Lyon, Statistique de la production de la soie en France et â l'etranger: recolte de 1913, Imprimerie A. Rey, Lyon 1915. google scholar
  • Akar Şevket Kamil, - AL, Hüseyin, “Uluslararası Finans Politik Açısından 1860-61 Suriye Bunalımı ve Mires Borçlanması”, Tarih Dergisi, 45 (2012), s. 77-122 google scholar
  • Aktar, Ayhan, Kapitalizm, Az Gelişmişlik ve Türkiye’de Küçük Sanayi, Afa Yayınları, İstanbul 1990. google scholar
  • Autheman, Andre, La Banque imperiale ottomane, Comite pour l'Histoire Economique et Financiere de la France, Paris 1996. google scholar
  • Berkes, Niyazi, The Development of Secularism in Turkey, Hurst & Company, Londra 1998. google scholar
  • Blaisdell, Donald C., European Financial Control in the Ottoman Empire, Columbia University Press, New York 1929. google scholar
  • Çiftçi, Cafer, “1837-1908 Sürecinde Bursa’da Koza Üreticiliği ve İpekli Dokumacılık Sektörü”, Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, XIV/24 (2013), s. 1-18 google scholar
  • _______, “Hudâvendigâr Vilayetinde İpekböcekçiliğinin Canlandırılmasında Düyûn-ı Umumiyye İdâresi’nin Rolü”, Belleten LXXVI/277 (2012), s. 905-950. google scholar
  • _______, Bursa’da İpekçilik (1837-1990), Bursa Büyükşehir Belediyesi, Bursa 2017. google scholar
  • Çizakça, Murat, “A Short History of the Bursa Silk Industry (1500-1900)”, Journal of the EconomicandSocial History of the Orient, XXIII/1-2, s. 142-152. google scholar
  • ______, “Incorporation of the Middle East into the European WorldEconomy”, Review, VIII/3 (1985), s. 353-377. google scholar
  • Ducousso, Gaston, L'industrie de la soie en Syrie et au Liban, Imprimerie Catholique, Beyrouth 1913. google scholar
  • Eşiyok, B. Ali, “Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun Dünya Ekonomisine Eklemlenmesinde Bir Dönüm Noktası: 1838 Serbest Ticaret Anlaşması”, Mülkiye Dergisi, XXXIV/266 (2010), s. 67-108. google scholar
  • Genç, Mehmet, Osmanlı İmparatorluğunda Devlet ve Ekonomi, Ötüken Neşriyat, İstanbul 2019. google scholar
  • Koyuncu, Derviş Tuğrul-Küçükkalay, A. Mesud, “Global Market Orientation of the Ottoman Agriculture Sector: An Interregional Compar-ison (1844)”, OsmanlI Araştırmaları, LXVIII/48 (2016), s. 171-228. google scholar
  • Önsoy, Rifat, Tazminat Dönemi Osmanlı Sanayii ve Sanayileşme Politikası, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, Ankara 1988. google scholar
  • Özdamar, Toroshan, Osmanlı Madenlerinde Fransız Sermayesi ve Galata Bankerleri, Duvar Yayınları, İzmir 2022. google scholar
  • ______, “Balkan Savaşlarından Sonra Osmanlı İmtiyazlarının Durumu ve Halefiyet Meselesi”, Belleten, LXXXVIII/313 (2024), s. 935-968. google scholar
  • Özdemir, Biltekin, Osmanlı Devleti Dış Borçları, T.C. Maliye Bakanlığı Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı, Ankara 2010. google scholar
  • Parvus Efendi, Türkiye’nin Mali Tutsaklığı, haz. Muhammer Sencer, İleri Yayınları, İstanbul 2005. google scholar
  • Quataert, Donald, Anadolu'da Osmanlı Reformu ve Tarım: 1876-1908, çev. N. Ö. Gündoğan ve A. Z. Gündoğan, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul 2008. google scholar
  • _______, Manufacturing and Technology Transfer in the Ottoman Empire, 1800-1914, The Isis Press, İstanbul 2010. google scholar
  • _______, Workers, Peasants and Economic Change in the Ottoman Empires 1730-1914, The Isis Press, İstanbul 2010. google scholar
  • Seurat, Michel, Lyon et la Syrie (1915-1925): interets economiques et opinion publique, Üniversite Jean Moulin, Unpublished master’s thesis, Lyon 1971. google scholar
  • Teoman, Özgür-Bozpınar, Cumali, “Osmanlı İmalat Sanayisinde Sermayenin Kurumsallaşması Sorunsalı: Bursa İpek Sektörü Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Business and Economics Research Journal, XI/4 (2020), s. 1013-1033. google scholar
  • _______, “The Development of the Silk Industry in the Ottoman Bursa: An Analysis of Periodization”, Gazi Akademik Bakış, XV/30, (2022), s. 157-176. google scholar
  • Thobie, Jacques, İnterets et Imperialisme Français dans l'Empire Ottoman (1895-1914), Publications de la Sorbonne Imprimerie Nationale, Paris 1977. google scholar
  • ______, Les interets culturels français dans l'empire ottoman finissant L'enseignernent congreganiste, v. 1, Les Editions Isis, İstanbul 2022. google scholar
  • Torkomyan, Kevork, ipek Böceği Beslemek ve ipek Tohumu istihsal Üretmek Usul ve Kavaidi, Divan-ı Umumiyye-i Osmaniyye Varidat-ı Muhassese İdaresi Matbaası, İstanbul 1326. google scholar
  • Uğuz, Sacit, “Karataban (Pebrine) ve Baygınlık (Flacherie) Salgınlarının Osmanlı İpek Böcekçiliğine Etkileri”, Bellek Uluslararası Tarih ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (2021), s. 31-47. google scholar
  • Ulman, Haluk, 1860-61 Suriye Buhranı/Osmanlı Diplomasisinden Bir Örnek Olay, A.Ü SBF Yayınları, Ankara 1966. google scholar
  • Uygun, Süleyman, “Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyet’e İstanbul Fransız Ticaret Odasının Kuruluşu ve Faaliyetleri”, Osmanlı Mirası Araştırmaları Dergisi, VII/18 (2020), s. 485-512. google scholar
  • Wallerstein, ImmanuelKDecdeli, HaleKKasaba, Reşat, “Osmanlı İmparatorluğunun Dünya Ekonomisi ile Bütünleşme Süreci”, Toplum ve Bilim, 23 (1983), s. 41K54. google scholar
  • ______, “The Ottoman Empire and the Capitalist World-Economy: Some Questions for Research”, Review, 11/3 (1979), s. 389-398. google scholar
  • _______, The Modern World-System III: The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy 1730-1840s, University of CaLifornia Press, CaLifornia 2011. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, Mehmet Ali, “Osmanlı’da İpekböcekçiliği Eğitimi: Bursa Harir Dârüttalimi ve Dârülharirlerin Açılması”, Turkish Studies, LXXXV/5 (2013), s. 577K594. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Özdamar, T. (2025). Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912). Turkish Journal of History, 0(86), 184-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.1601095


