Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158    Full Text (PDF)

Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies”

Muhammet Enes Kayagil

The issue of poverty and the fight against poverty has been one of the most important agenda items in the world for many years. Although the phenomena of wealth and poverty have existed in every period of history, they have never been separated by such deep disparities as they are today. Increasing income injustice has widened the gap between the rich and the poor and it continues to open further. Also, the concept of poverty has expanded so much in terms of content that it is not enough to express it with one definition. Absolute poverty, relative poverty, and human poverty are some of the terms used to detail the range and context of impoverishment. Besides, poverty is now subject to analysis from sociological, psychological or other perspectives. Considering this state of poverty, it is necessary to review the means of alleviating poverty. It is observed that the effectiveness of traditional tools has diminished in the fight against poverty, such as the World Bank when it first emerged. Therefore, there is a need for new tools to keep up with global developments. In this context, NGOs and development cooperation activities carry out important actions. This study aims to analyze the tendency to move away from traditional tools to new tools in fighting poverty. In this context, both tools will be examined within the framework of examples and theoretical discussions.

JEL Classification : I32 , I38 , O19 , F59

PDF View

References

  • Açıkgöz, R., & Yusufoğlu, Ö. Ş. (2018). Yoksullukla Mücadele İçin Alternatif Bir Yaklaşım Önerisi: Çoklu Katılımcı Yaklaşım. Yoksulluk, Farklı Boyutlarıyla. Görev G. & Yenihan, B. (Eds). Bursa: Dora Yayınları, 151-183. google scholar
  • Ahimbisibwe, I., & Ram, R. (2018). The contribution of millennium development goals towards improvement in major development indicators, 1990–2015. Applied Economics, 51(2), 170-180. google scholar
  • Aktel, M., & Kerman, U. & Altan, Y. (2007). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Yoksulluğun Değişen Yüzü. IV. Uluslararası Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. 19-21 October 2007. Çanakkale. 11-20. google scholar
  • Antonio, J., & Glennie, J. (2015). What is Development Cooperation. 2016 Development Cooperation Forum Policy Briefs. No:1, New York. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. google scholar
  • Atatanır, H. (2016). Türkiye’de Yoksulluk Sosyal Yardım ve Sivil Toplum Hak Temelli Yaklaşım Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Ankara: Dorlion Yayınları. google scholar
  • Ballard, N. (2006). Globalization and Poverty. United States of America: Chelsea House Publishers. google scholar
  • Başkaya, F. (2004). Kapitalizm ve Yoksulluk. Toplum ve Hekim, 19(1), 10-12. google scholar
  • Berten, J., & Leisering, L. (2017). Social policy by numbers. How international organisations construct global policy proposals. International Journal of Social Welfare, 26(2), 151-167. google scholar
  • Blackmon, P. (2008). Rethinking Poverty through the Eyes of the International Monetary Fund and the WorldBank. International Studies Review, 10(2), 179-202. google scholar
  • Büyükbaş, H., & Ören, K. (2005). Küreselleşme, Birleşmiş Milletler ve Uluslararası Sosyal Düzen Arayışı. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. Issue:13. 102-121. google scholar
  • Çeştepe, H., & Genç, Ö. (2011). Bretton Woods Kuruluşlarının Yoksullukla Mücadele Yaklaşımları ve Stratejileri. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Vol:7. Issue:14. 51-73. google scholar
  • Chossudovsky, M. (1999). Yoksulluğun Küreselleşmesi. İstanbul: Çiviyazıları. google scholar
  • Doğan, E. (2008). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Yoksulluk Siyaseti: Türkiye Sosyal Yardımlaşma ve Dayanışma Teşvik Fonu (SYDTF) Örneği. Uluslararası Yoksulluk Sempozyumu Bildirileri 2. Cilt. 1-3 Feb 2008. İstanbul: Deniz Feneri Yoksulluk Araştırmaları Merkezi, 123-146. google scholar
  • Easterly, W. (2001). The Effect of IMF and World Bank Programmes on Poverty. WIDER Discussion Paper. No. 2001/102. October 2001. Helsinki: The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), 1-18. google scholar
  • Gabay, C. (2013). Civil Society and Global Poverty: Hegemony, Inclusivity, Legitimacy. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Haan, A. (2007). Reclaiming Social Policy: Globalization, Social Exclusion and New Poverty Reduction Strategies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Hulme, D. (2015). Global Poverty: Global governance and poor people in the post-2015 era. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Hulme, D. (2016). Should Rich Nations Help the Poor?. Cambridge: Polity Press. google scholar
  • Karakaş, M. (2008). Küresel Yoksulluğun Öteki Yüzü: Yeni Yoksulluk. Uluslararası Yoksulluk Sempozyumu Bildirileri, 1. Cilt. 1-3 Feb 2008. İstanbul: Deniz Feneri Yoksulluk Araştırmaları Merkezi, 397-409. google scholar
  • Kayagil, M. E. (2020). Küresel Yoksullukla Mücadele Bağlamında Kalkınma İşbirliği Faaliyetleri. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
  • Keeley, B. (2012). From Aid to Development: The Global Fight against Poverty. Paris: OECD Publishing. google scholar
  • Koray, M. (2010). Büyüyen Yoksulluk-Yoksunluk Sorunu Ve Sosyal Hakların Sınırları. İ.Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 1-31. google scholar
  • Memiş, H., & Kara, M. & Tayfur, L. (2010). Yoksulluk, yapısal uyum programları ve sahra altı Afrika ülkeleri. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), 325-346. google scholar
