Research Article


DOI :10.26561/iutded.369143   IUP :10.26561/iutded.369143    Full Text (PDF)

Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship

Didem Akyıldız Ay

Sound symbolism describes the discipline of a hypothesized systematic correspondence between sound and meaning. At the core of the subject, the relationship between linguistic and nonlinguistic sound or phenomena is discussed, and whether the connection is conventional among word-meaning-nonlinguistic sound/phenomenon is scrutinized. Sound symbolism is a comprehensive subject which many disciplines are interested in and contribute to, and it is also complex, because its researchers have not been able to reach consensus on the subject. There are several subtitles about sound symbolism, which sometimes engage with one another, on which linguistics studies and various psychology subdisciplines, such as cognitive or behavioral, concentrate. In this study, information will be provided about the subtitles that have no terminological equivalent in Turkish, such as onomatopoeia, phonesthemes, size symbolism and shape symbolism, based on the data obtained from the studies of sound symbolism in other languages. Later, we will mention three different categories where the effects of phonemes in language are grounded in the mind’s meaning. 

DOI :10.26561/iutded.369143   IUP :10.26561/iutded.369143    Full Text (PDF)

Ses Sembolizmi ve Ses-Anlam Uyumunun Farklı Bir Sınıflandırma Denemesi

Didem Akyıldız Ay

Ses sembolizmi, ses ve anlam arasında sistematik bir ilişkinin olduğu varsayıldığı bir disiplindir. Konunun çekirdeğinde dil ile dil dışı ses veya görüngü arasındaki ilişkiler üzerinde durulur ve sözcük-anlam-dil dışı ses/görüngü arasındaki bağın uzlaşımsal olup olmadığı irdelenir. Ses sembolizmi konusu, birçok bilim dalının ilgilendiği ve katkıda bulunduğu kapsamlı bir konu olmakla birlikte konuyla ilgilenen araştırmacıların konuya bakış açılarında tam bir birlik sağlanamamasından dolayı aynı zamanda karmaşık bir konudur denilebilir. Dil araştırmalarında ve psikolojinin bilişsel, davranışsal gibi çeşitli alt bilim dallarında araştırmaların daha da yoğunlaştığı ses sembolizmiyle ilgili, birbirleriyle zaman zaman iç içe geçen birtakım alt konu başlıkları yer almaktadır. Bu çalışmada, ses sembolizmi konusunun diğer diller üzerinde yapılmış çalışmalardaki verilerden yola çıkılarak, onomatopeia, phonesthemes, size symbolism ve shape symbolism gibi Türkçede henüz terimsel tam karşılıklarını bulamadığımız alt konu başlıkları hakkında bilgi verilecektir. Daha sonra ise dildeki sesbirimlerin zihinde beliren anlam üzerindeki etkilerinin esas alındığı üç ayrı kategoriden bahsedilecektir.  


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


In almost all languages, there are words with phonemes that evoke the meaning they denote. The reason for this is that the same phonemes evoke similar concepts across many languages. Sound symbolism is a discipline that studies the relationship between sound and meaning. The similarity between the phonemes forming the words and the extra-linguistic sounds are significant in the types of sound symbolism, especially onomatopoetic words. Sound symbolism also deals with the relationship of the phonemes with senses other than audition. Here, the similarity between the phenomes’ articulation features and the extra-linguistic phenomenon with which they associate are significant. Sound symbolism is a field of language studies, and various disciplines research the associations created in the human mind by the sound-semantic harmony. For example, there is a considerable amount of research on this subject in the sub-branches of psychology, such as cognitive and behavioral psychology. In addition, studies on sound symbolism become especially important in the creation of brand names in the field of advertising. Although we know that Turkey has richer examples than many other languages in terms of sound and meaning harmony, these topics have not been addressed in all aspects of sound symbolism. This study provides information on the basic subjects and commonly used terms of voice symbolism with a view to pioneering new studies on sound symbolism in Turkish. Finally, in order to show that the layers of meaning associated with the phonemes have different levels in the mind, their relationship to extra-linguistic sound or phenomena are evaluated under three separate categories:

• Natural harmony: Onomatopoeic words fall into this category as the basic element of the sound symbolism because the extra-linguistic sounds that are heard are represented by the closest phoneme in the language. The relation between phoneme » sound is taken into consideration. These are the linguistic signs that are farthest away from the conventional or arbitrary linguistic signs in a language.

