Research Article


DOI :10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807   IUP :10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807    Full Text (PDF)

Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis

Cemile Uzun

Social media is crucial during and after earthquakes, as it enables people to both receive information and express themselves. This study focuses on the analysis of the emotional language used by people when sharing their experiences related to the earthquake that occurred in Turkey on February 6, 2023. In the current study, the emotional language analysis focused on the social media tool Twitter alone. Emotion analysis is a natural language processing technique used to identify emotions expressed in a text. The current study aims to reveal the reflection of emotions about the earthquake in specific expressions and the variation in these emotions over time. For this purpose, an emotional language analysis of tweets posted on Twitter with the hashtag #earthquake between February 6 and June 6 was conducted. Nakamura’s system of emotion analysis was used to perform the emotional language analysis. In his work “Kanjō hyōgen jiten (Dictionary of emotive expressions),” Nakamura emphasized ten classifications of emotions: excitement, embarrassment, joy, fondness, dislike, sadness, anger, surprise, fear, and relief. From these, six emotions, namely joy, grief, anger, surprise, fear, and relief, were selected to analyze the emotional language in tweets about the earthquake. Our study is distinct from other studies in Turkey in terms of both revealing the emotional language resulting from the earthquake and using Nakamura’s emotion analysis.

DOI :10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807   IUP :10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807    Full Text (PDF)

6 Şubat Depremi ve Twitter Duygu Analizi

Cemile Uzun

Sosyal medya, insanların hem bilgi almasını hem de kendilerini ifade etmesini sağladığı için deprem anında ve sonrasında önemli bir yere sahiptir. Çalışmada, insanların depreme ilişkin tecrübelerini ifade ederken kullandıkları duygu analizi dili üzerinde durulmuştur. Depremle ilgili duygu analizi dili tespit edilirken sosyal medya aracı olarak sadece Twitter kullanılmıştır. Duygu analizi, bir metinde ifade edilen duyguyu belirlemek için kullanılan doğal dil işleme tekniğidir. Çalışmanın amacı depreme yönelik duyguların dile nasıl yansıdığını ve bu duyguların zamanla nasıl bir değişim izlediğini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Bu amaçla, Twitter’de deprem etiketiyle 06 Şubat-06 Haziran tarihleri arasında atılan tivitlerdeki duygu dili analizi incelenmiştir. Duygu analizi dilini tespit etmek için Nakamura’nın duygu analizi sistemi kullanılmıştır. Nakamura, “Emotional Display Dictionary” adlı çalışmasında “heyecan, utanç, sevinç, düşkünlük, hoşlanmama, üzüntü, öfke, sürpriz, korku ve rahatlama” olmak üzere on duygu analizi sınıflandırması üzerinde durmuştur. Depremin insanlar üzerinde yarattığı duygular göz önünde bulundurularak Nakamura’nın duygu analizi depreme göre uyarlanmış ve 06 Şubat duygu dili analizi tespit edilirken “sevinç, keder, öfke, şaşırma, korku, rahatlama” olmak üzere altı duygu dili analizi kullanılmıştır. Hem Türkiye’de yaşanmış bir depremin duygu dili analizini ortaya koyması hem de Nakamura’nın duygu analizini kullanması yönüyle çalışmamız Türkiye’deki diğer çalışmalardan ayrılmaktadır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


An earthquake is a sudden release of energy in the rocks of the Earth that generates seismic waves. Turkey is a seismically active country that has been subjected to severe earthquakes throughout history. Turkey has experienced earthquakes of magnitude 7 and above since the 1500s. On February 6, 2023, two separate earthquakes of magnitudes 7.7 and 7.6 occurred in the Pazarcık district of Kahramanmaraş. This event was one of the earthquakes that deeply affected the history of Turkey.

Social media are online platforms where users can create content, share it, and interact with each other. During a disaster, a substantial amount of data were generated by social media users. When an earthquake occurs, social media acts as a crucial source of information for decision-making support systems. Furthermore, the experiences of people living through an earthquake can be quite diverse. There are several social media tools through which people share their experiences. Emotion analysis, a technique used in the field of natural language processing, is an analytical approach to identifying emotional responses in a data type. In this study, the flow of information on Twitter, including the moment of the earthquake and its aftermath, was investigated using emotional language analysis to assess the emotional language used by people in the tweets.

The data analyzed in this study were limited to tweets posted between February 6 and June 6, 2023. Only those tweets talking about the primary earthquake and the major aftershocks were considered, and the analyzed tweets were further limited to the keywords #earthquake and #zelzele. The data collection method used in this study was based on A. Nakamura’s (2005) emotion analysis. These emotions were adapted to those that can be felt during an earthquake. The major classes of emotions selected for the analysis were joy, shame, grief, anger, surprise, fear, and relief. The chief conclusions were as follows:

I. The most frequently used emotional language since the first moment of an earthquake was grief.

II. Emotions of fear and anger were more common in tweets posted in the afternoon. Furthermore, the emotional language of grief and fear seen in the early hours and days of the earthquake turned into the emotional language of relief over time.

III. The most commonly used emotional language in tweets after that of grief was the emotional language of relief. The emotion of relaxation was more common in tweets sent during the evening.

IV. Since March, there have been tweets expressing feelings of joy. In sentences using the language of joy, expressions describing the happiness of children have been encountered.