  • Metin, B. (2013). ‘Neoliberal Yapısal Uyum Politikalarından’ ‘Kapsayıcı Kalkınma Çerçevesine’ Dünya Bankasının Yoksulluk Sorununa Yaklaşımı. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2013(2), 211-234. google scholar
  • Metin, B. (2014). Yoksullukla Mücadeleye İnsan Hakları Açısından Bakmak: Amartya Sen’in Kapasite (Capability) Yaklaşımı Temelinde Bir Değerlendirme. Journal of Yasar University, 2014/9 (36), 6261- 6380. google scholar
  • Mutioğlu, H., & Gözgü, F. (2009). Küreselleşme ve Toplumsal Dönüşüm. Küreselleşme. Özdemir, A. & Eser, M. (Eds). Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi, 1-33. google scholar
  • Oberdabernig, D. A. (2013). Revisiting the Effects of IMF Programs on Poverty and Inequality. World Development, 46, 113–142. google scholar
  • OECD. (2018). Development Co-operation Report 2018: Joining Forces to Leave No One Behind,. Paris: OECD Publishing. google scholar
  • OECD.Stats. (2020, July 29). Aid (ODA) by sector and donor [DAC5]. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=TABLE5#. google scholar
  • Özbakır, S. N. (2016). Birleşmiş Milletler Binyıl Kalkınma Hedefleri ve 2030 Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri. İzmir: İzmir Ticaret Odası. google scholar
  • Riddell, R. C. (2007). Does Foreign Aid Really Work?. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Şenkal, A. (2017). Küresel Yoksulluk Sorunu. Gelir Dağılımı ve Yoksulluk. Özdemir, Ç. & İslamoğlu, E. (Eds). 2. Eds. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 227-245. google scholar
  • Şenkal, A. (2018). Küresel Sosyal Politika. Kocaeli, Umuttepe Yayınları. google scholar
  • Şenses, F. (2009). Küreselleşmenin Öteki Yüzü Yoksulluk. 5. Eds. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Shorrocks, A. etc. (2018). Global Wealth Report 2018. Zurich: Credit Suisse Research Institute. google scholar
  • T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. (2015). Kalkınma İçin Uluslararası İşbirliği, Metotlar ve Yaklaşımlar: Özel İhtisas Komisyon Raporu. Ankara: T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. google scholar
  • UNDP. (1990). Human Development Report 1990. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • UNDP. (2010). Human Development Report 2010. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • UNDP. (2020, July 12). About Us. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/operations/about_us.html. google scholar
  • UNDP. (2020, June 7). Hedeflerin Arka Planı. Retrieved from http://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/tr/home/sustainable-development goals/background.html. google scholar
  • United Nations. (2015). Millennium Development Goal 8: Taking Stock of the Global Partnership for Development MDG Gap Task Force Report 2015. NewYork: United Nations. google scholar
  • World Bank. (1990). World Development Report 1990. Washington: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • World Bank. (2020, May 30). Poverty. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty. google scholar
  • Yaşar, Y., & Yenimahalleli Yaşar, G. (2012). Neoliberal Küreselleşme ve Sosyal Politikada Dönüşüm. Mülkiye, Vol: XXXVI. Issue:274, 63-92. google scholar
  • Zanbak, M. (2017). Yoksullukla Mücadele Yöntemleri. Gelir Dağılımı ve Yoksulluk, Özdemir, Ç. & İslamoğlu, E. (Eds). 2. Eds. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 211-226. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Kayagil, M.E. (2020). Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(79), 27-53. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158


AMA

Kayagil M E. Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences. 2020;0(79):27-53. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158


ABNT

Kayagil, M.E. Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 79, p. 27-53, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kayagil, Muhammet Enes,. 2020. “Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies”.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 79: 27-53. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kayagil, Muhammet Enes,. Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies”.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 79 (Apr. 2024): 27-53. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158


Harvard: Australian Style

Kayagil, ME 2020, 'Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies”', Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 79, pp. 27-53, viewed 27 Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kayagil, M.E. (2020) ‘Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies”’, Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(79), pp. 27-53. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158 (27 Apr. 2024).


MLA

Kayagil, Muhammet Enes,. Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies”.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 79, 2020, pp. 27-53. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158


Vancouver

Kayagil ME. Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences [Internet]. 27 Apr. 2024 [cited 27 Apr. 2024];0(79):27-53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158 doi: 10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158


ISNAD

Kayagil, MuhammetEnes. Changes in Poverty-fighting Tools: From “Traditional” to “New Tendencies””. Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0/79 (Apr. 2024): 27-53. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.78.0158



TIMELINE


Submitted20.09.2020
Accepted05.11.2020
Published Online30.11.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.