• Associative harmony: Here it is essential that the phonemes have a similarity between the form and place characteristics of articulation; that is to say, there is a similarity between the extra-linguistic sound/phenomenon and whether the phonemic is in the back, frontal, and whether it is glide, flapped, plosive, fricative. Although this similarity is established for all components of sound symbolism, sound symbolic items outside the onomatopoeic words should be included in this harmony because the relationship between signifier and signified is more indirect.

• Melodic harmony is a type of harmony that is considered quite different from the other two types of harmony; it expresses a suprasegmental harmony created by using more than one word together. This harmony is widely used in tongue twisters, riddles, and especially in poetic language. In the language of poetry, the writer or poet conveys the emotion to the reader by using the phonetic properties of the phonemes and especially sound harmony (alliteration/assonance).


PDF View

References

  • ABELİN, Åsa, “Studies in Sound Symbolism”, Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics, 17. Doctoral Dissertation. Göteburg University, Department of Linguistics, Sweden 1999. google scholar
  • ADIYAMAN, Ceyda, “Türkçede Ses ve Anlam İlişkisi Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, III. Uluslararası Dünya Dili Türkçe Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı, 16-18 Aralık, İzmir, 2010, s. 17-26 http://web.deu.edu.tr/ilyas/ftp/bildirikitabi.pdf (Erişim tar. 27.07.2016 14:16) google scholar
  • ANDERSON, Earl R., A Grammar of Iconism, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, Place of publication: Madison, NJ 1998. google scholar
  • BATI, U., ÜNAL TEREK, G. “Marka Adları Üzerine Dilbilimsel ve Kavramsal Bir İnceleme: Türk Reklamcılık Ortamlarında Marka Adı Yaratım Süreçleri ve Stratejileri”, Marmara İletişim Dergisi, Cilt 17, Temmuz-Yaz, 2010, s.228-254. google scholar
  • BLOOMFIELD, Leonard, Language, George Allen-Unvin Ltd. London 1933. google scholar
  • DEMİRCAN, Ömer, “Türkçe Yansımaların Özüne Doğru”, IX. Dilbilim Kurultayı, 25-27 Mayıs 1995.s.175-191. http://dad.boun.edu.tr/article/view/5000129423/0 (Erişim tar. 06.06.2016 15:08) google scholar
  • DEMİRCAN, Ömer, “Türkçede Nedenli Göstergeler: Yansımalarda Anlamlama”, VII. Uluslararası Türk Dilbilimi Konferansı Bildirileri, 7-9 Ağustos 1996, Ankara, 1997, s.191-206. http://turkoloji.cu.edu.tr/DILBILIM/demircan_01.pdf (Erişim tar. 08.06.2016 20:54) google scholar
  • DEMİRCAN, Ömer, Türkçenin Ses Dizimi, Der Yay., 3. Basım, İstanbul 2009. google scholar
  • DURMUŞ, Mitat, “Sesbirim-Anlambirim Arasındaki İlişkiler Düzeyi ve Melih Cevdet Anday’ın Şiirlerinde Sesbirimsel Yinelemeler”, Hürriyet Gösteri, S. 278. Mart 2006, s.76-80. google scholar
  • ERCİLASUN, Ahmet Bican, “Türk Dilinde Ek-Ses İlişkisi”, Makaleler, (Yay. Haz.: Ekrem Arıkoğlu), Akçağ Yay., Ankara, 2007 s. 340-346. [39. PIAC (16-21 Haziran 1995, Szeged Macaristan)’ta okunan bildiri/ ayrıca; Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı-Belleten 1997, TDK Yay. Ankara 200, s.41-47] google scholar
  • JENDRASCHEK, Gerd, “Semantic and Structural Properties of Turkish Ideophones”, Turkic Languages, 2001, 5. s. 88-103. google scholar
  • HİNTON, L., NİCHOLS, J., OHALA, J.John, ‘Introduction: Sound symbolic processes’, in L. Hinton, J. Nichols, J.J. Ohala (eds) Sound symbolism, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge 1994, s. 1-12. google scholar
  • IDO, Shinji Ghaeyri, “Turkish Mimetic Word Formation”, Asian and African Studies, 8. 1. 1999, s. 67-73. google scholar
  • IMAİ, Mutsumi, KİTA, Sotaro, NAGUMO, Miho; OKADA, Hiroyuki, “Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning”, Cognition, 2008, S. 109, s. 54-65. google scholar
  • Karahan, Leyla, “Tekrar Gruplarında Ünlü Düzeni-Anlam İlişkisi Üzerine Düşünceler”, Prof. Dr. Ahmet B. Ercilasun Armağanı (Editör: Ekrem Arıkoğlu). Akçağ Yay., Ankara 2008, s. 140-148. google scholar
  • KAPLAN, Hasan, “Harften Sese, Harften Görüntüye Bâkî’de Ses-Ahenk-Görüntü”, TÜBAR, XXXVI, Güz, 2014. google scholar
  • KIRAN, Zeynel, Dilbilim Akımları. (2. Baskı). Onur Yay., Ankara 1996. google scholar
  • KOVİC, V.; PLUNKETT, K.; WESTERMANN, G., “The Shape of words in the brain”, Cognition, Jan., 2010. google scholar
  • KÖHLER, Wolfgang, Gestalt Psychlogy, (ilk basım 1929), New York, Ny. Liveright 1992 google scholar
  • MAGNUS, Margaret, Gods in the Word: Archetypes in the Consonants. CreateSpace 2010. google scholar
  • OGDEN, Charles Kay; RİCHARDS Ivor A., The Meaning of Meaning, Harvest/Harcourt Brace World Inc., (ilk basım 1923), Newyork 1946. google scholar
  • OHALA, John J.,“Sound Symbolism”, Proc. 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics [SICOL], 11-15 Aug. 1997, s. 98-103. google scholar
  • SAUSSURE, F. de, Genel Dilbilim Dersleri. (çev. Berke Vardar), Multilingual Yay., İstanbul 1998. google scholar
  • SHİBATANİ, Masayoshi, The Languages of Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990. google scholar
  • SVANTESSON, Jan-Olof, “Sound Symbolism: the role of Word sound in Meaning”, WIREs Cognitive Scinece, Wiley Periodicals, Mar., 2017, s.1.. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28328102 google scholar
  • TSUR, Reuven, “Size-Sound Symbolism Revisited”, Journal of Pragmatics 38., 2006, s. 905-924. google scholar
  • TOKLU, Osman, Dilbilime Giriş. (6. Baskı). Akçağ Yay., Ankara 2015. google scholar
  • ULLMANN, Stephen, Semantics, An Introduction to the Science of Meaning, Oxford Basıl Blackwell, London 1972. google scholar
  • VARDAR, Berke, Dilbilimin Temel Kavram ve İlkeleri, Multilingual Yay., İstanbul 2001. google scholar
  • YAYLAGÜL, Özen, Göstergebilim ve Dilbilim. Hece Yay., Ankara 2015. google scholar
  • ZÜLFİKAR, Hamza, Türkçede Ses Yansımalı Kelimeler, Türk Dil Kurumu Yay., Ankara 1995. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Akyıldız Ay, D. (2017). Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, 57(57), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.26561/iutded.369143