AMA

Özdamar T. Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912). Turkish Journal of History. 2025;0(86):184-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.1601095


ABNT

Özdamar, T. Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912). Turkish Journal of History, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 86, p. 184-209, 2025.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Özdamar, Toroshan,. 2025. “Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912).” Turkish Journal of History 0, no. 86: 184-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.1601095


Chicago: Humanities Style

Özdamar, Toroshan,. Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912).” Turkish Journal of History 0, no. 86 (Sep. 2025): 184-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.1601095


Harvard: Australian Style

Özdamar, T 2025, 'Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912)', Turkish Journal of History, vol. 0, no. 86, pp. 184-209, viewed 20 Sep. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.1601095


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Özdamar, T. (2025) ‘Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912)’, Turkish Journal of History, 0(86), pp. 184-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.1601095 (20 Sep. 2025).


MLA

Özdamar, Toroshan,. Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912).” Turkish Journal of History, vol. 0, no. 86, 2025, pp. 184-209. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.1601095


Vancouver

Özdamar T. Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912). Turkish Journal of History [Internet]. 20 Sep. 2025 [cited 20 Sep. 2025];0(86):184-209. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.1601095 doi: 10.26650/iutd.1601095


ISNAD

Özdamar, Toroshan. Indigenous Silkworm Egg Production and Competition in the Ottoman Empire According to the Istanbul French Chamber of Commerce (1890-1912)”. Turkish Journal of History 0/86 (Sep. 2025): 184-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.1601095



TIMELINE


Submitted13.12.2024
Accepted21.04.2025
Published Online04.07.2025

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.