V. The least used emotional languages were joy, surprise, and shame.

It was observed that certain distinct emotions emerged in the sentences, despite the absence of explicit emotional language. The frequency of certain words, excluding those used in the emotional language analysis, was also determined. It was determined that “begging” was the most frequently used emotion, other than the ones included in the emotion analysis language, and the most frequently used word was the verb “to protect.”


PDF View

References

  • Akaishi, J., Sakata, M., Yoshinaga, J., Nakano, M., Koshi, K. & Kiyota, K. (2022). Estimating the emotional information in japanese songs using search engines, Sensors, 22, 1800. http://dx.doi: 10.3390/s22051800. google scholar
  • Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York: Columbia University Press. google scholar
  • Bao-Khanh, H. & Nigel, C. (2013). Twitter emotion analysis in eartquake situations. IJCLA, 4(1), 159173. Erişim adresi: https://www.gelbukh.com/ijcla/2013-1/IJCLA-2013-1-pp-159-173-09-Twitter.pdf google scholar
  • Bolea, S. C. (2017). An analysis of tweets related to earthquakes, for the Romanian language, 2017 International Conference on Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogue (SpeD), 6-9 July, Bucharest, Romania, 1-6. http://dx.doi:10.1109/SPED.2017.7990437. google scholar
  • Cambria, E., Livigstone, A. & Hussain, A. (2012). The hourglass of emotions. Cognitive Behavioural Systems, Sprinter-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 144-157. Erişim adresi: https://ww.sentic.net/hourglass-of-emotions.pdf. google scholar
  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (1982). What emotion categories or dimensions can observers judge from facial behavior?. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Emotion in the human face, 39-55. Newyork: Cambridge University Press google scholar
  • Frijda, N. (1988). The laws of emotions. American Psychologist 43(5), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349 google scholar
  • Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. google scholar
  • James, W. (1884). What isan emotion? Mind. 9(34), 188-205. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/ stable/2246769. google scholar
  • McDougall, W. (1926). An introduction to social psychology. Boston:Luce. google scholar
  • Mowrer, O. H. (1960). Learning theory and behavior. New York, NY:Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1037/10802-000. google scholar
  • Nakamura, A. (2005). Emotional Display Dictionary. Sanseido: Tokyo, Japan. Erişim adresi: https://scholar. google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Emotional+Display+Dictionary&author=Nakamura,+A.&publication_ year=2005. google scholar
  • Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 1, 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408362. google scholar
  • Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J. (1990). What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97(3), 315-331. http://dx.doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.315. google scholar
  • Panksepp, J. (1982). Toward a general psychobiological theory of emotions. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 407-467. http://dx.doi:10.1017/S0140525X00012759 google scholar
  • Parrott, W. (2001). Emotions in Social Psychology. Psychology Press. google scholar
  • Plutchik, R. (2001). The nature of emotions. American Scientist, 89(4), 344-350. Erişim adresi: https:// www.jstor.org/stable/27857503 google scholar
  • Pourbeyranvand, S. (2021). Earthquake (Zelzeleh) in the written heritage of Persian language and literature. Journal of critical reviews. 8 (1), 429-439. Erişim adresi: https://www.jcreview.com/admin/Uploads/ Files/61bb1ca10e33c2.07646291.pdf. google scholar
  • Radianti, J., Hiltz, S. R. & Labaka, L. (2016). An overview of public concerns during the recovery period after a major earthquake: Nepal twitter analysis. 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, 2016, 136-145. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2016.25. google scholar
  • Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145-172. http://dx.doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145. google scholar
  • Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., Smith, M. S. & Daniel, M. O. (1966). The general ınquirer: a computer approach to content analysis”, The MIT Press. google scholar
  • Tokuhisa, R., Inui, K. & Matsumoto, Y. (2008). Emotion classification using massive examples extracted from the web. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), Manchester, UK. Coling 2008 Organizing Committee, 881-888. Erişim adresi: https:// aclanthology.org/C08-1111.pdf google scholar
  • Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness. Vol 1: The Positive Affects, New York: Springer. google scholar
  • Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Weiner, B., & Graham, S. (1984). An attributional approach to emotional development. In C. E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Uzun, C. (2023). Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, 63(2), 503-517. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807


AMA

Uzun C. Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature. 2023;63(2):503-517. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807


ABNT

Uzun, C. Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, [Publisher Location], v. 63, n. 2, p. 503-517, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Uzun, Cemile,. 2023. “Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis.” Journal of Turkish Language and Literature 63, no. 2: 503-517. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807


Chicago: Humanities Style

Uzun, Cemile,. Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis.” Journal of Turkish Language and Literature 63, no. 2 (May. 2024): 503-517. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807


Harvard: Australian Style

Uzun, C 2023, 'Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis', Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 503-517, viewed 3 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Uzun, C. (2023) ‘Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis’, Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, 63(2), pp. 503-517. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807 (3 May. 2024).


MLA

Uzun, Cemile,. Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis.” Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, vol. 63, no. 2, 2023, pp. 503-517. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807


Vancouver

Uzun C. Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature [Internet]. 3 May. 2024 [cited 3 May. 2024];63(2):503-517. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807 doi: 10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807


ISNAD

Uzun, Cemile. Twitter Mentions of February 6th Earthquake: An Emotional Language Analysis”. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature 63/2 (May. 2024): 503-517. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2023-1350807



TIMELINE


Submitted27.08.2023
Accepted08.11.2023
Published Online27.12.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.