AMA

Akyıldız Ay D. Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature. 2017;57(57):17-27. https://doi.org/10.26561/iutded.369143


ABNT

Akyıldız Ay, D. Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, [Publisher Location], v. 57, n. 57, p. 17-27, 2017.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Akyıldız Ay, Didem,. 2017. “Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship.” Journal of Turkish Language and Literature 57, no. 57: 17-27. https://doi.org/10.26561/iutded.369143


Chicago: Humanities Style

Akyıldız Ay, Didem,. Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship.” Journal of Turkish Language and Literature 57, no. 57 (Mar. 2025): 17-27. https://doi.org/10.26561/iutded.369143


Harvard: Australian Style

Akyıldız Ay, D 2017, 'Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship', Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, vol. 57, no. 57, pp. 17-27, viewed 25 Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26561/iutded.369143


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Akyıldız Ay, D. (2017) ‘Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship’, Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, 57(57), pp. 17-27. https://doi.org/10.26561/iutded.369143 (25 Mar. 2025).


MLA

Akyıldız Ay, Didem,. Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship.” Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, vol. 57, no. 57, 2017, pp. 17-27. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26561/iutded.369143


Vancouver

Akyıldız Ay D. Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature [Internet]. 25 Mar. 2025 [cited 25 Mar. 2025];57(57):17-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26561/iutded.369143 doi: 10.26561/iutded.369143


ISNAD

Akyıldız Ay, Didem. Sound Symbolism and an Attempt on A Different Classification of Sound-Meaning Relationship”. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature 57/57 (Mar. 2025): 17-27. https://doi.org/10.26561/iutded.369143



TIMELINE


Accepted08.11.2017

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.